Two days after this
disturbing report, US Undersecretary of State Roger Noriega
spoke to the American Enterprise Institute where he said, "Haitians
deserve democracy – and a government that looks out for their
interests…. The Bush Administration believes that if we all
do our part and do it right, Haiti will have the democracy
it deserves." Currently, everyone seems to be playing
their part extremely well.
This
is only the beginning of the road to democracy that Haiti "deserves."
Some of the real motivation
behind the recent US-led overthrow of President Aristide is emerging
as US policymakers and their corporate henchmen hatch plans
to put Haiti in the fiscal vice grip of neoliberalism. According
to Noriega, these plans would fall under the third of the "Principles
of US Engagement in Haiti," which will see the US government
encouraging "the Government of Haiti to move forward,
at the appropriate time, with restructuring and privatization
of some public sector enterprises."
If anyone had doubts
about whether or not Aristide was cow-towing enough to the
United States and its imposition of neoliberal stratagem, one
need only look at how quickly the interim government, in lockstep
with the US and elements of the Haitian Diaspora, are looking
to fast-track this neoliberal stranglehold on the country now
that he's gone. Clearly, Aristide was seen as some sort
of barrier to US-style neoliberalism, which cannot tolerate
any barriers to its advances.
The US stratagem appears
to be taking shape around the proposed Hero Act legislation,
introduced into the Senate in February of 2003 by Mike Dewine
(R-OH), and co-sponsored in
the House by prominent Congressional Black Caucus members.
While the CBC are demanding an investigation into Aristide's
departure, they have yet to issue a statement concerning the
new status of the Hero Act. The impression conveyed by one
CBC staffer was that the Hero Act, as it is now being trumpeted,
has taken on a completely different character.
During his recent
trip to Haiti, Colin Powell plugged the
Hero Act in an interview with elite-owned Radio Metropole: "We
have the Hero Act before Congress now...We would like to see
the Act passed and I will be examining and discussing it this
week with our Congress."
This
same day interim Prime Minister Gerard Latortue and Powell
met, and in their
post-meeting debriefing with the press, the Hero Act was again
mentioned, this time by Latortue: "What we talked about
in defense of the private sector's interests is the Hero Act.
The Hero Act is something we are discussing that favors, in
fact, some of the activities of the private sector."
The
Haitian-American Investment Bank – PromoCapital – has recently
been circulating propaganda,
foregrounding a recent letter of Sen. Dewine's, that calls
on his "colleagues" for support of the Hero Act.
In this letter, Dewine refers to the provisions in the Hero
Act as "the same as those provided to the least developed
countries in Africa through the African Growth and Opportunity
Act [AGOA]." The emphasis of the Act, in Dewine's words,
is on "trade incentives," "foreign direct investment" and "economic
development," which will culminate in "spill over
effects for the rest of Haiti's population." We should
briefly look to AGOA for indications as to the impact that
similar legislation might have on Haiti.
"The main effect
of AGOA," as reported by Patrick Bond in Zmag in
2001, "is to link aid to economic reform, by which is
meant the dismantling of state regulatory environment. There
are no benefits, and the costs include clear manifestations
of deepening structural adjustment and deregulation." Indeed,
many consider AGOA to be an 'African NAFTA.'” Widespread opposition
to AGOA exists "because it is a capitalist policy whose
aim is to undermine political sovereignty and economic choices
of African states by imposing privatization, trade liberalization
and other anti-working class policies."
The
AGOA was seen as combining "the worst terms of both NAFTA and harsh
IMF structural adjustment programs" while benefiting primarily "huge
US corporations." Last year, Bill Fletcher of the Transafrica
forum assessed AGOA's impact: "AGOA
has been a real mixed bag, but overall it's a sham...Exports
continue to be largely oil...AGOA doesn't carry with it human,
environmental and labor rights to protect people in areas where
production is supposed to be taking place." Quite simply,
according to Fletcher, "The notion that AGOA has actually
benefited African countries is a gross misrepresentation."
The
AGOA makes stipulations that allow for effective US unilateral
control over the conditions
that are to be met by African countries. Of course, a different
level of control will exist in the case of Haiti, as the Bush
Administration is spearheading Haiti's "reconstruction" – a
familiar and loaded term that followers of US foreign and trade
policy are well aware of. Noriega has already stated that the
US will be facilitating the updating of Haiti's Commercial
Code "in order to create the right environment for growth
and wealth creation." At the top of their latest circulation,
PromoCapital pledges allegiance to the US State Department
by quoting Roger Noriega's AEI speech. A closer look at the "Haitian
Diaspora" to which Noriega refers seems in order.
