Lawrence
Beitler was sitting on the
front porch of his home in Marion, Indiana,
when someone asked him to tote his 8×10 view
camera to the town square. It was past
midnight on August 7, 1930, and Beitler, 44,
was a professional photographer who mostly
shot portraits of weddings, schoolchildren,
and church groups. That night, he would be
photographing a lynching. He “didn’t even want
to do it,” according to a later interview with
his daughter, “but taking pictures was his
business.”
By
the time Beitler arrived on the square, a
jubilant mob of nearly 15,000 white men,
women, and children had gathered. Earlier that
night, a group of vigilantes had charged the
county jail to seize two black teenagers —
Thomas Shipp, 18, and Abram Smith, 19 — who’d
allegedly raped a young white woman and
murdered her boyfriend. Beitler took one photo
of Shipp’s and Smith’s brutalized bodies
hanging from a tree, the crowd of eager
onlookers before them, and left.
Lynching,
in the American imagination, is considered to
be solely the provenance of Confederate
racism, one of the most prominent examples
being the 1955 murder of
14-year-old Emmett Till in Mississippi. Yet
the most notorious lynching imagery prior to
Till came from Union towns: Duluth,
Minnesota; Cairo,
Illinois; Omaha,
Nebraska —
and Marion, Indiana. It is Beitler’s
photograph, in particular, that has served as
the most glaring visual reminder of the
country’s decades-long spectacle of racism and
public murder. The photo of the lynching of
two Indiana teenagers would never grace the
pages of the local paper. But the image is
everywhere.
It
was Beitler’s photograph that inspired Abel
Meeropol to write his anti-lynching poem
“Strange Fruit” in 1936, which Billie Holiday
would later record and make famous. Just last
month, a decade-old mural
adaptation of
the photograph in Elgin, Illinois, which
features only the faces of the white
participants, came under public scrutiny as
people discovered the image’s origin.
The
photo of the lynching of two Indiana teenagers
would never grace the pages of the local
paper. But the image is everywhere.
I
can’t say exactly when I first encountered the
image. It might have been as an undergrad at
Columbia, in the library of the black
students’ lounge as I thumbed through a copy
of Ralph Ginzburg’s 100
Years of Lynchings.
But my understanding of its significance came
in the late summer of 1996, when a friend and
I visited America’s Black Holocaust Museum
(ABHM) in my hometown of Milwaukee.
When
we entered the main exhibition room, there was
a built-to-scale rendering of Beitler’s photo
made out of wax, including the facsimiles of
Shipp and Smith hanging from the tree. “Did
you know that there was a third boy they tried
to lynch that night?” our museum guide, a tall
but frail older man, asked us, his voice warm
and gravelly. We didn’t. Our guide went on to
explain that there were actually three ropes
strung up on the maple tree in Marion on
August 7, 1930. A third teenager had been
dragged from his jail cell to the courthouse
square. His name was James Cameron and he was
the only known person to have ever survived a
lynching in America.
We
were standing in front of him.
Cameron,
then 82, continued to recount to an audience
of two the details of the night he nearly
died. A self-taught historian and recipient of
an honorary degree from the University of
Wisconsin, Milwaukee, he founded ABHM in the
1980s. Cameron, who died 10 years after I met
him, devoted his life to never letting America
forget what happened to him, resolute in his
belief that his life was spared to educate
black and white Americans of the long, bloody,
violent, and — ever ongoing — legacy of
racism.
I
was astounded. It was one thing to witness the
brutal deaths of these young men. It was
another thing to survive that nightmare and be
staff, curator, historian, executive director,
and living testament to it daily.
How
do you wake up every day and bear witness to
your own nightmare?
James
Herbert Cameron was
born in La Crosse, Wisconsin, in 1914, the
second of three children to James Cameron and
Vera Carter. His family moved south to
Birmingham, Alabama, and lived there until his
parents separated in 1928, after which
Cameron’s mother moved him and his two sisters
to Marion, a modest town of nearly 30,000
where black and white residents attended
integrated schools, yet maintained segregated
social spaces. (Much of Cameron’s biography
and his recollections in this story come from
his memoir, A
Time of Terror.
In
the summer of 1930, Marion, like much of the
country, was experiencing a heat wave that
compounded the effects of the Dust Bowl, and
scores of people were out of work as the
Depression began taking its toll. Cameron,
then 16, spent the afternoon of August 6 with
his buddies, Tommy Shipp and Abe Smith,
pitching horseshoes in a field. It was Smith
who convinced Cameron to join him and Shipp
later that night to “stick up” unsuspecting
couples in a secluded area of town known as
“lovers’ lane.” The three teens drove there,
armed, and attempted to rob Claude Deeter and
Mary Ball, a young white couple. But Cameron
recognized Deeter — he regularly shined
Deeter’s shoes in town and Deeter tipped well.
Cameron,
who had been holding the gun, gave it back to
Smith and ran. He heard shots in the distance.
Shipp and Smith were arrested shortly after
the shooting and allegedly named Cameron as
the shooter. Officer Harley Burden, the only
black officer on the Marion police force,
found Cameron at his mother’s home and took
him into custody.
