When
criminals are about to be caught, they try to hide their wrongdoing.
When drug dealers hear the police sirens, they dump the stash in
the alley or flush it down the toilet. When the Nazi officers in
the concentration camps heard the allied forces approaching, they
destroyed—and in many cases murdered—the evidence. There’s something
about the light of day when it shines its truth upon you.
And when a Texas state commission started looking
into a report that a faulty arson investigation apparently put an
innocent man to death, Gov. Rick Perry replaced the commission and
called the dead man a monster.
Because that’s what Southern hick town justice is
all about.
Cameron
Todd Willingham is now a free man, but unfortunately it took death
to release him from the confines of his prison bars. He was executed
on February 17, 2004 for the 1991 arson deaths of his three children.
Gov. Perry refused to grant him a 30-day stay, despite questions
about his guilt. According to a bogus forensics report, Willingham’s
house was intentionally burned down.
In 2005, Texas instituted a forensic science commission
to investigate mistakes and wrongdoing by forensic scientists.
Baltimore fire expert Craig Beyler, who was hired by this commission
to look into the Willingham case, concluded that there were no scientific
grounds to characterize the fire as an act of arson. As The New Yorker reported, Beyler said the approach of the arson
investigator in the case denied rational reasoning, was based on
“folklore and mysticism rather than science,” and violated “not
only the standards of today but even of the time period.” This,
in a state whose fire investigators typically had a high school
diploma, and unlike other states, no requisite experience and no
specialized training or qualifications.
So, the Texas commission was reviewing Beyler’s report,
and Gov. Perry, running for reelection, eliminated the members of
the commission before they could issue their findings. Pure politics.
After all, we don’t want people going around and talking about the
execution of innocent people.
Meanwhile, Judge Sharon Keller, presiding judge of
the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, that state’s highest criminal
court, could find herself in deep trouble. The State Commission
on Judicial Conduct initiated impeachment proceedings against Keller
for incompetence, violating her duties as a judge and casting public
discredit on the court. For a state such as Texas— with such abysmal
standards of integrity in its criminal “justice” system—you must
wonder what she did to stand out among the crowd.
Keller
refused to keep the court open after 5pm when she knew Michael Richard,
a death row inmate, sought a last-minute appeal challenging the
constitutionality of his punishment of lethal injection. The inmate
was unable to file an appeal and was executed. Also, Keller rejected
a new trial for Roy Criner, a mentally retarded man convicted of
rape and murder, even though DNA evidence showed that he did not
rape the victim. “We can't give new trials to everyone who establishes,
after conviction, that they might be innocent,” Judge Keller said.
“We would have no finality in the criminal justice system, and finality
is important. When witnesses testify, and when jurors return a verdict,
they need to know that they can't come back later and change their
minds.”
Keller was unrepentant, and Perry said the execution
of Willingham was appropriate based on the "totality of the
issues”. Ex-governor Mark White suggests that Texas might have to do away with the death penalty
altogether, given that it does not deter crime and is unfairly administered, with a risk
of executing the innocent. Bad habits are hard to break, and with
423 executions since 1974, including 152 under Gov. George W. Bush, Texas
has the most voracious appetite for capital punishment. But perhaps
the Willingham case is what is needed to end the barbaric practice.
My take on this subject is that the death penalty
never was intended to be fair, as it is a holdover from Jim Crow
lynching. Capital punishment was an effort to transplant lynchmob
justice into the courtroom and make lynching official, if not respectable.
A broken system that was designed to be broken—just clean it up
and no one will notice, they thought. Guilt or innocence is of
little concern here, as finality reigns supreme. And Judge Keller
essentially said as much. It is no accident that the states of
the former Confederacy— the states with the most violent racial
history, a deep legacy of extrajudicial terror and killings— have
been among the most enthusiastic executioners. Interestingly, those
states also seem to have the lowest educational and health standards.
Typically, the inmates on death row are people of color, and poor
white folk like Mr. Willingham, those who lack resources and are
unable to afford the best justice money can buy. We will never
know how many people have been wrongfully executed. But
Cameron Todd Willingham certainly would not have been the first.
And perhaps we will never
know how many opportunistic individuals have built their political
careers on the corpses of the executed, whether guilty or innocent.
Rick Perry and Sharon Keller now have ethical clouds
hanging over their heads. They utilized death as a political tool,
but now, ironically, the death machine that helped bolster their
careers could be their undoing. Yet, both are appropriate spokespersons
for the death penalty. They have helped perpetuate an inherently
unjust, incompetent and capricious system that legalized the lynchmob.
If you would like to comment on this article, please do so below. There is a 400 character limit. You do not need a FaceBook account. Your comment will be posted instantly. Thanks.
Entering your email address is not mandatory.
You may also choose to enter only your first name and your location.
Any BlackCommentator.com article may
be re-printed so long as it is re-printed in its entirety and full
credit given to the author and www.BlackCommentator.com. If the
re-print is on the Internet we additionally request a link back
to the original piece on our Website.
Your comments are always welcome.
eMail re-print notice
If you send us an eMail message
we may publish all or part of it, unless you tell us it
is not for publication. You may also request that we withhold
your name.
Thank you very much for your readership.
Your comments are always welcome.
October
22 , 2009
Issue 347
is
published every Thursday
Executive Editor:
Bill Fletcher, Jr.
Managing Editor:
Nancy Littlefield
Publisher:
Peter Gamble
Est. April 5, 2002
Printer Friendly Version
in resizeable plain
text format or pdf
format.