Union
busters are set to come out of the woodwork over consideration by
the U.S. Senate of the Employee Free Choice Act, the law that would
make it a little easier for Americans to organize unions in their
workplaces.
Already,
the section of EFCA that had Corporate America and the right wing
in an uproar, so-called card check - which would allow a union to
form if a majority of workers signed union cards - has been eliminated
from the legislation, but that didn’t stop business associations
from finding tragedy in the rest of the bill.
A trade newspaper for the trucking industry, Transport Topics,
reported early this month that union busters warned a gathering
of fleet executives in Las
Vegas that, even with the elimination of card check, “…mandatory
arbitration is probably the most pernicious part of the Employee
Free Choice Act.”
Peter Kirsanow, a former member of the National Labor Relations Board,
now a member of a Cleveland law firm, reportedly told the gathering
that all previous U.S. labor laws combined “…probably don’t have
the kind of impact the Employee Free Choice Act may have.”
The
mandatory arbitration section is the fear point for employers. Under
current law, even if workers organize, there is no requirement that
management reach an agreement, ever. Rather, they can “surface bargain,”
that is, they can sit at the bargaining table and talk about Ohio
State football or anything else for a year or two or more and never
come to an agreement.
Often,
when that happens, a decertification petition is circulated sometime
soon after the first year and the fledgling union is fighting for
its life just to survive, let alone getting a first contract.
This
is the time for the employer to turn loose its “union avoidance”
consultants - union busters - and let them go to work, showing that
the union can’t do anything for them and, even so, they’ll still
have to pay dues and maybe, someday, go on strike. They’re good
at this and, today, the union busters often are hired even before
any sign of a union organizing campaign, to size up the workers
and see where the weak spots are and how the rank-and-file can be
divided without making it look as if the boss did it.
Although
the right to form unions is enshrined in American law and in the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights - which a majority of the
world’s nations endorses - organized labor is one of the first institutions
that corporations, armies, and corrupt politicians go after in trying
to wrest control of a nation.
Unions
in the U.S. have vast experience
facing the powers-that-be which want to have free rein in operating
their businesses and industry. Here today, however, it doesn’t happen
as much through the use of overt violence, as in some developing
countries. Rather, it is done using the shortcomings of the law
(or by illegal means that are rarely prosecuted). Woody Guthrie
said it most succinctly: Some rob you with a six-gun, others with
a fountain pen.
Perhaps
the hysteria of American business interests over EFCA is warranted
to a small degree, because even a watered-down version will give
workers a boost and could indeed change the corporate landscape.
Kirsanow told the gathering in Las
Vegas that, under EFCA, if an agreement is not reached within 120
days, the matter goes to arbitration and the resultant contract
will be valid for the next two years. This would be a profound change
for workers who sit across from management negotiators with no way
to convince them to come to agreement on a contract.
No
doubt, some of the thousands of union-busting firms in the U.S.
are visiting employer group meetings the same as that in Las Vegas this month, delivering the same message and warning that
tough times are coming. They are certainly in the business of rustling
up business.
It
has been tough times for workers and unions for many years and EFCA
would level the playing field somewhat. The late Marty Levitt, author
of Confessions of a Union Buster, underwent a transformation
after he had been engaged in the nefarious profession for 20 years
of his adult life.
He
was moved to repent, to admit the underhanded methods that were
almost universally used by union busters to stop workers from representing
themselves at the bargaining table. He said that, in 100 campaigns,
he only lost five to union workers. That’s how difficult it is to
organize a union against the power of the employer and the army
of consultants waiting to crush their efforts to gain a measure
of equality in the workplace. Levitt made the rounds of union meetings
and conventions, speaking wherever he could to inform people of
the kind of class war that was under way in America.
When
the research assistants were organizing several years ago at the
State University of New York at Stony Brook, through the Graduate
Student Employees Union Local 1104 (Communications Workers of America),
they estimated that the union-busters were charging about $800 an
hour.
Also,
they pointed out during their campaign that, the Research Foundation,
part of the SUNY system, retained 50 percent of the grants received
by professors throughout SUNY. One of their demands was that SUNY
not use that grant money to try to break their effort to organize
a union.
There
are thousands of ways for employers to deny workers’ rights under
U.S. labor law and they will use as many of them as possible - or
they can afford - especially in the coming weeks when EFCA is being
considered, first in the Senate, then in both houses of Congress.
Richard
Trumka, elected president of the AFL-CIO in September, has said
that he has not given up on card check and some observers believe
that there is a slim chance that it will be restored to the final
bill.
Corporate
America is worried about what
might replace card check, a “quickie” election, which would be required
within five days to two weeks after a petition is filed. There would
barely be time to launch a full-blown anti-union campaign, directed
by union-busting consultants. Even
worse, in the employer’s view, the union could for the first time
have access to workers, in the workplace on the same days that the
boss addresses the workers.
Everybody
is getting into the act of thwarting unionization of workers. In
addition to the usual crowd - U.S. Chamber of Commerce, National
Association of Manufacturers, National Federation of Independent
Business, and all of the right-wing think tanks - there are ever
new manifestations of opposition.
Something
called Agriculture for a Democratic Workplace formed last spring
to oppose EFCA, consisting of 40 groups in agribusiness, all very
concerned that their largely underpaid and exploited workers would
lose their right to an election if EFCA (if card check were included)
became the law of the land. That is, of course, on the few occasions
when the same employers allowed an election to be held at all.
The
world in which we find EFCA being debated is much the same as in
the past several generations: Employers have most of the power and
the workers have little. Corporate America would like to keep it so, because, that
way, the money will keep floating to the top 1 percent of the income
pile in the U.S.
EFCA
is creating a lot of employment…for union-busting consultants, not
many of them with the honesty and integrity to admit what they are
doing to their fellow Americans, as Marty Levitt did. Ultimately,
he was sorry for what he did.
Union-busters
of today, if they are sorry for anything, are sorry that they can’t
make more money doing what they do.
BlackCommentator.com Columnist, John Funiciello, is a labor organizer
and former union organizer. His union work started when he became
a local president of The Newspaper Guild in the early 1970s. He
was a reporter for 14 years for newspapers in New
York State. In addition to labor work,
he is organizing family farmers as they struggle to stay on the
land under enormous pressure from factory food producers and land
developers. Click here
to contact Mr. Funiciello.
|