George
W. Bush and the Republican Party love embryos and fetuses, but
their concern for children who have already been born is less apparent.
The “unborn” are so loved by the right wing that the President
signed the Unborn Victims of Violence Act (UVVA), a federal
law that increases penalties for assaults or injuries to pregnant
women in the commission of federal offenses. The President even
invited the family of pregnant murder victim Laci Peterson to the
bill signing. The bill is also known as the Laci and Connor Law.
The President left no stone unturned in resorting to heavy handed
sentiment to disguise the true intent of the legislation.
The
UVVA makes “the unborn” persons with rights. Needless to say, supporters
of the legislation would like to see Roe v. Wade overturned and
with it the right to safe, legal abortions. These same people are
opposed to any measure that the government can use to assist poor
children and their families. The Senate deadlocked on the reauthorization
of the Welfare
Reform Act when Democrats and Republicans
could not agree on issues such as the number of hours worked by
welfare recipients, money for childcare, increasing the minimum
wage and the elimination of overtime for white collar workers.
Living,
breathing children don’t need to have parents with decent incomes
or money for childcare. For that matter they don’t even need to
be with their parents. Under the guise of protecting abused children,
House Majority Leader Tom
DeLay wants to make it easier to
send foster children away from their home states.
Many
children in foster care have been abandoned or abused, but others
have been taken from their homes because their parents spank them
or because there is domestic violence in the home. A swat on the
behind can now send a child into the foster care system, especially
when the parents are not white. If DeLay gets his wish women will
be forced to give birth to children whether they want to or not,
and will then have them taken away to another state. There has
not been such a horrendous proposal since Newt Gingrich proposed
a return to orphanages.
The
President’s No Child Left Behind educational act is opposed by
states and localities across the nation because it provides no
funding for its ill-conceived provisions. It sounds good to allow
children to transfer out of poorly performing school districts
but if there are no slots in the better districts the point is
moot and the bill is an expensive waste of time. There is even
a little known provision, section 9528, which requires school districts
to give the military access to students names and addresses for
recruiting purposes. Perhaps the Republicans do care about
children. They have to save them for warfare later in life.
Politicians
always claim to love children. Baby kissing is the norm across
the political spectrum. The President’s favorite photo-ops take
place in classrooms and the more brown faces the better. The reality
of his concern for children is quite different. Tax cuts that favor
the wealthiest take money from the most vulnerable
children in American society. America’s high rate
of incarceration disproportionately
affects black male children, who have a 1 in
3 chance of going to jail at some point in their lives.
Bush
was able to pretend he was not a doctrinaire right-winger because
he promised to be the “education president.” Voters were told about
the miracle in Houston, Texas public schools that drastically lowered
drop out rates and raised test scores. Unfortunately it was all
a
lie. Houston had cooked its educational books. High school
drop out rates went unreported and tests were rigged when failing
students were prevented from taking them. The architect of this
fraud, Rod Paige, was rewarded with an appointment to a cabinet
level position, Secretary of Education. It isn’t enough that he
presided over a hoax but he recently called members of the National
Education Association “terrorists.” We all know what happens
to anyone charged with being a terrorist. They end up in Guantanamo
Bay without access to counsel or even being charged with a crime.
Perhaps that will be the next Republican educational proposal for
unruly kids and educators who tell the truth.
The
right wing love for the fetus but neglect if not hatred for children
is summed up by the attitude of a fisherman with a disappointing
catch. “Throw ‘em back, kill ‘em later.” The right wing encouragement
of child bearing without any concern for the care or education
of children is very sinister and reminiscent of fascist regimes
that honored and rewarded large families. They also had no regard
for life and wanted to snatch as many young people as possible
for use as cannon fodder.
The
Bush administration has gone to more extreme measures to insure
that not only are no children left behind, but that they keep on
coming. They were not content to ban partial birth abortion. Attorney
General John Ashcroft demanded the medical records of thousands
of women who have undergone the procedure, lest anyone forget themselves
and think that they still have civil liberties. Hospitals and physicians
are now being asked to help big
brother keep women in line
and prevent them from exercising their reproductive rights.
Mr.
Ashcroft is very pious, he and his staff start the work day with
prayer, but he has serious issues with female sexuality. One of
his first acts as Attorney General was to cover a naked breast
on a statute that no one else had complained about or even noticed
was naked. Ashcroft is the last person who should have any power
over the lives of American women.
The
same can be said for the entire Bush administration. They invoke
the name of God in everything they do, including going to war.
They put children first when it comes to reproduction, but they
are always the last ones into the lifeboats.
Margaret
Kimberley’s Freedom Rider column appears weekly in . Ms.
Kimberley is a freelance writer living in New York City. She
can be reached via e-Mail at [email protected]. You can read more
of Ms. Kimberley's writings at http://freedomrider.blogspot.com/ |