The
conservative right continued its deafening drum beat to
a return to yesterday with a rally this past weekend on
the 47 anniversary of the most celebrated march date of
the 20th Century Civil Rights movement. Called the “Restoring
America’s Honor” rally, it was led by conservative talk
show host, Glenn Beck, and featured him and the other star
of the Tea Party movement, the conservative party’s latest
high profile anti-intellectual, Sarah Palin. Both Beck
and Palin have been touted as the new stars of the Tea Party,
but Beck claims this wasn’t a Tea Party event—just most
of the folk attending it coincidentally just happen to be
“tea partiers.” All 87,000 of them (according to air photo
documents). Beck and his crew are hyping a 300,000 turnout
but haven’t provided any photos to substantiate such a claim.
If fact, they aren’t even circulating crowd photos. What
mass march wouldn’t want to show the power of their followers
and supporters in a collective photo? None that I know of.
We
know why the National Parks Service doesn’t count any more.
They stopped in 1997 after claiming that the 1995 Million
Man March only had 400,000 attendees. They later adjusted
it to 700,000 but that was still a million short of the
1.7 million to 2 million everybody else saw (including myself).
The substance of Beck’s attendance numbers
really is not the issue here. It’s the symbolism attached
to holding it on the most significant benchmark of the movement
everybody wants to emulate again. The message of the movement
still resonates on the conscience of America. Well, at least
some of them. King’s booming voice of “Let Freedom Ring”
as a signature verse in what Rev. Jesse Jackson, Sr. now
called his “Bounced Check” speech, but was overridden by
another verse by which the speech became renowned (“I Have
A Dream”). Yet, the Beck/Palin spin on this is that it is
time to “let freedom ring” for disenfranchised “Americans”
(code for white people), thus the whole “restoring” America’s
honor thing. I just have one question, Where were these
folk during the “Baby Bush” administration, when America
was really being dishonored? It guess America wasn’t
in the same kind of social retreat then (where they had
to rally about it). But two years into President Obama’s
presidency, the conservatives have found new ideas, religion,
a movement and now a conveniently symbolic date to express
themselves. The substance of what they have to say is still
in question.
Both
Beck and Palin only became dissent voices in the last election
cycle, so they wouldn’t have been factors in any Republican
“rally” cry. The Republican party really has no “front men”
(women) per se, other than John McCain-who ain’t nobody
listening to. This new drum beat continues to have these
subtle racial over(under)tones. This latest poke at King
is right out of the Republican “colorblind” card deck. In
the 1990s, Republicans were quoting King more frequently
than black leaders were. And the “Judge not by the color
of our skin, but by the content of our character” verse
of King’s speech witnessed a total cooptation by the conservative
movement. So what is significant about Beck choosing the
August 28th date to hold his rally? The March on Washington
was considered the “change point” of the Civil Right Movement.
King, who keynoted the speech, said “Now is the time.” The
march on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial was nationally
televised and demanded the attention of the nation, on this
day. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was introduced to Congress
the following Monday, and passed several months later (in
part in memoriam to the slain President that called for
the Act).
Glenn
Beck and his ideological dance partner, Sarah Palin, used
all the symbolic language of that day to establish context
for this movement in this time. Palin, who has never read
an original line in this revived party ride, in fact, said
“We are standing today at the symbolic crossroads of our
nation’s history.” Oh really? Sound familiar. She went on
to say that she was humbled to be standing with “patriots”
and called for them to look around, that they were standing
with “Americans.” Hmmm…then she called on “Americans” to
restore the honor of America, show their courage, weaved
in Washington, Lincoln and King. Beck took a different
tact (from his usual lack of tact) saying he talked to God
and God called for them all to pray for their country. Now
God can touch everybody, even Glenn Beck, but whether or
not he intended it to turn out this way, the “spiritual”
or “religious” tone gave the illusion that Beck was taking
a “King-ian” approach of a God inspired moment 47 years
ago. Whether Beck was trying to suggest that he is now on
“God mission” to restore America’s honor is a question everyone
is asking. Clearly it was a political rally, without the
political tone…well, except for the Palin rhetoric. Obviously
God hadn’t touched her. She didn’t stay around long enough,
leaving soon after she spoke. Still she stayed around long
enough to be the symbol she was brought in to be. But Beck
called for a “great awakening.” Hmmm…
I
guess they tried everything else. Evangelism can’t hurt.
What does hurt is how conservatives continue to bastardize
the King legacy and have no problem doing it. They are not
sincere in advancing America’s social cause. They are interested
in a social retreat and are mocking the significance of
an “overcoming” moment in America’s socio-political history.
They continue to mock one of America’s moral leaders and
use his language in retreat of what he stood for. When both
Martin Luther King, Jr. and Sarah Palin call for “moral
courage,” you somehow know they’re not calling for the same
thing. They are both symbols of a movement that have two
entirely different calls to action.
They
just share the same language…and now the same date in history.
Let’s just hope they don’t have the same results for their
targeted objectives.
BlackCommentator.com Columnist, Dr. Anthony Asadullah Samad,
PhD is a national columnist and author of Saving The
Race: Empowerment Through Wisdom. His Website is AnthonySamad.com. Click here to contact Dr. Samad. |