For
a few years now, I have been debating many of my friends who attend
or attended HBCUs on whether or not consolidation of these schools
was a realistic option in the future. Overwhelmingly, the
response was a resounding, �NO�. Brothers and sisters cited
several strong reasons, the loss of heritage, the blow to alumni,
the blending of histories that would not give either or any institution
the recognition they deserve, the fact that every HBCU serves someone
somewhere who may not get a chance at a college education somewhere
else, etc. Now to be clear, I did not attend an HBCU. I did
spend several years working for the United Negro College Fund and,
in particular, the Gates Millennium Scholars Program (GMS), which
is administered by UNCF. In my years working with GMS, which
offers the option to attend any school in the country top African
American, Native American, Alaskan Native, Asian Pacific Islander
American, and Hispanic American students, I noticed that some of
the top African American students were choosing Georgia Tech instead
of Morehouse, American University instead of Howard, and Florida
State instead of FAMU. This was not an across the board decision,
there were still young brothers and sisters that chose HBCUs instead
of PWIs (predominately white institutions, yes, this is a real term).
However, you have to remember that by receiving this scholarship,
which eliminated nearly all costs of an undergraduate degree, having
the money to attend any school in the country was no longer a concern,
meaning there was no financial comparative advantage to attending
Tulane University over Xavier University in Louisiana, when under
normal circumstances, there might be.
The financial piece is huge for both the student and the college
as well. When a student applies to go to a school, based on things
like their grades, extra-curricular activities, certain merit based
awards, and their family�s financial standing, the college can choose
to award that student scholarship money to attend.
However, the scholarship money that can be offered to the
student is contingent upon whether or not the university has the
funds in place to give those awards out. For the most part,
these dollars come from the endowments or investment strategies
that colleges have in place. It�s not rocket science to surmise
that schools with larger endowments have more money to give as scholarships
back to potential students. Harvard, for example, has an endowment
of $26
billion and Brown University, which has made significant strides
toward reducing the amount of loans students would need to take
out by offering more grants and aid has an endowment of slightly
more than $2
billion. Howard University, on the other hand, has an
endowment of $400
million, while Morehouse has an endowment of over $117 million,
as a comparison of scale, Stillman College has a endowment of $18
million. Not having a huge endowment is not an indication
of deft financial planning or superior leadership, it�s often the
result of the degree to which alumni and their families, corporations,
etc. are able to contribute. Of course, historical and systemic
racism plays a part in all of this, but that is not the focus of
this discussion.
Clearly
put, a top performing African American student from a low income
family would generally be able to attend most PWIs with a lower
debt than by attending an HBCU. These are the cold hard economic
realities of the situation. This doesn�t have anything to
do with the quality of the experience they would have in either
environment, but it does speak to the amount and the duration of
loan payments that could be made.
Additionally,
keep in mind that colleges also, essentially, make money off of
students that either pay for their education out right or do so
through loans.
These
students and their families are critical to supplying the dollars
that are needed to acquire and retain the best educators in their
fields, build state of the art buildings with smart boards in every
classroom, fund computer labs with Mac computers or in other words
all the things that make impressionable 18 year olds choose one
school over another.
The challenge for HBCUs is on several levels and I will use this
time to discuss a few that I believe are most critical. Starting
with the students themselves, HBCUs have traditionally served students
that may not receive opportunities at other institutions. This
does not mean that the student or the college is inferior, but it
can mean that the student is not able to pay for their education
out right and/or is not at an academic performance level where they
could receive a �free-ride� to any school in the country (as a point
of reference, the GMS scholarship mentioned earlier, is only available
to students with a 3.3 GPA or higher). Even applying for and
receiving federal aid can be an insurmountable task for students
from families that are broken, do not maintain tax return information,
are intimidated by the financial aid process and for all intents
and purposes only view college as something for the rich and well
off.
There is a catastrophic drop-out rate for African Americans that
means that many of the students that may have attended schools like
Huston Tillotson University or Miles College will not even graduate
from the high schools in their neighborhoods. This means these
students, along with the critical dollars they might have brought
in with private scholarships, loans, and family income will not
be present.
