In
recent months, I have taught remedial sessions for high school
graduates of our public schools. These sessions focus on basic
writing skills, grammar and syntax. Students are taught the basic
5-paragraph essay in order to re-take the two-year college entrance
exam. As a teacher of these sessions, I am given a script of subjects
/ material to be covered in each session.
The
majority of my students have been African American, Black Americans
and a sprinkling of student immigrants from Africa and the Caribbean.
It
saddens me to recognize semester after semester that a number
of these students and a number of students I have taught at the
college level are unable to distinguish between a fragment and
a sentence or unable to comprehend the theme or message of a mainstream
newspaper article.
In
�The Dangerous Drift Back towards Segregated Schools,� Marian
Wright Edelman has for years noted the obliteration of anything
that can be called education for all children in the U.S.,
particularly for Black children. Dr. Wright Edelman calls attention
to two recent school board decisions in North
Carolina that she sees as a �troubling national trend toward re-segregation
in public schools.� Lengthy debates regarding �redistricting plans�
preceded each decision by the school boards in New Hanover County (including Wilmington) and in Wake
County.
In
New Hanover, the debate on a new middle school redistricting plan
focused on ��neighborhood schools,�� she writes. The �redistricting
plan� would re-segregate schools according to race and to economic
class �because our neighborhoods look that way.�
Sounds like a �humanitarian� �neoliberal� plan that
would benefit �neighborhood� school children, right? Except that
these neighborhood schools are already predominately Black and
segregated!
According
to Dr. Wright Edelman, the only white and Republican member of
the school board joined two Black Democratic members in challenging
the plan. Last fall, Elizabeth Redenbaugh and the two Black Democratic
members sent a letter to parents and other members of the school
board. In the end, the three were overruled earlier this year
in a 4-3 vote.
Redenbaugh
described what she witnessed during the debate with �Dr. Wright
Edelman. Parents approached Redenbaugh and told her that they
didn�t want their children in school with Black children. Why,
these parents ask, do we do anything ��at all for black children
in our county��? Redenbaugh continues: They look me in the eye
and say, we�ve spent too much money on Black children. ��Nothing
helps.��
Such
statements literally grieve my heart and beg the question: Who
is my neighbor?�
In
neighboring Wake
County, more of the same!
As
Dr. Wright Edelman writes, in Wake County,
including Raleigh, �schools
may be moving backward in a similar direction.� On March 4, 2010
the school board voted �to begin studying a new districting plan
that would change the current busing system and reassign students
based on �neighborhood attendance zones.�� In other words, as
Dr. Wright Edelman explains, segregate the schools �because of
the neighborhood demographics.�
Keep the problem in the margins of society - where
it is anyway - so many believe.
No
parent, no matter his or her race, wants to send their child to
a school where they have to pass through a metal detector. In
a Dr. Martin Luther King�s Dream world that would be unnecessary.
No parent, no matter his or her race, wants to send their child
to a school to sit next to another child whose parent or parents
care less about the child�s education or the quality of that education.
No
parent, no matter his or her race, wants to send their child to
school to sit next to a fledging gang member. No parent, no matter
his or her race, wants to send their child to school to sit next
to another who thinks learning to read and write, to think, is
a waste of time. No parent, no matter his or her race, wants to
send their child to school to sit in a classroom where the teacher
has low expectations of his or her students or who thinks the
students are inferior.
If
a good many parents are now disinterested in the education of
their children or the quality of that education, we should ask
how did this happen? What were the circumstances surrounding their
education?
In addition to recalling the history of desegregating schools in the U.S. and the
historic Brown vs. Board of Education and the Supreme Court�s
2007 ruling that the �desegregation plans that assign students
to schools on the basis of race are unconstitutional� (Dr. Wright
Edelman), we need to also look at what integration has
achieved in the Black community.
Black
children are not mentally inferior but they have been sold
an inferior educational process that divorces them from
empowering narratives and images of themselves and their community.
In the past forty years, there has been a systematic, institutionalized
effort to separate Black children from cultural references in
which they can see themselves as individuals in a collective that
has long striven to challenge an undemocratic society. Instead,
Black children, generation after generation, particularly since
the Reagan Era, have been told a narrative and shown images of
themselves in alignment with the racist narratives and images
that surrounded enslaved Blacks. But enslaved Black knew who they
were and many died or suffered as a result of trying to learn
to read and write. Once Emancipation came, many sought to learn;
others began schools to teach themselves and the children in newly
established communities.
What
happened to this people, this mindset since those
years? How much of a threat did these average ex-enslaved people
pose to the nation-state and why? Why after the establishment
of Affirmative Action was the ruling declared unconstitutional
and dismantled? Why are we now confronted with Black teens for
whom freedom is being a consumer of cheap goods and democracy
means everyone can shop at Wal-Mart or everyone can carry around
a Blackberry and still not have a clue as to who was David Walker
or Rodney Walters and still have not ever read a Gwendolyn Brooks
poem or a Toni Morrison novel. How do we engage our young so that
Sojourner Truth speaks to them?
No
matter what the plan is called under whatever president, the agenda
has been the same: keep this Black community ignorant of its strength
and power. And the way to do this is to appear innocent
of the crime of capitalism and the practice of a slow but thorough
genocide while supporting a policy that when implemented
on the micro-level treat Black children as contending with the
infantile only fit to wander in the wilderness for another
forty years. Nothing helps because those who benefit don�t
plan to change their policy toward Black Americans. Fear won�t
allow them to change!
Those cultural references are powerful and threatening
as is the Black child who dares to want to learn who she or he
is - historically.
