Bookmark and Share
Click to go to the home page.
Click to send us your comments and suggestions.
Click to learn about the publishers of and our mission.
Click to search for any word or phrase on our Website.
Click to sign up for an e-Mail notification only whenever we publish something new.
Click to remove your e-Mail address from our list immediately and permanently.
Click to read our pledge to never give or sell your e-Mail address to anyone.
Click to read our policy on re-prints and permissions.
Click for the demographics of the audience and our rates.
Click to view the patrons list and learn now to become a patron and support
Click to see job postings or post a job.
Click for links to Websites we recommend.
Click to see every cartoon we have published.
Click to read any past issue.
Click to read any think piece we have published.
Click to read any guest commentary we have published.
Click to view any of the art forms we have published.


"AIDS is the number one cause of death for African Americans between the ages of 25 and 44.  That is startling.... Today you're going to hear many reasons why AIDS is on the rise again.  And here's a shocker.  It's one of the big reasons why so many women are getting AIDS:  Their husbands and boyfriends are having secret sex with other men... OK?  OK?  This lifestyle even has a name.  It's called living on the down low.  Have you heard about it?…" [1]

The date was April 16, 2004.  The words were those of Oprah Winfrey leading off that Friday’s version of her long running syndicated daily TV show.  But instead of information on the promised “many ways you can get AIDS,” what Oprah’s audience got was an hour of disinformation, stereotyping and hucksterism.  They got just one way to avoid the deadly infection, from one source: secretive and predatory bisexual black men, “Living on the Down Low.”

During that hour, Oprah and her guest, J.L. King, the author of what became, thanks to exposure on Oprah’ TV show and web site, a best selling book, did incalculable and lasting damage to the battle for HIV-AIDS prevention, treatment, and understanding of the epidemic in the African American community.

Huckster J.L. King portrayed himself as a typical example of a “down low brutha,” supposedly reformed just enough to want to sell his book and services as a speaker, passing on tidbits of useful information such as where he and other “down low bruthas” go to meet each other:

Mr. KING: He could be available and he could be part of the society, this invisible fraternity. I'm going to go into a church. I can go anywhere in the country and find out where churches--where most of the guys are or where I can make that connection and that's where I'm going to go. You're not going to find me in no gay club because I have nothing to do with the gay culture.


Mr. KING: That's them. That's their thing.

WINFREY: OK. So you would go to a church.

Mr. KING: I would go to a church. There's be one--I--I can go to the church, a gym or a grocery store.

WINFREY: Or a grocery store.

Mr. KING: Anywhere. Anywhere, 'cause we're everywhere. [2]

Among the sage bits of advice King had for black women on the lookout for signs of “down-lowness” in their sweethearts and spouses, was to “watch their eyes,” pay attention to their gay friends, to follow them around.

WINFREY: But let's just say what should you be looking for to figure out if your husband or boyfriend is living on the down low? You, who said that you have been surprised yourself...

Mr. KING: Yeah.

WINFREY: guys who were on the down low, so how is a woman who is, number one, in love, going though the motions of, you know--how--you know, the daily routine, 'cause how would your wife have--have known?

Mr. KING: Women have a--a--an intuition, a sixth sense, that something is not right in their home. And they will follow their intuition and really start...

WINFREY: Well, she literally followed you...

Mr. KING: Yeah.

WINFREY: the--yeah.

Mr. KING: Yeah, she got nosy.


Mr. KING: If women really want to find out, if they really want to know what their man is all about get nosy.


Mr. KING: Follow him….

Mr. King isn’t selling public health advice – he’s selling public hysteria, and thanks to his exposure on the Oprah show, King now makes a good living off it.

Although Oprah Winfrey is not a public health professional, what she says and what she allows to be said on her show concerning the AIDS epidemic definitely matters.  According to the Black Aids Foundation, one of whose representatives did appear in the final minutes of the April 16, 2004 Oprah show, the number of print and broadcast news stories about the domestic AIDS epidemic declined by 57% between 1997 and 2002, during which time the occurrence of new HIV-AIDS cases among whites declined.  Since then, the incidence of new HIV-AIDS cases has spiked in the African American community, but without an attendant increase in coverage.  The Kaiser Family Foundation confirms that it is the popular media which provide the public with most of what they know about the epidemic.   

