(Read
Part
2, Part
3)
Introduction
There
was happiness all over the world on Wednesday morning November 5
as the world woke up to the victory of Barack Hussein Obama in the
campaign to become the President of the United States. US citizens,
in the main, rejected neo- conservatisms and neo-liberalism. The
team around Obama had organized the most sophisticated election
campaign in the history of the United States, breaking the old conventional
wisdom about red and blue states and the divisions between black,
brown, first nation and white workers. The political organization
of this ‘machinery of hope’ had tapped into the deep spiritual energies
of people who wanted change. Rituals of hope were translated into
effective tools for inspiring a new generation that had been alienated
by the old politics of manipulation and exclusion. Songs of hope
echoed from across the USA to different parts of the world using
the new media to make this election a referendum on the future of
global humanity. Barack Obama has been called a transformative figure
and a transcendental figure by many commentators but it is important
to grasp the moment that made Obama the person best able to tap
into the turning point away from the old politics of the nineteenth
and twentieth centuries.
Barack
Obama and his team had grasped the need to catch up with the technological
change and the revolutionary potentialities of the moment. Obama’s
election took place in the middle of the push forward to the era
of singularity. This is the era were the convergence of information
technological tools and the human brain will reach a new level.
Unfortunately, many of the scientists working on these new possibilities
have been trained in the era of ‘white nationalism’ and concepts
of the hierarchy of human beings. The convergence of biotechnology,
nanotechnology, information technology and cognitive technology
had opened the possibilities for profound transformations of the
relations between humans and the relations between humans and nature.
Intentional actions by humans to live in harmony in nature and with
each other opened revolutionary possibilities for wealth creation
and for global eradication of exploitation, racism and gender discrimination.
Yet, trapped by the ideas and conventions of liberalism and neo-liberalism,
the Obama transition to the top office in the USA was torn between
the past forms of economic organization and the multiple challenges
of breaking from the old forms of destruction, war and greed.
Messages
of change, hope and peace during the election campaign had resonated
with a population that wanted an end to war, militarism, fear and
economic terrorism. Environmental destruction, waste, toxic dumps
and toxic assets reinforced the cancers of sexism, racism, homophobia
and economic exploitation. These are the elements of counter-revolution
that had been set in motion after the Civil Rights Revolution in
the United States. The election results of 2008 with the landslide
victory of Barack Obama flowed from decades long struggles to democratize
US society. The old was in the process of dying but the new was
seeking desperately to be born. What was missing was the ideological
and political clarity to embrace the moment in a way that would
transform the politics of the United States.
The
urgency of the moment could not await the intellectual and ideological
maturation of the citizens of the United States. Forced by the weight
of fallout from the conservative and neoliberal ideas about market
fundamentalism, the US government nationalized financial institutions
(banks and insurance companies) with a massive intervention to save
the automobile industry. Because of the ideological lag from the
Reagan counter-revolution, the mainstream media and the intelligentsia
could not easily use the word ‘nationalization.’ Henry Paulson termed
the moves, ‘conservatorship.’ This word was more palatable to a
class that had created a fictional financial system that rested
on the confidence in the US military might. From across the Atlantic,
the former Mayor of London, Ken Livingstone commented that the pace
of nationalization in the USA and Britain was the fastest in history
outside of a revolution. Whether it was called conservatorship or
nationalization the real change that was urgent was for citizens
to become engaged with these new state institutions so that democracy
was not confined to elections. Democratic control and accountability
by workers at the nationalized entities would strengthen democracy
and democratic participation.
As
the consequences of the military defeat of the USA in Iraq became
clearer, the quicksand of get-rich schemes on Wall St (termed the
financial services industry) evaporated with the schemes called
‘credit default swaps’ and ‘collateral debt obligations’ exposed
to be fraudulent gambling schemes of humans who were inspired by
greed. As the cascading impact of the financial exposure accelerated.
there were new stories every day of conmen who had masqueraded as
financiers. The recursive process of scandal begetting scandal and
scams exposing other scams behind the so called ‘financialization’
and ‘securitization’ took place at such a breathtaking speed that
the media had no time to hide the depth of the crisis form the working
peoples.
