Note:
This week Brother Funiciello's "Solidarity America" column
is presented as our cover story and part 41 of the BC
series about Single-Payer Healthcare. Click here
to read any of the articles in this special BC series on Single-Payer
Healthcare.
The
issue of health care for all in America is a recurring one for the
generations. Theodore Roosevelt thought that providing care for
everyone was a good idea.
That
was a century ago. For more recent generations, there was President
Harry Truman, then President Lyndon Johnson, there was President
Bill Clinton and now, President Barack Obama. They all thought
providing health care for all was an idea whose time has come.
Sometimes,
a good idea has to travel the birth canal many times before it actually
can be born. Universal health care is one of those things.
Europeans
look with astonishment at our latest go-round about providing health
care for all of the people. They, like a large percentage of Americans,
believe access to health care is a human right, not a privilege.
Sadly,
in America, health care is a privilege and nearly 50 million
are without the financial wherewithal to get help and treatment
when they need it. If health care is a right, then the U.S. is
a country that daily violates the human rights of so many millions
and is responsible for hundreds of deaths every day.
It
isn’t just the deaths of women, men, and children that is so shocking—and
that it happen every day—but it is the suffering that may go on
for months or years that accompanies each one of those deaths.
These
things are not a consideration for those who oppose health care
for all, such as HR 676, Expanded and Improved Medicare for All,
which has been picking up the support of more and more labor organizations,
elected officials, doctors and other medical practitioners, as well
as the people.
In
the past 60 years, it just “wasn’t the time” to pursue health care
for all. There was always some other important consideration. But,
there are always other important considerations: wars, natural disasters,
economic downturns (or economic disasters). If one looks for “other
important considerations,” there is always one around to make it
easy to say “it’s not time” and we should fight health care for
all, and put it off for another generation.
Canada’s
Medicare—health care for all—started in somewhat the same way, but
their plan for universal coverage started in the Province of Saskatchewan,
under the leadership of then-Premier Tommy Douglas, one of Canada’s
best-known political leaders, who started his public life in Ottawa
in 1936. After that, Medicare became a national program.
He
became involved in Saskatchewan politics, becoming premier (akin
to a governor in the U.S.). Always, though, he believed that human
rights and needs should be placed above power and profit. And that
did set him apart from many politicians of his day—as it would place
him apart from about half or more of the national political leadership
in the U.S. today, especially when it comes to universal health
care.
In
a 1944 speech, he told the story of politics and what had to be
done to change it, by way of a tale that he delivered as “The Story
of Mouseland.” He wasn’t the first to tell the story, but he certainly
told it most effectively.
Since
nobody is likely to tell the story in the same way, here it is as
he told it:
It's the story of a place called Mouseland. Mouseland
was a place where all the little mice lived and played, were born
and died. And they lived much the same as you and I do.
They even had a Parliament. And every four years they
had an election. Used to walk to the polls and cast their ballots.
Some of them even got a ride to the polls. And got a ride for
the next four years afterwards too. Just like you and me.
And every time on Election Day all the little mice
used to go to the ballot box and they used to elect a government.
A government made up of big, fat, black cats.
Now if you think it strange that mice should elect
a government made up of cats, you just look at the history of
Canada for last 90 years and maybe you'll see that they weren't
any stupider than we are.
Now I'm not saying anything against the cats. They
were nice fellows.
They conducted their government with dignity. They
passed good laws—that is, laws that were good for cats.
But the laws that were good for cats weren't very
good for mice. One of the laws said that mouseholes had to be
big enough so a cat could get his paw in. Another law said that
mice could only travel at certain speeds—so that a cat could get
his breakfast without too much effort.
All the laws were good laws. For cats.
But, oh, they were hard on the mice. And life was
getting harder and harder. And when the mice couldn't put up with
it any more, they decided something had to be done about it. So
they went en masse to the polls. They voted the black cats out.
They put in the white cats.
Now the white cats had put up a terrific campaign.
They said: “All that Mouseland needs is more vision.” They said:
“The trouble with Mouseland is those round mouseholes we got.
If you put us in we'll establish square mouseholes.” And they
did. And the square mouseholes were twice as big as the round
mouseholes, and now the cat could get both his paws in.
And life was tougher than ever. And when they couldn't
take that anymore, they voted the white cats out and put the black
ones in again. Then they went back to the white cats. Then to
the black cats. They even tried half black cats and half white
cats.
And they called that coalition.
