We can thank the late economic justice warrior for her groundbreaking contribution in showing that “positive thinking” is part of a whitewashing of economic inequality.

Although the late Barbara Ehrenreich was best known for her 2001 bestsellingbook Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America, which chronicled the real-life impacts of the 1996 Welfare Reform Act, she made an equally great contribution to economic justice with her subsequent book exposing the cult of positive thinking.

Ehrenreich, who passed away on September 1, 2022, at age 81, had started her professional life with a PhD in cellbiology. She didn’t relegate her journalism to mere facts. She delved as deep as she could—to a microscopic level—tomake sense of the world. We concluded from
Nickel and Dimed that people were not making it in America. But we realized throughher book Bright-Sided: How Positive Thinking Is Undermining America that the economy was proceeding unimpeded by this fact because we were putting a smiley face on inequality.

The Great Recession began in 2007. Two years later, in 2009, Ehrenreich published
Bright-Sided. Two years after that, in 2011, the Occupy Wall Street (OWS) protestsbegan in New York’s Zuccotti Park and spread throughout the country. OWS participants called damning attention to the starke conomic split between the haves and the have-nots, in this case the wealthiest “1 percent” of Americans and the rest of us—the “99 percent.” There was no putting a smiley face on the economy in that moment.

It was during this period that I had the honor of
interviewing Ehrenreich. She explained that “there is a whole industry in the United States that got an investment in this idea that if you just think positively, if you expect everything to turn out alright, if you’re optimistic and cheerful and upbeat, everything will be alright.”

Ehrenreich, who survived cancer, said she began her investigation into the ideology of positive thinking when she had breast cancer, roughly six years before
Bright-Sided was published. That’s when she realized what a uniquely American phenomenon it was to put a positive spin on everything, even cancer.

When she looked for online support groups of other women struggling with cancer, what she found was, “constant   exhortations to be positive about the disease, to be cheerful and optimistic.” Such an approach obscures the central question of,“why do we have an epidemic of breast cancer?” she said.

She applied that idea to how positive thinking was obscuring questions of economic inequality. And she found that therewas an entire industry built up to assure financially struggling Americans that their poverty stemmed from their own negative thinkingand that they could turn things around if they simply visualized wealth, embraced a can-do attitude about their bleak futures andwilled money to flow into their lives. Central to this industry are “the coaches, the motivational speakers, the inspirationalposters to put up on the office walls,” and more, said Ehrenreich.

She also connected the rise of the American megachurch to the rising cult of the positive-thinkers. “The megachurches are not about Christianity. The megachurches are about how you can prosper because God wants you to be rich,” she said.

Joel Osteen, the pastor of a Houston-based megachurch, is perhaps one of the best-known leaders of the so-calledprosperity gospel. In one of his sermons—conveniently
posted online as a slick YouTube video to reach a maximum audience—Osteen claims that according to“the scripture,” “the wealth of the ungodly is laid up for the righteous,” and that “it will be transferredinto the hands of the righteous.” His congregants may be tempted to imagine bank transfers from wealthy atheists magicallypouring into their accounts.

Osteen has been the beneficiary of serious wealth transfers from his own congregants intohis pockets, so much so that he can afford to live in a
$10 million mansion. There’s no conundrum here, for Osteen is living proof to hisfollowers that the power of positive thinking works.

Ehrenreich pointed out that the whole point of these churches is to create apositive experience for their congregants and to project a notion of exciting possibilities. The megachurch phenomenon is centered on “the   idea that the church should not be disturbing. You don’t want to have a negative message at church. So that’s why you won’teven find a cross on the wall.”

Perhaps this is because the image of a bloodied, half-naked Jesus Christ nailed byhis hands and feet to a wooden cross is just too painful to bear and might detract from dreams of future Ferraris and private jets. “What a downer that would be!” exclaimed Ehrenreich.

Where did the cult of positive thinking originate? “American corporate culture is saturated with this positive thinking ideology,” especially in the 1990s and 2000s, said Ehrenreich. “It grew because corporations needed a way to manage downsizing, which really began in the 1980s.”

Businesses that laid off masses of employees had a message that Ehrenreich encapsulated as, “you’re getting eliminated… but it’s really an opportunity for you. It’s a great thing; you’ve got to look at this positively. Don’t complain, don’t be a whiner, you’re not a victim, etc.”

Such sentiments percolated into the mainstream. Americans internalized the idea that losing one’s job has got to be a sign that something better is coming along and that “
everything happens for a reason.” The alternative is to blame one’s employer, or even the designof the U.S. economy. And that would be dangerous to Wall Street and corporate America.

Another purpose of fostering positive thinking among those who are laid off is, as per Ehrenreich, “to extract more work from those who survive layoffs.” Indeed, we have an ugly culture of overwork in the U.S., with corporate employees having normalized the idea that they need to work insanely late hours, work on the weekends, and take on exhaustive amounts of responsibilities. After all, those who remain employed, unlike their laid-off former colleagues, ought to feel lucky to have a job—more positive thinking.

There may be a breaking point now, one that Ehrenreich thankfully lived to see, as a newer set of phenomenabegan emerging since the COVID-19 pandemic began. They include the “
great resignation,” a term for masses of Americans quitting thankless jobs. And, morerecently, “quiet quitting,” which is a new name for an older union-led idea of “work torule” as workers are starting to only put in the hours they are paid to work and no more. How novel!

We owe Ehrenreich a debt of gratitude for shining a light not only on the perversity ofthe U.S. economic system but also on the gauzy veil of positive thinking that obscures the obscenity. Ehrenreich may not have lived to see her ideas of economic justice be fully realized. But, as she
once told the New Yorker, “The idea is not that we will win in our own lifetimes and that’s the measure of us but that we will die trying.”

This commentary was produced by Economy for All, a project of the Independent Media Institute.

BlackCommentator.com Guest Commentator, Sonali Kolhatkar is the host and producer of Uprising, a popular, daily, drive-time program on KPFK, Pacifica Radio in Los Angeles and co-director of the Afghan Women's Mission, a US-based non-profit organization that works with the Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan (RAWA).

  Bookmark and Share

Bookmark and Share