Not
just in the USA, but internationally, the corrosive repercussions
of Bernard Madoff’s ponzi scheme with the loss of $50 billion dollars
for ‘investors’ further eroded confidence in US capitalism. In so far as the
confidence in the US financial system and belief in the US dollar
as the reserve currency of the world was based on trust, the in fighting between
different sections of the falling financiers’ revealed to
Central bankers and peoples all over the world the fictitious nature
of the Wall Street edifice.
In this cascading quagmire, sections of the US establishment
began to understand that it was the politics of Barack Obama that
could save the social system. Hence, during the transition, even though
Obama said that there was only one President, the media managers
understood the need for his face to give confidence, so he was paraded
on television every day. This portrayal of Obama as the steady leader
could not hide the news about bail out, bank failures and the rise in unemployment.
When 250 union workers occupied the Republic Windows and Doors plant
in Chicago,
the move to occupy a factory meant that a definite new stage was
reached in US politics in the 21st century. Citizens began to hear
of the long
-term organizing goals of Unions such as the United Electrical,
Radio and Machine Workers of America.
Citizens
from all corners of the world joined with those in the United States
who were nurturing the birth of the new twenty first century politics.
The expectations from this Obama victory triggered new possibilities
as workers looked to the Obama administration to reinvigorate interest
in the rights of workers in all parts of the world. As with workers
in Chicago, the youth began to be released from the fears, insecurities
and phobias that had been rained on them by the media and the image
makers of the military/industrial/cultural/petroleum complex. Here
was one crack in the edifice of mind control. Would the crack in
the edifice of mind control unleash a new cultural apparatus in
the USA? This break was not only possible but slowly developing
even before the inauguration as those media outlets that had enthusiastically
supported the militarism of the War on Terror now open the airwaves
to new voices and now social groups. All of the contradictions before
the society were now being discussed as those who had surrounded
Obama now jockeyed for positions in the new administration.
This commentary is to stiffen the resolve of those who supported
the Obama campaign not simply to elect an African American as the
President of the United States, but to unleash a new democracy where
the central aspect of change is based on a new mobilization of the
citizen not just to vote but also to govern.
Alice
Walker called on the President to govern with happiness. Reflecting
on the positive mood inspired by Obama on the night of the election
an d the mood of happiness of the multi racial
and multinational gathering, Walker wrote,
A primary responsibility that you do have, is to cultivate
happiness in your own life. To make a schedule that permits sufficient
time of rest and play with your gorgeous wife and lovely daughters.
And so on. One gathers that your family is large. We are used
to seeing men in the White House soon become juiceless and as
white-haired as the building; we notice their wives and children
looking strained and stressed. They soon have smiles so lacking
in joy that they remind us of scissors. This is no way to lead.
Nor does your family deserve this fate.
One way of thinking about all this is: It is so bad now that
there is no excuse not to relax. From your happy, relaxed state,
you can model real success, which is all that so many people in
the world really want. They may buy endless cars and houses and
furs and gobble up all the attention and space they can manage,
or barely manage, but this is because it is not yet clear to them
that success is truly an inside job. That it is within the reach
of almost everyone.
How
can the progressive movement build on the spirit of happiness and
revolution in the midst of an economic depression? This was the
challenge of the progressive forces who carried forth the spirit
of optimism of those who had fought against historic oppression.
We
will begin outlining the elements of the counter-
revolutionary period in the USA that had instilled unhappiness,
fear, insecurity and state repression in the period after the Civil
Rights Revolution. Our effort will be to grasp how the counter-revolution
was opposed by the peace and justice movements throughout the world
and the extent to which the campaign of change to win rode on the
crest of the waves created by the peace and justice movement. While
highlighting the elements of counter-revolution, it will be the
basic thrust of the paper to delineate the delicate political moment
that is emerging out of the crisis of capitalism. Past experiences
of crisis reveal the moments when those in power seek to mobilize,
jingoism, chauvinism, imperialism, racism and sexism to divide working
peoples. Adolf Hitler and the Nazis were the most successful in
pursuing this division inside Europe to the detriment of the lives
of millions of citizens of the planet.
