Denver, Colorado - On the eve of the official nomination of Presidential candidate
Barack Obama, the son of an immigrant, some of the leading voices
shaping the Democratic Party’s immigration reform platform reveal
a mix of reserved optimism and pragmatism.
While the Blue Dog Democrats
- a group of 47 moderate and conservative Democratic Party members
of the United States House of Representatives - support a position
on immigration that bears more than a passing resemblance to the
“enforcement only” approach of many Republicans, other Democrats
support a combination of legalization and major reforms as alternative
to raids and detentions that defined the Bush era of immigration.
In between these two positions
are a significant number of Democrats and their supporters who want
to focus primarily on legalization without including without any
significant changes to the policies that enable raids and massive
detention like this week’s raid in Mississippi.
Outside the Pepsi
Convention Center are hundreds of immigrant
rights groups, planning a major mobilization this Thursday – the
day of Obama’s acceptance speech. They will protest what they believe
is the unwillingness of Democrats and their Washington-based immigrant
rights allies to seriously support what the press release of the
March 25th Coalition calls “Human legalization and a moratorium
on raids and deportations.”
As she anxiously awaits the
end of Bush era, Representative Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Chair of the
House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees,
Border Security, and International Law, says she sees real change
on the immigration horizon. “I’m confident that with an Obama presidency
we will have comprehensive immigration reform in the first term-but
it’s not going to be easy.” Lofgren, a former immigration attorney,
and other panelists speaking at one of the few from among the hundreds
of Convention events at which immigration was even discussed, were
cautiously optimistic, but they also expressed a number of different
interpretations of what the sorts of policies define “comprehensive
immigration reform.”
For
her part, Lofgren, who did not support the McCain-Kennedy bill,
which combined policies legalizing the more than 12 million undocumented
immigrants in the U.S. with policies increasing the number of ways
to persecute, prosecute, jail and deport future undocumented immigrants,
believes that “an important part of the answer is not to have so
many people who do not have legal status.” But at the same time,
she believes that something must be done to about a “whole [detention]
system that is wrong and causing lots of suffering.” Lofgren and
a number of other Democrats in Congress cite the recent case of
the Chinese immigrant Hui Lui Ng, who died while in immigration
detention, just two weeks before the Convention.
Though he too decries the raids,
detention and deportation issues criticized by Lofgren and others
as the “least humane part of the broken immigration system”, Simon
Rosenberg, President and Founder of the New Democrat Network (NDN),
which sponsored the panel, is not optimistic that these issues will
be included in whatever reform package gets introduced next. “Although
desirable, I think it would be difficult to include fixing the detention
and [immigration] judicial system in comprehensive immigration reform
because it really wasn’t a critical part of what came about last
time,” said Rosenberg. “It doesn’t mean that it shouldn’t get done. I’m just not
sure if that’s the best vehicle for it. If the goal is to include
these issues in comprehensive immigration reform, then we have lots
of work to do to make them front and center in this debate.”
Frank Sharry, executive director
of America’s Voice, a Washington-based immigration reform group,
admitted that he and others supporters of the McCain-Kennedy legislation
failed because they “made concessions” on detention, enforcement
and other issues in order to woo Republicans, who, Sharry said,
“failed to bring any votes.”
“We knew the senate [McCain-Kenney
Bill] was deeply flawed but we believed the legalization component
for the 12 million immigrants was decent and the family reunification
provisions could be fixed before the final passage.
Sharry also stated that he and
others were “hopeful” they could change some of the more than700
pages of enforcement language in the McCain-Kennedy legislation.
Sharry said he is “self-critical” about the expectations but also
said he and others will continue to support an approach to immigration
reform that calls for legalization that “doesn’t fear the rule of
law”, from which other advocates, he said, shy away.
For his part, Congressman Raul
M. Grijalva, whose district in John McCain’s home state of Arizona
was referred to during hallway talk at the Convention as “ground
zero” for the immigration reform debate, said he has been pushing
for his colleagues to place a priority not just on legalization,
but on detention, raids and issues as well. “We
can’t wait any more when it comes to demilitarizing and improving
enforcement and detention. It’s what I hear in my district all the
time, all the time. And things have gotten better for us [Democrats]
in the past 5 years,” said Grijalva. As he received word of the
ICE raid in Mississippi,
Grijelva said, “Our side has to get tougher. We can’t afford to
be as muted this time.”
BlackCommentator.com Guest
Commentator, Roberto Lovato, is a contributing Associate
Editor with New America
Media. He is also a frequent contributor to The Nation and his work has appeared in the Los
Angeles Times, Salon, Der Spiegel, Utne Magazine, La Opinion,
and other national and international media outlets. Prior to becoming
a writer, Roberto was the Executive Director of the Central American Resource Center (CARECEN), then the country’s
largest immigrant rights organization. Click here
to contact him or via his Of América blog. |