“We need the vision to see in this generation’s ordeals the opportunity
to transfigure both ourselves and American society. Our present suffering
and our nonviolent struggle to be free may well offer to Western
civilization the kind of spiritual dynamic so desperately needed
for our survival.”
– Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., “Strength to Love,” 1963.
“Imagine…if the movement’s vision of freedom were completely to
envelope the nation’s political culture. If this were the case, then
the pervasive consumerism and materialism and the stark inequalities
that have come to characterize modern life under global capitalism
could not possibly represent freedom. And yet, freedom today is practically
a synonym for free enterprise.”
– Robin D. G. Kelley, “Freedom Dreams: The Black Radical
Imagination,” 2002.
Great social movements may be sparked by outrage, but they are sustained
by dreams. For generations, Black folks dreamed of the death of Jim
Crow, finally marshalling extraordinary energies to end legal segregation
and, in the process, transform the nation. Now the tyranny of concentrated
wealth threatens to moot the democratic rights won so dearly, forty
years ago.
In the previous era, the sum of many oppressions came to be symbolized
by the image of one man: Birmingham Police Commissioner Eugene “Bull” Connor,
the epitome of southern, racist state violence. Today, the corporate-propelled
economic Race to the Bottom has, not a face but, more appropriately,
a logo: that of Wal-Mart, the world’s biggest and most rapacious business.
Like “Bull” Connor, Wal-Mart’s malevolence has galvanized a deep and
broad opposition. As Connor personified centuries of racial oppression,
Wal-Mart is truly the “model” of predatory, global capitalism – the “destructive
force” that “rezones American cities, sets wage standards and
even conducts diplomacy with other nations.”
There is outrage aplenty in Chicago, as the mega-retailer attempts
to steamroll its way into the South and West Sides of the city, a conquest
that would extend Wal-Mart’s suffocating embrace to all of the top
ten U.S. markets except Detroit and New York City. The coalition that
is assembling to oppose Wal-Mart and its hyper-aggressive corporate
model – in Chicago and elsewhere across the nation – has the potential
to transform itself into a genuine anti-corporatist, Black-led movement.
Yet, as many of the organizers are aware, the Wal-Mart offensive must
be countered by more than popular outrage. To sustain a movement, the
people must be given reasons to dream.
The civil rights dreams of Dr. King’s day did not prepare African
Americans for the machinations of capital – although King himself was
clearly on the cusp of a larger social vision when he was cut down,
in 1968. With few exceptions, the men and women that assumed Black
political leadership were (and remain) bereft of any notions of urban
development other than to accept what is offered by the federal bureaucracy
or corporate developers. They have seldom thought beyond patronage
and “piece of (somebody else’s) pie” politics, and believe their job
is to accept whatever is on the corporate menu – and be grateful.
After three decades of such “leadership,” the very idea that democracy
can turn people’s dreams into realities in their own neighborhoods,
is alien. Is it any wonder that the Black public sees no relationship
between democratic processes and their surroundings? Yet only an organized
people, energized by their own dreams, can resist the designs of organized
wealth. They need to believe in a “freedom” that affirms the people’s
absolute right to prevail over any corporate scheme, and to know that
people’s dreams can transform neighborhoods, nations, and history.
Especially when the relentless corporate juggernaut called Wal-Mart,
with sales of $250 billion a year, comes banging at the city door.
Slaying the dragon
“Living wage Yes – Wal-Mart No!” About 30 young ACORN activists in
red T-shirts arrayed themselves like a street-wise choir along the
right wall of the St. Sabina Catholic Church auditorium, punctuating
a May 1 afternoon of speeches with righteous, sloganeering fervor.
St. Sabina has for decades been a progressive venue on Chicago’s South
Side, a place where it seemed quite normal to hear visiting United
Church of Christ minister Rev. Reggie Williams, Jr. open the mass meeting
with the words, “We pray that you will bless those who have been cast
out – by corporations.”
