“I'm
also not very analytical. You know I don't spend a lot
of time thinking about myself, about why I do things.”
- George
W. Bush, June 4, 2003
When
President Bush sat down for an interview with Tim Russert
on Meet the Press
he single-handedly proved that affirmative action is a bad
thing. George W. Bush is the poster child for affirmative action.
He attended prep school at Andover Academy because his father
was an alumnus. He didn’t get good grades at Andover but got
into Yale because the Bushes were alumni there as well. His
father’s connections got him into a National Guard unit and
helped him avoid serving in Vietnam. When he didn’t feel compelled
to complete his National Guard duty he just walked away and
didn’t suffer because of his decision. He then went to Harvard
where he earned his MBA. He was admitted to Harvard despite
earning only a C average while at Yale.
George
W. Bush has participated in a racial preference program his
entire life.
But after all those years of entitlement and connections to
the best America has to offer, George W. Bush has emerged as
a man who can’t put together more than two coherent sentences
and stumbles and pauses when attempting to express very simple
ideas.
It
is not necessarily a bad thing to use family connections
in a nation that proudly
refers to itself as the land of opportunity. The old saying
doesn’t specify how the opportunity should come about. Problems
arise when there is an expectation of privilege and no acknowledgement
that any responsibility comes along with it.
Ted Kennedy probably
would not be a Senator if he had a different last name and
had not run for that office when his brother was President.
He was also a legacy admission to college, in his case Harvard
University. But unlike President Bush, the Senator thinks for
himself and does his homework. Apparently he thinks enough
to realize that the issue of privilege must be addressed as
a matter of public policy. He has sponsored legislation that
would force colleges and universities that receive federal
aid to disclose the
number of students admitted as legacies. It is very clear that
he also reads the newspaper, something the President doesn’t
feel obliged to do. At least that is what the President said
in an interview with Fox
News.
Brit Hume:
How do you get your news?
President Bush: I
get briefed by Andy Card and Condi in the morning. They come
in and tell me. In all due respect, you've got a beautiful
face and everything.
I
glance at the headlines just to kind of a flavor for what's
moving. I rarely read the stories, and get briefed by
people who are probably read the news themselves. [sic] But
like Condoleezza, in her case, the national security adviser
is getting her news directly from the participants on the world
stage.
It
is difficult to concentrate on the issue of the President’s willful ignorance
when he is also calling Brit Hume beautiful, but this column
will only deal with the issue of the President’s competence.
If the President thought he had erred in saying he doesn’t
read the newspaper he didn’t show it because he confirmed his
lack of interest in a subsequent interview with ABC
News.
President Bush: Yes.
I get my news from people who don't editorialize. They give
me the actual news, and it makes it easier to digest, on
a daily basis, the facts.
Diane Sawyer: Is
it just harder to read constant criticism or to read —
President
Bush: Why even put up with it when you can get
the facts elsewhere? I'm a lucky man. I've got, it's
not just Condi and Andy, it's all kinds of people in my administration
who are charged with different responsibilities, and they
come in and say this is what's happening, this isn't what's
happening.
The President is correct
about one thing. He is very lucky. He is lucky to have been
born into a family that has shrewdly mastered the art of making
money and positioning itself politically. He is lucky that
being a well connected, old-money WASP protected his grandfather,
Prescott Bush, after he was fined by the United States government
for doing business with Nazi
Germany.
If
George W. Bush is the result of affirmative action then we
have to end it
immediately. When President Clinton engaged in tortured triangulating
over the same issue he coined the phrase, “Mend it, don’t end
it.” Perhaps Clinton should have been bolder. If affirmative
action results in a President who doesn’t want to read then
mending will not be enough.
Of course, the Bush
administration has shown nothing but hostility to affirmative
action when it helps anyone other than those who are already
privileged. The son of the Skull and Bones Society and an Ivy
League fraternity has thrown cold water on the idea of anyone
else achieving the American dream unless they pull themselves
up by the proverbial boot straps. When the Supreme Court deliberated
on affirmative action admissions at the University of Michigan
the Bush administration filed a brief calling
Michigan’s program unconstitutional. Of course the focus was
on extra points given to Black and Latino students, but the
Bushies knew better than to mention the advantages given to
legacy children or residents of Michigan’s nearly all white
upper peninsula.
America can end the
controversy over affirmative action by taking a very simple
step. George Bush should admit that he and other members of
the establishment elite are in fact not fit for their positions.
Before affirmative action it was rare for Blacks and Latinos
to attend Ivy League and other top schools. The President is
living proof that all of those admitted did not live up to
the legend that they were the best and the brightest. A simple
acknowledgement that they are not the only ones worthy of consideration
will suffice. The President can go on national television and
say something along these lines:
“It
is painfully obvious to everyone that I do not have the skills
to be President of
the United States. I reached this point because of family connections
and sweetheart deals. Only the most qualified people in our
society should have the opportunity to reach the position that
I have. Henceforth, my administration will now declare that
affirmative action is in fact constitutional and also a benefit
to America. If affirmative action is guaranteed we will never
again risk the presence of a low achieving, disengaged, inarticulate
man in the White House. America can and must do better. Thank
you and good night.”
Margaret
Kimberley’s Freedom Rider column appears weekly
in . Ms.
Kimberley is a freelance writer living in New York City. She
can be reached via e-Mail at [email protected]. You can read more
of Ms. Kimberley's writings at http://freedomrider.blogspot.com/