Judging by some of
the names on the list of PromoCapital shareholders and founders,
this legislation has been 13 years in the making. At least
nine of the seventy people named as PromoCapital shareholders
and founders were known or suspected financial backers of the
1991 military coup, which overthrew President Aristide and
proceeded to slaughter well over 3,000 people. These people
had their assets blocked by
the US Department of Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control
under the Clinton Administration, until 1994.
The
Haitian military and FRAPH murderers were supported by some
of these same people,
and recent developments make it appear logical that they have
once again supported a coup, with the intent to derail democracy
once again in Haiti. This time around, the coup had to be planned
differently so as to give these coup-backers turned "bankers" free
reign to further pillage the country economically while terrorizing
those who dare to explore their democratic political consciousness.
The triumvirate of Haiti's elite, the illegitimate Latortue
regime, and the Bush Administration (in addition to the equally
reprehensible roles played by France and Canada) could
not have developed without a unified denial of the coup, along
with a denial of human rights abuses and political persecution.
Besides the coup-backers,
there are many other notable
persons on the PromoCapital list, such as Axan Abellard,
a resident of Florida who was on the short list for Prime Minister
in early March with eventual PM Gerard Latortue. Or Hans Tippenhauer,
one of the most outspoken of the Group of 184 "leaders" during
the build-up to the coup. Tippenhauer publicly referred to
the "rebels" that were terrorizing Northern Haiti
as "freedom fighters" long before Gerard Latortue
similarly praised them on March
20, 2004. Also on the list are several powerful individuals
who control a great deal of Haitian wealth, such as Dumas Simeus,
Danielle Jean-Pierre, Albert Levy, Henri Deschamps, and many
others.
Deschamps,
for example, has his hands in much of the media in Haiti,
and has connections
to USAID. Simeus is the Chairman of PromoCapital and runs the
largest Haitian-American-owned business in Texas. Overall,
the web of corporate connections that make up much of the PromoCapital
shareholders and founders list, is extensive. I expect that
further investigation will yield some considerable insight
into the "modus operandi" of the planning and execution
of the recent coup.
Before
February 29th, the US did not publicly state its allegiance
to the "democratic
opposition" in Haiti. The mainstream press never explored
the relationship between the US lending institutions and "civil
society," even though multiple lending institutions are
either known or alleged to have had financial connections to
the opposition. USAID in particular has already stated its
support for PromoCapital's "Haiti Reconstruction Fund," and
are clear that "The departure of President Aristide presents
us now with an opportunity to rebuild and move forward." This
position, in addition to the Latortue Regime's having recently
received the full endorsement of the Bush Regime, has evolved
in the short span of six weeks, since the "resignation
and willing departure" of President Aristide.
At this point, any
notion of the Haitian people having the opportunity to decide
for themselves how to proceed with and determine their own
future, is being shoved down the memory hole by powerful interests
with the strength of steadfast denial. The Hero Act, vigorously
pursued by Haitian elite and the Bush and Boca Raton Regimes,
will likely be in place before the Haitian people even get
to cast their next vote. Herein lies the crux of Plan Haiti:
polarize or eliminate the existing democratic political opposition,
while militarizing the country (with impunity) to prevent popular
uprisings from emerging.
Any
elections will be far from legitimate and will not, as Powell
stated, "put
the country back on a constitutional footing." Latortue
discussed with Powell the ground rules of the future "democratic
process," which were agreed to by "the political
parties [excluding Lavalas, and] the civil society groups...We
have also agreed that no one in this government or in the former
government will participate in the administration as long as
they have not renounced the use of guns and corruption." Latortue
neglects to explain how "former officials" will be
able to voice such a renunciation, given that they are largely
in hiding from lynch squads who are doing the dirty work of
Latortue and the Boca Raton Regime, paving the way toward "a
new beginning" and "a future of hope for the Haitian
people."
As
other details are emerging regarding the US's role in training
and funding the
Haitian "rebels" in the Dominican Republic, and a
rumored US military occupation of Haiti's strategic Mole St.
Nicolas (situated on the Windward Passage, facing Cuba), one
has to wonder at what point any of this will be made public
knowledge. (See “US accused of training Haitian rebels in Dominican
Republic.”) As of this writing, Haitian citizens are bearing
the most painful and violent consequences of (yet another)
US destabilization campaign. They are being targeted for persecution
due to their pursuit of democracy and freedom, and for their
desire to fulfill their human right to self-determination.
The United States understands history and knows how to make
sure it repeats itself in Latin America and the Caribbean.
If US policies proceed unabated, the chances are good that
never again will Haiti's poorest be invited to the table of
democracy, for no such table can exist while people are force-fed
harmful neoliberal programs while staring down the barrel of
a gun.
Anthony
Fenton is an independent journalist/political activist from
Vancouver, B.C. Recently, he accompanied the Quixote Centre
Emergency Observation Delegation to Haiti.