The 
              Crenshaw/Expo Line light rail project, part of Metropolitan Transit 
              Authority's (MTA) long awaited railway to the LAX Airport, finally 
              "turned dirt" this week, nearly twenty five years after 
              it was first proposed. Rail transit has been a kicker for economic 
              development throughout the region. It will be the largest economic 
              development project in the history of South Los Angeles, at $1.7 
              billion dollars and will create 7,800 jobs in one of the most economically 
              depressed areas of the city.  
            This 
              "on again, off again" segment of the MTA 30 year transit 
              expansion strategy was "off the (priority) board" as recently 
              as two years ago. Los Angeles County Supervisor, Mark Ridley-Thomas, 
              made it a priority upon his election in November, 2008, and within 
              his first year of office (and back on the MTA board) got the Crenshaw/Expo 
              line "upgraded" from a bus line to a rail line last December. 
              So, exploratory soil drilling started this week to ascertain exactly 
              how to environmentally plan the line, plan the stops and create 
              the greatest economic impact for the community.� It might also be 
              a good idea to begin the station stops and grade separation discussion, 
              if the desire is to maximize economic development capacity 
              in a historically underserved community. 
             Just 
              as controversial as having light rail in depressed urban communities, 
              is building "at grade" rail transit which causes great 
              traffic separation, immovable barriers and dangerous crossings. 
              Living "across the tracks" has a cultural and historical 
              meaning to black communities. Railroad tracks running through the 
              community represented "separation barriers" based on race 
              and economics. Crossing the tracks meant a change in demography 
              that was immediately noticeable in home quality, commercial access 
              and the presence of brown fields. Retail diversity tended to take 
              a drop, depending on where Blacks lived.  
            The 
              new rail dilemmas are always about cost, as it always seems that 
              environmental and public safety issues that affect other people 
              seem to be ignored in poor and minority communities.� At grade 
              simply means ground level. Subterranean grade (below ground) 
              and above grade (above ground) are more expensive but has a greater 
              economic impact on a community due to the fact that the structural 
              barriers for the rail line doesn't impact commercial retail development. 
              Commerce tends to shy away from communities where at grade rail 
              lines exist because the traffic access is lower due to the inability 
              to cross the tracks. Furthermore, issues of crossing rails and endangering 
              pedestrians are mitigated because the tracks are out of the way 
              of pedestrians.  
              
            The 
              big fight in the other light rail that touches the tip of the black 
              community (the Expo line to the sea) was that at grade rails were 
              built where above grade rails were merited. Even as the design of 
              the Expo line is being challenged in the courts, the construction 
              of the line continues to be at grade level. The primary consideration 
              for urban rail lines has always been cost, not safety. The Expo 
              Line is a prime example of this as the rail line passed a middle 
              school and a high school. The politics of light rail development 
              seems to change, depending on what side of town you live on. Supervisor 
              Ridley-Thomas is looking to change all that. He is on record demanding 
              that the entire Crenshaw Line be built above grade so not to doom 
              the future economic development prospect of the Crenshaw community. 
              It's a great call and one that doesn't have the community chasing 
              the horse after its out of the barn (like on the Expo line). 
              
            The 
              next issue always plaguing urban rail development is whether "to 
              stop" or "not to stop." Where railway bypasses the 
              community, again is where economic opportunity bypasses the community. 
              If people don't get off the train, commerce gets no customers and 
              jobs don't come to the area. Mass transit is a job stimulus and 
              rail transit stops are key traffic stimulants. The Crenshaw/LAX 
              has been developed without a stop in the Leimert Park, a cultural 
              enclave that needs the traffic flow. Due to actually break ground 
              in 2012 or 2014, the Crenshaw community is determined to change 
              the design of the light rail line to include a Crenshaw/Leimart 
              stop. The stop is the discussion taking place now that the 
              Creshaw line has been the green lighted. 
            Both 
              where the Crenshaw Line runs and where the Crenshaw Line stops should, 
              and will, be at the center of community focus. The community made 
              sure it got done. Now we all have to make sure it gets done right. 
            BlackCommentator.com 
              Columnist, 
              Dr. Anthony Asadullah Samad, is a national columnist, managing director 
              of the 
              Urban Issues Forum 
              and author of 
              Saving The Race: Empowerment Through Wisdom. His Website is 
              AnthonySamad.com. Click here 
              to contact Dr. Samad.  |