Once
Cameron arrived at the Grant County Jail in
the early morning hours of August 7, there
were already groups of men waiting as word
spread of the attack. Deeter was dead by early
afternoon, and a police officer hung his
bloody shirt in the window of city hall as a
visible flag. But Deeter’s death wasn’t the
principal outrage that wagged on everyone’s
tongues: His companion, Mary Ball, accused
Shipp, Smith, and Cameron of rape (an
allegation she’d later recant). It was this —
the story of Ball’s alleged assault told over
and over — that incensed the white residents
of Marion and surrounding towns. In his
account of the day, A
Lynching in the Heartland,
Indiana historian James Madison noted that
local phone lines were clogged with callers
discussing the alleged crimes of the three
boys.
For
black residents of Marion, such as Katherine
“Flossie” Bailey and her husband, Dr. Walter
Bailey, it became clear that not only were
Shipp, Smith, and Cameron in danger, but the
town’s entire black community was too. The
Baileys were among Marion’s most prominent
black families. Walter was the only black
physician in town and Flossie was the
president of the state branch of the NAACP. In
the aftermath of the arrests, they made every
effort to rouse authorities to protect Marion
— sending a cable to Gov. Harry Leslie,
calling for the National Guard. They phoned
the county sheriff, Jacob Campbell, several
times demanding that he relocate the three
teenagers, as well as seek additional support.
Campbell rebuffed their calls and offered his
assurances that the boys would be protected.
Marion Mayor Jack Edwards, elected only a year
prior at the tender age of 27, conveniently
left town for “business.” Meanwhile, other
black Marion residents fled to neighboring
Weaver, a mostly black community, to stay with
relatives.
By
9 o’clock on the night of August 7, the mob
had swelled to an estimated 15,000. The
streets around the courthouse were blocked by
crowds and cars. Campbell, who occupied the
residence attached to the jail, moved his
family to another part of town. “The thing I
remember most vividly,” his daughter later
recalled, “was seeing so many people, women,
standing out there in the crowd with little
tiny babies in their arms just hollering, ‘Get
in there and get ’em, get in there and get
’em.’”
Mary
Ball’s father, Hoot, approached the jail
entrance and demanded the keys. “Let us get
the niggers,” he told Campbell. “If this was
your daughter, you would do the same as I am
doing.” From his second-floor cell, Cameron
heard Campbell proclaim, “These are my
prisoners. Go home!” Yet he was not comforted
by the sheriff’s declaration. “Perhaps I
imagined it,” he’d later write in his memoir,
“but I could not detect a note of sincerity in
his voice.”
The
mob surged forward,
some pummeling the jail with sledgehammers
while others forced their way through the
garage. When they breached the ground-floor
walls, they snatched Tommy Shipp first from
his cell. Mary Ball’s sister purportedly
watched from atop a car, encouraging the mob
to wrap a rope around his neck and lynch him.
He was already bruised and beaten when they
strung him up on the maple tree at the corner
of Third and Adams streets outside of the
courthouse, diagonal from the jail. Shipp
struggled to free the rope from his neck. The
mob lowered him, broke both his arms, and
pulled.
“I could see the bloodthirsty
crowd come to life the moment Tommy’s body
was dragged into view.”
Cameron
surveyed the gruesome scene from his cell. “I
could see the bloodthirsty crowd come to life
the moment Tommy’s body was dragged into
view,” he recounted in his memoir. “In a
matter of seconds, Tommy was a bloody mass and
bore no resemblance to any human being. The
mob kept beating him just the same. Even after
the long, thick rope had been placed around
his neck, fists and clubs still mauled him,
and sticks and stones continued to pummel his
body.”
After
the throng returned for Smith, they beat him
with crude weapons, and a man impaled him with
a pipe. Smith was dead before they tied the
noose around his neck. Cameron heard the
gleeful cries once the deed was done. Nauseous
and drenched in cold sweat, he knew what was
next.
“We want Cameron! We want
Cameron!” he heard them chant. When a group
of white men forced their way onto the
second floor, the black men in his cell
block made a fruitless attempt to hide and
protect him. “Impulsively, I acted like I
was going to give myself up when Big John
and another Black man grabbed ahold of me
and held me back,” he wrote. “They had
become too angry to remember their own fear
— if they had any. But they were helpless
and powerless to offer any kind of
resistance to the mob. They stood with me.”
When
the mob threatened to lynch another boy, in
jail with his father for hitching trains from
the South to look for work, the father pointed
to Cameron. “The nightmare I had often heard
about happening to other victims of a mob now
became my reality,” Cameron wrote. “Brutally
faced with death, I understood, fully, what it
meant to be a black person in the United
States of America.”
Beitler’s
photograph of the August 7,
1930,
lynching in Marion. Lawrence
Beitler
- Indiana Historical Society
Cameron
was punched and
kicked as he was dragged from the jail’s second
floor to the maple tree. “I didn’t rape anyone!”
he howled over the din of the crowd. Half
conscious, he felt the noose being wrapped
around his neck. “The rope was handled so
roughly it caused a rope burn,” he wrote. “For a
moment I blacked out. I recovered in a moment
though, as they began shoving and knocking me
closer to the tree under the limbs weighed down
with the stripped bodies of Tommy and Abe.”
