When
the Soviet Union collapsed a few decades ago,
there was virtual celebration in the streets and Americans claimed
victory over the behemoth that seemed to pervade our every place
and time for a half-century.
In
the minds of many, if not most Americans, there were communists
everywhere: they were in the State Department, they were in the
workplaces, they were in the universities, and they were in the
entertainment industry, they were under our beds.
The
Cold War fears were energized anew most days of the week and the
people were kept in a state of high anxiety. This condition became
a way of life as we became steeped in fear and paranoia over possible
nuclear attack or the imminent foreign takeover of the U.S.
Our
great industries turned their productive capacity to the building
of weapons systems and defense systems - whether they worked or
not. The cost did not matter, since our national life was at stake.
The “American way of life” was at stake and it needed to be defended
at all costs.
For
long years, the U.S. seemed to be able to
do it all: provide an ever-larger budget for defense and military
and give the country its opportunity to provide that American way
of life for more and more people. It was possible because of an
increase in productivity of American industry, new technologies,
and American superiority in continuing to supply the nation and
its people with the cheapest energy, mostly from oil, whether it
was of domestic or foreign sources.
As
far as the American people knew, the Soviet Union wasn’t doing badly,
either, since their people were not rising up against the system
and their defense and military sectors seemed to be growing at the
same (or greater) rate than ours.
Things
are not always as they seem.
The
Soviets went into Afghanistan and became much
hated by the occupied people, almost instantly. They were there
for 10 years. Our intelligence agencies didn’t seem to pick up the
signs that they were leaking their economic lifeblood at a great
rate, and then we helped create what became Osama bin Laden and
al Qaeda to finish off the Soviets in that rugged country. Defeated,
the Soviets pulled out of Afghanistan.
Collapse
of an empire such as that of the Soviets should have been a warning
to others, particularly to the U.S.,
which was the only other “superpower,” the other empire.
The
Berlin Wall came down and the Soviet Union collapsed and became,
once again, Russia and its friendly (a
few not-so-friendly) satellite nations. Americans rejoiced at their
“victory” of capitalism over communism. Many of them seemed to think
there would be a shift in foreign policy and the nation’s budget
and that the American people would be the beneficiaries of a “peace
dividend.”
That
is, they would see a change in the priorities of the nation, that
human needs would, for the first time in a half-century, take precedence
over weapons and the military. That was an unrealistic expectation.
The Soviet Union, now Russia,
was forced to admit that they had bottomed out, but the U.S. would not make such an
admission.
Instead,
what we’ve seen is an ever-increasing military and defense budget,
a sharply reduced concern for the vulnerable members of the society
and of wage-working men and women, and a sharply-increasing disparity
in wealth between the top five percent of Americans and the rest
of us. Unemployment - real unemployment - stands between 10 and
20 percent. The people are suffering.
When
the Soviet Union fell and there was a party
atmosphere across the nation over American “exceptionalism,” it
was almost as if many thought that the victory over communism was
a foregone conclusion.
The
new Russian leaders allowed the “free market” to rule, apparently
under the impression that, since capitalism and free markets defeated
their economic form, a and some form of capitalism. The result was
a disaster. Members of a rapacious class of entrepreneurs set out
to become rich and powerful - fast. And, they did, but the people
suffered greatly and the government stepped in - in their own inimitable
fashion - to allay the suffering of the people.
At
the time of the collapse of the Berlin Wall, celebration seemed
a bit premature. The Soviet Union and the U.S.
were like the two sides of an isosceles triangle, which, in effect,
held each other up. What would happen if one of the sides fell?
The remaining side, it seemed, having no visible means of support,
would start its inevitable fall.
Each
empire has its own unique trip to the ground. We’ve seen Russia’s. It’s possible that we’re seeing the
last stage of the other side of the triangle. It’s not Russia that is now in Afghanistan,
the “graveyard of empires, it’s the U.S. Some of the same problems of post-Cold War
Russia exist
in the U.S.
and it seems that the peace dividend is farther from our grasp than
ever. While it’s true that Americans have a tradition of democracy,
the people seem to feel they have lost control - just as the Russian
people felt that they had little or no control over their own lives.
Corporate
America has emptied the land
of every form of enterprise that can be moved somewhere else where
there are weaker labor and environmental laws and they’re rewarded
for doing so. A class of people who are strangers to the American
ideal of citizenship have taken over the economy, the society, and
the country’s politics.
There
isn’t much that can not be bought or influenced by money, but working
people don’t have spare money to contribute to the coffers of the
powerful.
America has taken on the role of “the last empire,” as Pentagon
budgets in recent years have shown. The expansion of our wars and
the maintenance of our military might across the globe show that
there isn’t going to be a peace dividend in the foreseeable future.
Rather, we’re going to keep spending on things that explode and
on recruiting people who will be required to kill or be killed,
all in the name of peacekeeping.
Being
the only superpower can be bad for a nation’s health. It certainly
is deadly for its people, for they are left out in the cold, literally.
Their prospects are not good, unless they organize to make fundamental
change in their economic, political, and governmental structures,
which have become what the founders of America would not recognize.
A
nation’s people who are polarized will not solve society’s problems.
We have lots of angry people and those on the right don’t even seem
to know what they’re angry about. These are not rich people. They
are working people, and they have been whipped into frenzy by the
radio and television noisemakers, who dispense their particular
brand of vitriol and hate for hours every day, in every part of
the country.
We’ll
find no solutions to our problems until there can be rational discussion
and debate. There can be no discussion or debate of our problems
among the people if they continue to be polarized. People are hurting
in America because
the “of the people, by the people, and for the people” part of Lincoln’s speech at Gettysburg
has been forgotten.
Those
who act out of ignorance and allow themselves to be led by demagogues,
who are paid 1,000 times as much per year as a wage-worker, should
be examining the motives of the people who daily stir their most
base instincts. It should not be news that their interests are not
the same. Still, they follow.
The
U.S. may be close to the ground after the fall of its prop (the
other superpower) a couple of decades ago, but, low point or not,
the people need to stop listening to the demagogues, educate themselves
about the reality of their lives, and understand that the second
side of the triangle was never going to stay up by itself. The people
are going to have to do the heavy lifting and make the changes themselves.
BlackCommentator.com Columnist, John Funiciello, is a labor organizer
and former union organizer. His union work started when he became
a local president of The Newspaper Guild in the early 1970s. He
was a reporter for 14 years for newspapers in New
York State. In addition to labor work,
he is organizing family farmers as they struggle to stay on the
land under enormous pressure from factory food producers and land
developers. Click here
to contact Mr. Funiciello.
Any BlackCommentator.com article may
be re-printed so long as it is re-printed in its entirety and full
credit given to the author and www.BlackCommentator.com. If the
re-print is on the Internet we additionally request a link back
to the original piece on our Website.
Your comments are always welcome.
eMail re-print notice
If you send us an eMail message
we may publish all or part of it, unless you tell us it
is not for publication. You may also request that we withhold
your name.
Thank you very much for your readership.
Your comments are always welcome.
September24
, 2009
Issue 343
is
published every Thursday
Executive Editor:
Bill Fletcher, Jr.
Managing Editor:
Nancy Littlefield
Publisher:
Peter Gamble
Est. April 5, 2002
Printer Friendly Version
in resizeable plain
text format or pdf
format.