It’s not Oprah’s fault that news we can use about the HIV-AIDS epidemic in black America is so scarce.  But it is precisely the lack of information about this burgeoning public health crisis which imposes moral and ethical responsibilities on communicators and broadcasters, especially those with large audiences directly affected by the epidemic to get it right.  The Oprah show and fearmongering AIDS hustler J.L. King instead got it very, very wrong.  The real lowdown on the down low is that it just ain’t true.  Most of the existing HIV-AIDS cases are not gay men, and hedonistic bisexual black men on the DL are NOT the major vector of virus transmission to black women.

Is it True?  Does it Matter?

Oprah’s declaration that secretive and predatory bisexual black men, of whom author J.L. King offered himself as a typical example, were in some large part responsible for the AIDS epidemic – “one of the big reasons why so many women are getting AIDS” – was then and remains today factually untrue. BC will not speculate on how the fraudulent nature of this claim eluded the Oprah show’s producers some 17 months ago.  But for a good while now, anyone with Internet access has been able to bring up the search engine and type in the terms “HIV-AIDS + downlow” (without the quotes).  The topmost result is a page from the Center for Disease Control titled “FAQ – Men on the Down Low.

It says, in part:

What are the sexual risk factors associated with being on the down low?

Much of the media attention about men on the down low and HIV/AIDS has focused on the concept of a transmission bridge between bisexual men and heterosexual women. Some women have become infected through sexual contact with bisexual men.1 However, many questions have not yet been answered, including:

  • Do bisexually active men account for more cases of HIV infection in women than do men who inject drugs?
  • Are bisexually active men more likely than other groups of men to be HIV infected?
  • What proportion of HIV-infected men who have sex with male and female partners identify with the down low?”
  • Do men on the down low engage in fewer or more sexual risk behaviors than men who are not on the down low?”
  • Do people other than bisexually active men who do not disclose their behavior to sex partners identify with the down low?
What are the implications for HIV prevention?

The phenomenon of men on the down low has gained much attention in recent years; however, there are no data to confirm or refute publicized accounts of HIV risk behavior associated with these men. What is clear is that women, men, and children of minority races and ethnicities are disproportionately affected by HIV and AIDS and that all persons need to protect themselves and others from getting or transmitting HIV.

There it is in black and white.  When you ask the Centers for Disease Control about this “down low” stuff the first things they tell you are that they don’t know whether or not “DL bruthas” account for more HIV transmission to women than men who inject drugs.  They don’t know whether DL bruthas are more likely to be HIV infected than other men, including exclusively heterosexual men.  There is no data to back up Oprah’s assertion that DL behavior is “one of the big reasons why so many women are getting AIDS.”

We at BC are not the first to note that the Oprah Winfrey show and Down-Low author J.L. King are in deep disagreement with the Center for Disease Control, and with the known facts of the AIDS epidemic. Of the eight medical doctors, public health professionals, HIV-AIDS treatment and testing providers and advocates on the case level and the policy level whom BC interviewed for this article, not one could be found to co-sign the notion that “down low bruthas” are chiefly responsible for the epidemic of HIV-AIDS among black women. 

We humbly suggest that Oprah owes her audience a sincere and profound apology for popularizing this damaging myth, and a follow-up show that features real doctors, real HIV researchers, real public health professionals who minister to the epidemic on a daily basis, along with real advocates of testing, treatment, healing and prevention. A great place to start might be someone from the Black AIDS Foundation, who only got a handful of words in edgewise in the final moments of the infamous “down low” show.

BC Consults a Doctor/Researcher 

To see how easy it might be to follow our own advice, BC looked around for a real medical doctor to ask about the “down low,” one involved in public health issues as they relate to the black community. Dr. David Malebranche, an MPH and assistant professor of medicine at Atlanta’s Emory University, has been speaking, writing and conducting research on public health issues and HIV-AIDS for some time. 

