Last week,
after understandable outrage, an
Indiana chapter of Moms
for Liberty, a
nonprofit organization that advocates for
“parental rights” in education, ended up
apologizing and condemning Adolf Hitler after
previously using a quote from the racist and
anti-Semitic Nazi leader in its inaugural
newsletter. “We condemn Adolf Hitler’s actions
and his dark place in human history,” read a
statement from chapter chair, Paige Miller, on
the cover of the revised newsletter. “We should
not have quoted him in our newsletter and
express our deepest apology.”
The
group was recently labeled as an extremist group
by the anti-hate watchdog group SPLC in its annual
2022 Year in Hate and Extremism report. The
initial version of the newsletter included the
quote, “He alone, who OWNS the youth, GAINS the
future,” and cited Hitler.
While the origin of the quote is not entirely
known, it has been attributed in numerous
historical texts to a 1935 rally speech by the
Nazi leader.
Perversely
going on the defensive, the national chapter
Moms for Liberty took to social media,
denouncing the Indiana
Star, the local
paper that reported the story as engaging in
“intentional dishonesty,” even while issuing a
statement that condemned the chapter’s decision
to quote Hitler. Tina
Descovich and Tiffany Justice, co-founders of
the organization, responded in a statement,
“They should not have quoted Hitler. Period,
Parents are passionate about protecting future
generations from tyranny, but Hitler did
not need to be quoted to make that point.”
Gee! You think so, Ms. Desovich
and Ms. Justice! Well, thanks for coming to such
a reasonable conclusion! Please forgive my
sarcasm, but really! Of course, they should not
have used commentary from one of the most
odious, despicable, and abominable human beings
in history! We didn’t think that you would
respond otherwise. The truth is that Moms for
Liberty is hardly an aberration.
There has always been a segment
of Americans, to be candid, primarily White
Americans, who have, whether overtly or
covertly, harbored rabid levels of hostility and
hatred toward individuals they have viewed and
perceived as “the other.” These men and women
were largely forced to discuss and reaffirm
their racist and bigoted viewpoints with
like-minded individuals. For much of our recent
history, their outpourings were confined to
secret conferences, white supremacist
communications, underground newsletters, obscure
far-right magazines and radio programs and in
more recent decades, the darkest, racially
sordid corners of the web.
After their disastrous and
humiliating defeat in 1964, the right-wing
segment of the republican party, who by this
time had wrestled control of the party away from
the more moderate Stanton/Rockefeller wing, was
emotionally and psychologically shell shocked by
such a devastating loss and thus determined to
have their collective voices and ideas
represented on the national stage.
Over the past several decades,
the conservative right has been successful in
amassing a cottage industry of right-wing
pundits, radio and network hosts, think tanks,
magazines, journalists, clergy and other
political tools. Moreover, they have been
successful in utilizing such resources to
achieve their agenda. Furthermore, such forces
have been very astute to playing on the fears,
resentments, hatreds, fragilities and
insecurities that have rankled the psyches of
their listeners, readers, voters, and
congregations.
Embodied with perennial dual
forces of patience and determination, they have
reached within striking distance of being able
to claim, “mission accomplished.” It has become
an alarming, disturbing and distressing state of
affairs. Those of us who are committed to a
progressive, inclusive society that respects the
rights of all American citizens must combat and
respond to such vile and fascist oriented
politics progressively, proactively and with
fearless ferocity.
|
|