Click
here
to read any of the articles in this special BC series on Single-Payer
Healthcare.
In March
2010, President Obama signed into law the �Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act HR 3590.
�This historic bill for the first time extended mandatory medical care
to ninety four percent of US citizens, adding another 32 million
people to the healthcare system. Under this law, insurance companies
can no longer deny people health care on the basis of preexisting
conditions. Young people are allowed to stay on their parents� insurance
until age 26. It extended coverage for senior citizens and strengthened
Medicare.� Still, the bill did not include a single payer system
where the government would be able to provide health insurance for
all. In reality, what was called health care reform in the US was
a victory for the health insurance industry, biotech corporations,
big pharma and the health maintenance organizations.� The US is
so conservative that the extreme right branded the bill as a government
takeover. The bill was a desperate measure to stabilize the capitalist
system in a period when the US system spends over $2.2 trillion
on health care and yet ranks number 37 in the provision of health
care for its citizens. This inefficient system of capitalist accumulation
holds the citizens of the US hostage to an outmoded form of economic
organization in the 21st century. Throughout the history of capitalism
in the USA, it was the capitalists who decided who had the right
to live. Europeans who have always had a government health service,
tongue in cheek told the US, �welcome to the 20st century,� because
even after this �reform� there is not a universal system of healthcare
coverage.
What is health in the US?
In any society, one cannot separate mental, physical, spiritual,
and emotional health. And by this criterion, the US is an unhealthy
society. Racism has besmirched the society so that there is the
stress and strain of living under racist laws and policies. The
health care system was one where mega profits were made by the big
companies in the health business. In a very inefficient system where
health care spending� was at approximately 15.2% of GDP, there was
59 per cent of the population covered by private capitalists�(through
employers) while 26 per cent� was covered through the government
�medicare� system.� Upwards of 15 per cent, approximately 45-50
million persons were without health care.� The health care providers
were making so much money that this branch of accumulation created
a severe crisis for other capitalists. Hence, as a desperate measure
to save the section of the capitalist class squeezed by the health
care industry, it was urgent that the government institute a system
to prop up capitalism in general. This is what is called a broken
system by Lawrence Lessig.� In the USA, health is considered a privilege,
not a right and only the privileged should live under this kind
of thinking.
In many� areas of social engagement, the USA is an unhealthy
society. The air is polluted. Sixty percent of Americans live
in areas with unhealthy air pollution levels. Rivers and lakes are
dumping grounds for toxic materials.� The food industry is one which
is organized for the profitability of the industry, thus making
the US a �fast food nation� where processed foods do great damage
to the health of citizens. Most of the favorite food types in the
society �� hamburgers, hot dogs, french fries, cookies, pizza, Soda
(soft drinks), chicken wings, ice cream, doughnuts, and potato chips
��are injurious to the health of the citizens as they are processed
foods that leave citizens with symptoms like weight gain, fatigue,
headaches, aches and joint pains, and so much more. Unhealthy foods
was always a problem, but has been accentuated by the era of genetically
modified foods and genetically modified seeds.
Yet, unhealthy food is good for profits in so far as the
more unhealthy the people, the better for the pharmaceutical companies.
The health of the citizens is further being compromised by
the wide spread chemicalization of the society. Pesticides, petrochemicals,
and the use of fossil fuel have been so wide spread that the society
is polluted to the point of cancer epidemic. When one adds the leading
causes of death � hypertension-stress, cardiovascular disease, HIV/AIDS,
diabetes, cancer, high blood pressure� it can be seen that what
is needed in the US is not health care reform per se, but a complete
change in the mode of economic organization so that everyone has
a right to health and decent life. In essence, the health care reform
debate reopens an old question in the US: who has a right to life?
Health Disparities
The economic and social consequences of this system were
so outrageous that there was a clamor in the society for complete
change. Big capitalists in the automobile industries (such as General
Motors) were calling for a change in the system because they complained
that their competitors in Europe and Japan had government subsidized
health care. Small businesses in the society called for health care
reform because so much of their profits were taken up by the cost
of providing health care for the workers.� Doctors and health care
providers were conscious of the waste of the system that spent the
most in the world but was 37th. The trade union movement was one
of the big lobbies for health care reform because the working peoples
wanted change in the delivery of health. Senior citizens were lobbying
through their organization the American Association of Retired Persons
(AARP), and breast cancer survivors and women who termed health
a gender question were clamoring for investment in care. These women
argued that just being a woman was a pre-existing condition. In
essence, the section of the society that wanted health care was
the vast majority of the 80 per cent of the population that suffered
from the cancerous society.
Yet, the three percent of the mega capitalists could dominate
the US legislative chambers to the point that even before the health
care bill was written the Obama administration had acquiesced to
the wishes of the pharmaceuticals. As one writer summed up the process
of getting out this legislation, the Obama�team bought off Pharma
(with the promise not to use market forces to force market prices
for prescription drugs), and the insurance industry (with the promise
that they would face no new competition from a public option). So�
by the end, the administration succeeded in, according to Lawrence
Lessing, "bribing and accommodating them to such an extreme
degree that they ended up affirmatively supporting a bill that lavishes
them with massive benefits."
This is how conservative the society has become so that even
in the face of this major compromise, the liberal language of health
disparities and health care reform cannot fully explain to the people
what was so good about this health care reform bill.
Despite the fact that conservatives have railed against this
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, one can see from
studying the fine points of this bill that it is not a system of
universal health care. It is a system to prop up the capitalist
in the health industry because even with these �reforms� 18 million
will still be left out of this health care system. These are the
citizens who do not have the right to live.