St. Sabina’s Father Michael Pfleger challenged the 300-strong crowd: “Let’s
not let Chicago be embarrassed by allowing here what Inglewood has
already said no to.”
Three weeks earlier, the mostly Black and Latino city of Inglewood,
California voted two
to one to shut its doors in Wal-Mart’s face. At stake
was the democratic process, itself. Wal-Mart spent more than $1 million
on a ballot initiative to override local and state regulatory powers
at its proposed 60-acre Inglewood site. Until just a few weeks before
the vote, it appeared that Wal-Mart would prevail, with the support
of Inglewood’s groveling Black mayor, Roosevelt Dorn. But a labor-community
coalition – backed by the city council and the tireless efforts of
Los Angeles Congresswoman Maxine Waters and a host of national notables – won
the day.
"They can't trick cities and communities into giving away the
store, getting everything they want without any oversight,” said Madeline
Janis-Aparicio, leader of the Coalition for a Better Inglewood. “They're
going to have to do business differently if they want to do business
in California."
Wal-Mart CEO Lee Scott brushed
aside the defeat: "It's
a single store. We have lost votes on single stores before, and I would
assume in the future we will have some we lose."
On to the next victim: Chicago, the second-largest Black population
center in the United States, heavily union, and Rev. Jesse Jackson’s
home base. Jackson, who lent his voice to the Inglewood resistance,
denounced Wal-Mart’s intrusion into the South and West Sides:
“I urge Chicago and communities across the nation
to stop the Wal-Mart-ization of our economy. Some may say ‘these
jobs are better than no jobs,’ and
are attracted to Wal-Mart's promise of ‘jobs and low prices,’ especially
in these times of high unemployment and the need for community
economic development. But a closer look at Wal-Mart exposes it
as a Confederate
economic Trojan horse. On the outside, it looks like a show horse.
But open it up and what do you see: jobs at welfare level wages;
jobs without health care benefits; jobs without the right to organize;
a Wal-Mart that forces out local small business and throws their
workers into the unemployment lines….
“This month, the communities of Chicago must
place their vote in Wal-Mart's path. It will be a signal to communities
everywhere that
the giant monopoly Wal-Mart, the largest private sector company
in the world, with all of its economic power and wealth, can and
will
be defeated. We must stand up. Let us not forget that Dr. King
spent his final days organizing for the right to organize, for livable
wages
and health care benefits for all. The shadow of his life obligates
us to fight Wal-Mart; we will not change our course. Wal-Mart
must change its course.”
Wal-Mart is not about to change course. It is the most ideological
corporation on the planet, and refuses on rightwing principle to sign
any agreement that would dilute capital’s divine right to do whatever
it pleases (although the company does on occasion sucker communities
with non-binding promises). The mega-chain rings the Windy City with
suburban boxes, and has secured the tepid endorsement of Mayor Richard
Daley. And unlike in Inglewood, Chicago’s Black councilpersons include
some of the most backward, buyable, and just plain ignorant examples
of post-civil rights politicians, anywhere in the nation. They are
the faces of abject, urban defeat.
A deep, ugly cynicism
When Wal-Mart’s proposed West Side store came before the Council’s
Zoning Committee in late April, Alderwoman Emma Mitt dismissed evidence
of the company’s fierce anti-labor practices: "I don't know about
them because I go in there and shop. I'm not trying to get into their
business."
When a people’s representative doesn’t think it’s her job to “get
into” Wal-Mart’s “business” – Mitt’s ward includes the proposed site – then
we must realize that a vast void has been allowed to descend on the
Black political conversation. Mitt’s outrageous remarks reflect much
more than a deep, ugly cynicism. Rather, they are comprehensible only
in the context of a 30-year-long failure to address Black community
development as an issue of democracy. More important than the
fact that she has been bought, Mitt and her amen corner cannot conceive
of democracy playing any role in development, which she perceives as
the “business” of Wal-Mart and other corporations.
