For
years - many years - I’ve been reminding people that, when we were
young, trips to the doctor or the hospital were rare. You
went when you were sick or injured or the doctor came to the house
and picked a medication out of the little black bag and wrote how
to take it on a piece of paper.
What
happened in a short, few generations?
We
have some of the most frightening diseases and maladies today and
they’re not just afflicting the older among us just because we’re
living longer. They are striking babies and children. How many children
60 years ago suffered from cancer? How many suffered from autism
or Asperger’s Syndrome, or any of the other scores of health problems
that have become so commonly reported in the past two decades?
It’s
true that this is anecdotal, but the more these problems are studied
clinically and the more scientific and medical research that is
done, the more it seems that we’re making ourselves sick - not that
we couldn’t see it coming.
Our
“health care crisis” that has spawned the chaotic noise over health
care reform is something that we could have prevented or, at least,
lessened in its effect on us as individuals and human communities.
We
could have prevented the poisoning of our air and water, with a
closer watch over the industries that were strategically placed
on our rivers and lakes. These bodies of water became the dumping
ground for the toxins of our time. Many communities drew their drinking
water from them and, in the process, the health of our bodies was
compromised.
The
same industries spewed poisons into the air and we all breathed
it, continuing the breakdown of our systems. These things brought
on increasing problems, with asthma and other respiratory illnesses,
especially for children whose systems were not mature enough to
withstand these assaults on their bodies.
Many
of these things have become “issues” for Americans, especially since
the first Earth Day, April 22, 1970. We have come a long way as
a nation to clean up some of the most toxic waters and pockets of
toxic air, but still the air and water are not safe for multitudes
of our people. Such things as dumps, hazardous waste landfills,
and burn plants that spewed the toxins into the air and ground water
were placed in areas where poor people lived - where they still
live.
In
many cases, this amounted to environmental racism and the people
who live there are fighting a never-ending battle to remove the
threat to themselves and their children. These problems were in
both urban and rural areas. They still are problems in those areas
and the fight is the same.
In
the past, when America was filled with heavy
industry and manufacturing, the corporate owners and officers fought
against laws that would tend to correct some of the problems as
if they were fighting for their own, human lives, instead of fighting
just for the profit of their corporations. Usually, they won, and
they continue to win.
There
are many to blame. Included of course, would be the industrialists,
“robber barons” of the late 19th Century, the modern heads of Corporate
America, a legion of national politicians who are largely supported
in their repeatedly successful campaigns for re-election by the
same corporations, and most of the scientific and medical communities
which have failed to warn in the strongest possible terms of the
consequences of our way of life, possibly because of the connection
between academia and Corporate America.
Our
“way of life” is something that we, as a people, have done. We have
lived without giving much thought to what we have been doing to
ourselves, to our continent, and to our earth. We are about 5 percent
of the earth’s population, yet we consume some 30 percent of the
earth’s resources, give or take 5 percent, according to whose numbers
you look at. This has been, and is, unsustainable.
For
the past 40 years, since that first Earth Day, a large percentage
of Americans have had a pretty good idea what was happening and
a pretty large number of those people were in a position to do something
about it. There were too many - the children, the poor, and disabled
- who were not in a position to solve any of those monumental problems.
They had to take life as it came, something to which they’ve become
accustomed, even though it makes them sick.
However
you look at it, Americans live an affluent life, with a concentration
of consumption of all manner of goods right at the top of the income
scale. Our “carbon footprint” is very large and it’s going to take
a great effort to make it smaller.
We
Americans can’t seem to reconcile the reconstruction of a safe environment
with our seeming need to buy stuff and all of the negatives that
go along with that stuff’s manufacture, transportation, distribution,
retail sale, and disposal.
In
the 1980s, during a strike of chemical plant workers in Louisiana’s
“cancer alley,” a section of the Gulf
Coast, a worker noted that most families
were affected by cancer and that the struggle to make the workplace
safe was one of the most difficult.
He
pointed out that many chemical plants in the U.S.
were owned by German companies, which had bought plants in this
country because they could get away with pollution and flouting
of safety rules here which they couldn’t in Germany.
