While
millions of Americans are waiting for their first unemployment check
or the knock on the door by a sheriff’s deputy bearing an eviction
notice, there are people in other parts of the world for whom the
economic collapse has them wondering how long they and their children
can survive.
This
deep recession, tending toward depression, is hurting Americans,
but for hundreds of millions who have come to depend on “free trade”
with the so-called developed world, it’s a matter of life or death.
Factories
are closing in China. People from
the countryside who have been forced to the cities or the edges
of cities to find work have found wage-paying jobs in the factories
that seemingly produce everything that is sold in American retail
stores. They make television sets, radios, cell phones, all manner
of electronics equipment. They make screws and nails and all kinds
of hardware. They make pots and pans and kitchenware, appliances,
and, in the past few years, they have begun to grow more and more
of the food we eat and the formula we feed to our infants.
America’s trade imbalance with China is enormous, something that wouldn’t have
been imagined even 20 years ago. We owe them…plenty.
But
when our economy started to go downhill on skids, they began hurting,
as well. Untold numbers of those factories have been closing, because
the orders from the U.S. just aren’t
coming in and the prospects of their picking up are not good.
India,
a significant trading partner with the U.S., also has its problems,
as it shifts from a largely agricultural society, to one that could
become dependent on the kind of “industry” that is preeminent in
the U.S. - use and storage of information.
The
smaller Asian countries that have come to depend on “free trade”
with developed nations also are feeling the pinch. Factors that
have forced developing countries into difficulty include: debt,
privatization of publicly-owned resources or government functions,
and mass urbanization, which involves moving people off the land
to urban areas.
The
latter was the policy urged on developing nations, which were convinced
to clear the land to grow cash crops for export to pay back loans
to the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). This
was done over many years by those two institutions and other “aid
and assistance” agencies of the small elite of powerful nations,
such as the U.S.,
Europe, and Japan.
Little thought has been given to the disruption of peasant and indigenous
cultures in a global economy. The
thought of economic collapse never crossed their minds, but the
potential negative effects are enormous.
There
is small likelihood that peasants who have worked in the global
factories of the provincial cities of China
have any agricultural societies to return to. It will be the same
for the workers in other Asian countries, such as Vietnam,
Cambodia, and
Malaysia. They’ll
have to stay where they are.
At
least, when they were back there in the mountains and valleys, they
had the prospect of something to eat. They could grow it themselves.
As urban dwellers or slum dwellers today, the potential for that
is small. In China, the rich exist - by their own standard
and even by the world standard - but they are a small percentage.
They
are capitalists within a Communist political shell and in many ways,
it is capitalism the way America’s
Robber Barons of a century ago would have liked it.
Within
the past year, the average hourly wage in China
was estimated at about 57 cents, so, considering the affluence among
some Chinese, the lowest wage has to be pretty low to bring that
average to 57 cents.
China’s arable land is limited, however, and, with water
shortages coming and the growing of more and more food for export,
there will be many millions of hungry people. But no provision was
made to meet such emergencies by the people who run the global economy.
The Chinese rural people would work for a penny or two on the dollar,
compared with American workers and that’s the only thing that mattered
when the world was opened up for “free trade.” Nobody prepared for
economic collapse.
Now
that the world is in an economic slide, the world’s affluent have
to ask themselves whether they have a responsibility to the world’s
poorest, those who have been used to make the cheap-goods-high-profit
world economy. If the experience of American workers is any indication,
the world’s poor will wait a long time before transnational corporations
make any effort to see that their wealth-producers have such basic
human rights as food, clothing, shelter, health care, education,
and clean water.
There
is no global unemployment insurance program, and the aid programs
of U.S. foreign policy are not designed to help development,
as much as to help the global corporations.
In
the Christian Science Monitor this week was a picture of
bags of pinto beans being unloaded in Congo, an African nation that is suffering in
so many ways. On each bag was imprinted a large American flag and
“U.S. AID.”
It
makes people feel good to provide that kind of assistance, but the
policies of the U.S. government have been this: We’ll give you
money for food aid, but you have to buy the food from the U.S. and you have to have it shipped in American
vessels. This kind of aid helps American agribusiness corporations
and the shipping industry, but it does nothing for economic development
in the recipient country.
Historically,
shipments of food aid to countries around the world have been notorious
for never making it out of the port city; rampant corruption in
the distribution; routine theft and illegal sale of the food, and
the near impossibility of getting the food to those who need it
most because the road and highway systems are poor or non-existent.
Better
to send aid to support growth of indigenous and peasant agricultural
systems and the development of water systems. In such aid programs,
the people would become self-sufficient and self-reliant. But
there is little profit in this for the global trading system and,
therefore, it is not of great interest to transnational corporations.
For
our low-wage trading partners, there doesn’t seem to be much in
it, except low wages for people who traditionally have not worked
for wages. The mantra of media cheerleaders of global “free trade”
has been that it’s enough that there are jobs that pay anything
- even 10 cents an hour - because, before that, there were no wages.
Global
corporations should have learned much over the years from their
dealings with developing countries, but the way that food aid is
being handled in Africa to this day shows that
they have learned little. Most African countries were probably on
the short list of countries whose people would work for a pittance
to produce for the world market, but business interests have experienced
disruption on their way to full economic dominance - worldwide recession.
Low-wage
workers of the global economy are now in need and it’s likely that
no thought will be given to them, even though they have made the
gargantuan profits possible. In the ideology of a global capitalist
system, there is no responsibility to those workers who created
the institutional wealth. Corporations don’t care. The character
of their structure does not allow them to care. People, though,
can - and must - care and make a difference by taking action.
BlackCommentator.com Columnist, John Funiciello, is a labor organizer and former union organizer.
His union work started when he became a local president of The Newspaper
Guild in the early 1970s. He was a reporter for 14 years for newspapers
in New York State. In addition to labor work,
he is organizing family farmers as they struggle to stay on the
land under enormous pressure from factory food producers and land
developers. Click here
to contact Mr. Funiciello. |