They even got one government made up of cats with
spots on them: they were cats that tried to make a noise like
a mouse but ate like a cat.
You see, my friends, the trouble wasn't with the colour
of the cat. The trouble was that they were cats. And because they
were cats, they naturally looked after cats instead of mice.
Presently there came along one little mouse who had
an idea. My friends, watch out for the little fellow with an idea.
And he said to the other mice, “Look fellows, why
do we keep on electing a government made up of cats? Why don't
we elect a government made up of mice?”
“Oh,” they said, “he's a Bolshevik. Lock him up!”
So they put him in jail.
But I want to remind you: that you can lock up a mouse
or a man but you can't lock up an idea.
Every
day, in the newspapers and on television and radio, we can read
and see and hear exactly what Tommy Douglas was warning the people
about with his Mouseland story.
With
some exceptions, we have a Congress made up of people who are going
to act in a manner that is best for them, not for their constituents.
They will find every kind of rationale for their votes against universal
health care. They will find every kind of excuse. They will evade
the questions of the people. Some will hide in their offices or
in their vacation homes in the mountains, the seashore, or the islands
off some warm coast.
All
of the Republicans and many of the Democrats are reminded every
day where their campaign contributions come from. Insurance companies
and the medical care industry have deep pockets and they have in
their pockets not only money, but a large number of national politicians,
as well.
A
plan such as HR 676, which is single-payer and universal, is a direct
threat to the billions of dollars of profits that go each year to
the medical-industrial complex. The CEOs who take their $10 million
or $80 million per year out of those profits are not going to give
in to a universal no-profit system without a fight.
That’s
what we’re seeing now in the so-called town hall meetings held by
(mostly) Democratic representatives, whose events are broken up
by Americans screaming about “socialism” and declaring that, if
the government gets involved in health care, it will be the end
of America as we know it.
Many
of them don’t know that Medicare (health care coverage for those
older than 65) is a single-payer universal program that is paid
for by the government. Or that Medicare does its work five to seven
times more efficiently than the for-profit medical industries.
It’s true that it doesn’t cover dental care or vision care or most
prescription drugs (except for those who opted in to the doughnut-hole
system of the Bush Administration), but it is a program of the government
that has proven itself to be beneficial to the common good.
Tommy
Douglas was on to something and he knew it several generations ago.
It’s not new and it’s not unique to Canada or any other country.
It’s part of the human condition.
In
America, as in other places and times, the society of mice has continually
elected cats to govern them. There is a preponderance of them in
Congress today, and they’ll keep on voting to keep the cats in power.
The
one thing that they count on is that the mice won’t notice that
they are cats. But, when the people pay attention to the little
mouse with an idea, they might put the cats out and the mice in—it
could happen and, when it does, we’ll see profound changes in the
way government does its business. At least, for starters, we might
see universal single-payer health care, the only reasonable way
to go.
(Note:
To hear Tommy Douglas (1904-86), in his Mouseland speech, click
here
to watch an animation of the speech and the story, as only TD could
tell it. The animation is introduced by actor Kiefer Sutherland
who is a grandson of Douglas.)
Note:
This week Brother Funiciello's "Solidarity America" column
is presented as our cover story and part 41 of the BC
series about Single-Payer Healthcare. Click here
to read any of the articles in this special BC series on Single-Payer
Healthcare.
BlackCommentator.com
Columnist, John Funiciello, is a labor organizer and former union
organizer. His union work started when he became a local president
of The Newspaper Guild in the early 1970s. He was a reporter for
14 years for newspapers in New York State. In addition to labor
work, he is organizing family farmers as they struggle to stay on
the land under enormous pressure from factory food producers and
land developers. Click here
to contact Mr. Funiciello.
Any BlackCommentator.com article may
be re-printed so long as it is re-printed in its entirety and full
credit given to the author and www.BlackCommentator.com. If the
re-print is on the Internet we additionally request a link back
to the original piece on our Website.
Your comments are always welcome.
eMail re-print notice
If you send us an eMail message
we may publish all or part of it, unless you tell us it
is not for publication. You may also request that we withhold
your name.
Thank you very much for your readership.
Your comments are always welcome.
September
3 , 2009
Issue 340
is
published every Thursday
Executive Editor:
Bill Fletcher, Jr.
Managing Editor:
Nancy Littlefield
Publisher:
Peter Gamble
Est. April 5, 2002
Printer Friendly Version
in resizeable plain
text format or pdf
format.