This
article originally appeared in Africana.com. The old maxim
warns us to beware of priests who lose their faith but keep
their jobs. By that logic, a whole lot of alleged spokespersons
for black people should've been unemployed a long time ago.
In the wake of Bill Cosby's now-famous Pound Cake Speech at
the NAACP Legal Defense Fund's dinner commemorating the Brown
v. Board of Education case, the comedian has been praised
by white conservatives and black folk at large for essentially
keeping it real. For airing dirty laundry. For saying in public
what your uncle Bobby has been saying behind closed doors for
years.
But hold on. Before you fix your mouth
to sing Cosby's praises, consider this: the fact that some black
people make similar comments in private does not make them any
more accurate when they are spoken in public.
When it all gets down to
the get-down, black people are no more immune to believing stereotypes
about
African Americans than anyone else – and Cosby's podium-pounding
was full of the grossest stereotypes of poor black people. Even
if you agreed with his hyperbolic claims of $500 sneakers taking
precedence over Hooked on Phonics in the hood, even if
you signed on to his 21st Century bootstrap prescriptions ("You
can't blame white people for this"), it's impossible to
ignore the classist, bigoted and reactionary underpinnings of
his disdain for giving black children names like Shaniqua or
Ali, or his justification of police shooting people in the back
of the head for "stealing pound cake." (I have to wonder
what Cosby would say to me, a black man with a Ph.D. and no criminal
record, who has, nonetheless, had police pull guns on him three
times in his life – once by an officer demanding that I walk
on the sidewalk and not the street.) In the wake of Amadou Diallo
and Abner Louima, in the wake of literally dozens of black people
being arrested and imprisoned on false evidence in Tulia, Texas,
two years ago, these comments are not only ignorant, but also
extremely dangerous.
Amid all the national clatter
that Cosby's comments have generated, it would be easy to miss
the fact that
there is nothing particularly new about his indictments – his
prescriptions fit into a century-old program of bourgeois behavior
modification directed at poor black people from their purportedly
better-off kinfolk. The historian Evelyn Brooks Higginbotham
has come up with a name for this phenomenon, referring to the
idea that personal etiquette is a form of racial uplift as "the
politics of respectability." Since at least as far back
as the days when Du Bois announced his Talented Tenth program,
the afrostocracy has felt it necessary to clean up, dust off
and lead their less fortunate cousins into the promised land
of social acceptance. Call this Negro Noblesse Oblige.
This concern wasn't totally altruistic: black elites recognized
that, in the reductive racial reasoning of the United States,
the embarrassing behavior of poor black people would always compromise
their own bourgeois standing. (This class tension led Tennessee
to experiment with first-class and second-class sections within its
segregated railroad cars.)
And though the two clashed bitterly
on matters of personality and policy, both Booker T. Washington
and Du Bois found common ground in advocating moral uplift among
the Negro masses. Du Bois lamented in the pages of his masterful Philadelphia
Negro that moral corruption and vice were the major afflictions
among the newly arrived Southern migrants. Booker T. Washington
famously urged his followers to become models of thriftiness,
cleanliness and religious adherence, believing this would clear
the way to racial uplift. During the same era, Elijah Montgomery,
the founder of the all-black town of Mound Bayou, Mississippi,
banned the sale of liquor in the area and conducted house-to-house
investigations of the domestic arrangements of residents, ordering
all couples who were not legally married to leave the district.
In the early 20th century,
organizations like the National Association of Colored Women
and the Women's
Convention of the National Baptist Convention, keenly aware of
the prevailing stereotypes of black female sexuality, advocated
a program of abstinence and "virtue" as a means of
defending their own collective honor. A nearly obsessive concern
with personal behavior ties together movements as diverse as
Garveyism, the Montgomery Bus Boycott (whose leadership quietly jettisoned the case of a black teen who had been arrested for refusing to give up her seat months before Rosa Parks when the young woman later became pregnant while unmarried), the Nation
of Islam and the activities of the National Urban League. (Urban
Leaguers met newly arrived migrants with care packages that included
soap, toothbrushes and lists of life "instructions" — which
included warnings not to come outside with rollers in their hair
or keep livestock in their yards.)
Taken on its face, a "morality" agenda – however
that is defined – may have been useful; unplanned pregnancy and
crime did negatively impact black people's lives. The
problem, however, lies in the theory that this "morality" would
somehow vanquish racism – which has as its underlying premise
the inability to recognize any black person as moral in the first
place. And "morality" has frequently been conflated
with a simple, assimilationist ideal of white behavior – which
is why Cosby could so easily lump naming a child "LaQuita" or
speaking non-standard English into the same category as theft
and disdain for education. When you get down to it, how decent
can you be when you saddle your kids with names like that? What
kind of person – besides a whole lot of those who were fighting
off police dogs in Birmingham – doesn't bother to conjugate correctly?
The question is not whether or not we've overcome, but whether
some of us are too ghetto to even deserve to.
This respectability politic also ties
together Cosby's entire career, from his days playing a Rhodes
Scholar on I-Spy to his role as the successful obstetrician
Heathcliff Huxtable on The Cosby Show and his noted criticism
of Eddie Murphy for his use of profanity and sexual subject matter.
In a society built upon one-dimensional, pathological views of
black life Cosby's body of work – and his support for historically
black colleges – is commendable. But positive imagery and philanthropic
good deeds don't justify what is essentially hate speech.
Truth told, reactionary, elitist, stereotypical
and inappropriate as they were, there was really nothing black-specific
in Cosby's comments. Every ethnic group in this country has experienced
this dynamic of intra-group embarrassment. (I have long believed
that the NAACP should give Jerry Springer an image award for
pulling back the sheets on white American dysfunctionality.)
And rich people have been declaring poor people immoral since
the days of feudalism; the irony is that we've only recently
generated black people who were rich enough to be taken seriously.
Ultimately, Cosby was right: we can't
solely blame white people for this contempt for the black poor.
There are plenty of black people who are responsible too. But
most of them are not named Shaniqua.
William Jelani Cobb is an assistant professor of history at
Spelman College and editor of The Essential Harold Cruse.
He can be reached at [email protected].
Visit his website at www.jelanicobb.com |