With Iowa
being the fourth state to approve marriage equality, lesbian, gay,
bisexual, transgender, and queer Americans’ optimism is high, believing
many more states will follow suit.
“We’re hoping this momentum
is contagious,” Daniel Richards of Rhode
Island told me. And should Rhode Island soon
approve of same-sex marriage, it would be the fourth New England
state to join Massachusetts, Connecticut, and now Vermont.
But with Rhode
Island’s Republican Governor, Donald Carcieri recently denouncing
same-sex marriage, the battle for LGBTQ Rhode Islanders will be
a hard one.
Rhode Island
is the only state in New England that does
not recognize same-sex marriage, civil unions, or domestic partnerships.
And with a governor who supports the National Organization for Marriage,
a nonprofit organization with a mission to protect heterosexual-only
marriage and the faith communities that sustain it, I told Daniels
his state’s fight for marriage equality might be similar to California’s
Proposition 8 battle.
There are currently two bills
in the Rhode Island legislature that would legalize same-sex marriage but
Carcieri opposes both bills, stating, “What I don’t want to see
happen with this issue is what’s happening in courts deciding things
or legislatures deciding things. This is such an important issue
I think it should be put to the voters.” And if the governor has
his wish, the right for LGBTQ Americans to marry will be a referendum
on the 2010 ballot.
But Daniels told me that
while Rhode Island’s battle for marriage equality will be an arduous one,
the fight will not be as difficult for queer Rhode Islanders because
the state’s communities of color are small and its faith communities
of black ministers even smaller.
“Why would you need people who
are not voting with you but against you? In
Rhode Island we don’t
have to talk about them and don’t have to talk to them. They’re
a liability,” Daniels stated.
With the passing of Proposition
8 and blaming the African American community for its victory at
the ballot box, the struggle for same-sex marriage showed us that
it is a state-by-state battle, where the demographics of each state,
indeed, comes into play.
Some strategists like Daniels,
in the Marriage Equality Movement, have felt all along that communities
of color - both straight and queer - have slowed the process, progress
and momentum in this nationwide culture war. These activists have
openly stated and showed in their community strategies and organizing
that they don’t want or need queer communities of color, especially
in predominately white states, to win the battle.
And their reason is the following:
With
enough successive wins from less heterogeneous LGBTQ and straight
communities, like Iowa, Connecticut, Vermont, and, yes, even my
state of, Massachusetts, these judicial endorsements of same-sex
marriages not only increase public acceptance of LGBTQ nuptials,
but these endorsements can conceivably push more quickly the issue
of marriage equality to the federal level for LGBTQ Americans, all
the way to the U. S. Supreme Court, circumventing our internal wars
of class, race, and homophobic faith communities entirely.
“There has been a shift of about
10 percentage points in the past five years in public support for
same-sex marriage. On a deep moral issue like this, that’s very
rare,” Nathaniel Persily, who teaches law and political science
at Columbia University
and has tracked public opinion about gay rights after several court
decisions, stated to the Associated Press.
The truth of the matter concerning
Proposition 8 is that the blaming of its passing ought not be placed
on shoulders of African Americans, who comprise just 6.2 percent
of the state’s overall population. But this fact plays small in
understanding that our government is the culprit here by legally
framing a minority group’s civil rights as a ballot question.
So where do we go from here,
without killing each other?
First, our state-by-state battle
for marriage equality cannot be framed as a single-issue agenda
addressing the concerns and values of an elite few, regardless of
the size of its LGBTQ communities of color.
Second, communities of color
cannot be deployed in this battle in a used-when-needed basis, like
for the movement’s photo-op moments.
Third, inviting communities
of color in the decision making and statewide strategies makes for
an inclusive movement.
But
not all marriage equality activists from predominately white states
feel the marriage equality battle can be successfully won without
the input and inclusion of their communities of color.
“If people want equality it
takes a lot of people to win. It takes everyone not just one community
of people advocating the rights for a few versus advocating the
rights for us all, “ stated my masseuse Dale Wingate of Maine.
If Marriage Equality pushed
white states first as its game plan to avoid communities of color,
as Daniels suggests, it would not only be continuing to push forward
a single-issue agenda, but it would also be ignoring vital ways
for coalition-building across diverse communities and honorable
ways of connecting the struggle for marriage equality of LGBTQ citizens
to the wider cause for justice.
BlackCommentator.com
Editorial Board member, the Rev. Irene Monroe, is a religion columnist,
theologian, and public speaker. A native of Brooklyn, Rev. Monroe
is a graduate from Wellesley College and Union Theological Seminary
at Columbia University, and served as a pastor at an African-American
church before coming to Harvard Divinity School for her doctorate
as a Ford Fellow. Reverend Monroe
is the author of Let Your Light Shine Like a Rainbow Always: Meditations on Bible
Prayers for Not-So-Everyday Moments
. As an African American feminist theologian, she speaks for
a sector of society that is frequently invisible. Her website is
irenemonroe.com.
Click here
to contact the Rev. Monroe. |