The
Supreme Court, in their recent decision in Citizens United v.
Federal Election Commission, may have complicated
the growth of black elected officials by their 5-4 conservative
majority giving corporations carte blanche authority to directly
spend money in elections.�� By deciding that corporations have First
Amendment rights to spend money in elections to voice their preferences,
they have been given the right of �persons� in constitutional law.��
In effect, they now have the same rights to influence elections
as individuals, when the differences in power, status and capability
is obvious.
I
remember Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. fighting for the Voting Rights
Act by saying, �give us the ballot and we will fill our legislative
halls with men of good will � ��� We have done well since that statement
was made; then there were only five black members of Congress and
now there are 43 with similar growth in black elected officials
occurring at every level to the point that there are now more than
9,000.
This
decision enables the enormous wealth of the capitalist system to
enhance its ability to determine winners and losers in American
elections, and since data from the 2008 elections indicated that
corporations gave twice as much money to Republicans than Democrats,
it tilts the playing field strongly in their direction.
Blacks
who campaign for office have traditionally had far less funding
than their white counter-parts which is why many opposed the McCain-Feingold
campaign finance law that placed limits on soft money.� Black elected
officials were disproportionately recipients of soft money in their
campaigns, and studies show that within the black community they
could raise enough money to run campaigns successfully.��
The
Supreme Court decision however, not only destroys McCain/Feingold
by inviting even more money into campaigns, it also places blacks,
especially those who would run in �white districts,� in a highly
competitive bind.�� It is still very difficult for blacks to run
in such districts and win, and they are placed at a huge disadvantage
because money generally goes to white candidates in those districts.��
This means that although blacks have run successfully in many white
majority districts, representing 40% of the Congressional Black
Caucus, it will be more difficult to expand the number of elected
officials beyond what now exists.
Most
importantly, a significant portion of the black community needs
the social and economic product of legislative action at every level,
but with more candidates being elected with corporate funds, it
could skew the democratic process within legislative bodies toward
the interests of the upper class.� This point is vividly seen in
the current fight over health care, as a substantial number of members
of Congress, funded by corporations, oppose restrictions on insurance
companies and the expansion of care to thirty million people.��
Someone said it right, the impact of the United Citizens decision
is that rather than having Senators and Representatives serving
the interests of their constituents in states, more of them will
essentially be owned by corporations.�
Laws
limiting the participation of corporations in elections have been
around for nearly one hundred years, so this decision of the conservative
wing of the Court is a monumental disrespect for precedent.� In
that connection, Senate Democrats were suckered into supporting
Chief Justice John Roberts, largely on the strength of his promise
to respect judicial precedents.� In the last decade,� Conservative
justices have thrown precedent aside in rolling back rights that
supported broad democratic participation in society and favoring
dominant, racial, political and economic interests.
This
decision of the High Court, together with the actions of Republican
conservatives in the Congress, illustrates how determined and single-minded
progressives must be to defeat them.� The ball limiting money in
American elections has been tossed back to the White House and the
Congress, let�s see how much Democracy they really want.
BlackCommentator.com Editorial Board member, Dr. Ron Walters, is the Distinguished
Leadership Scholar, Director of the African American Leadership
Center and Professor of Government and Politics at the University
of Maryland College Park. His latest book is: The Price of Racial Reconciliation (The Politics of Race and Ethnicity) (University of Michigan Press). Click here to contact Dr. Walters. |