George
W. Bush and the Republican Party love embryos and fetuses,
but their concern for children who have already been born
is less apparent. The “unborn” are so loved by the right wing
that the President signed the Unborn Victims of Violence
Act (UVVA),
a federal law that increases penalties for assaults or injuries
to pregnant women in the commission of federal offenses. The
President even invited the family of pregnant murder victim
Laci Peterson to the bill signing. The bill is also known as
the Laci and Connor Law. The President left no stone unturned
in resorting to heavy handed sentiment to disguise the true
intent of the legislation. The
UVVA makes “the unborn” persons with rights. Needless to say,
supporters of the legislation would like to see Roe v. Wade
overturned and with it the right to safe, legal abortions.
These same people are opposed to any measure that the government
can use to assist poor children and their families. The Senate
deadlocked on the reauthorization of the Welfare
Reform Act when Democrats and Republicans could not agree
on issues such as the number of hours worked by welfare recipients,
money for childcare, increasing the minimum wage and the elimination
of overtime for white collar workers.
Living,
breathing children don’t need to have parents with decent incomes
or money for childcare. For that matter they don’t even need
to be with their parents. Under the guise of protecting abused
children, House Majority Leader Tom
DeLay wants to make it easier to send foster children away
from their home states.
Many
children in foster care have been abandoned or abused, but
others have been taken from their homes because their parents
spank them or because there is domestic violence in the home.
A swat on the behind can now send a child into the foster care
system, especially when the parents are not white. If DeLay
gets his wish women will be forced to give birth to children
whether they want to or not, and will then have them taken
away to another state. There has not been such a horrendous
proposal since Newt Gingrich proposed a return to orphanages.
The
President’s No Child Left Behind educational act is opposed
by states and localities across the nation because it provides
no funding for its ill-conceived provisions. It sounds good
to allow children to transfer out of poorly performing school
districts but if there are no slots in the better districts
the point is moot and the bill is an expensive waste of time.
There is even a little known provision, section 9528, which
requires school districts to give the military access to students
names and addresses for recruiting purposes.
Perhaps the Republicans do care about children. They have to
save them for warfare later in life.
Politicians
always claim to love children. Baby kissing is the norm across
the political spectrum. The President’s favorite photo-ops
take place in classrooms and the more brown faces the better.
The reality of his concern for children is quite different.
Tax cuts that favor the wealthiest take money from the most vulnerable
children in American society. America’s high rate of incarceration disproportionately
affects black male children, who have a 1 in 3 chance of going
to jail at some point in their lives.
Bush
was able to pretend he was not a doctrinaire right-winger because
he promised to be the “education president.” Voters were told
about the miracle in Houston, Texas public schools that drastically
lowered drop out rates and raised test scores. Unfortunately
it was all a
lie. Houston had cooked its educational books. High school
drop out rates went unreported and tests were rigged when failing
students were prevented from taking them. The architect of
this fraud, Rod Paige, was rewarded with an appointment to
a cabinet level position, Secretary of Education. It isn’t
enough that he presided over a hoax but he recently called
members of the National Education Association “terrorists.” We
all know what happens to anyone charged with being a terrorist.
They end up in Guantanamo Bay without access to counsel or
even being charged with a crime. Perhaps that will be the next
Republican educational proposal for unruly kids and educators
who tell the truth.
The
right wing love for the fetus but neglect if not hatred for
children is summed up by the attitude of a fisherman with a
disappointing catch. “Throw ‘em back, kill ‘em later.” The
right wing encouragement of child bearing without any concern
for the care or education of children is very sinister and
reminiscent of fascist regimes that honored and rewarded large
families. They also had no regard for life and wanted to snatch
as many young people as possible for use as cannon fodder.
The
Bush administration has gone to more extreme measures to insure
that not only are no children left behind, but that they keep
on coming. They were not content to ban partial birth abortion.
Attorney General John Ashcroft demanded the medical records
of thousands of women who have undergone the procedure, lest
anyone forget themselves and think that they still have civil
liberties. Hospitals and physicians are now being asked to
help big
brother keep women in line and prevent them from exercising
their reproductive rights.
Mr.
Ashcroft is very pious, he and his staff start the work day
with prayer, but he has serious issues with female sexuality.
One of his first acts as Attorney General was to cover a naked
breast on a statute that no one else had complained about or
even noticed was naked. Ashcroft is the last person who should
have any power over the lives of American women.
The
same can be said for the entire Bush administration. They invoke
the name of God in everything they do, including going to war.
They put children first when it comes to reproduction, but
they are always the last ones into the lifeboats.
Margaret
Kimberley’s Freedom Rider column appears weekly in . Ms.
Kimberley is a freelance writer living in New York City. She
can be reached via e-Mail at [email protected]. You can read more
of Ms. Kimberley's writings at http://freedomrider.blogspot.com/ |