Fascist
tendencies that grow on the basis of exploitation and racial genocide have
never been far from the surface of US society. While the media shower
Obama with praise as the post-racial President, it is the cocoon
of privilege that would blind these commentators to the devastating
consequences of institutionalized racism in every aspect of social
and economic life in the USA. The protracted struggles against
racism will continue under President Obama because the election
of Obama as the First President of African descent cannot break
the mindset of eugenics and the entrenched ideas of white supremacy
in the body politic. It is the long term struggle against institutionalized
racism and dehumanization that places the struggles against the
prison industrial complex as part of opposition to global lockdown.
The violations of the Geneva Conventions by the Bush administration
abroad followed directly from the torture and violation that continues
on a daily basis in the vast and growing prison complex at home.
The
peace and justice forces have been able to withstand the neo-conservative
onslaught embedded in the imperial war on terror. In the concluding
section, this author
will seek to grasp how is it that citizens in the USA were caught
in a revolutionary moment without revolutionaries. It will be the
argument that in so far as the counter- revolutionary ideas of fundamentalism,
(religious, military and economic) sought to blunt alternative ideas
about social and economic life, the realities and tragedies of hurricane
Katrina, the health crisis and cancer epidemic were bringing forth
new ideas.
What is necessary is for the old left to develop some self- criticisms, especially with respect to the
ideas of racism and hierarchy of human beings. Some sections of
this historic left expended an unusual amount of energy critiquing
the transition process while they were slowly learning that the
resolution of the crisis will not be dependent solely on the actions
of what is done by US citizens. The capitalist crisis is a global
crisis and the management of the end of the dollar hegemony is necessary
to ensure that the decline of the super power status of the USA
is not exploited by racists and neo-conservative forces. A new morality
in politics requires repair. This is where reparations become the
cornerstone of the next phase of the US revolutionary process.
Obama’s victory in the context of
counter-revolution.
Samir
Amin, in his book, The Liberal Virus: Permanent War and the Americanization
of the World, sounded a warning about the possibilities of genocide
of epic proportions if humanity followed the logic of neo-liberalism
that sought to change agriculture around the world to follow the
forms of agricultural production of Western Europe and North America.
“Peasant
agriculture, accounting for 3 billion humans, faces economic extermination
by 20 million modern farms”, he warned in this book.
Here
Amin made the connection between the imposition and promotion
of genocidal economic relations embedded in neo-liberalism. At
the same time,
while sounding this warning, Amin traced the history of the ideas of liberalism
in Western Europe and North America pointing to the dangerous
forms of this ideology as it had matured with the context of enslaving
Africans and the genocide of First Nation Peoples. Amin, in dissecting
the ideology of liberalism in Europe after the French Revolution,
drew solace from the survival of the ideas of equality within
Europe. Even while acknowledging the rise of fascism and imperialism
in this tradition of equality, Amin was more optimistic about
the future of political change in Western Europe than in the United
States. In the Liberal Virus, he argued that US
militarism will be far more barbaric than earlier forms, pillaging
natural resources and destroying the lives of the poor. This
sobering assessment of the liberal traditions of the USA brought
out clearly the history of the ideology of liberalism and the
rise of neo-liberalism that preached the linkages between liberty
and the market. The virus is based on the view that the market
brings US citizens the opportunity for liberty. But to defend
this liberty, US citizens had to support permanent war.
Neo-liberalism
and market fundamentalism were the most visible sign posts of the
conservative ideas in the USA that stood at the foundation of counter-revolution.
