Please
remember my sisters this month!
Why?
December 1 is World AIDS Day
and Black women are dying of AIDS. And is anyone doing anything
about it?
Right here in the nation�s capitol,
the HIV/AIDS epidemic rivals that of many Third World countries. Washington D.C.
affectionately dubbed as �Chocolate City� is approximately 60 percent of people of African descent. And
of it�s residents one in 20 is thought to have HIV, and 1 in 50
of its residents to have AIDS. Of the 3,269 HIV cases identified
between 2001 and 2006 that tested positive, nine of 10 were African
American.
Are these statistics overwhelming?
�The
Washington data is really a microcosm of what we already know: that
AIDS in America today is a black disease,� said Phil Wilson, founder
of the Black AIDS Institute, an HIV/AIDS think tank that focuses
exclusively on AIDS among black Americans.
According to the U.S. Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention, African Americans account for
half of all new HIV cases despite comprising 13 percent of the U.S. population. Equally alarming
is that HIV/AIDS is the leading cause of death for African American
women between the ages of 25 and 44.
At the �Women and Response to
AIDS� panel at the at the 16th International AIDS Conference in
Toronto in 2006, Sheila Johnson, founder of the Crump-Johnson Foundation
in Washington D.C., pointed out that another at-risk population
in the African American community is teenage girls.
Seventeen percent of the U.S.
teen population is African American. In 2004, 70 percent of all
teens testing HIV-positive were black. One in 10 African American
teenage girls test HIV-positive in the nation�s capital, the highest
percentage in the country among this age group.
When asked why such a high percentage
test positive, Johnson said, �As long as girls see themselves as
glorified sex objects in hip-hop videos, HIV/AIDS will increase
within this population.�
Are these statistics overwhelming?!
But so too is the failure of
leadership African Americans have faced since the epidemic began.
And no group of women is as
affected by the failure of leadership in this country than women
of African descent.
African American women and their
struggle against the AIDS epidemic was never so glaringly obvious
than in the 2004 vice presidential debate between Dick Cheney and
John Edwards.
And
the invisibility of my group�s plight has less to do with African-American
women�s agency to combat the epidemic than with how the government,
African-American men, the Black
Church, and race and gender biases inherent in the problem collude
with African-American women�s efforts to get help.
Gwen Ifill, an African-American
female journalist with PBS� �Washington Week� and moderator of the
vice presidential debate, brought the issue of AIDS in the U.S. front and center when
she asked the men to comment on its devastating impact on African-American
women.
�I want to talk to you about
AIDS, and not about AIDS in China
or Africa, but AIDS right here in this country,
where black women between the ages of 25 and 44 are 13 times more
likely to die of the disease than their counterparts. What should
the government�s role be in helping to end the growth of this epidemic?�
Ifill asked.
Vice President Cheney responded
to Ifill�s question by saying, �Here in the United States, we�ve made
significant progress. I have not heard those numbers with respect
to African-American women. I was not aware that it was - that they�re
in epidemic there.�
But Edwards� response wasn�t
any better. Edwards deflected the question by first going back to
answering the previous question. Then with the remaining seconds
left, he flubbed his way through.
However, three years later,
in the June 2007 Democratic Primary Debate at Howard University
that focused on African American issues ranging from health care
and housing to Katrina relief, the economy and the environment,
Black women stood on their feet as they applauded Sen. Hillary Clinton�s
comment about the impact of HIV/AIDS on African American women.
�Let
me just put this in perspective: If HIV-AIDS were the leading cause
of death of white women between the ages of 25 and 34 there would
be an outraged outcry in this country.�
When the color of the epidemic
shifted from white to black, the inherent gender bias focused only
on the needs of African-American men and rendered women invisible.
And when gender became a new lens to track the epidemic, white women
were the focus. The invisibility of African-American women in this
epidemic has much to do with how the absence of a gendered race
analysis makes African-American women invisible to the larger society.
What is also unnerving is that
today African American women make up 60 percent of all AIDS cases
reported among women, 64 percent of new AIDS cases among women,
and are three times the number of new cases reported among white
women.
Many African-American women
with HIV contracted it from heterosexual sex. And two ways that
the virus is contracted heterosexually is through intravenous drug
use and African-American men �on the down low.� But men living on
the DL is not a new phenomenon in the African-American community.
Naming it, however, is. And it was J.L. King who became the country�s
poster boy by exposing the behavior in his best-seller, On
the Down Low: A Journey into the Lives of 'Straight' Black Men Who
Sleep with Men.
�There are many women, too many
women, in relationships with men who they think they know but really
don�t. He knew he had the disease, his mother knew he had the disease,
his doctors knew, everyone seemed to know except me. And no one
said a word,� LaJoyce Brookshire wrote in the foreword of Browder�s
book, herself author of Faith
Under Fire: Betrayed by a Thing Called Love.
While homophobic attitudes in
the larger African-American community and church contribute to their
behavior, African-American men are also not taking responsibility
for how their behavior is killing African-American women, and putting
the entire community at risk.
But the disparities within the
healthcare system also contribute to the disproportionately higher
number of HIV cases among African-American women, which directly
affects their quality of life and the spread of HIV.
