On
July 3, Professor
Ruth Ben-Ghiat ,
author of Strongmen:
Mussolini to the Present, commented
that “one of the most alarming things” about “Project
2025” is the blatant admission
that Donald
Trump did
not accomplish everything he intended to in his
first administration. “They got a slow start […]
so their codeword is ‘day one,’” Ben-Ghiat
told MSNBC’s Katie Phang of the
think-tank’s proposal document,
which is assumed to represent a considerable
percentage of a Trump’s policies should he be
successful in earning a second term. The
distinguished New York University
historian further stated, “Already,
politically vetted people are in place and will
immediately implement the plans if Trump wins.”
Project
2025 is an
alarming
agenda the right intends to enact. Fortunately,
it appears that more Americans have become aware
of this treatise, also known as an almost
900-page document vowing to rework the executive
branch: every department, every agency, and
every office. Composed with extensive articles
by multiple conservative thinkers and activists
under the tutelage of the Heritage Foundation’s
Project 2025, the 900-page
handbook declares
itself as part of a “unified effort to be ready
for the next conservative administration to
govern at 12:00 noon, Jan. 20, 2025.” “There is
much work ahead,” it states, “just to undo the
significant damage that will have been done
during the Biden years.” (That’s what it says!)
Suffice it to say that it is George Orwell’s
novel 1984 meets
Margaret Atwood’s The
Handmaids Tale.
As
can be imagined, such a manifesto is impossible
to fully analyze in one brief column, so the
most efficient way to sum it up is to emphasize
that Project 2025 has four agendas to advance
conservative influence throughout the US
government, starting with a long
roadmap.
Alongside the document, the organization is
developing a database of
possible staff for an incoming Trump
administration and, as part of a “Presidential
Administration Academy,” is teaching new
hires about how the government should function.
The penultimate step consists of a presidential
transition playbook that
seeks to help the next president hit the ground
running in his effort to gain total control over
the executive branch.
The intended actions of the
organization are as follows:
· Redefine the way society
functions,
· Dismantle the social
safety net,
· Cut wages for working
people,
· Undermine our economy, and
· Reverse decades of
progress in civil rights,
Among other retrograde
intentions.
Donald Trump, in his typical
“hear no evil, fear no evil, see no evil” stance
when confronted about the document, wrote in a
post on his Truth Social network: “I know
nothing about Project 2025. I have no idea who
is behind it. I disagree with some of the things
they’re saying and some of the things they’re
saying are absolutely ridiculous and
abysmal. Anything they do, I wish them
luck, but I have nothing to do with them.”
Anyone who believes Trump did not have any
knowledge of this plan, is as gullible as they
come.
Not
surprisingly, many conservative organizations
are behind the effort. Part of the plan includes
terminating federal employees that conservatives
believe are prohibiting right-wing policies from
being implemented and replacing them with their
own choices, as several
news outlets have reported .
The handbook describes “a top-to-bottom
overhaul” of the Department of Justice and puts
an end to the FBI’s efforts to curb the spread
of misinformation. The handbook said that “the
FBI have absolutely no business policing
speech.”
(Charlie Neibergall / Associated
Press)
Reproductive
rights are targeted. The plan wants the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to
cease promoting abortion as health care.
Furthermore, Project 2025 urges the Federal Drug
Administration (FDA) to stop promoting and
approving requests for creating abortion pills,
referring to them as “the single greatest threat
to unborn children in a post-Roeworld”
while insisting that the approval process was
“politicized” and “illegal.” Rather, the group
argues that “Alternative options to abortion,
especially adoption, should receive federal and
state support.” Deferred Action for Childhood
Arrivals (DACA), immigration policies, sanctuary
cities, and other immigration policies are in
their line of fire.
Not surprisingly, anti-LGBTQ+
and anti-diversity policies are mentioned
throughout the education recommendations
sections in Project 2025 and in Trump’s
platform. The project proposes ridding education
programs of any “gender ideology and critical
race theory,” such as a “non-binary” category in
data collection or the ability of trans youth to
participate in sports aligned with their gender.
It also calls for parental approval for the use
of names or pronouns other than those on their
children’s birth certificates. And it wants to
abolish protections against discrimination based
on sexual orientation and gender identity. The
mandate targets anything the project considers
to be “critical race theory,” arguing that any
such measures should be abolished. Notably,
these include “mandatory affinity groups,”
training programs for teachers that require them
to “confess their privilege,” and assignments in
which “students must defend the false idea that
America is systemically racist.”
Many
other critics besides
Dr. Ben-Ghiat have labeled Project 2025 as
“authoritarian.” In fact, Kevin Roberts,
president of the Heritage Foundation stated “We
need to understand what time it is in America.
And right now, Donald Trump, whether someone
likes it or not — I happen to like it — is the
standard bearer for conservatives.” He further
stated that the project mandate “would be
implemented smoothly without bloodshed if
liberals and progressives do not challenge it.”
Really?! Talk about arrogance unbridled
arrogance!
To
paraphrase renowned legal attorney Sherilynn
Ifill, former head of the NAACP legal defense
fund and more recently, the Vernon E. Jordan,
Jr., Esq., Endowed Chair in Civil Rights at
Howard University, if Mr. Roberts and his band
of right wing acolytes believe that most
American women, people of color, LGBTQIA+ and
other historically marginalized groups are going
to passively stand by and allow their hard
earned rights to be revoked by a band of a right
wingers with a fascist agenda, they
have another thing coming!
Indeed! Include me along with Ms. Ifill as well!
Such language presents an unmistakably ominous,
threatening, declarative and dangerous prospect.
It is an alarming ultimatum that must be taken
very, very seriously! Democracy is on the ballot.