Florida’s
Republican governor Ron DeSantis is eager to
cast himself as the new and improved Donald
Trump. He has waged a relentless war against
what he calls “woke ideology” by attacking the
rights of vulnerable minorities to teach
and learn history,
to read literature,
and to get life-saving medical care such
as gender-affirming
treatment and reproductive
health care.
Now, his attack on Florida’s largest
corporation is being cast in the same vein of
“good
versus evil.”
Except
that the DeSantis-Disney war ought really to
be viewed as an opportunity to call
Republicans out on their slavish devotion to
Big Business and dare them to follow through
with stripping not just the Disney
corporation, but all money-hungry companies of
their dependence on public financing. Both
DeSantis and Disney are predatory, albeit in
different ways.
Disney,
a company that has deep cultural sway over
Americans for being a purveyor of “magic” and
“happiness,” has enjoyed a very special and
extremely unusual arrangement in Orlando,
Florida, where its Walt Disney World Resort
occupies tens of thousands of acres named
the Reedy
Creek Improvement District.
Since 1967, the state of Florida has allowed
the corporation to govern
the area and
even to issue tax bonds to residents in order
to pay for municipal services while being
exempt from certain regulations and taxes.
Rather
than viewing Disney World as “the happiest
place on earth,” Sophie Weiner, writing
in Popular
Mechanics in
2018, explained that, “Disney World is what it
looks like if you give a corporation full
control over an area of land as big as San
Francisco. It’s worked out great for the
company, which counts on the park for 14
percent of its $2 billion yearly earnings.”
Further, in 2021, the state of Florida gifted
the company a massive
$580 million tax break in
exchange for moving about 2,000 jobs from its
California locations to Florida.
But
in March 2022 Disney
took a stand against
the Parental Rights in Education Law, which
has been dubbed the “Don’t Say Gay” act,
prompting DeSantis’s ire. A month later
Florida’s Republican legislature
dissolved Disney’s special status in
a law that is to take effect on June 1, 2023.
DeSantis explained the move saying, “I’m just
not comfortable having that type of agenda get
special treatment in my state.” In other
words, Disney’s special corporate arrangement
would not be tolerated if it challenged his
homophobia.
Except
that Disney had to be pushed hard into taking
such a moral stand. For weeks
after the bill was
announced the company was perfectly content
enjoying the largesse of Florida even as
activists were demanding it speak out against
a law prohibiting teachings that touch on
gender identity and sexual orientation to kids
in kindergarten through third grade. Disney’s
own workers protested
their employer’s lack of courage. The
hashtag #BoycottDisney began
trending. The company eventually,
reluctantly, reacted by
suspending all its
political donations in the state of Florida to
both parties—not exactly the most principled
stand.
To
his credit, Disney’s then-CEO Bob
Chapek also
made public statements against the bill and
offered a $5 million donation to the Human
Rights Campaign (which the group rejected).
But
earlier this year Florida, realizing that
dissolving Disney’s tax status would end up
dumping a billion-dollar bond debt onto the
public, quickly scrambled to restore
the special district while
muzzling Disney. A new law will allow the
governor to appoint leadership positions of
Reedy Creek Improvement District instead of
allowing Disney to do so.
Representative
Anna Eskamani, a progressive Democrat in the
state legislature, told the
Hollywood Reporter,
“The inner workings [of the special district]
stay the same. The only difference is Disney
won’t challenge the governor on anything
anymore.” The company was initially happy and
Disney World’s head Jeff
Vahle said
his company was “ready to work within this new
framework.”
Testing
this new arrangement DeSantis has revved up
his culture war, approving
a rule change to
expand the Don’t Say Gay bill to all grades
and sending a message to LGBTQ youth that
their lives don’t matter. But the new board
that he appointed to govern Disney’s special
district voted
to nullify a company plan to
expand and develop the area. It was only then
that Disney filed a lawsuit against DeSantis
claiming he violated their first amendment
rights over the homophobic law.
Every
step of the way Disney was happy to suck up
all the tax perks and financial autonomy it
could get away with, regardless of whom its
host was harming. Only when its financial
status was threatened has it claimed to be on
the side of LGBTQ communities.
Aside
from Eskamani, few Democrats have called
Disney out for its hypocrisy and for reaping
special financial perks, instead supporting
the corporation for being a job creator.
Democratic Congressional representative Darren
Soto chastised
DeSantis,
saying, “It’d be nice if he stopped attacking
Central Florida’s top employer.” He added,
“We’re talking about trying to get [Disney] to
invest more money to create more jobs. And
this is not helpful to those efforts.”
Soto’s
words suggest that he sees Disney performing a
massive favor to the state by operating its
resort and parks there instead of the other
way around. But the sort of jobs that Disney
creates is precisely what has fueled deep
income inequality in the U.S. Its presence in
Florida has meant thousands of poorly paid
jobs that keep Floridians in a hand-to-mouth
existence, unable to cope with the rising cost
of living. Aubrey Jewett, a University of
Central Florida political science
professor, told
USA Today,
“Yes, we have a lot of jobs. But they don’t
pay very much. And we seem to have lost ground
over time, especially when it comes to housing
costs.”
One
Disney worker told the
Guardian,
“We’re grossly, grossly underpaid for the
hours that we work,” and that “[a] lot of
Disney workers are barely squeaking by. You
have workers with families sleeping in their
car.”
Disney
heiress Abigail Disney, who is an outspoken
progressive, even made a documentary about
the poor treatment of Disneyland workers in
Anaheim, California, where the company also
enjoys special
tax benefits in
exchange for creating jobs and where it
was granted
an exception to
a voter-passed minimum wage increase. Just as
in Florida, Disney’s California jobs are worth
about as little as
the taxes the company pays to the state.
In
addition to constantly being granted
exemptions for taxes and regulations,
corporations like Disney enjoy a mythical
status in the U.S. for being so massively
profitable that their dollar signs obscure
capitalism’s ugly underbelly.
Disney
should not have control over land, resources,
tax regulations, or wages. And lawmakers
should not be allowed to trample over the
rights of minorities. It’s not difficult to
oppose both Disney’s power grab and DeSantis’s
dangerous culture wars. Indeed, both positions
are fully consistent with progressive ideals
of protecting and furthering the rights of
human beings.
This
commentary was
produced
by Economy
for All,
a project of the
Independent
Media Institute.