While health disparities in
the black community are overwhelming, so too is the failure of leadership
African Americans have faced since the epidemic began.
But Phil Wilson states it plainly:
�I think it�s important for
us to take just a moment to realize that we are where we are today
because we weren�t concerned when we thought it was somebody else�s
disease,�
However, the disease has also
taught us about the various faces - across race, class and gender
- who wore and continue to wear the face of this disease.
When The New York Native,
a now-defunct gay newspaper, in its May 18, 1981, issue first reported
on a virus found in gay men then known as GRID (Gay-Related Immune
Deficiency), an editorial noted that �even if the disease first
became apparent in gay men, it is not just �a gay disease.�� And
HIV/AIDS, having neither an alliance to nor an affinity for queer
sexualities, spread.
But where would the leadership
on HIV/AIDS come from?
But
let�s confront the elephant in the black community, by telling the
truth and shaming the devil. The biggest problem that black lawmakers
have had to confront concerning the HIV/AIDS crisis in their communities
is the political gag order imposed on them by their voting constituency�s
homophobia and animus toward any discussion of the disease. Would
the leadership on HIV/AIDS come from the black church?
When it comes to the black church
and HIV/AIDS, I am always reminded of what my mayor in Cambridge, Mass., Ken Reeves,
who is both African American and gay, told The Washington Blade
in March, 1998, during a two-day Harvard University HIV/AIDS conference:
�African American male ministers over 40 are a tough nut to crack.
If we wait for the black church on this, we�ll all be dead.�
The Black Church continues
to play a part in the death of African Americans with AIDS. While
its silence on the issue is appalling and unconscionable, so too
is its various forms of heterosexualized rituals and pronouncements,
that denigrate both LGBT people and women. A study by the Pew Forum
on Religion and Public Life showed that since 2000, African-American
Protestants are less likely than other Protestant groups to believe
that LGBT people should have equal rights. And since hot-button
issues like gay adoption and marriage equality have become more
prominent, support for LGBT rights among African-American Protestants
has dipped as low as 40 percent.
Therefore, women with AIDS are
as unwelcome in the Black Church as LGBT people. Within Black
Nationalist milieus like the Black Church and the Nation of Islam espousing
save the endangered black family, African-American women with AIDS
are also viewed as race traitors. In this patriarchal straightjacket,
biological essentialist views are as holy and deified as the Bible
itself. And with the belief that women are to multiply and bring
forth new life for the perpetuation of the race, women with AIDS
lose their status in the community. Often labeled as �loose� for
having contracted the virus, she is viewed as not only as diseased
but also dangerous because her sexual wiles continue to seduce men.
A
woman with AIDS is a fallen woman, not only for having contracted
the disease, but also for having disregarded the policing of sexual
behavior by the Black
Church.
The feminization of this disease
makes many of us AIDS activists and scholars wonder if the same
amount of money, concern, communication, and moral outrage that
was put into white gay men with the disease will be put into curbing
its spread among black women.
The AIDS epidemic among African-American
women is also symptomatic of the dialogue we need to have about
our bodies and sexuality, which has been choked for centuries by
a �politic of silence.�
Working in conjunction with
the �Politic of silence� is what African-American women historically
created as a �culture of dissemblance� and �the politic of respectability,�
the silence African-American women created around their bodies and
sexuality that had been exploited during slavery was viewed as a
revolutionary act against the white oppressive gaze.
African-American women are no
more promiscuous than white women, however, stereotypes about African-American
women�s bodies and sexualitities prevent the proper prevention and
education needed to stem the tide of HIV/AIDS.
The
iconography of black women is predicated on four racist cultural
images: the Jezebel, the Sapphire, Aunt Jemima, and Mammy. With
the image of the strong black women who can endure anything and
�make a way out of no way,� her strength is either demonized as
being emasculating of black men or impervious to the human condition.
The Aunt Jemima and Mammy stereotypes are now conflated into what�s
called �Big Mamma� in today�s present iconography of racist and
sexist images of African-American women.
While the Aunt Jemima and Mammy
stereotypes are prevalent images that derive from slavery, for centuries
both of them have not only been threatening, comforting and nurturing
to white culture but also to African-American men. The dominant
culture doesn�t see and hear African-American voices on this issue
because our humanity is distorted and made invisible through a prism
of racist and sexist stereotypes. So, too, is our suffering.
BlackCommentator.com
Editorial Board member, the Rev. Irene Monroe, is a religion columnist,
theologian, and public speaker. A native of Brooklyn, Rev. Monroe
is a graduate from Wellesley College and Union Theological Seminary
at Columbia University, and served as a pastor at an African-American
church before coming to Harvard Divinity School for her doctorate
as a Ford Fellow. She was recently named to MSNBC�s list of 10 Black Women You Should Know. Reverend Monroe is
the author of Let Your Light Shine Like a Rainbow Always: Meditations on Bible
Prayers for Not-So-Everyday Moments .
As an African American feminist theologian, she speaks for a sector
of society that is frequently invisible. Her website is irenemonroe.com.
Click here
to contact the Rev. Monroe. |