Chicago Federation of Labor President Dennis Gannon demanded that
Wal-Mart sign agreements before gaining entrance to the city. Alderwoman
Carrie Austin made sense by mistake when she countered: "And how
many other people have you asked to put it in writing? Did we ask Target?
Did we ask Home Depot? Did we ask Menards?"
Although Austin’s question sprang from the same slavish corruption
as that which oozes from her colleague, Mitts, she had hit on an essential
fact. No city in America is prepared to negotiate with developers except
on a case-by-case, episodic basis, because no city has anything that
could be accurately called a Plan for development, informed by an exhaustive
audit of its strengths and assets, and arrived at through genuine democratic
processes. Without a audit and plan, there is no sound, civic basis
for negotiations. Alderwoman Austin may not want to set standards,
but she knows when there aren’t any – which frees her to wallow in
the pig sty with Wal-Mart.
The committee approved and forwarded Wal-Mart’s plan to the full council.
Corporations, unlike cities, always have plans. They come armed
with facts and figures that cannot be disputed by even well meaning
politicians
who have no countervailing facts of their own. As we wrote in
the September 4, 2003 issue of , “Owning all the data,
corporations literally feed urban politicians the growth and
job projections that are then
inflicted on the public as official (and campaign) literature,
tightly closing the information loop and smothering democracy
in its crib – a
prime source of pervasive urban hopelessness.” Mayor Daley buys
into Wal-Mart’s figures, too.
A fighting model
The roaring fury of Wal-Mart’s rise to become the world’s business “model” has
caught progressives, labor and, especially, Black America flatfooted,
scrambling for a response. The citizens of Inglewood, California
were fortunate to have access to another “model” – an evolved
practice of negotiating Community Benefit Agreements (CBAs) with
developers, designed
to set a “baselines” for corporate behavior while financing needed
services to those directly affected by development projects.
The strategy – part
of what has made California the “gold
standard” for “community
grassroots organizing” – was
developed by the decade-old Los Angeles Alliance for a New Economy
(LAANE).
LAANE takes credit for creating “a powerful coalition of community
organizations, unions, religious leaders, academics and elected
officials” – the
same coalition that defeated Wal-Mart in Ingleside. Madeline
Janis-Aparicio, leader of the Coalition for a Better Inglewood,
is also a LAANE activist,
and co-authored the definitive, how-to document, “Community
Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects Accountable,” along
with Greg LeRoy of Good
Jobs First.
Among LAANE’s closest allies in the Inglewood confrontation
with Wal-Mart was the United Food and Commercial Workers union
(UCFW), battered by
a three-month strike and lockout with supermarket chains bent
on following the Wal-Mart “model” of labor relations in southern
California. (See , “Remaking
America in Wal-Mart’s Image,“ February
19.)
Wal-Mart’s defeat in Inglewood buoyed spirits among union and
grassroots activists in Chicago. Bracing for Wal-Mart’s assault,
they borrowed a page from LAANE’s strategy for dealing with developers,
creating their own “Community
Benefits Agreement for Wal-Mart in the City of Chicago.”
No contract, no sales
"Right now, we have to organize and tackle this beast," said
Elce Redmond, as he presented the draft agreement on Wal-Mart to the
May Day crowd at St. Sabina Catholic Church. Redmond is a leader of
the South Austin Community Council, and one of the drafters the Agreement.
“Even if they sign, we’ve got to push them nationwide,” said
Rev. Reginald Williams, Jr. Williams is associate pastor of
the 8,500-member Trinity United Church of Christ congregation,
but
today he was ministering to
the “movement” gathered
for a Chicago
Workers’ Rights Board hearing on Wal-Mart.
The 12-point Community Benefits Agreement is a model for corporate
behavior and accountability that could be applied or amended to fit
a wide range of development projects, not just Wal-Mart.