“It’s a racist slander,” Dr. Malebranche told BC when we asked him what he thought of the proliferation of media stories about the DL.  At the 2004 International AIDS Conference he had this to say about the Oprah show and the DL hype machine:

“Demonizing Black male sexuality has been a staple of American culture since slavery, where our role was to work and breed, and the Mandingo stereotype of a hyper-sexual Black man with an insatiable appetite for white women was created. That history haunted my thoughts as I watched Oprah Winfrey’s recent show about ‘down low’ Black men, or guys who live a ‘heterosexual lifestyle’ (whatever that means) but have sex with other men on the side.

“The show misquoted HIV statistics, offered sensationalistic generalizations, and portrayed down low men as hedonistic predators who carelessly have unprotected sex with men and women. It did all of this in an effort to convince Oprah’s faithful audience that the current HIV epidemic among Black women is mainly due to the down-low, or ‘DL,’ brothers….

“All of this is just as much of a fantasy as the Mandingo stereotype. The majority of public health research doesn’t support the theory that DL men are a “bridge” for HIV to the general Black community. There are no substantive studies on down-low Black men. That’s in large part because researchers can’t find actual DL men – few of them would be willing to participate in a study discussing the sexual behavior they are supposedly so invested in concealing.”

Still, the hype goes on.  J. L. King and others who counsel scapegoating, suspicion, misdirection and the bulk purchase of their books continue to be celebrated in the media and prosper on the lecture circuit.  BC asked Dr. Malebranche why TV and the media publicize lurid and bogus allegations while stories based the findings of real researchers and treatment professionals are so rare.  His answer was illuminating.

“Because those findings don’t demonize black men,” answered the good doctor. 

We add to that trenchant observation this selection from Emory University’s Emory Report, summarizing a recent study published by Dr. Malebranche and co-author Greg Millet of the Centers for Disease Control:

“When you look at the whole issue of what down-low means, it really translates into the issue of disclosure – who you’re telling and who you’re not telling – and may be dependent upon the nature of the relationship and gender of the individual with whom you’re having sex,” Malebranche said. “If some black MSM (men who have sex with men) are secretively bisexual, studies have demonstrated that they’re more likely to have more female partners than disclosing black MSM, and thus are more likely to have unprotected sex with these female partners. However, these same men report lower rates of unprotected sex with their male sexual partners than disclosing MSM.”

These facts lead the study team to ask, “If bisexual black men represent a small proportion of black men in the United States, and nondisclosing black men are less likely to be HIV positive than gay-identified men or engage in high-risk behavior, then is this population primarily responsible for the HIV epidemic among heterosexual black women?”

According to recent statistics, approximately 40 percent of the cumulative AIDS cases among black women through 2003 are attributable to intravenous drug use, with another 40 percent attributable to risky sexual behavior. However, it’s not known what proportion of these cases are infected through having sex with heterosexual, bisexual or homosexual men.

”The flawed logic often perpetuated by the media is that only homosexual men have HIV, bisexual men only contract HIV through homosexual behavior, and the only way black women contract HIV is through sexual contact with these bisexual men,” Malebranche said. “Homosexuals are not the only ones with HIV, and just because someone keeps their same-sex behavior secretive doesn’t necessarily mean that they are irresponsible with condom use.”

The authors argue that the issue of high-risk sexual behavior among heterosexuals has been absent from the discussion involving men on the down-low and the high prevalence of HIV among black women. For instance, they found that rates of condom use by black heterosexuals are low, even among couples, where one partner is HIV positive and the other is HIV negative.

“Secretive sexual behavior has been around since the dawn of time,” said Dr. Malebranche to BC. “Why is it that now we need a new name for this behavior, aside from our need to blame and demonize black men, and distract our attention from what’s really going on? … Aside from…injected drug use, most of it [AIDS] comes from one place – unprotected sex.  And most of the sex that most of us are having and continue to have with partners of the same or either sex continues to be unprotected.  It’s foolish, and in the context of an epidemic it’s dangerous to imagine that so-called ‘down low brothers’ have a corner on the market for risky behavior or unprotected sex.  They don’t.  We all have a hand in this.”