Within the USA, it was the presence of the revolutionary traditions
of the black working peoples along with their allies from the white,
brown and First Nation Peoples that had held back counter-revolution
into developing full blown fascism. Samir Amin downplays the long
traditions of anti-racist struggles in the USA, where black people
instinctively understood that, "extreme inequality is not only
tolerated, it is taken as a symbol of "success" that liberty
promises.” Samir Amin’s adage that ‘liberty without equality is
equal to barbarism’ is not a theoretical point but reflected the
lived experiences of the long struggles of institutionalized racism,
Klan violence and police brutality. It was the organized and unorganized
actions of the black liberation traditions that prevented full blown
fascism in the USA in the last depression.
and war from1929 to 1945.
German
society is widely known as the high point of the degeneration from
counter–revolution to full blown fascism in the 20th century, but
many of the economic, social and intellectual underpinnings of German
fascism had their origins in the eugenics movement in the United
States. No less a person than the President of the United States,
Theodore Roosevelt had expressed the most fascist ideas when he
argued that,
Society has no business to permit degenerates to reproduce
their kind.... Any group of farmers, who permitted their best
stock not to breed, and let all the increase come from the worst
stock, would be treated as fit inmates for an asylum.... Some
day we will realize that the prime duty, the inescapable duty
of the good citizens of the right type is to leave his or her
blood behind him in the world; and that we have no business to
permit the perpetuation of citizens of the wrong type. The great
problem of civilization is to secure a relative increase of the
valuable as compared with the less valuable or noxious elements
in the population... The problem cannot be met.
I wish very much that the wrong people could be prevented
entirely from breeding; and when the evil nature of these people
is sufficiently flagrant, this should be done. Criminals should
be sterilized and feebleminded persons forbidden to leave offspring
behind them... The emphasis should be laid on getting desirable
people to breed..." Quoted from The Biotech Century,
page 117
Averell
Harriman (former Governor of NY and one of the most important leaders
in the Democratic Party for over 50 years) grew up in a household
where his mother was the main financial supporter for the Eugenics
Records Office at the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. This was the
center for research on eugenics and human heredity. So potent were
the ideas of eugenics in the USA that even leaders of the Women’s
movement who were struggling for the right to vote subscribed to
the fascist ideas of eugenics. Margaret Sanger said, "Eugenics
is … the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial,
political and social problems.”
These
statements reveal the reality that genocidal thinking was never
absent form US society. Genocidal thinking as manifest in the US
eugenics movement is the kind of thinking that devalues the lives
of other human beings on the basis of their race or ethnicity. Just
when concerned citizens were inquiring as to whether there were
linkages between the Eugenics research at the start of the century
and the new directions from the Human Genome Project at Cold Spring
Harbor, James D. Watson made the clear statement in 2007 that the
Africans were less intelligent than Europeans. As a Nobel Prize
winner in medicine and one time head of the Cold Springs Harbor
Laboratory, Watson was bringing his considerable scientific reputation
to consolidate scientific racism in the community of those involved
in genetic engineering.
Eugenics
had graduated from the death camps of the Germans to the white lab
coats of research parks across Universities in the United States.
Universities were competing for start- up funds to
establish Life Science centers where the ideas and principles of
James Watson would be supported under the guise of academic and
scientific research (Would resources from the Obama stimulus package
go to these researchers without a fuller ethical inquiry into the
current forms of eugenics in the USA?)
The
US society had been able to escape the worse aspects of the capitalist
depression of the thirties because a progressive coalition had supported
the Democratic Party and the administration of Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
This was the anti-racist coalition that turned its back on the
segregationists that had dominated the Democratic Party between1865
and 1933. It is not by accident that in preparation for his role
as the President of the United States, Obama is preparing his administration
for massive state intervention and infrastructure projects similar
to the New Deal.
The
New Deal was not simply a massive government project to jump start
the economy, it was a political alliance between labor, anti-racist
forces, socialists and the anti–fascist faction of the capitalist
class. Ultimately, it was military Keynesianism that broke the depression
but blacks had to fight a prolonged and protracted struggle against
the chauvinistic and racist ideas that formed the basis of the liberal
ideology of US capitalism.