The points include: no public subsidy for the project; 100 percent
union construction, demolition and remodeling work, with 50 percent
of the work performed by contractors from the community surrounding
the site; 90 percent of employees must be Chicago residents, including
management; a living wage with affordable, comprehensive health benefits;
compliance with all workplace laws, and nondiscrimination in hiring;
no retaliation for union activities, management neutrality on union
representation issues; no inquiries on immigration status; a halt to
predatory pricing; the site will be made immediately available to other
retailers if abandoned by Wal-Mart; mandatory participation in a “Community
Commission” to monitor compliance with the agreement; regular contributions
to a Community Improvement Fund to be administered by the Community
Commission. Violation of the agreement would subject Wal-Mart to fines
and “possible waiver of future zoning variances for other developments.”
“From this day on we will not be a whore anymore for any kind of corporate
pimp,” vowed Rev. Williams. Hundreds said Amen.
Truth gets a hearing
It was time to “testify” in church, and for the Workers’ Rights
Board’s
secular record. “Anyplace that Wal-Mart has been let into a community,
conditions have gone down,” said Mary Finger, UFCW International
Vice President and the union’s director of Civil Rights and Community
Relations. “Those that lose jobs will have to go out and get
public assistance…and the jobs that we have now will be turned
into Wal-Mart jobs. Are you going to lay down and say, that’s
all we deserve?” A
voice in the crowd said “Hell No” to that, and all agreed.
Wal-Mart’s appeal, in the ghetto and elsewhere, is that it creates
jobs, as if out of thin air. However, a report completed in March by
the Center for Urban Economic Development (CUED) at the University
of Illinois-Chicago, projects a net loss of jobs if Wal-Mart
is allowed to build its big box on the West Side.
Wal-Mart “will displace more jobs in the general merchandising sector
than it creates for Chicago residents,” said the CUED’s Chirag Mehta. “We
estimate that the store will lead to a net loss of 54 jobs inside the
general merchandising sector and 11 jobs outside the general merchandising
sector for Chicago residents. The jobs, once lost, will lead to an
annual loss of $1.2 million of income in current dollars for city residents.”
The employment-destroying logic of Wal-Mart’s predatory model is inescapable – although
the facts are drowned out of public discussion by the sheer volume
of the corporation’s “jobs, jobs, jobs” ad campaigns. Although the
proposed West Side store “will expand the pie slightly by pulling in
customers currently shopping in the suburbs…for the most part, Wal-Mart
will only take away customers from existing retailers,” Mehta testified.
"In the 28-mile area around where the proposed
store will open (the typical market area for a big box retail store
in an urban market),
there are 763 retailers that do business in one or more of
the retail sectors that competes directly with Wal-Mart. Among
those, there are
61 general merchandising stores and the 40 discount retailers
that will likely bear the brunt of job loss…. Without a doubt,
the vast majority of the residents who live within the expected
service area
of the proposed store already have comparable retail options.
If the proposed Wal-Mart store opens, the retail options will undoubtedly
decline as will the total number of jobs in the local market….
”In terms of the fiscal impact…the City of Chicago
should see a slight increase in sales and property taxes. Overall
there will be
a net tax gain for the city, albeit only a slight gain over
the life of the project.”
So much for Mayor Daley’s rational for selling out the city to Wal-Mart.
Carefully calculated oppression
Gonza Kaiijage worked for Wal-Mart while a college student in
Carbondale, Illinois. She thought she was a part-timer. “Getting
more hours than you asked for probably sounds like a great situation
to a lot of people,
but the point is that they wanted me to work 38 hours a week,
and still be defined as part-time with no benefits and no health
insurance.” What
Kaiijage described is Wal-Mart’s science of squeezing maximum
hours from workers for minimum pay – all carefully calibrated
in Bentonville, Arkansas, along with the exact temperatures
in each of the company’s
thousands of stores. Wal-Mart pimped Ms. Kaiijage and hundreds
of thousands of part-timers, keeping her just two hours shy
of the (meager) benefits kick-in point. Kaiijage couldn’t
live with that, and no other employer can compete with that – although
in time they will learn if the Wal-Mart model is not defeated.