Hierarchies of Humans
The US society was founded on a system of hierarchy where
the First Nation people did not have a right to life. The first
European settlers in the US killed millions of the indigenous peoples.
Their livelihoods were destroyed, and up till this day, they dump
hazardous materials in the lands and rivers of these first nation
peoples
At the dawn of the Republic of the USA, the only enslaved
Africans that were perceived healthy were those who submitted themselves
to slavery. Any enslaved African who opposed slavery was diagnosed
with an illness � drapetomania. And for the slave masters
the cure for this illness was whipping the enslaved Africans. This
episode in the medical history of the US has been documented in
the book, Medical
Apartheid: The Dark History of Medical Experimentation on Black
Americans from Colonial Times to the Present
. In this book, the author, Harriet Washington, traced the
history of the experimentation on the bodies of enslaved black men
and women. Gruesome tales of mutilation, forced sterilization, violation,
and terror is to be found in the history of medicine in the US.
In fact, when the US was prosecuting the Nazis in the Nurenberg
trials for forced sterilization, the US government was carrying
out the same sterilization on black people.
The story of the development of one branch of medicine �
gynecology and obstetrics � owes so much to the experimentation
on the bodies of enslaved black women. The story of Dr. Marion Sims,
the father of US gynecology is getting more well known. This was
a man who took enslaved black women and carried out experiments
on them without anesthesia. After the period of enslavement, there
was the era of the well known Tuskegee Syphilis experiment when
the US Department of Health experimented on a group of black men
for forty years to see the impacts of Syphilis on black people.
This same medical experimentation continues today with illegal experimental
AIDS trial that has been going on in Africa. In the book, The
Constant Gardener, John Le Carre presents a fictional
account on the role of pharmaceutical companies in experimentation
on black bodies. When interviewed, Le Carre said that the real horror
of the experimentation and testing on Africans at home and abroad
is more horrendous than described in the book. It is the same medical
infrastructure that worked to support the patent laws to deny medicines
to people who were dying of HIV/AIDS.
Pressures needed from grassroots organizing
African brothers and sisters still remember the pressures
of the US government against the South African government when the
people demanded retroviral drugs for the millions dying of AIDS.
As in the USA, so was it in South Africa, the health of the profits
of the pharmaceutical companies was far more important than the
health of human beings. It required an intercontinental grassroots
movement linking the Treatment Action Campaign (TAC) in South Africa
to the Aids Coalition to unleash power (ACTUP) to shame the Clinton
administration which was� defending the big pharmaceutical companies
on the grounds of defending Trade Related Intellectual property
rights (TRIPS). African people at home and abroad joined with other
forces in the Third World to oppose the stipulations of the World
Trade Organization to defend the big companies and bioengineering
MNCs like Du Pont, Novartis, Monsanto, Pfizer, Eli Lilly and Dow
Chemical. The battle of Seattle of 1999 was a battle over the future
of health.
Samir Amin has written in his book, The
Liberal Virus: Permanent War and the Americanization of the World,
that under the thinking of these big companies, the planet can dispense
with the lives of over 2 billion people. In short, only one section
of humanity should have the right to live. The tremendous growth
in capacities of the �scientific establishment� to isolate and recombine
genes of plants, animals and humans and �Play God�, is being accompanied
by a "new supporting sociology", a "eugenics civilization"
and a "new cosmological narrative." One can find out about
the power of these The
Biotech Century
big companies in the book, . The essence of these sweeping economic
and social forces is a new outlook towards humans, a commodification
where "the working unit is no longer the organism, but rather
the gene" (p.14) and respect and dignity shift from the individual
to strands of manipulable chromosomal information. "Cell by
cell, tissue by tissue, organ by organ, we may willingly surrender
our personhood in the marketplace" (p.173). Ergo, when politicians,
scientists and corporate leaders in the developed world sing paeans
to the marvels of the biotech century, "they are being disingenuous
in their public pronouncements." (p.36) Jeremy Rifkin�s path-breaking
book, although purporting to present data and leave to the reader
the choice of deciding which side one is on, is effectively an expos�
of the falsity and inequity of most marvels prophesied by the promoters
of unrestricted bioengineering. Rich people can spend millions on
cosmetic surgeries and investing in their beauty while the poor
die of hunger, environmental racism and exploitation.
The
health care reform package of Barack Obama will not help the poor
and a large section of US citizens. From the foregoing, it can be seen
that health question isn�t simply one of access to care but more
fundamentally as to who has right to live in the society. Universal
health care will only come from bottom up organizing in the society.
It cannot come from on top.� When the health care bill was passed
in the US, European newspapers commented that the US was now entering
the 20th century. That is because the debate about who should have
health care dates back to the 19th and 20th century. The USA has
not entered the 21st century when it comes to valuing the lives
of human beings. It was in the face of the widespread opposition
from the right that progressives such as Congressman Dennis Kucinich
-supported the reform looking for a new day when the reform battle
will be extended. The health care reform bill must be seen by progressives
as the start of the fight for universal health care.
Click
here
to read any of the articles in this special BC series on Single-Payer
Healthcare.
BlackCommentator.com
Guest Commentator, Dr. Horace Campbell, PhD, is Professor of African
American Studies and Political Science at Syracuse University in
Syracuse New York. His book, Rasta
and Resistance
From Marcus Garvey to Walter Rodney is going through its fifth
edition. He had contributed to many other edited books, most recently,
"From Regional Military de-stabilization to Military Cooperation
and Peace in South Africa" in Peace
and Security in Southern Africa (State and Democracy Series),
edited by Ibbo Mandaza. He has published numerous articles in scholarly
journals and is currently writing a book on the Wars against the
Angolan peoples. Click
here to contact Dr. Campbell. |