Space
does not allow for an elaboration of the protracted struggles from
the fight against fascism globally, but it is important to restate
the fact that imperialism, militarism and expansionism thrived inside
the United States after World War II. As early as the fifties, when
President Dwight Eisenhower had warned of the rise of the Military
Industrial Complex, the sociologist C. Wright Mills had written
in his book of the development of the Permanent War economy
and the interlocking directorates between the military, the economic
and the political elite. Mills also very early outlined how the
military industrial complex was corrupting the mission of the University
so that the eugenics thinking within the society reinforced the
devaluation of other humans while celebrating free markets.
Militarism, the Breton Woods
Institution and US Imperialism
Both
imperial wars of the twentieth century had been precipitated by
the challenges of German capitalists to the dominance of the British
imperialists. One by-product of British imperialism and militarism
was the centrality of the British Currency (the Pound sterling)
as the currency of world trade. In the midst of fighting fascism
in Germany there were concerns in the United States for the reconstitution
and the recomposition of global capitalism after the war. Thus,
in 1944, the Breton Woods system was instituted so that the USA
could become the international headquarters of capitalism. The establishment
of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the International Bank
for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) or the World Bank – entrusted
the defence of international capitalism in the hands of the US ruling
class. The dollar was enshrined as the currency of world trade (replacing
sterling) and the USA used the strength of the dollar to support
the reconstruction of capitalism in Western Europe.
Despite the competition between US and European capitalists,
the USA supported European Reconstruction under the Marshall Plan
to wean the European working classes away from ideas of socialism
and new modes of organizing economic life. The dollar as the reserve
currency of the international trading system was aligned to the
British pound and this cemented the special relationship between
the USA and Britain. Under the articles of agreement of the IMF,
the USA was supposed to maintain the value of the dollar at US $35
to an ounce of gold. This arrangement held until the USA exhausted
itself in its attempt to roll back the decolonization process, manifest
in the struggles against the peoples of Vietnam.
The Civil Rights movement
and the rise of counter- revolution.
The
war against the peoples of Asia and Vietnam strengthened the capitalist
classes with a vested interest in the military industrial complex.
A core set of ideas relating to social Darwinism, survival of the
fittest, control of labor, the build-up of the military to confront
communism, and the rolling back of liberation movements were reproduced
in the educational system that taught and celebrated racial genocide.
African Americans had to wage a concerted struggle in the streets,
in the factory, at the voting booth and in schools for the rights
that had been enshrined in the UN Universal Declaration of Human
Rights. These struggles for social and economic rights were designated
as a component of the Civil Rights revolution and the Obama electoral
campaign was a direct beneficiary of many of the ideas, strategies
and tactics that had been developed in the struggles for the Civil
Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Cultural artists captured the continuities
between the Civil Rights Revolution as they wailed, “Rosa Parks
sat so Martin Luther King could walk" "Martin Luther King
walked so Obama could run." Kwame Ture had forewarned of the
linkages between the Civil Rights Revolution and the future revolutionary
trajectory of the United States in the book, Ready for Revolution.
The
counter-revolution of global militarism, anti-communism sexism,
and super-exploitation of immigrants was most manifest in the campaign
of assassinations against the Black Liberation Movement. The assassination
of Martin Luther King Jr. Malcolm X, school children, church goers,
Robert Kennedy, John F. Kennedy and the Cointelpro frame up and
street killings were meant to halt the coalescence of the Black
Liberation movement with the revolutionary traditions of the USA.
This counter-revolutionary period had a base in the intellectual
culture of the society and found a political base in Reaganism.
It was appropriately called the Reagan Revolution. As this counter
revolution deepened, Newt Gingrich proudly called himself a revolutionary.