BC thinks Dr. Malebranche is onto something here.  The myth of the downlow fails to accurately explain where the virus comes from or equip us to protect ourselves and each other.  It is both a racist and a homophobic slander.  Oprah’s producers must have known that however false and misleading it might be, their “down low” show would attract viewers and be remembered by them, just like that low-down hustler J.L. King knew it would sell books.  The market has an endless appetite for shocking tales of unique black depravity.  We need look no further than last week’s reports broadcast around the world of sniper fire halting the helicopter evacuation of hospital patients in New Orleans, which the FAA now confirms never happened.

BC suspects we may be seeing a new kind of defamatory offensive against African America, in which some of the worst pathologies of white America are projected by its corporate media upon us.  One such canard currently in wide circulation holds that the African American community in general, and especially the black church, are, unlike their white counterparts, bastions of virulent homophobia. 

Certainly there is no doubt that black homophobia exists, and that many backward pastors drink and dispense from this poisoned well.  It’s also true that gay male musical directors in black churches are prevalent often enough to be a kind of cliché.  Nobody at BC has spent much time in white Baptist churches, but we doubt they see much of that, or that gay band leaders and drum majors are a cliché in white colleges either.

BC Consults an HIV-AIDS Treatment Professional

As Executive Director of the South Carolina’s HIV-AIDS Council, Dr. Bambi Gaddist has been on the front lines of HIV-AIDS treatment and advocacy a long time. She has a PhD in Public health. In our conversation with her about the “down low,” homophobia, the black church and the AIDS epidemic Dr. G addist recounted that for years there have been several standard questions she has asked every person who comes through her agency’s doors for service, and which she has also asked many hundreds of people for whom she has done workshops and presentations. Among those questions are:

  • How old were you at the time of your first non-coerced sexual encounter?
  • Did you use any protection against STDs?
  • Is there anything that anyone in your life could have said to you right there, right then, that would have dissuaded you from doing this?

Uniformly, Dr. Gaddist reports, those questioned say they were under 20, used no protection and doubt anyone could have said anything to prevent the encounter.

“African Americans concerned about the HIV-AIDS epidemic are not well served when we allow lurid conversations about the ‘down low’ to take up all the oxygen in the room… There are vast disconnects between what we as peers and parents tell each other, between what many of our churches are telling young people, and what we are actually doing, and yet another disconnect between that and what we must do to get a handle on this epidemic,” says Dr. Gaddist. “HIV-AIDS is not a ‘gay disease’, and ‘down low bruthas’ are not lurking everywhere, but the virus could be anywhere… It’s the spirit of shame, fear, and judgment that continues to perpetuate the spread of the virus throughout our community and families.”

Dr. Gaddist added that the South is now ground zero for the black HIV-AIDS epidemic, its 36% of the US population accounting for 40% of the nation’s AIDS prevalence (existing cases) and 46% of AIDS incidence (new cases) in 2003. If HIV-AIDS was a gay male disease, she points out, why is it on the decline in the western and northeastern US, but on the rise in the south, including the rural South? The answer is that HIV-AIDS is increasingly a black disease, and the southern states is where half of us still are.

Dr. Gaddist believes that, notable exceptions aside, there is plenty of hope and love for all God’s children, regardless of sexual orientation, within the African American church. Its leaders, she says, have a vital role to play in bringing a halt to the epidemic. “Bishops, pastors, and those entrusted with the authority to guide their flocks are now, more than ever, being called to unconditional love for ‘the least of these’. The South Carolina HIV-AIDS Council exists to help them answer that call.”

Where America Refuses to Look For HIV: The Prison Industry

An obvious, overlooked and under-researched vector of HIV-AIDS into black women and black communities is the planet’s largest prison industry, right here in the United States. The US leads the world in the numbers and the percentage of its citizens behind bars. Black America, representing just one-eighth of the nation’s population, contributes about half of the prison industry’s human raw material. Despite mountains of anecdotal evidence, little research to date has been done on the incidence and prevalence of HIV-AIDS in America’s prisons and jails, and the relationship between the epidemic on either side of the walls.

