Throughout
most of our lives, African people in America have been told
if you get a good education you can get a good job. African
people in Africa were told something similar. If you get
a good education your condition in life will improve.
In
the early part of the twentieth-century until the late 1960s
and early 1970s, the thrust was to encourage African people
in America to at least get a high school diploma so that
they could be eligible for a job in a significant segment
of the work force.
The
explosion of the 1960s Civil Rights and Black Power Movements
forced colleges and universities to admit Africans in America
to their predominately white colleges and universities in
large numbers.
Today,
African people in America are encouraged to get college
education so they can get a good job. The education market
has been saturated to the extent that a high school diploma
of the 1930s, 40s, 50s, and 60s, in most instances, has
the same meaning as a college degree today.
That
meaning is one of a college degree, qualifying people for
entry-level jobs in the U. S. labor market, except for those
instances where people have been trained in specialized
fields at the undergraduate level.
What
we hear repeatedly today is that we must concentrate on
African people in America reading, writing, and math skills
at the elementary and secondary levels so they can compete
for the jobs that will be available in U.S. multinational
corporations in the twenty-first-century, driven by the
world of technology and computers.
Many
of our ancestors in the eighteenth, nineteenth, and early
twentieth-centuries, who were concerned with the issue of
education, asked the question�education for what? It is
quite clear that the major direction of U.S. educational
policy has been to train and educate African people to work
for white people. That is, to teach them to read, write,
and compute, so they will be prepared to work for us.
In
a paper written by our great ancestor Dr. Jacob Carruthers
several years ago, entitled, �Black Intellectuals and The
Crisis In Black Education,� he observed, �When the chattel
slave system was destroyed by the Civil War, one of the
first acts of the victors was to provide for Black schooling
on a wide scale. The northern industrialists through their
philanthropic alter egos began finding and establishing
Black colleges. These colleges were intended to sit atop
a Negro education system.�
Further
Dr. Carruthers wrote, �By the turn of the century, even
southern whites were making use of this Negro education
system to facilitate the transition from the old chattel
to a new, but equally effective, system of Black exploitation.�
Carruthers
explains, �The new system depended upon the cultivation
of a Black elite to serve as examples for the masses of
Blacks and to demonstrate the rewards of obedience.�
The
educated Black elite, Carruthers points out, �demonstrated
time and time again their ability to do what they had been
trained to do. Eventually, a few of them were invited to
manage the segregated colleges that were established to
train Black teachers. In this manner, a small, educated
Negro elite became overseers of the educational affairs
of millions of Black people.�
This
model of education, that continues today, was established
by so-called leading white educators in this country who
met at Lake Mohonk, New York (a resort area) on June 4-6,
1890, and June 3-5, 1891 to read and discuss papers on what
they officially called the �Negro Question.�
Again,
Dr. Carruthers writes that at the end of the second conference
�they had decided that the primary things that Blacks had
to be taught were morality and the dignity of labor (i.e.,
working for white folks).�
African
people in the United States have a rich tradition of leaders
who have taken issue with the white conceptualization of
the mission of education of African people in America. David
Walker, Henry Highland Garnet, Henry McNeal Turner, Martin
R. Delany, and Edward Wilmot Blyden were nineteenth-century
advocates that the education of African people should be
designed to assist us in doing for ourselves.
In
the twentieth-century, leaders such as Marcus Garvey, Carter
G. Woodson, Elijah Muhammad, and Malcolm X, all spoke and
wrote consistently about the need for African people to
develop an education program aimed ant developing African
people �to do for self.�
In
other words, we are still challenged today to create an
education climate that inspires African youth in America
to understand that the purpose of education is to develop
the skills and historical understanding of the past as it
relates to the present and future in preparation for working
for self and the liberation of African people. This is the
challenge of the twenty-first-century� to defeat the one
hundred year tradition established by white educational
leaders who created curricula for Africans in America designed
to prepare them to work for white folks.
Our
esteemed ancestor, Dr. John Henrik Clarke reminded us repeatedly,
that, �history is the clock that people use to tell their
political and cultural time of day. It is also a clock that
they use to find themselves on the map of human geography.
The role of history in the final analysis is to tell a people
where they have been and what they have been, where they
are and what they are. Most importantly, the role of history
is to tell a people where they still must go and what they
still must be. To me the relationship of a people to their
history is the same as the relationship of a child to its
mother.� The purpose of education must always be �for
us to do for ourselves!�
BlackCommentator.com Columnist, Conrad W. Worrill, PhD, is the
National Chairman Emeritus of the National Black United
Front (NBUF).
Click here to contact Dr. Worrill. |