Yet,
just as Cameron prepared for the end, someone
spoke up. In Cameron’s retelling, a voice “rose
above the deafening roar of the mob,” speaking
“sharp and crisp, like bells ringing out on a
clear, cold winter day.” The voice — “feminine”
and “sweet” — delivered a simple instruction:
“Take this boy back. He had nothing to do with
any raping or killing.”
A
swift silence followed. “No one moved or spoke a
word,” Cameron wrote. “I stood there in the
midst of thousands of people, and as I looked at
the mob round me I thought I was in a room, a
large room where a photographer had strips of
film negatives hanging from the walls to dry. I
couldn’t tell whether the images on the film
were white or black, they were simply mobsters
captured on film surrounding me everywhere I
looked.”
The
identity of whoever intervened — or whether
anyone intervened at all — remains a mystery to
this day. Cameron believed it could only have
been the voice of God, though according to later
accounts, some never even heard the “angelic”
voice he described in his memoir. According to
Madison, most of those who did claim to hear it
said it was a man’s voice, with some believing
it was Mary Ball’s uncle.
“I suddenly
found myself standing
alone, under the death tree
—
mystified!”
Regardless,
after what Cameron called a “brief eternity,”
“the roomful of negatives disappeared.” “I found
myself looking into the faces of people who had
been flat images only a moment ago,” he wrote.
“I could feel the hands that had unmercifully
beaten me remove the rope from around my neck. I
suddenly found myself standing alone, under the
death tree — mystified!”
As
the crowd cleared a path between the tree and
the jail, Cameron limped back, uttering a prayer
with each step. No one laid a hand on him. When
Cameron reached the steps of the jail, Sheriff
Campbell took him by the arm and led him to a
police car with armed officers who immediately
escorted him to a jail in Huntington, nearly 30
miles north of Marion. The following day,
Cameron was moved 30 miles south of Marion to
Anderson, Indiana, and the National Guard
arrived in Marion, per Gov. Leslie’s orders.
It
would be after midnight that Lawrence Beitler
would make his way to the courthouse square with
his view camera and flash, in the thick and
humid dark. Sheriff Campbell cut Shipp’s and
Smith’s bodies down the next morning. Some
Marion residents reportedly collected trophies
from the murders: scraps of Smith’s and Shipp’s
clothing, pieces of bark from the maple tree,
and pieces of the lynching rope itself, an item
that was highly coveted. Beitler stayed up for
10 days and nights to meet the demand for prints
of his photograph, which he sold for 50 cents
each. According to a 1988 Marion
Chronicle-Tribune interview
with his daughter, Betty, “It wasn’t unusual for
one person to order a thousand at a time.”
From
1882 to 1968, 4,743
Americans —
3,446 of whom were black — were lynched, their
deaths fueled by fears over miscegenation and
perceived threats to white economic
dominance. While the majority of lynchings
did take place in the South, 128 black Americans
were killed by Northern lynch mobs between 1880
and 1930. Between 1889 to 1930, 21 black people
were lynched in Indiana alone.
Motivating
many of these lynchings — and, in several cases,
preventing law enforcement from stopping them —
was the influence of the Ku Klux Klan. According
to A
Lynching in the Heartland,
in 1920s Indiana, white, native-born Hoosiers
joined the Klan in droves, feeling increasingly
threatened by black migrants heading north from
southern states. By 1925, membership peaked at
250,000 and encompassed more than 30% of the
state’s white male population, allegedly
including then-Gov. Edward L. Jackson and other
high-ranking officials in the state.
That
all changed, however, in 1925, when Grand Dragon
D.C. Stephenson was convicted for the rape and
murder of an Indianapolis student. His highly
publicized trial, paired with his implication in
widespread state political corruption, quickly
depleted membership. By 1930, the Indiana Klan
ceased to be a public force, but the vestiges of
its influence still pervaded local politics.
While the Klan never claimed responsibility for
the lynching of Shipp and Smith, it’s highly
probable that former members and sympathizers
participated.
From 1882 to 1968, 4,743 Americans
were lynched.
Indiana
state law already required law enforcement to
protect prisoners from lynchings, and officers
could have faced removal from office upon
failure to do so. However, not once did Campbell
fire a shot in an attempt to disperse the crowd.
“If a shot had been fired, three or four hundred
persons, including women and children,
undoubtedly would have been killed,” Campbell
later told the Indianapolis
Times.
“One shot would have been the signal for
slaughter.”
“The sheriff and police
completely laid down,” Flossie Bailey wrote in
an August 8 letter to Walter White, then
executive secretary of the NAACP, “after
assuring the Executive Board [of the NAACP]
that every effort would be made to avert the
tragedy.” Bailey requested White’s assistance
to pressure state officials to investigate and
send protection for the black residents of
Marion. White arrived in Marion a week later
to conduct his own investigation in tandem
with the state’s inquest, interviewing
witnesses to try to determine the identity of
leaders of the lynch mob. Though Beitler’s
photograph circulated widely, no one came
forward to identify people to authorities.
