Just finished re-reading the
‘60’s counterinsurgency classic, War
of the Flea: The Classic Study of Guerrilla Warfare, by
Robert Taber. I think I read it back in high school, as it has
that real familiar feel to it of a book you’d read years ago.
The details were gone from my memory; if you’d asked me about
it last week or earlier I couldn’t have told you jack about it.
now it is being bruited about as a necessary and essential read
in military / diplomatic circles. I’m tending to agree; the author
ain’t dumb and ain’t blind neither. Most all the US written stuff
in that time frame - the ‘60’s - dealing with counterinsurgency
and wars of national liberation and third world security issues
was all puerile garbage. This ain’t. There’s more than a touch
of wisdom to it.
Taber seems to have been forgotten
almost like his books have. There aren’t any more details readily
available on his life than the liner notes on his books, which
state that he was an investigative journalist for CBS in the ‘50’s,
and was among the first journalists who searched out and interviewed
Fidel Castro in the Sierra Maestra mountains in 1958. He wrote
a book on that, M-26;
Biography of a Revolution, in 1960, and this book, in
1965. This book came to me courtesy of Trinity University via ILL,
and it apparently has been checked out exactly once in its lifetime,
The book is a quite well-written
survey of all the major guerilla movements in the 20th Century,
up to 1965. Taber manages to keep the material lively, which isn’t
generally the case for military writings, and also manages to
keep it short, which is rare most everywhere. See for yourself
- here’s some of Taber’s writings:
Taber, quoting our old friend
Vo Nguyen Giap, the Vietnamese commanding general from 1944-1978,
on guerillas fighting a conventional Western army:
“The enemy will pass slowly
from the offensive to the defensive. The blitzkrieg will transform
itself into a war of duration. Thus, the enemy will be caught
in a dilemma: He has to drag out the war in order to win it, and
does not possess, on the other hand, the psychological and political
means to fight a long, drawn-out war.”
Couldn’t have said it better
myself about our two wars ongoing. Giap’s apt turn of phrase –
“the psychological and political means to fight a long, drawn-out
war” - is something we overlook completely, both in our foes and
in ourselves. We look to the power of our weapons and the prowess
of our troops in using them. Giap looked to the soldier’s and
citizen’s hearts, where individual will and patriotism reside,
and he defeated us and the French both.
quotes a news article dated 4-21-64, which pointed out that the
number of ARVN (our South Vietnames ally’s
army) small-unit operations in the preceding week totaled 5190.
Only 70 of them made contact with the enemy, and contact meant
as little as a single bullet fired at them from a hedgerow. Shows
that even back then, the truth was out in the open, if anyone
had their eyes open to see it. Can’t say as anyone has produced
similar statistics from Afghanistan or Iraq - haven’t heard of
any, and the fact that nobody in the reportorial corps has tried
to turn them up, as the percentage of contacts per operation,
and the percentage of contacts you, and not the enemy, initiate,
are probably THE key statistics in explaining how the war is going
- shows what a bunch of military illiterates the fourth estate
are, and how they haven’t learned anything from Vietnam, either.
Another one from Giap, this,
the classic dilemma of an invading foreign army:
“The nature and the very aim
of the campaign the (colonialist) enemy is conducting oblige the
enemy to split up his forces so as to be able to occupy the invaded
territory...the enemy was thus faced with a contradiction: It
was impossible for him to occupy the invaded territory without
dividing his forces. By their dispersal, he created difficulties
for himself. His scattered units thus became an easy prey for
our troops and mobile forces.”
“For the French, the Indochina
War was lost then (after the RC-4 defeats in 1950) and there.
That it was allowed to drag on inconclusively for another four
years is a testimony to the shortsightedness of the civilian authorities
who were charged with drawing the political conclusions from the
hopeless military situation.”
So there it is. The United
States, and our good friends, the Limeys,
have a political system more broken than the French Fourth Republic’s.
We’ve been fighting more obviously lost wars for longer, and apparently
are doubling down on one of them as we speak. Maybe starting a
third one, too.
For all the talk of this book
being greatly read in military circles, well, hell, it’s time
to test the officer corps on their reading comprehension and see
if it is up to a sixth-grader’s level. Maybe the State Department’s,
too. If stuff like this not jumping off the page and hitting you
square between the eyes - and making you wince at how little we
learned from Vietnam then, or since, and how shamefully we are
repeating ourselves in self-delusion and contempt for our foes’
intelligence, motivation, and bravery - well, hell, whatever bad
happens to us, we’ve got it coming. The almighty might smile on
fools and children, but to the best of my knowledge his mercy
doesn’t extend to the stupid.
Guest Commentator, Daniel N. White, has lived in Austin,
Texas, much longer than he figured he would.
He reads more than most people and a whole lot more than we are
all supposed to. He recommends all read his earlier piece in BC,
Redux, which is still, in his estimation, the best piece on
the Iraq surge anybody printed when it started. He is still doing
blue-collar work for a living - you can be honest doing it - but
is fairly fed up with it right now. He invites all reader comments,
and will answer all that aren’t too insulting. Click here
to contact Mr. White.
Any BlackCommentator.com article may
be re-printed so long as it is re-printed in its entirety and full
credit given to the author and www.BlackCommentator.com. If the
re-print is on the Internet we additionally request a link back
to the original piece on our Website.
Your comments are always welcome.
eMail re-print notice
If you send us an eMail message
we may publish all or part of it, unless you tell us it
is not for publication. You may also request that we withhold
Thank you very much for your readership.
Your comments are always welcome.
8 , 2009
published every Thursday
Bill Fletcher, Jr.
Est. April 5, 2002
Printer Friendly Version
in resizeable plain
text format or pdf