BC welcomes Dr.
Farley as a columnist
When
Christopher Hitchens recently used the word “us” to refer to “Americans,”
I knew the U.S. Department of Homeland Security had made its biggest
mistake yet.
Like
most on the Left, I am disgusted by Christopher Hitchens’ hitching
his wagon to the neo-conservatives and the warmongers on account
of the “war on terror”. For the first few years, I kept expecting
him to say, “Just kidding! I have been fooling all of you, just
to show how easy it is to become a darling of the Right.”
I’m
still not sure if he really means it or if this is all a product
of his alcohol-sodden brain. Unfortunately, the lizard part of
his brain—the part that controls his poisonous tongue—is fully functioning.
When
Hitchens turned traitor, it nearly spelt disaster for those of us
on the side of humanity. Hitchens could defeat all comers, like
Brad Pitt’s Achilles in the movie Troy, only fat and smarmy.
When
I was a graduate student at Oxford, I saw many English undergraduates
with this kind of wit. At first I respected it, before I saw that
they all had it. I then realized it must have been something they
picked up in public school, like an affinity for buggery. (Not
that there’s anything wrong with a little buggery now and then:
everything in moderation.)
I
became positively disgusted when I saw that this “wit” only ever
had one object: to insult the other party, and not in a playful,
let’s-all-share-in-the-joke way. I went from loving England and
Oxford to still preferring England to America, but loathing the
OUP (Oxford University Pratts).
Himself
an Oxford graduate, Christopher Hitchens is so sharp his wordplay
can slice your argument in two. Indeed, Hitchens is literally too
clever by half: he takes the “tionary” out of “Oxford English dictionary.”
He
is the Mule in Isaac Asimov’s Foundation: In the long lineage
of Oxford Union debaters, he represents the tail end of evolution’s
bell curve. He is the anti-Jesus: He can defeat all challengers
in a verbal duel, but instead of the power to heal, he has only
the power to hurt. He is an anti-Jesse Owens: Quicker than everyone,
but he works for the fascist criminals rather than against them.
He
makes us look stupid.
Where
Satan’s Mistress goes wrong is that he believes the person who can
get the audience to laugh at his opponent is the person who is right.
I assure you that if I were to debate Hitchens...he would
defeat me handily and make me look like a fool. But an Oxford Union
or television debate is not the proper format: Give me instead a
debate where the audience has to read the transcript, and
where each party has days to respond to the other side (including
time to read books that touch on the other party’s claims). Hitchens
would lose such a debate.
He
would never agree to one either. But we don’t need him to.
Let’s
bombard his editors at Vanity Fair, and every American university
that invites him to speak, with complaints about his being an opportunist
or simply a bad writer. American liberals generally are cowards
who cave in to this sort of pressure.
A
web page should be maintained of all of Hitchens’ right-wing statements,
which should be carefully refuted.
He
has also made enemies of at least one powerful American, New York
City mayor Michael Bloomberg, who might perhaps relish contributing
to Operation Enduring Fools.
Christopher
Hitchens’ mouth is a cave in which deadly munitions are stored.
Let’s
send in bunker busters.
BlackCommentator.com
Guest Commentator, Dr. Jonathan David Farley, is the
2004 Harvard Foundation Distinguished Scientist of the Year.
He is currently Teaching and Research Fellow teaching mathematics
at the Institut für Algebra Johannes Kepler Universität
Linz, Linz Österreich Click here
to contact Dr. Farley. |