What
parent or Black teacher during Reconstruction would tolerate indifference
to learning or any behavior deemed disrespectful to themselves
or to the community? The Black parent and Black teacher with a
vested entrance in saving and cultivating cultural references
(empowering narratives and images) would not tolerate substandard
anything from Black children!
Black
parents and Black teachers are no longer free to educate Black
children. While King�s Dream may have appealed to those
who thought �America
would be true to its promise� of democracy, it has proven to be
not only a disaster but most important, a criminal act of genocide
against the Black American population. Lost in the political,
social and cultural wilderness, our community has not only lost
its way but its cultural reference points: for many there is no
past nor future - only the present, today and now, this moment!
Before
the Dream and a leap of some Black Americans into the stream,
we should have spent the last forty years, as Malcolm suggested,
getting our own act together. Then we could have reached the same
conclusion with Dr. King that America
needs to turn to democratic socialism. But, in terms of education,
fear of the Black population wasn�t limited to white school administrators
and faculty. The Black elite have turned their backs on Black
America. Betraying the struggle for justice for all, the Black
elite accepts the just-us integration plan, a corruption
cover-up plan.
I
believe we leaped for the Dream of integration and received
the nightmare of fear.
I
agree with Dr. Wright Edelman who refers to Gary Orfield�s findings
in the Civil Rights Project at the University of California,
Los Angeles: segregated schools are not good for
anyone. �We already know they are disastrous for poor and minority
students, for whom there is a strong connection between school
segregation, failing schools, and high dropout rates.� Studies
show, she argues, that the transfer of Black and Brown children
to �inter-district� schools �to improve integration, improve the
�life chances� of those children while showing no �negative effect
on the academic progress of students in the receiving district.�
But,
between a study at this university and a study at this institute
for policy, we are experimenting with the life chances of so many
other Black children. How much money is wasted on studies while
Black children and the community as a whole continue to see its
future consumed by fear? Having
taught in increasingly post-racial academic environments where
it is almost a crime to even refer to Black students or Black
subjects outside the month of February, I am weary about the curriculum
at these schools where Black and Brown enter as bodies in seats
but not as thinkers and doers, contributors to all fields of study
(math, science, literature, history, social science, philosophy
etc). Are we to accept that we are the objects of university studies
of pathology or criminality in the U.S.? Is the Black child who
transfers to an integrated classroom to believe that he or she
must overcome portrayals of Black pathology and criminality supplied
by endless studies and media images of Black Americans? How much
of the heritage they carry within them would they have to shed
in order to experience those �life chances� in an integrated American
classroom? Will white children and immigrant children to this
country continue to embody a sense of entitlement and power as
they climb the ladder on the bodies of Black Americans?
We
must reject the knowledge that Black Americans are only
fit for becoming high or low paid servants of the system destroying
us all.
A
segregated America is not good for any
citizen, but politicians will play politics with each other with
no concern for justice.
It
is not a question of segregation vs. integration but a question
of justice, fairness, freedom - allowing people to be free to
be, allowing Black Americans to be human and fulfill their
potential as human beings. It�s as if we�ve died since those many
years back when housewives decided to walk rather than ride those
apartheid buses. It�s as if we died when Fred Hampton was murdered
and our desire to feed and educate our children died too.
Civil
Rights advocate and litigator Michelle Alexander (The
New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness)
suggests that we go back, pick up the struggle where Dr. Martin
L. King left off. It�s all of us or none of us, she argues. For
Dr. King, �a human rights movement� held revolutionary potential,�
Dr. Alexander writes. Therefore,
we must, as Dr. Alexander offers, pick up where Dr. King left
off and resume the poor people�s campaign.
A
poor people�s campaign would encompass human violations, including
the criminal educational system. I would suggest that one way
to engage the poor people�s campaign is to begin by taking back
the responsibility of educating our children. As Black people
concerned about our future, our children, the survival of our
heritage of anti-racism, anti-imperialism, anti-capitalism - within
the poor peoples� campaign - we need to establish a space in our
communities where we empower our children beyond fear. Sending
a few ideal Black children to sit next to white students
so white parents feel less fearful ultimately dehumanizes us.
We have masses of Black children and young adults who can�t read
or write - and they have attitudes, anger as a result of
being forced to survive their dehumanization by unconsciously
or consciously collaborating in the process of destroying their
humanity. But we have to engage this population! All of us or
none of us!
An
individual here and there isn�t enough. But a movement that begins
with one or two and starts in one�s neighborhood can�t be stifled
by the fear of those who would prohibit our efforts. This movement
must be a collective movement aimed at dismantling the War
on Drugs while targeting poverty, homelessness, unemployment.
Such a movement would chip away at warmongering, imperialism,
capitalism, and RACISM, dismantling the structure that reinforces
an undemocratic response to the presence of the majority of people
in the U.S. and around the world.
Much is at stake, and we can�t ask another people to move beyond
their fear. Those
of us who are Black must take the first step and be willing to
step up again, at this time in history, and to teach our Black
children the story of our survival and our future.
Obviously,
no one else will!
BlackCommentator.com Editorial Board member, Lenore Jean Daniels, PhD,
has been a writer for over thirty years of commentary, resistance
criticism and cultural theory, and short stories with a Marxist
sensibility to the impact of cultural narrative violence and its
antithesis, resistance narratives. With entrenched dedication
to justice and equality, she has served as a coordinator of student
and community resistance projects that encourage the Black Feminist
idea of an equalitarian community and facilitator of student-teacher
communities behind the walls of academia for the last twenty years.
Dr. Daniels holds a PhD in Modern American Literatures, with a
specialty in Cultural Theory (race, gender, class narratives)
from Loyola University,
Chicago. Click here
to contact Dr. Daniels.