Former Miss America Carolyn Sapp flew in from California to report
on the largest active class action suit in the nation,
seeking injunctive relief and punitive damages for Wal-Mart’s systemic
discrimination against women. Ms Sapp cited “voluminous data” showing
men are paid more than, and promoted over, women as a matter of
corporation-wide
practice.
Thus, Wal-Mart is an engine of the “feminization of poverty.”
At age 80, Mississippi-born Rev. Addie L. Wyatt is a legendary
activist, having served as the first woman local union
president of the United Packinghouse Food and Allied Workers.
Wyatt breathed fire from
her wheelchair: “Wal-Mart
acts like they can come into our city and think that slavery
is still alive. I cannot believe that any of you would allow yourselves
to be treated as a slave.”
Among the notables seated at the dais were several city and state
officeholders, including state Rep. Mary Flowers. "I'm for jobs
in this community, but I have an insult level," she said. "People
need a livable wage. As an African-American woman, I once worked for
$1 an hour. I'm not talking about what I don't know."
But Wal-Mart is truly something new on Earth, a super-exploiter
that devours the competition, lowers labor standards wherever it
treads,
and rearranges economies to create conditions most beneficial
to itself. Already the biggest corporation by any measure, its
influence is further
magnified by example. “Wal-Mart makes others mimic its way
of doing business,” said James Thindwa, testifying
for Chicago Jobs
With Justice, one of the prime movers
of the hearings.
Wal-Mart’s
model leads to a “proliferation of sweatshops in other countries.”
Wal-Mart beckons falsely to the unemployed while wreaking havoc in
bargaining sessions at unionized workplaces. Mike Jackson, a UFCW shop
steward at an Osco Distribution Center, testified:
“It seems to me that by targeting minority areas, providing weak pay
with poor benefits, they are targeting those that need good jobs the
most….
”I have witnessed first hand the effect that predatory competitors
have on our contracts. Management always says that they cannot afford
to continue paying us decent wages because they have to compete with
retailers that sell everything at discount price. We are
constantly told that they must lower what we receive, in
order to lower their
prices, retain customers and remain competitive. This is low-road
employment”
The Low Road
“Retail and other business are forced into Low Road practices to compete
with this predatory giant,” said veteran activist Dan Swinney, Executive
Director of the Center for Labor and Community Research CLCR). “Wal-Mart
will accelerate the de-development of our communities, further drain
scarce public resources, and encourage anti-labor actions and sentiment.”
Yet Swinney believes there is a host of companies that are willing
to cooperate with community groups and local government – to
resist Wal-Mart’s slash-and-burn mode of business. “There
are existing stores like Costco, Dominicks, Jewel,
as
well as thousands of smaller,
locally-owned stores that can be part of a High Road retail
sector that meets the needs of our local consumers.” These
High Road businessmen and women, says Swinney, can potentially
become allies in the quest
for rational, people-serving urban development strategies.
Rather than allow Wal-Mart to pollute the political, social
and economic environment
of cities, politicians should encourage good corporate
citizens and penalize Wal-Mart and its acolytes.
“It’s a business argument,” Swinney explains. “It is simply the obligation
of good government to find and reward those in the retail sector who
operate on the High Road and will generate a positive return on investment
for the city.”
Later, after the hearings were over, Swinney elaborated on CLCR’s
“Building
the Bridge to the High Road” strategy, which focuses
on "people stepping" in to grapple with the “anarchy” of
urban economies. The key, he says, is creating “early warning
systems” to gather accurate
information on which businesses are closing, or in danger
of shutting down. CLCR has found that “40 percent or more” of
urban businesses that close or leave the city do so because
of “the issue of succession” – typically
involving elderly owners whose children don’t want to run
the business. Swinney’s group helps find neighborhood people “who
want to take over the company” and assists workers and
entrepreneurs seeking companies to buy.
According to Swinney’s ”High Road,” progressives
must recognize that sections of the business community
share the fundamental objectives of our High Road. And a broader
segment of the
business community has at least a material interest in
the success of building the economy, no matter what strategic alliance
guides development.