In his book on the Bush administration, What Happened: Inside
the Bush White House and Washington’s Culture of Deception,
Scott McClellan outlined the plans of Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney
and the neo-cons for a permanent campaign or permanent revolution
It
was the peace movement nationally and globally that intervened in
the permanent campaign. Historically, the Black Liberation movement
had served as an inspiration for the anti-war movement, the peace
movement, the Free speech movement, the gay and liberation movement,
the women’s movement, the environmental justice movement, the anti-
colonial movements (eg Puerto Rico and anti-apartheid) and sections
of the workers movement. These movements did not agree on a strategy
for liberation but it was understood that the capitalist mode of
production stood as an obstacle to human freedom, self-emancipation
and limited independence. Through the culture of the Civil Rights
movement, the US media was beamed all across the world so that cultural
heroes such as Mohammed Ali was not simply an American hero but
a hero to all anti- imperialist forces.
Subsequent
to the defeat of the USA in Vietnam, the counter-revolutionary forces
set out to roll back the gains of the Civil rights period. Professor
Ronald W. Walters has chronicled the various policies of the conservative
forces in his book, White Nationalism-Black Interests: Conservative
Public Policy and the Black Community. Professor Walters
correctly documented how the radical section of the conservative
movement captured power in the United States and drew attention
to how the Clinton administration strengthened these conservative
forces. The conservative sections of the capitalist class invested
in think tanks and foundations to recast the free market ideas of
neo-liberalism. The Heritage Foundation and the American Enterprise
Institute emerged slowly during the period of Ronald Reagan to settle
at the apex of a network of foundations, publications, columnists,
radio talk show hosts, religious organizations, professional fund-raisers,
and endowed professors to promote the ideas of white supremacy and
obscene militarism. The basic dogma of both conservatism and neo-liberalism
was based on the strength of the military and the fight against
communism. After the fall of the planned economies in Eastern Europe
in 1989, the intellectuals of the conservative movement in the USA
were emboldened to believe in the supremacy of the US form of organizing
economic life. By the end of the twentieth century, capitalism was
presented as a religion with the market as the ‘deity of choice.’
It was in this euphoria over the triumph of capitalism when Harvey
Cox penned, ‘the Market as God.’
Throughout
this period of the massive buildup of US military, the European
capitalists who had been crushed during Second World War set about
the establishment of the European Union in order to establish a
common currency to compete with the dollar as the currency of world
trade. After the massive deficits of the US government, the Europeans
refused to continue to finance the US deficits. As long as the
dollar was the currency of world trade, the USA could finance its
deficits by printing money and by militarily occupying other countries
to reinforce US cultural domination. The conflict and cooperation
between the European Union and the USA was camouflaged but after
the convergence of the European economies with a common currency,
the Euro (in 2002), the competition between the USA and Europe was
out in the open as the EU sought to develop another imperial front
in the international system.
Cultural
imperialism reinforced the US corporations as the film and media
complex was placed at the service of those who promoted genocidal
thinking and militarism. Ronald Reagan, as an actor, cemented the
linkages between militarism and the media during his rise to power
and his actual service as President 1981-1988. Republican-style
attacks and negative campaign tactics were introduced into corporate
public relations as an essential ingredient of eugenics and mind
control. One central component of mind control was to induce fear
and pessimism in the ranks of the most oppressed. The genius of
the election Obama campaign was to make a leap beyond the cynicism
and callousness of the rulers who believed that the oppressed could
be divided forever.
The Audacity of Hope was translated from a book project
into a ground operation that intervened to halt the permanent campaign
of Karl
Rove and the Republican Party. Rove was the activist on the political
front while Cheney and Rumsfeld were the militarists to consolidate
the counter evolution that had been given a fillip in the Reagan
period. There were very few differences between the two main political
parties over the neo-liberal project, and, in fact, the Clinton
administration was most aggressive in advancing the neo-liberal
trade deals along with the promotion of the World Trade Organization.
While the Clintons actively promoted the neo-liberalism of trade
and deregulation internationally, it was left to the second Bush
administration to fully promote deregulation and aggressive militarism.