The Time is Now: The State of AIDS in Black America”, is a compelling, authoritative and easy to read document issued by the Black AIDS Foundation in February 2005 which we highly recommend to any and everyone. It addresses the prison-HIV connection first by pointing out that the grossly disproportionate rate of black incarceration exists alongside the soaring rate of HIV-AIDS infection:

“It is reasonable to assume Black inmates account for a similarly disproportionate share of the HIV infections. But further, more than three times as many African American inmates died of AIDS-related causes in 2002 than did whites. Politically and culturally the African American community desperately needs to demand more of the public health systems governing state and federal prisons.

“Rarely do we see as gaping of a disconnect between public policy and the reality it is intended to govern as that between the rules organizing our nation’s prisons and the rapid spread of HIV and Hepatitis C within them. The party line among prison officials is that HIV infection rates are high in their facilities because they are high in the populations from which prisoners are disproportionately drawn – young Black and Latino men and women. But what if it’s the other way around? What if HIV’s disproportionate impact on urban Black and Latino communities can be traced at least in part to the high incarceration rates in those same neighborhoods – and the unsafe sex, drug use and tattooing that takes place inside prisons?

“[E]ven if we simply accept the fact that a large number of those entering prison do so with an HIV infection, the potential epidemic inside – and eventually outside – is awesome, for few environments would better facilitate the virus’s spread.

“Prison officials are famously reluctant to allow researchers to study the frequency of risk behavior in their facilities, and they do few epidemiological studies of their own… But given the testimony of current and ex-offenders about the realities of inmate behavior, and given the high prevalence of both HIV and hep C, we can only assume the worst.”

“[T]he tools proven to be most effective at stopping HIV’s spread, condoms, clean needles, fresh tattoo ink, are banned in most correctional facilities. Few systems provide adequate HIV education and still fewer offer substantive services to aid those living with HIV when transitioning back into their home communities upon release. Given the astronomically high incarceration rates, we cannot afford to ignore the prison epidemic. “

But that’s exactly what we do when we concentrate on myths and distractions like the hunt for those ubiquitous and invisible “DL bruthas.” Just as much of black America’s leadership is content to ignore the fact of our nation’s disastrous public policy of mass incarceration of black youth, we have so far turned a blind eye to the growing the threat to public health posed by the epidemic in America’s prisons, where again, we are the majority. Prison industry officials, for their part, are doubtless fat and happy to be so ignored. Many states and large counties, have privatized inmate health services too, creating an additional large disincentive to prevention, testing or aggressively treating HIV and hep C positive prisoners. BC believes that South Carolina is one of only two states that tests inmates on entry for HIV, offering them counseling and in some cases sending them to separate facilities.

The Good News

TV shows like Oprah’s try to end on a positive note --- a ray of light, a success story, a glimmer of hope. BC didn’t have to look far for this either.

Last month in Illinois, where African Americans make up 15% of the state’s population, are 51% of the diagnosed AIDS cases, and 65% of the prison census, activists successfully enacted groundbreaking legislation that enables Chicago State University to conduct the nation’s first comprehensive study of the connection between the HIV-AIDS epidemics in prison and in the state’s African American communities. We talked to Chicago’s Lloyd Kelly of the Let’s Talk, Let’s Test Foundation, one of the principal advocates behind this initiative.

“'Let’s Talk, Let’s Test’ stands for let’s talk about HIV, and let’s go get tested,” Kelly told us. “We have talked about this for a while, and now we are going to test it, too. People have pointed for years to a possible link between prisons and the HIV epidemic. The CSU study will give us some hard, useful data and go some of the distance to prove or disprove between the HIV crisis out here, and the one behind the walls.”

The Illinois legislation does not provide for mandatory testing of prisoners. “That would be a bad idea,” said Kelly. “Inmates have rights too…. Who are we to tell people they have to be tested, given the consequences of coming up positive?”