Business people bring indispensable skills and resources
to the process, and must be attracted and recruited to our efforts.
In return for their
work, they must be rewarded with fair compensation and
return on investment, with partnerships that enhance the performance
of their companies,
and inclusion in all aspects of our community.
“But,” as Swinney said in the final words of his testimony at St.
Sabina Church, “the first step is to stop Wal-Mart from coming to our
city.”
Showdown on May 26th
The dreadful Alderwoman Emma Mitt brought about 100 supporters to
witness her buffoonery at the May 5 City Council Meeting on Wal-Mart.
Consumed by an idiotic megalomania, Mitt worked her crowd. "We
want to take the worst retailer in the world, the worst, as they say,
and make it the best," said the crazy woman, imagining she could
tame a company that punishes nations. "But you know something?
To make them the best, you've got to have them inside."
Two hundred of Father Michael Pfleger’s troops waved “No Wal-Mart
in Chicago” placards as the priest pushed the Community
Benefits Agreement: "We
have to demand jobs. We have to demand good-paying jobs
and benefits and unless we set a standard, we then accept
whatever's thrown out
by any company that says, it's better than nothing,"
Wal-Mart had by now mouthed promises on local hiring and “average” wage
levels, but it wasn’t negotiating with anyone (except in Alderwoman
Mitt’s imagination), and will never set the precedent of signing a
binding agreement that might slow down its finely calibrated, global
Race to the Bottom.
As 38th Ward Alderman Thomas Allen put it: "They won't put anything
in writing, they won't agree to anything, they give lip service, they
hoodwink and they bamboozle people. It's like, 'Line-up. Drink the
Kool-Aid. It's good for you. You're gonna like it.'"
Richard Daley forgot whose mayor he was, appearing to base his support
for Wal-Mart on suburban opinion. "What happened in the suburban
area? What happened? Where's the voices? Where are the voices? Where
are the people?" said Mayor Daley. According to this logic, Wal-Mart
must be a fine company, since folks from the suburbs weren’t demonstrating
at Chicago’s City Hall.
Through deft maneuvering by anti-Wal-Mart alderpersons, the vote on
the West Side store was postponed until Wednesday, May 26.
Organizer Jim Bakken thinks the Community Benefits Agreement strategy,
borrowed from Los Angeles, is working. “There are some alderpeople
who are completely opposed to Wal-Mart,” he said. “There is an even
larger group that wants to see some written agreement, or they will
oppose it. There is a groundswell of opposition to these stores. The
more the aldermen learn about Wal-Mart as a company, the more they
oppose it.”
Urban democracy
More than any recent event, the supermarket strike and lockout
in southern California – considered a “Wal-Mart” strike even
though the Walton family’s outlets were not directly involved – has
galvanized labor against the Wal-Mart model, creating a more
activist-friendly
environment in labor circles. Giant predators have that effect
on people.
Wal-Mart’s belated drive to fully penetrate the nation’s inner cities
exposes the utter failure of post-civil rights politics as actually
practiced in much of Black America. The wave of African American urban
electoral victories did not give rise to a strategy that would leverage
the cities’ inherent – and inherited – strengths and assets. Instead,
opportunistic elites within the community – and gutter feeders with
even baser ambitions – saw the cities as places to be stripped and
sold off or even given away.
In the first installment of ’s ongoing series, “Wanted: A
Plan for the Cities to Save Themselves” (August
14, 2003),
we described how urban politicians “extend permanent
invitations to private capital to do whatever it wants
with their constituents’ property and futures,
but please do something! Rarely do they have anything
resembling a plan of their own, beyond a firm determination
to accept whatever
capital offers…” Although we were (and remain) focused
on the larger issues of frenzied gentrification and corporate
rip-offs subsidized at
the expense of existing urban populations, the Wal-Mart
urban offensive brings the contradiction into even starker
relief. Chicago’s Alderwoman
Emma Mitt serves as a perfect example (or straw woman)
of the abysmal ignorance and moral corruption that has
resulted from thirty years
without a plan for the cities. These are the fruits of
an historic failure of Black politics.