Billy
Connors, the manager of a theater near the
courthouse, was one of the few white residents
of Marion to rebuke local law enforcement’s
actions on the record. “I am going to tell you,
that if what I understand is right — and I have
heard a lot of talk — they knew something was
going to happen,” he told state investigators.
“We are supposed to have a police force here
ample to protect the city; why they were even
allowed to gather I can’t understand.”
Ultimately,
two trials were held in attempt to prosecute the
ringleaders of the mob. Eight men were charged
as inciters, in addition to Sheriff Campbell,
who was charged with failure to protect Shipp,
Smith, and Cameron. However, by the end of March
1931, juries acquitted two of the alleged
inciters and the state dropped its charges
against Campbell and the other men for lack of
evidence. Hoot Ball was never charged.
Cameron,
having just survived his own lynching, faced a
different fate. Though Mary Ball recanted her
rape accusation, he was still charged as an
accessory to Deeter’s murder. Bailey secured
Cameron two highly respected black lawyers from
Indianapolis, who successfully filed a change of
venue for his trial, moving it from Marion to
Anderson, where Cameron had remained in jail
since the day after the lynching. In July 1931,
11 months after the lynching, an all-white male
jury in Anderson found him guilty of accessory
before the fact to voluntary manslaughter. He
was sentenced to up to 21 years in prison.
Though he was eligible for parole after two
years, he encountered delays from the parole
board. One of the members, a rumored Klan
member, was later discovered to have written
letters protesting Cameron’s release.
When
Cameron was released in 1935, his mother and
sisters stood outside the penitentiary to greet
him. Now 21, he was a free man, resolved “to
pick up the loose threads of [his] life, weave
them into something beautiful, worthwhile and
God-like.”
Virgil
Cameron has the
same kind yet intense eyes as his father. We
met last August at a coffee shop on
Milwaukee’s East Side, a short walk from the
Milwaukee River. At 74, he is a veteran of the
Marine Corps and proudly sported a USMC
snapback honoring his years of service in the
1960s. He was discharged in 1967 to help care
for his father, who, decades after the near
lynching, faced periodic health problems. As
treasurer of the board of America’s Black
Holocaust Museum, Virgil has been the main
family member to continue his father’s work of
educating Americans on the original sin of
slavery and violence against black bodies.
His
passion for history became striking as he told
me little-known facts about the black life in
Wisconsin — like that Milton, 70 miles
southwest of Milwaukee, is home to an underground
railroad site called
the Milton House. “You go downstairs and
there’s a tunnel. You couldn’t stand up, you
had to crawl,” he said. “It’s amazing and it’s
here in Wisconsin.”
Virgil,
Cameron’s third-oldest child, was born in 1942
in Detroit, where Cameron moved following his
release from prison in 1935. Two years later,
Cameron married Virginia Hamilton, a nurse,
with whom he had five children: Virgil, three
other sons, and one daughter. Shortly after
Virgil was born, Cameron moved his young
family back to Anderson, Indiana, the very
same town where he was convicted, to be closer
to his sisters and ailing mother. Now an adult
and a father, Cameron cobbled together jobs,
working for a time for the manufacturer Delco
Remy and opening a shoe shine and convenience
store in downtown Anderson in order to support
his family.
While
Anderson was socially segregated, Cameron’s
family seemed to be exempt from adhering to
those norms. Virgil will never forget the time
his mother and siblings went to the local
movie theater and sat in the orchestra, rather
than the segregated balcony where other black
people would sit. When a white usher tried to
force them to move, his mother refused, until
a white manager ultimately intervened. ‘Those
are the Camerons,” Virgil recalled him telling
the usher. “Leave them alone.” Cameron and his
wife would go on to challenge the segregation
policies of the theater, which eventually
integrated rather than risking lawsuits.
Cameron
and Virginia became prominent members of
Anderson’s black community in other ways, as
well. Cameron served as president of the NAACP
chapter in Madison County, where Anderson is
located, and eventually founded four other
chapters in the state. In 1942, Indiana Gov.
Henry F. Stricker appointed Cameron as the
state director of civil liberties, a position
in which he investigated civil rights abuses
and violations of equal accommodations law.
Yet, according to Virgil, Cameron’s commitment
to civil rights work in Indiana was met with
lukewarm support from other black communities
in the state, who worried his activism would
create “trouble” for them. It also rankled
some white people.
“I know he was getting
threats, but we weren’t really aware of it
until we got older,” Virgil said. “There was
one day when a bunch of cars that pulled in
front of the house and dad grabbed his
rifle, and we went out with him. They were
exchanging words and then the men pulled
off.”
Eventually,
Cameron had faced enough threats, and he
decided to move his family. He chose Milwaukee
after an NAACP speaking engagement landed him
there in 1950. At the time, the city was
receiving a great influx of black Americans,
who relocated from Southern towns and cities
or, as in Cameron’s case, Northern ones that
practiced de facto segregation. The city’s
economy, teeming with blue-collar work and
nice homes, seemed to hold ample opportunity
for families like Cameron’s to live the
promise of the American dream.