Within this period there were conservative elements that
were proud to be called imperialists. Of these formations, the Project
for a New American Century (PNAC) led by Donald Rumsfeld and Richard
Cheney called on conservatives to be proud of being imperialist
and were not afraid to declare that the United States was above
international law. The varying writers who proclaim the need for
US imperialism are documented in the book, The New Imperialism
by David Harvey. This author wants to go beyond David Harvey and
note that the one section of the academic left has been unwilling
to grasp the full dangers that have been outlined in the Liberal
Virus. Academic treatises on imperialism treated the wars
in Afghanistan and Iraq as bad decisions of a neo- conservative
cabal instead of understanding this militarism and war as emanating
directly from the permanent war culture.
Chris
Hedges linked this permanent war culture to the Christian right
and the culture of despair in order to promote the American fascists.
In his brilliant clarification off the signposts of American fascism,
Hedges highlighted the ‘cult of masculinity,’ the religious crusades,
the war on truth and the commercialization of God as the key sign
posts of American fascism. This author would agree with these signposts
with the qualification that the vibrant peace movement, the abolish
prison movements, the black liberation movement, the reparations
movement, the women’s movement and the environmental justice movement
developed as a counterweight to fascism. Hence this author termed
the period not as fascist but one of counter-revolution.
There
were key elements to this counter-revolutionary period.
1.
Re-segregation
and the entangled hierarchies in the USA and at the global level
(called Global Apartheid - hierarchies most evident in the organization
of urban communities, the system of schooling and absence of schools).
2.
Economic
polarization and disparities globally. Concentration and centralization
of capital taken to new heights (dominance of Wall Street and
dollar hegemony).
3.
Twenty-first
century eugenics, such as AIDS, Sterilization, Designer babies,
Biometrics and the cancer epidemics.
4.
International
Drug and Military interconnections: Ritalin culture, wars on drugs
and crack cocaine epidemics (global drugs, finance infrastructure)
feeding the prison industrial complex.
5.
Religious
Fundamentalism (especially Christian, Islamic, Jewish and Hindu
fundamentalism).
6.
Armaments
Culture, (Militarism and military humanitarianism - war and influence
of intelligence, security apparatus, information warfare (multi-billion
expenditure on war and the development of nuclear weapons).
7.
Media
disinformation, psychological warfare and mind control.
8.
Environmental
decay: pollution and global warming (most manifest in Hurricane
Katrina and the aftermath).
9.
Big
Pharmaceutical conglomerates, genetically modified food and seeds.
10.
Racism at a new level.
11.
Sexism, deformed patriarchy, and homophobia.
It
should be noted that the identified elements of counter-revolution–militarism,
war, eugenics, institutionalized racism, Ritalin culture, environmental
decay and toxic racism, propaganda and psychological warfare, economic
disparities, bell curve ideas of schooling, re-segregation, sexism
and homophobia–cannot be understood in isolation. Within this counter-revolutionary
period militarists and anti-democratic forces thrived in all parts
of the world. Because of the degree of concentration of capital
that had been reached, the counter- revolutionary politics of the
one per cent of billionaires on Earth imposed the politics of retrogression
and negative human relations not only for citizens of the USA but
for most of humanity. In the process there was a vast array of institutions
that were organized to demobilize and disorganize the citizens of
the world.
(Read
Part
2, Part
3)
BlackCommentator.com Guest Commentator, Dr. Horace Campbell,
PhD, is Professor of African American Studies and Political Science
at Syracuse University in Syracuse New York. His book, Rasta
and Resistance: From Marcus Garvey to Walter Rodney
is going through its fifth edition. He is also the
author of Reclaiming
Zimbabwe: The Exhaustion of the Patriarchal Model of Liberation
and is currently working on a book on Obama and 21st
Century Politics. He has contributed to many other edited books, most
recently, “From Regional Military de-stabilization to Military Cooperation
and Peace in South Africa” in Peace and Security in Southern Africa (State and Democracy Series)
, edited by Ibbo Mandaza. He has published numerous
articles in scholarly journals and is currently writing a book on
the Wars against the Angolan peoples. Click here
to contact Dr. Campbell. |