It
was clear to them that, when the unions inside the plants were strong
and could make the plants safe and healthy for the workers, the
communities in which the plants were located also were healthier
and safer. As unions have been diminished in the U.S., so has their power to
protect themselves and their communities.
One
of the primary causes of our general debilitated condition is the
U.S. food system. Like protests to the contrary
in the “health care system,” those who don’t know better - or, more
likely, those who have a direct financial interest in it - say that
“we have the best health care system in the world.” The same ones
also say “we have the best food system in the world.”
Neither
of these claims is connected to the reality of our daily lives.
The outcomes to our health care system show it. We’re far down on
the list of developed nations in infant mortality and our life expectancy
is not as long as many other nations, for two quick examples. Every
day, we hear of some other health problem that is not treatable
with what American medicine has to offer.
We’ve
begun to learn about the rise of swine flu and that it likely comes
from the industrial production of pork, in which system the pigs
and the farm workers suffer greatly. We’ve had pfiesteria in the
Chesapeake Bay, in which the poisoned water is related to the disposal
of the feces of the 600 million chickens that are produced on Maryland’s
Eastern Shore every year. And, we have the threat of bird flu, from
industrial poultry operations that are now found in many countries,
in addition to the U.S.
How
does a nation ring the alarm bells about the “obesity epidemic”
and the explosion of Type II diabetes, even among the children,
without acknowledging that it is our “systems” that are sickening
us?
For
more than a century, American industry “externalized” its costs
- that is, companies left their pollution and other problems to
subsequent generations, to both deal with on a medical level, to
clean up, and to pay for, often long after the company had moved
to another country or shut down to move to the next fast-money operation.
Since
World War II, the way of producing food in the U.S.
has become more like the industrial system that produced our cars
and trucks and most of our other manufactured goods (when we were
producing such goods). In fact, the food “system” may be the largest
industrial entity there is left in the country.
In
recent years, researchers and even movie makers have focused on
the food system and Americans have begun to learn something about
what’s making them sick. It does appear to be the “systems.” Whether
consumer goods or our food are produced domestically or in foreign
countries, they come from “systems” that were designed for two things
- maximized profits and consolidation of control of those systems
by corporations.
All
of this is made possible by our technological prowess. Without computers
and other technical wonders, this kind of control and profit-taking
could not be done. The central control present in all of our systems
is by corporations, which tell us what we’re going to buy. We have
“choices,” but every one of those choices is given to us by Corporate
America and, when you think about it, there aren’t many.
Slowly,
very slowly, the people are becoming aware of the insidious nature
of the “choices” that we’re allowed to make. Like it or not, you
will eat large quantities of high fructose corn syrup and hydrogenated
fats, which are added to most prepared food because they are cheap.
Americans eat a lot of prepared food.
The
industrial model of production of our food gives us limited choices,
even if there are 45,000 items for sale in our supermarkets, because
our food dollars are spent on a minuscule percentage of those supermarket
items.
Unbalanced
systems - in terms of power of the people, compared with the small
percentage of corporations and individuals that control our “choices”
- can and do make us sick. If we want to address our “health care
crisis,” we must first address the industrial systems that make
us a relatively insignificant part of the process.
BlackCommentator.com Columnist, John Funiciello, is a labor organizer
and former union organizer. His union work started when he became
a local president of The Newspaper Guild in the early 1970s. He
was a reporter for 14 years for newspapers in New
York State. In addition to labor work,
he is organizing family farmers as they struggle to stay on the
land under enormous pressure from factory food producers and land
developers. Click here
to contact Mr. Funiciello.
Any BlackCommentator.com article may
be re-printed so long as it is re-printed in its entirety and full
credit given to the author and www.BlackCommentator.com. If the
re-print is on the Internet we additionally request a link back
to the original piece on our Website.
Your comments are always welcome.
eMail re-print notice
If you send us an eMail message
we may publish all or part of it, unless you tell us it
is not for publication. You may also request that we withhold
your name.
Thank you very much for your readership.
Your comments are always welcome.
September17
, 2009
Issue 342
is
published every Thursday
Executive Editor:
Bill Fletcher, Jr.
Managing Editor:
Nancy Littlefield
Publisher:
Peter Gamble
Est. April 5, 2002
Printer Friendly Version
in resizeable plain
text format or pdf
format.