And
yet, Milwaukee — like all of America — was
still unable to escape the vestiges of white
supremacy. “It was a good environment, but if
you were black, you were programmed to go to
certain areas,” Virgil said. Cameron’s family
lived in Bronzeville, the heart of
the black community in northeast Milwaukee,
which bustled with black-owned businesses,
restaurants, and theaters. Virginia became a
licensed practical nurse, while Cameron became
a facilities manager at one of the city’s
large malls. Ever entrepreneurial, he also
moonlighted with his own carpet-cleaning
business, which Virginia helped manage.
Together, they built up savings and provided a
modest, middle-class life for their
children.“[They] had us all involved in music,
sports,” Virgil told me. “He always seemed to
want us to expand our horizons.”
Still,
Cameron’s activism didn’t wane once he
relocated to Milwaukee. An autodidact, he
amassed a collection of some 15,000 books over
the years, which supplemented his frequent
trips to the Library of Congress. Cameron
obsessively wrote and read, piecing together
black American history, studying the origins
of the transatlantic slave trade, the Civil
War, and the Klan. He was vocal about racial
discrimination wherever it manifested, writing
columns for the local black papers, the Milwaukee
Courier and
the Milwaukee
Star, as
well as searing letters to the editor of
the Milwaukee
Journal and Milwaukee
Sentinel.
“Everybody was expecting to see his letter to
the editor every week,” Virgil said.
Cameron
also dedicated himself to a project he had
begun while he was still a teenager serving
his sentence at the Indiana State Reformatory:
writing a book about the night he was almost
lynched. “He was constantly talking about this
book, this manuscript,” Virgil told me.
Cameron would spend hours in the basement
writing, provoking the curiosity of his young
son. “I finally asked him one day, ‘Dad, why
are you always typing? What are you doing?’”
Virgil recalled. “He said, ‘I’ll let you read
it, son, when you are older.’”
Virgil
was 12 when Cameron first let him read an
early draft of the book chronicling his near
murder. At the time, Virgil still hadn’t fully
grasped that the boy in the book was his own
father. He thought it was someone else’s
story, possibly a work of fiction. He was in
high school when he finally realized that it
was Cameron who was spared from one of the
most infamous lynchings in American history.
“I felt that he was one … lucky person,”
Virgil said. “There was an intervention that
allowed him to live.”
It
would be a 1979 church
trip to Israel that would seed Cameron’s idea
to create a museum centered on the history of
slavery in the United States and its evolution
into a racialized caste system accompanied by
violence and terror. Upon visiting Yad Vashem,
it struck Cameron that the horrors endured by
descendants of African slaves in the Americas
shared some similarities to the Holocaust.
“It shook me up something
awful,” Cameron told journalist Cynthia Carr
in 1993. (Carr
later wrote a book confronting
the possibility that one of the onlookers in
Beitler’s photo was her own grandfather.) “I
said to my wife, ‘Honey, we need a museum like
that in America to show what happened to us
black folks and the freedom-loving white
people who’ve been trying to help us.’” He
left with a vision and renewed purpose for why
his own life was spared; he had survived to
remember, to educate the nation.
For
years, he sent his book manuscript to
publishers, but no publisher seemed interested
in publishing a first person account of a
lynch mob survivor. (Cameron later told Carr
that he rewrote the manuscript about “a
hundred more times” and collected early 300
rejection letters.) In April 1980, Ebony published an
excerpt of his memoir and dispatched a
photographer who returned to Marion with him,
documenting his visit. However, national
exposure to his story still did not garner a
willing publisher. Undeterred, Cameron took a
second mortgage and self-published A
Time of Terror in
1982. He printed 4,000 copies and sold them
out of his trunk of his car at speaking
engagements.
Cameron
also self-published pamphlets — over 30 total
— in which he drew upon his research and
experiences to illuminate various cornerstones
of white supremacy. In one from 1986 titled
“Police Community Relations Among Blacks in
Milwaukee, Wisconsin,” Cameron protested many
of the same issues being challenged today by
the Black Lives Matter movement. “[The police]
have been enemies of us black people since in
their organization in the early 19th Century,”
Cameron wrote. “They can do nothing to alarm
or silence me beyond murdering me. Even at
that, they may rest assured that I protest it
— even in the grave. I have been initiated
since my time of terror at the age of 16. I am
72 years old now and destined, like all other
nonwhites, to experience a time of terror to
the grave.”
Cameron’s
resolve to build a museum to commemorate and
reconcile America’s dark history intensified
and by the late 1980s, he was able to secure —
rent-free — a modest storefront on Atkinson
Avenue, in a predominantly black neighborhood
on Milwaukee’s north side. The doors of
America’s Black Holocaust Museum opened ceremoniously
on a Sunday in 1988: June 19, known as
Juneteenth, commemorating the day in 1865 when
Southern slaves in Texas were notified of
their emancipation by executive order. Filled
with books and artifacts Cameron had collected
over the years in his basement, it was a
monument to the legacy of lynching in the
United States.
