There
has been a great deal of both chatter and analysis - on the Internet
and in other media - regarding the Obama administration’s seemingly
lackluster response to demands that officials from the Bush administration
(up to and including the former President himself) be investigated
and possibly prosecuted for abuses of authority. There are probably
many sources for this hesitation, but I will offer one that I have
not heard discussed: the classic “American” view on history.
Hard-wired
into the culture of the USA is what I have called the “from now
on” philosophy. This philosophy (and practice) recurs throughout
US history. It is actually very simple to identify and understand.
In essence it suggests that what is done is done; that there is
no use harping on the past because it has happened; and, that the
focus should be on the future. Thus, irrespective of any crimes
that are committed (and by the way, this applies to the actions
of the ruling elite as well as how they are perceived by the non-elite,
but does not apply to the actions of the common folk), that does
not matter so much as what is anticipated to take place. In other
words, our crimes do not matter as long as FROM NOW ON we are committed
to a different and nobler practice.
The
“from now on” philosophy helps to explain how and why US history
is not investigated and analyzed in our schools and institutions
of higher learning more fully than they are. The myths that pass
for US history cover over amazing crimes that have been committed.
The current PBS Series on Native Americans, “We Shall Remain”,
which details key elements of US history from the standpoint of
the Native American, catalogues any number of crimes, atrocities
and broken agreements committed by the US against myriad Native
American tribes. Not only do most people in the USA fail to grasp
the depth and scope of these crimes, not to mention their significance,
but to the extent to which they are acknowledged, it is often with
a dispassionate, almost bored response. Implicit in the response
is that irrespective of the crimes, that is all in the past and
in the future the USA will not commit such actions.
The
problem, obviously, is that the failure to understand the roots
of the various crimes that have taken place, be it the genocide
against Native Americans, slavery and Jim Crow against African Americans,
seizure of northern Mexico, demonization and oppression of Asian
immigrants, and annexation of former Spanish colonies such as Puerto
Rico, results in the re-commission of those crimes in various contexts.
The
“from now on” approach allows the perpetrators to ignore not only
the roots of the crimes, but the notion, quite ironically, of personal
responsibility. I remember back in the 1980s watching an episode
of the show Lou Grant (the Ed Asner series about a
fictitious newspaper in Los Angeles). In this particular episode
the publisher discovered that her
late husband had benefited from the World War II incarceration of
Japanese immigrants and Japanese Americans in detention centers.
Specifically, land and homes that had been lost by the internees
came into the possession of her late husband and helped him to become
the wealthy person that he was. The publisher was shocked that her
husband could have been such a person because, other than participating
in this fraud, he was supposedly a wonderful individual. At that
moment she had to decide how to approach the situation and whether
to admit his actions and accept her own liability.
US
reality is far different from that episode of Lou Grant.
Rarely does the upper-crust, unless otherwise compelled, acknowledge
their complicity in one or another crime. Instead, they color over
the past and contribute funds to foundations in order to ease their
conscience, but more importantly, appease their critics.
For
these reasons it has come as no surprise that the Obama administration
has been less than zealous in pursuing the various criminals of
the Bush administration, specifically, those who ignored all the
warning signs about the pending 9/11 attack; those who carried out
the detention of immigrants; those who constructed the Guantanamo
facility; those who brought us the Afghanistan quagmire and the
Iraq disaster; and those who authorized torture, with their fine
words and disingenuous qualifiers. It is less a matter of whether
the Obama administration wishes to continue these practices, but
more that there is a deep reluctance to open up the past. Once that
door into the past is opened, it is often very difficult to shut.
An examination of what led to the invasion of Iraq, for instance,
might expose a great deal about the US role in contributing to weapons
of mass destruction going to Iraq in the first place. An examination
of torture, may not only go up the ladder to the Oval Office of
one George W. Bush, but may also expose various and sundry activities
by the Central Intelligence Agency.
For
these reasons it is far easier to suggest that FROM NOW ON the USA
will be on good behavior. FROM NOW ON the USA can be counted upon
to be a friend to democracy and a friend to the world’s people.
Knock-knock:
there is a little problem with this. For the most part, the people
who have committed the crimes have not disappeared nor have they
done penance. They have just relocated. Second, these crimes were
not committed in a vacuum; there were many people who let them happen,
either through cowardice of inaction or because they allowed themselves
to believe the rationales. In other words, the conditions for a
repetition of these various crimes have not disappeared. Only the
“pause” button has been pushed.
BlackCommentator.com
Executive Editor, Bill Fletcher, Jr., is a Senior Scholar with the
Institute for Policy Studies,
the immediate past president of TransAfrica Forum and co-author of, Solidarity Divided: The Crisis in Organized Labor and a New Path
toward Social Justice
(University of California Press), which examines the crisis of organized
labor in the USA. Click here
to contact Mr. Fletcher. |