Brother Kelly’s point, and we think he is right, is that potential employers, landlords and other parties have been known to acquire people’s medical records through various means and discriminate against people who are HIV-positive. Ex-offenders have enough to deal with already without compulsory HIV testing. Just as placing exclusive blame on bisexual black men for the HIV epidemic is unproductive, scapegoating prisoners is wrong too.

Among the provisions of Illinois House Bill 2578, according to an August 19 Chicago Tribune article:

  • The Department of Corrections and county jails must offer voluntary HIV testing with no co-pay to inmates when they arrive in prison, during their incarceration and prior to their release. Limited testing at a small fee is currently provided in state prisons and some jails.
  • HIV-positive inmates who are released must receive transitional case management and referrals to support services through the Department of Corrections and other agencies.
  • HIV-positive welfare recipients may request changes in their work, education or training program if they meet Americans With Disabilities Act standards for disability.
  • High-traffic state offices, such as driver's license facilities and public aid offices, located in high-risk communities must provide space to community groups to offer rapid HIV testing.

Community groups, Kelly told BC, will be able to walk up to people in line getting drivers licenses or applying for unemployment benefits, and administer an HIV test with results in 20 minutes. Additionally, there is to be a permanent panel including two ex-offender reps who will review implementation of the act. A provision for the distribution of condoms was struck from the law late in the process to ensure its passage. Called the HIV-AIDS Response Act, it awaits funding in the next session of the Illinois legislature.

There is no doubt that the Oprah show which featured low down J.L. King and helped legitimize his ghetto-centric and homophobic boogeyman theories about the spread of HIV set back the cause of addressing the epidemic which is ravaging black America. The DL boogeyman does not begin to explain the facts of the HIV epidemic, in which substantial proportions of infections occur daily from injected drug use, from sexual contact with an injected drug user or someone else who has been with such a user. It doesn’t take into account the prison factor, and it allows us to forget that many heterosexual men as well as women have multiple undisclosed partners and are unprotected with many, most, or all of them.

Besides allowing us to ignore or evade responsibility for our individual and collective sexual behavior, discussion and media hype over the DL hype diverts attention from commonsensical public policy measures like those recommended by the Black AIDS Institute’s “The Time is Now,” which call calls for engaging HIV “not only as an individual health concern, but also as a political and social struggle.”

Those recommendations, on pages 7 and 8 of the report are

  • 1. Funding for Domestic Care and Treatment Programs
  • 2. Fight to lower the cost of HIV-AIDS and all other drugs affordable without bankrupting existing or future public health insurance plans.
  • 3. Fight for the Future of Medicaid: The Bush Administration intends to end Medicaid as we know it.
  • 4. Support for Needle Exchange Programs: End the federal and state bans against these programs which have been proven to save lives.

  • 5. Reject Scapegoating in the Black Community: Instead of looking for someone to blame, we need to change individual and collective behavior and public policies to prevent new infection and prolong the healthy lives of those already infected.
  • 6. Restore Comprehensive Sex Education: “Abstinence-only” education is ineffectual at best, and federally funded “abstinence-only” often contain outright disinformation.
  • 7. Institute Sensible HIV Prevention Measures in Prisons: Offer free voluntary HIV testing to current and former inmates, real assistance with transition, clean needles and condom distribution, etc.

The “DL brutha” is a boogeyman, and boogeymen are for children. When we become adults, we cast aside childish things. It’s time to send the DL boogeyman back to wherever he came from. Oprah helped unleash that boogeyman. Will she help bury him?

Bruce Dixon can be contacted at [email protected]

[1] Transcript of the Oprah Winfrey show, “A Secret Sex World: Living on the ‘Down Low’”, Executive Producer Ellen Rakieten, April 16, 2004, page 2.  Downloaded transcripts from the Oprah Winfrey show are only $6.

[2] Ibid, P, 11

Your comments are always welcome.

Visit the Contact Us page to send e-Mail or Feedback

or Click here to send e-Mail to [email protected]

e-Mail re-print notice

If you send us an e-Mail message we may publish all or part of it, unless you tell us it is not for publication. You may also request that we withhold your name.

Thank you very much for your readership.


September 8 2005
Issue 149

is published every Thursday.

Printer Friendly Version