The
location, however, was temporary, and as
interest piqued within the community and more
people came to visit, Cameron searched for a
larger space to accommodate his vision for the
museum. In 1992 — the year before Indiana Gov.
Evan Bayh formally pardoned Cameron for his
1931 conviction — Cameron moved the museum to
the old Braggs Boxing Gym, on Fourth Street
and North Avenue in Bronzeville, which he
acquired from the city of Milwaukee for $1.
With the help of local leaders, Cameron was
introduced to local Jewish philanthropist Dan
Bader of the Bader Foundation. Though
Cameron’s use of the term “holocaust” had
drawn criticism from some Milwaukee Jews,
Bader was struck by Cameron’s knowledge of the
Shoah and the connections he drew between the
persecution of Jews and the descendants of
African peoples in America. According to
Virgil, he wrote a check for $50,000 on the
spot. (When asked about objections to the name
in 2002, Cameron told the Chicago
Reader that
“[American] Indians also needed a holocaust
museum, and that ended any objections they
had.”)
The
donation was crucial for beginning renovations
to the old boxing building, where Cameron had
already relocated the museum after some hasty,
self-funded repairs. It also legitimized the
project to additional foundation and grant
support. Cameron’s vision for the museum
wasn’t restricted to elucidating the horrors
of lynchings. Rather, as with his pamphlets,
he sought to educate Americans on the entire
history of black people in America, connecting
the legacy of slavery as the antecedent to
cruel indignities endured by the children of
the African diaspora. By the early 2000s, the
museum received around 25,000 visitors a year.
Cameron displayed objects he collected over
the years, which included paraphernalia from
lynchings, postcards, photographs from the Jim
Crow era, newspaper clippings that depicted
black Americans, caricaturized miniatures, and
the wax installation of Beitler’s photograph.
In 1999, he also expanded the facility to host
the traveling exhibition of the wreckage of
the slave ship Henrietta
Marie.
However, it was always Cameron himself who was
the biggest
draw.
“We need a museum like that
in America to show what happened to us black
folks and the freedom-loving white people
who’ve been trying to help us.”
Fran
Kaplan met Cameron on an ordinary day in 1999.
The granddaughter of Russian Jewish
immigrants, she was born 70 miles away from
Marion in Lafayette and had vague memories of
hearing about lynching growing up. Cameron
guided Kaplan and her son, who was visiting
from out of town, through the museum’s
exhibits and finally to a seated area to
screen the 1995 BBC documentary Unforgiven:
Legacy of a Lynching,
which retold the story of the night of August
7. In one scene, William Deeter, Claude
Deeter’s brother, tearfully embraced Cameron
at a Marion church; it was the first time the
two ever met. Both men exchanged words of
forgiveness and faith. When the film ended,
Kaplan recalled, Cameron came out to sit with
them and talk. “I was just silent,” Kaplan
remembered. “[I] couldn’t connect with him
because I was so awed.”
Patrick
Sims was a graduate student in theater at the
University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, when he
first visited the museum in 1997. Now a vice
provost for diversity at the University of
Wisconsin, Madison, he recalled that he saw in
Cameron’s story parallels between his own
encounters with police officers. “That could
have been me. That could have been my
grandfather,” he said. His thesis, a
one-person play
based on Cameron’s life called 10
Perfect: A Lynching Survivor’s Story,
intentionally concluded with a reconstruction
of Beitler’s photograph. In performances, Sims
occupied the spot where 16-year-old Cameron
would have been lynched.
The
project created space to share stories
otherwise hidden. Sims learned that his own
grandmother had aided a black man fleeing an
angry mob of white men in rural Missouri. “Why
are we not sharing these experiences?” he
asked, noting how trauma can be
unintentionally passed down between
generations. “Why aren’t we talking about
these things?”
For
some, however, there was a reticence to enter
ABHM’s doors. Lucas Johnson, 32, a lifelong
Milwaukee resident, told me that he “always
wanted to go, just never got around to it.”
Members of my own family have remarked about
making a plan to visit but never did. I too
shared some of this reticence. I supported the
museum’s existence in spirit, but dreaded the
work of confronting America’s ugly history of
violence toward black people.
When
I finally entered those doors, unaware that my
August 1996 visit fell so close to the
anniversary of Cameron’s near murder, I had no
idea what to expect. I don’t remember most of
the conversation. I do remember meeting a
powerful and reserved spirit who showed me the
rope from the lynching tree and other
artifacts of racial bigotry. I didn’t want to
know any of it, but I understood that I needed to.
I also felt psychic pain. I also felt
gratitude. In a world that challenges the
forward assertion of black life, I thought
over and over, Thank
god he lived. Thank
god. Thank god.