Secondly, which has been covered above, PWIs are positioned better
to offer scholarships and grants to African American students that
HBCUs cannot compete with for the same talent. Student to
student, Johns Hopkins University can offer more in scholarship
dollars than Morgan State University can to higher performing students.
Also, in these times of seemingly endless recession (regardless
of what the FED says) how many parents are going to direct their
children into taking loans or relying on the family�s ability to
pay for education when, in reality, the same education can be achieved,
for less money, down the street? This is an important point
that students at HBCUs and PWIs need to understand; education is
only as good as the effort one puts forward to get it. Yes,
there are experiences at an HBCU that a student can get that cannot
be duplicated at a PWI and vice versa, however, what happens in
the classroom is largely dependent on the
person sitting in the seat taking notes.
Thirdly, and far more insidious, is the growing idea that HBCUs
do not have the value that they did thirty or forty years ago. Historically,
HBCUs were created to provide access to higher education to African
Americans that could not receive it anywhere else. These schools
became critical to developing not only the minds of the brothers
and sisters that attended but also their consciousness. The
Student Non Violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) was conceived
at Shaw University and a pre cursor to that organization which was
called the Non Violent Action Group (NAG) began at Howard University.
That said, in a �post racial� world (or the illusion of one)
where the president of the United States is of African descent,
and a handful of African Americans can count themselves among the
super rich and wealthy, many people within and outside of the black
community are questioning the validity of HBCUs. Indeed, many
high school youth today, who will be receiving acceptance letters
from various institutions of higher learning over the next few months
have little understanding of the history of HBCUs, why they remain
relevant today and even less understanding of the breeding ground
these schools once were for brilliant minds like Thurgood Marshall,
Stokely Carmichael (aka Kwame Ture) and Martin Luther King Jr.
The suggestion by elected officials in Mississippi that HBCUs should
consolidate
may be more of harbinger of things to come than an anomaly. Many
smaller HBCUs rely on state funding to maintain operations and in
these times where many states are approaching bankruptcy, it�s not
a foregone conclusion that the belt tightening will affect more
and more of these institutions.
As controversial as the position is, I am suggesting that some HBCUs
consolidate under their own volition. Schools that realize they
are having problems recruiting students, making payments on critical
bills, developing multiple majors under disciplines etc. may consider
consolidation as a way to keep both schools active and ultimately,
help the mission of HBCUs to continue. This may also be a
way to combine endowments and offer more aid to attending students.
This would not be the first time consolidation has happened,
Clark Atlanta University is a combination of Clark College and Atlanta
University and has remained a vital institution of higher learning
since consolidating in 1988. I am well aware that consolidation
is not an easy process; schools considering this option would have
to have strong and visionary leadership as well as monumental negotiating
skills. Perhaps organizations like the United Negro College
Fund or the Thurgood Marshall Scholarship Fund could serve as arbitrators
or advisers during the discussions.
History
is ripe with examples of the decline and eventual dissolution of
institutions and organizations created for the benefit of black
people. The Negro League is a clear example of something that
was created for black people when they could not integrate with
the broader society that was ultimately undone once players, owners,
and fans lost sight of the league�s true value and purpose. Even
worse, there are historical instances where these organizations
and institutions let ego stop them from surviving.
For some institutions, consolidation may be the only key to their
long-term survival. If in 2009 elected officials are making
an argument that HBCUs should consolidate with each other, what
kind of future will exist for these colleges and universities in
2019? Will we one day wake up to find the elected officials
of Virginia have decided that Virginia Union University is being
consolidated into Virginia Commonwealth University?
How will history judge those who attended HBCUs and those that lead
them if, incredibly, fifty years from now, they are no longer present?
BlackCommentator.com
Guest Commentator Charles J. Evans is an institutionally unaffiliated
culture critic and active scholar of issues pertaining to leadership
as it relates to people of African descent. He
blogs regularly at OtherSideofthemtn.
Click here
to contact Mr. Evans. |