It's
election season again, and campaign news stories time again,
too. There's one race in my parts I'm paying attention to, even
if the news crowd isn't, and that's the local DA race here in
Travis County (Austin), Texas. The previous DA of 30 years is
retiring, and there was a four-way contest of current Travis
County ADA's in the general election to succeed
him. It’s now down to a runoff.
I
used to think that bureaucracies existed in a world that was
beyond influencing by ordinary human beings, but I've since
changed my mind some. I now think that most but the giant bureaucracies
are to a fair degree under the influence of the personality
of the person at the top, if that person is doing their job
right, and not just warming a chair. That's particularly true
of an office such as the DA, which isn't too big an agency in
a town the size of Austin. How much of what sort of law gets done depends on the character
and agenda of the head DA. Political scientists waste time debating
this point, but Mao Tse-Tung had it cynically right when he
said that fundamentally, political power is the power to oppress
others. Particularly true if you are the DA wielding the law.
Texas law gives the Travis County DA a
whole lot of power - ALL political corruption and campaign law
cases statewide are prosecuted from his office, and if you don't
think that matters nationally, just ask Tom DeLay, he'll be
glad to tell you about falling afoul of the Travis
County DA.
Political
campaigns and campaign events are, once the novelty of them
wears off, pretty dull and predictable. After watching them
for a while mostly all follow the same sort of predictable scripts
as bad TV shows. There are no new plot twists in sitcoms and
there isn't much new in political campaign events either. This
set of facts goes a long way in explaining why political reporting
and coverage is as bad as it is. Reporters have seen it all
before, are bored and resent writing political coverage stories
more than Faulkner would have resented writing scripts for Gilligan's
Island. But once in a while, something
significant, different and important happens at a campaign event,
and that's news, that's important. Why reporters don't see it
when it happens right in front of them? I guess they just aren't
paying attention. It could also be that they can hardly see
anything anymore that isn't in the standard script book; if
it isn't in the script book then it doesn't matter or exist.
It's too bad for them, and it's worse for us and the functioning
of American democracy.
A
case in point is the DA's race candidate forums. The first one
was held at Gene's Po-Boys, and it had a lot of attendees from
the courthouse crowd. Attendance ran a little over a hundred.
Close and upfront, all four candidates fielded questions from
the audience. The best questions came from ordinary citizens,
not the courthouse lounge lizards. Joe asked why the DA's office
wouldn't extradite from Atlanta
the suspect who'd broken into his house, stolen his house's
contents, and left his driver's license behind. Right interesting
to see all four fumble the question.
I
shot the hard question at them all about the great Travis County
Witch Trial of 1992, the Fran's Daycare case, one of the last
and ugliest satanic child daycare molestation mania cases that
hit this country in the 80's and early '90's. The daycare center's
owners are still in the slammer, will be ‘til they die, and
most everyone has forgotten them and that decade and a half
long mania that put hundreds like them behind bars. We got to
see Rosemary Lehmberg fumble the facts on this, her case, and
see Gary Cobb's scorn and indifference toward it and me both.
Those two obviously go through life without looking in their
rearview mirrors.
Stephanie
asked about evidentiary problems in past cases, and got talked
down to and patronized by Gary Cobb - comes with the territory
of being female and less than five feet tall, I guess. Watching
how the candidates fielded hot questions coming from out of
the blue from knowledgeable and articulate citizens was really
instructive and revealing of the character of the candidates.
None of this was covered by any of the reporters there, and
it really should have.
But
there was an even better, more revealing event at the next candidate
forum, this one at the Dell
Community Center. Attendance was a
lot smaller, maybe 30 - the event was hardly promoted. This
time, questions from the floor were submitted in writing, in
advance and pre-screened by the moderator - you could tell the
previous forum's questioning had gotten under the skins of at
least some of the candidates. There was a lot less time allocated
to audience questions this time, too, and less than a handful
were asked, with the time limits set down by the moderator.
The moderator called time on the questions, leaving most unasked,
and then gave each candidate three minutes for a closing speechette
on why he or she should be our next DA.
Mindy
Montford's turn came, and she stood up and said that she'd already
given her speech, but that there was a stack of citizen questions
there on the desk that didn't get answered, and that she wanted
to answer them because that was what's important, not another
speech.
Her
first question was on Joe’s case, and she answered that she
had tracked Joe down after the event, gone out to coffee with
him later, and had promised him that she would get that criminal
back from Atlanta if she had to drive him back from there herself.
She was the only candidate who had bothered to meet with Joe
on this. Her next question was on the Fran's Daycare case, and
she promised to look into it, that the case was before her time
at the DA's office but she thought it deserved another look.
Mindy
Montford stepped up to the plate and batted those questions
out of the park. I was as proud as I've ever been for a politician,
to see her real concern with ordinary citizens' problems and
her deep-seated belief in the democratic process on display
and in action.
I
only wish she had had a bigger audience to see her presentation,
and that the reporters covering the event would have noted it.
None of them did, dammit. This was a real campaign event. This
is what campaigns are supposed to be about. This is what campaigns
are supposed to do and show and tell us. And if campaigns are
hardly ever like that, well the reasons why are pretty openly
on display here. Just look at the [Austin] Chronicle note:
“Thanks
for writing to us, but your letter is too long to be considered
for possible publication. The Austin Chronicle has a 300-word
limit on letters. If you wish to shorten your letter and re-submit
it, we will gladly take it under consideration.”
There
appears to be more concern with the length of a reader letter
than there is with reporting important details about an important
campaign.
Candidates
fear being blindsided, and reporters follow the script they
know. It's a lot easier for both groups this way but it doesn't
do the democratic process, or the American republic, any favors.
But
I'm voting for Mindy this go-round. I'm proud of her.
BlackCommentator.com
Guest Commentator, Daniel N. White, has lived in Austin, Texas, much longer than he figured he
would. He reads more than most people and a whole lot more than
we are all supposed to. He recommends all read his earlier piece
in BC, 1975
Redux, which is still, in his estimation, the best piece
on the Iraq surge anybody printed when it started. He is still
doing blue-collar work for a living - you can be honest doing
it - but is fairly fed up with it right now. He invites all
reader comments, and will answer all that aren't too insulting.
Click
here to contact Mr. White.