In
2005, more than 105 years
after federal anti-lynching legislation was
first introduced to Congress, former Louisiana
Sen. Mary Landrieu sponsored a resolution
to formally
apologize for
the Senate’s failure to pass anti-lynching
laws that would have brought the men
responsible for the deaths of Smith, Shipp,
Till, and so many others to justice. While the
House of Representatives passed several bills
to address the epidemic of lynching from the
1930s and 1940s, these bills died on the
Senate floor or faced filibuster from Southern
Democrats. “There may be no other injustice in
American history for which the Senate so
uniquely bears responsibility,” Landrieu said
before the vote.
Cameron,
then 91 and using a wheelchair, was the only
living representative who could attend on
behalf of the nation’s 5,000 known lynching
victims. When he entered the press room, he
was greeted by 100 photographers and
reporters, and thunderous applause. He recalled how,
after he was taken back to the jail in Marion,
Sheriff Campbell told him, “I’m going to get
you out of here for safekeeping” — only to
learn later that Campbell himself was a member
of the Ku Klux Klan. “I was saved,” Cameron
said, “by a miracle.”
“My father had that strength.
That he could forgive the thing that people
tried to do to him.”
“It was amazing for him,”
Virgil said. “He thought it was the final
recognition for what slavery was. It was the
apology he was looking for that America
should have apologized long ago.” Virgil’s
voice broke a bit. “My father had that
strength. That he could forgive the thing
that people tried to do to him.”
Cameron
died a year later at the age of 92 after
living with lymphoma for five years. The
devout Catholic’s funeral was held at
Milwaukee’s Cathedral of St. John, with
hundreds in attendance, including current
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and Rep. Gwen
Moore. His wife, Virginia, died in 2010 at the
age of 92; he is survived by three of his
children and 18 grandchildren and
great-grandchildren.
For
two years following Cameron’s death, America’s
Black Holocaust Museum remained open, with a
modest staff of five and as many as ten to
fifteen volunteer guides — known as “griots” —
who hosted group and school visits. However,
it operated on a shoestring budget and was
eventually forced
to close its
doors in 2008, when the recession exacerbated
its financial struggles.
I
wonder now, with each anniversary of his near
murder, how did Cameron stomach it? How, with
each group of visitors, was he always willing
to relive his trauma? Cameron’s commitment to
educate the American public, including black
people and “freedom-loving whites,” as he
would say, of the terror of racial violence
required strength and unyielding resolve that
I’m not sure any one of us could ever know.
“It’s amazing that over
the years that people have written plays about
lynching, people have written poetry, people
have done visual art … for one thing, you
can’t get too much more dramatic than this,”
Fran Kaplan told me in her home office in
Milwaukee last August, as her finger landed on
the folds of a book opened to a photo of a
lynching from Texas in 1920. “What is the
psychology of committing these kinds of
murders?”
Kaplan’s
initial meeting with Cameron in 1999 would go
on to have a profound impact on her. At 69,
she is now virtual museum coordinator for
ABHM, which continues
to live online,
receiving approximately 700,000 visitors
annually from 200 countries and hosting public
events like talks, screenings, and intergroup
dialogues on anti-racism.
An
all-volunteer operation, it centers itself
around four principles: remembrance,
resistance, redemption, and reconciliation.
In
2015, Kaplan was contacted by a white woman
whose friend was lynched in her home in
Mississippi during the 1960s, a killing that
she felt responsible for. She had tried
reaching out to the victim’s family, but they
wanted nothing to do with her. Kaplan
encouraged the woman to look into Coming to
the Table, an organization that
brings together descendants of lynching
perpetrators and victims to begin the work of
reconciliation.
For
Kaplan, the encounter only underscored the
vision behind her work today: to collect and
tell the stories of lynching victims. “My
perspective, as a white person in this
setting, is to help white people understand
the tremendous jigsaw puzzle that is racism in
America,” Kaplan said. “So they can see the
picture, so that they understand the picture,
so that they can dismantle that picture.”
The
stories ABHM hopes to collect are not only of
how lynching victims died but also of the
lives they led. So often, the story of
lynching is the retelling of what led to
somebody’s death and, for the families left
behind, the shame and fear of the aftermath.
“It goes to the whole sense of Black Lives
Matter,” said Reggie Jackson, chair of ABHM’s
seven-person board. “[The] lives of the people
who were lynched, their lives didn’t matter —
so there’s no reason to mention anything about
them other than the act they committed that
led to their lynching. The newspapers were
like, ‘Who really cares who they were?’”
Jackson
grew up near Money, Mississippi, the town
where Emmett Till was murdered. “For years, I
just wanted to go there,” Jackson said. “And
my family was like, ‘You don’t want to go
asking questions about it.’” Jackson, 50,
visited ABHM in the 1990s after moving back to
Milwaukee from California when he completed
his service in the Navy. Cameron was alone and
gave Jackson a tour, and Jackson bought copies
of pamphlets and his book. Before Jackson
left, Cameron told Jackson his story and why
he started the museum. The two men talked for
over three hours. “I told myself, I
have to come back and help this man,”
Jackson said. He returned to volunteer at ABHM
in 2001 and eventually grew close to the
Camerons, visiting the elderly couple often in
their home.
