Guess
who discovered Who's Who In Black Los Angeles after
two years? Before you ask, I really wanted to feature a Los
Angeles Times editor in Who's Who in Black Los
Angeles. Really. The problem is, there is not a single African
American among those who make coverage decisions for the paper.
In hindsight, it probably was a mistake not to include the one black
man on the paper's full-time metro reporting staff. That brother
deserves a special award for what I imagine he goes through every
day. Well, maybe next year. Now the Times wants
know �Who's who� in the black community. I can't say for certain
the dearth of African Americans-or all people of color for that
matter-on the Times staff is to blame for its recent
shoddy coverage of a venture I manage.
But
whatever the reason, over the last month, there has
been some significant misreportings about the sponsorship
support of Los Angeles County in the 2009 (second) edition of Who's
Who In Black Los Angeles (WWBLA). WWBLA is a client of
mine. I was hired to manage the editorial content and build sponsorship
support in the nation's second largest city with the nation's fifth
largest black population. I don't usually mix my clients' business
with my editorial commentary. I try to keep them separate, but the
issue is too egregious to ignore. The sponsorship was purchased
out of Los Angeles County Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas' district
discretionary fund for constituency support and community enhancement.
The
sponsorship was to promote the plan for re-opening King Hospital
and advertise county services. The biographies to �spotlight� county
executives was a bonus ALL receive for buying certain levels of
advertisement. It wasn't asked for. Some sponsors take it. Some
sponsors don't. The Supervisor chose to highlight the hardworking,
unsung heroes of County government.
The
story started when the L.A. Times wrote a story
on the discretionary of all the County Supervisors.
The story somehow focused on Ridley-Thomas, who spent the least
amount of the Supervisors called into question, and the
Times misreported that Ridley-Thomas �paid $25,000� to
put himself in WWBLA. Even after the facts were presented, the misreporting
continued. Last week, the misreporting took a huge leap when Times columnist,
Steve Lopez, jumped in the fray and thumped DWP for buying ads in
the book. Lopez's column was full of inaccuracies and he only built
on the misreporting of the Times earlier stories.
You could tell from Lopez's commentary that there was an underlining
slant here. So what's really up?
The
gross misrepresentation of Mr. Lopez's commentary is the perpetuation
that Supervisor Ridley-Thomas paid to get in the book. NOBODY paid
to get in the book. If fact, I'll pay Mr. Lopez $1,000 if he can
find ONE PERSON who paid to get in the book. It's free to get in
the book. Not all submissions are accepted and there is no obligation
to buy the book if selected. The real disappointment of the Lopez
commentary is he tried to attack the integrity of the book on a
simple(minded) premise that Will Smith or Lamar Odom wasn't in the
book.
There
are a million blacks in Los Angeles. Everybody can't be in the book,
nor does everybody want to be in the book, as one
of his �interviewees� suggested. However, for your information,
Mr. Lopez, Lamar Odom was in the first book. And we hope Will Smith
will be in the third book, a tribute to black Hollywood. However,
does that mean the other 800 persons in the first two editions don't
deserve recognition? Or that the book is not legitimate because
one or two persons aren't in the book? That is non-sense. WWBLA
is about accomplishment of African Americans in all fields and on
all levels, not just the celebrity or notoriety levels for people
who keep their face in the news (despite what the Columbus rep said-that
is NOT a process for selection).
The
company, Who's Who Publishing, has been around for 20 years and
is in 26 cities, with a database of 170,000 of the most affluent
and influential African Americans in this nation. Not a �fly by
night� company.
Mr.
Lopez suggested that his principal interviewee, Earl Ofari Hutchinson,
certainly should've been in the book because �he's everywhere.�
Well, as a social critic writing this weekly column for the past
20 years, I try not to criticize my colleagues but Hutchinson put
himself in the line of fire on this one. Hutchinson was solicited
and did submit for the first edition. It came after
deadline. We couldn't get it in the book. If Mr. Lopez wants to
see Mr. Hutchinson's bio, call me. I'll show it to you. As
for Lopez's assertion that Mr. Hutchinson saw the book as a �hustle,�
well many consider Mr. Hutchinson's advocacy �a hustle,� which is
why he's �everywhere.� Mr. Hutchinson is known for chasing
the media with the fervor of an ambulance chasing attorney.
Many
believe Mr. Hutchinson �hustles� expert commentary opportunities
under the premise of being a �Ph.D.� when, in fact, he
does not have one. His �mail-order degree� is from a defunct, non-accredited
degree mill, not real university. So, I'm not sure Hutchinson legitimizes
Lopez's story. Everybody else Lopez purportedly interviewed told
him they didn't pay to get in the book. Hutchinson suggested, according
to Lopez, that he �wasn't going to pay or find a sponsor.� He wasn't
asked to do either, a total misrepresentation. But Lopez needed
SOMEBODY to validate this misreported story and he found in Hutchinson,
a very sad commentary in and of itself.
Both
L.A. County and DWP have public affairs/public information budgets
to promote their services and educate the public. They place millions
of dollars with ad placement agencies to strategically place agency
service ads in newspapers, magazines, billboards and buses. Yet,
those agencies rarely place paid ads in African
American owned publications. They say the same thing corporations,
contractors and other public entities say, that they can't find
�qualified� blacks or black businesses or media outlets to spend
dollars with. Well, WWBLA has taken that argument away.
DWP
engaged in a multi-million dollar ad campaign on water conservation
last year. You mean to say the black community wasn't supposed to
get any of these ad dollars? DWP bought three (3) full page color
ads at $5,000 each; one on water conversation, one on economic development
programs and one on supplier diversity opportunities. The agency
spotlight of DWP executives was a throw-in for the multiple ad buy.
THIS WAS BUSINESS. LA County and DWP advertised in a publication
that sells ads and reaches an affluent population ($75,000 median
income, 60% homeowners). The amount of money spent out of each of
their budgets was less than one-tenth of a penny. If you gave a
homeless person a penny on the street, they'd throw it back at you,
or assault you.
Mr.
Lopez should know something about that. He does not have to scour
the bowels of Skid Row to find exceptional talents in our community.
And Lopez must look further than his movie DVD player, the Lakers
game or the local bus bench to find �everyday� role models doing
great things. But he wants to dismiss what WWBLA really means
to our community in that regard because The Times is
trying to find a story where there is none. We can always count
on the L.A. Times to write stories that assault
the dignity, and insult the intelligence, of the black community.
This really wasn't enough money to even write about.
Lastly,
the L.A. Times and Mr. Lopez could find out how
wasteful DWP, known as the City's �slush fund agency,� really is--if
the story was about waste. WWBLA is not even in the top 1,000 of
DWP's most frivolous expenditures. You could also be heroes as government
�watchdogs,� if you weren't so disingenuous.
I'd
give $1,000 to know what the real motives are. Or maybe I'll insult
your intelligence like you try to insult ours, and give you just
a penny. That's all your opinion is really worth here. WWBLA will
continue to lift the many doing good work in our community.
And Mr. Steve Lopez and the Los Angeles Times can
continue to ridicule legitimate black business practices and the
affirmation of African American people known and unknown.
BlackCommentator.com Columnist, Dr. Anthony Asadullah Samad, is a national columnist and author of Saving The Race: Empowerment Through Wisdom. His Website is AnthonySamad.com. Click
here to
contact Dr. Samad. |