History sometimes dispenses second chances. Wal-Mart’s corporate personality,
as offensive as it is destructive, has placed a logo on the generalized
crisis into which concentrated capital is plunging the nation and world.
It is no coincidence that the company that is leading the global and
domestic Race to the Bottom is also controlled by the most blatant,
public reactionaries at the top of America’s billionaire pyramid – Sam
Walton’s heirs. Black folks can identify the enemy more easily when
they hail from places like Bentonville, Arkansas. That tends to get
people in the mood to fight back – but it does not, of course, provide
a strategy for resistance to the relentless corporate absorption of
the people’s space and rights, in which Wal-Mart is only one player.
The nightmare with Wal-Mart’s name on it – a process that Dan
Swinney calls “de-development” and which in other forms results
in urban ethnic cleansing – can only be successfully countered
by building a movement that is fueled by the people’s dreams. Dreams
are what development is all about. Yet in 21st Century
America, only rich men’s
dreams are allowed – Thou shalt have no other dreams
but mine, says capital. Black politicians have collaborated
in this people-stunting politics,
believing the cities in which they wield at least nominal
power are worthless. Why
else would they so eagerly
transfer urban assets for a song, or for nothing at all,
or in Wal-Mart’s
case, for a job- and community-destroying monstrosity.
The new urban politics must be rooted in a development strategy that
calls upon the people to imagine a city that fulfills their needs,
a politics that provides them with the tools to transform their surroundings
in ways that they choose, through a process that affirms the value
and power of democracy – the value and power of themselves. If people
can dream a city, they will fight to make it real.
The Los Angeles Community Benefits Agreements, now part of Chicago’s
progressive political arsenal, are flexible templates for campaigns
for democratic development. The Agreements create a process
of thought and action that places the people’s needs and desires, as
expressed by themselves, at the center of the urban development question,
which is, at its most basic: What kind of city do we want to create?
The LAANE Agreements are marvelously malleable; they encourage the
movement to grow in scope:
“Ideally, cities should make a community needs
assessment and baseline community benefits part of every subsidized
project. A citywide policy
for subsidized projects could do just that. This would
promote uniformity, avoid lengthy and repetitious project-by-project
battles, and ensure
that all subsidized projects in a given jurisdiction
provide some basic community benefits. A push for a citywide community
benefits policy
also provides a valuable opportunity for coalition-building
and strengthening organizing networks.”
LAANE’s approach also fits well with Dan Swinney’s “High Road” strategy.
At the end of the day, the people’s “corporate ally” is the one who
will sign a contract.
The power of dreams
The global and domestic economic crisis with Wal-Mart’s face
on it has forced a closer collaboration within the coalition
that
can forge this new urban politics. It will be an essentially
Black-led (and increasingly Latino-oriented) movement, as was
glimpsed in Chicago
and Inglewood. Black labor will take the point position,
goading and guiding their union fellows towards decisions and
confrontations that
can no longer be avoided. Black labor is also the key
to placing large sums of capital at the service of democratic
development, through the
billions of dollars in union pension funds that are
currently controlled by corporate developers.
Many white progressives have proven capable of formulating strategies
and inventing tools that serve the larger mission: to create the conditions
for a social democracy in which human destinies are not determined
by privilege. Still, it will be up to African American progressives
to nurture and help articulate a democratic vision among the Black
urban majority – to encourage, demand, that they dream cities,
and act collectively on those dreams.
We dreamed in concert, once, and won citizenship rights that we never
fully used. In that sense, half the battle was won, forty years ago.
It’s time for the next step.
Click
here to read Part 1 of this series.
Click
here to read Part 2 of this series.
Click
here to read Part 3 of this series.
Click
here to read Part 5 of this series.
|