In
Kaplan’s eyes, Jackson is the protégé of
Cameron. “I wanted to follow in his
footsteps,” Jackson said. He currently works
as a special-education teacher for a charter
school, and in his free time, dedicates his
energies to ABHM.
Jackson,
along with Kaplan, Virgil, and core members of
the board, are working with a local real
estate developer to reopen ABHM at its former
location on North Avenue in Bronzeville,
though the neighborhood is also struggling to
return to its halcyon days. Like most former
urban centers that served the black community,
it experienced rapid economic decline, a
victim of “urban renewal” efforts that led to
the dispersal of black communities and
businesses in the area. In May, Maures
Development was awarded tax credits to
facilitate the construction of a low-income
apartment complex in Bronzeville, the ground
floor of which is anticipated
to provide space
for the museum. “I hope it reopens,” my aunt
told me recently. “To see an actual piece of
history … real things that were used to keep
our people captive. And divided. It would be a
good thing for Milwaukee to have back.”
Museums
educate a class of citizens in the hopes that
presenting the narratives of their nation will
shape identity and fidelity, pass the story
forward, and, perhaps, correct past wrongs. In
the act of remembering, they can serve to
remind a people to do better, be better.
Museums are not always mausoleums to
greatness; they can be an instructional look
at the fullness of humanity, so we never
forget what monsters we can become and
endeavor to resist it. If we forget, we
repeat.
In
1998, three white men tied 49-year-old James
Byrd to the back of a pickup truck and dragged
him to death. In 2011, a group of Mississippi
teens beat
and ran over 48-year-old
Craig Anderson “for fun.” In 2014, the death
of 17-year-old Lennon Lacy led
the Justice Department to open an inquiry to
determine if his death was a lynching in North
Carolina. Nooses proliferate on college
campuses; perpetrators feign ignorance of its
meaning. Last year, a Florida graphic design
company featured a
noose dangling
from a tree as part of an ad campaign for
Photoshop tools. And just a month after that,
in Marion, the boss of a firefighter tossed a
noose into his black employee’s hands. The
employee is married to a distant relative of
Abram Smith.
If
we forget, we repeat.
Yet
perhaps the moment is right for Marion to
again properly revisit and memorialize its
lowest moment. In Glendora, Mississippi,
there’s now a museum honoring
Emmett Till’s life and educating the public
about his murder. Duluth, Minnesota, where
three black circus workers were lynched by a
mob of an estimated 10,000 in 1920, dedicated
a memorial to
the men in 2003. The recent
opening of
the Whitney Plantation in Louisiana and
the forthcoming National
Black American Heritage Museum at the
Smithsonian Institute also seem to point
toward a public readiness to confront the sins
of the nation’s past, even as they persist in
our present.
And
yet, Marion is a place of selective memory. A
few people have contacted Kaplan proposing to
place a memorial there or to relocate ABHM in
the town, but it has simply remained talk.
Occasional visitors to the Marion Public
Library and Grant County Museum come asking
questions. Last August, I was one of them,
when I visited on the 85th anniversary of the
murders of Tommy Shipp and Abram Smith.
Outside the genealogy room in the library,
where some records of the lynching are housed,
there was a modest exhibit of the history of
the county. A dusty photo and display of James
Dean, who was born in Marion, was showcased.
Jim Davis, the illustrator who created
the Garfield comic
strip, also held a place of honor. That week,
a small exhibit celebrating the heritage of
notable black citizens of Marion, including
Flossie Bailey, was also displayed. There was
no mention of Cameron anywhere.
Perhaps
Marion believes it can forget its greatest
tragedy now that the only survivor and witness
to the crime died 10 years ago. Marion today
has endured a fate not dissimilar from many
Rustbelt cities. Its population of
approximately 30,000 has remained steady, but
it bears the scars of economic depression.
Foreclosed homes and empty lots stretch for
blocks.
The
grounds around the courthouse are still
manicured and preserved. They are home to a
boulder with a plaque honoring Martin Boots,
the first white man to set foot in Marion, who
later founded the county. The intersection of
Third and Adams streets — where Smith and
Shipp were lynched — is now a memorial to
Grant County residents who died in the Vietnam
War.
When
I reached the intersection, I took out my
camera. I had taken great care, making sure to
charge the battery of my fancy SLR.
Mysteriously, it didn’t work. The once-charged
battery was dead. Fate or coincidence would
not let me mark the occasion.
A
week later, when I met with Virgil in
Milwaukee, I told him about my camera’s
malfunction, to which he responded with a
knowing look. “You know the tree died, right?”
he said.
Virgil
continued to recall a family visit to Marion
for an event for his father. “The impression
that you get is that Marion … the state that
it’s in, it has not progressed,” he said.
“It’s got that stigma and I think that
lynching has a lot to do with it.” More people
filled the café patio where we sat, their
chatter bouncing off the canopy while wind
rustled the leaves of trees nearby. Milwaukee
weather, fickle as ever, brought a chill to
the late August heat.
“Marion died because of that
incident. It’s just like something is
hovering over that city.”
This
commentary is also posted in BuzzFeed
Collections.
|
|