Mr.
Paget-Clarke recently returned from Niassa and Maputo Provinces
in Mozambique.
Being in a field
in southern Niassa province, in Mozambique, listening to a group
of women and men members of a peasant and small farmers’ association
sing a cappella while they wield their hoes is both thrilling and
supremely humbling. Particularly when you realize that the song
is being improvised and that they are singing about their association
movement and thanking you for dropping by.
I was in Mozambique
because I was fortunate enough to be invited to attend the Fifth
International Conference of La Via Campesina in Matola, a suburb
of the capital city Maputo. La Via Campesina is an organization
of organizations, a powerful aspect of the growing movement of peasants,
family farmers, indigenous and landless people of the world. My
goals were to help record the conference by interviewing some of
the delegates and to learn more about the campesin@ way of life
and how that way is crystallized in a call for and a practice of
food sovereignty. In particular, I wanted to learn what that means
to the peasants and small farmers of Mozambique.
Diamantino Nhampossa
is the executive director of UNAC (União Nacional de Camponeses
/ National Peasants' Union) and also a member for Africa on La Via
Campesina’s international organizing committee. When he spoke to
me, he told me, “ (t)he Via Campesina model for development, which
is food sovereignty, is a model which can be accessible to the rural
poor in this country. ... what we do as an organization is make
sure that the local organizations, associations, grassroots organizations
have power to look for solutions to their own problems. We do that
promoting a lot of meetings, organizing a lot of training, a lot
of exchanges to strengthen the farmers to be able to look for solutions
for their own problems.”
To help me understand
what that means “in our reality”, as one association member described
it, he set me up with UNAC Niassa advocate director Julio dos Santos
Pessego. Niassa province is in northwest Mozambique and three hours
by jet from Maputo. With Pessego (as everyone calls him -- Pessego
means peach) I visited four Niassa associations. With us were Portuguese/English
interpeter Edgar Basilio Ussene, UCA (Union of Associations and
Cooperatives of Lichinga) leaders Alifa Aide and Xavier Jaime who
also translated from Yao to Portuguese, and UCA president Carlos
Afana). After Niassa, I visited association members in Marracuene
in southern Mozambique. What follows is what they told me.
Issues
of food
In the field
I mentioned above, Francisco Quenesse explained why members of his
Lichego community, in the Sanga district adjacent to Lichinga, Niassa’s
capital, formed their First of December Association. “We have come
together to constitute an association to resolve issues of food.”
Sitting in the courtyard behind a home in the village of Meponda,
a community on the shores of Lake Niassa, president of the community
Julieta Musse told us, “We constituted the organization because
we believe that joint efforts are better than working alone. We
also believe that when you are in an association you can have a
different experience. Jointly you can advance and improve production.”
The goal of
increasing the production of food was central to the formation of
all the associations I talked with. What I discovered was that the
process of the association led to this and very much more.
When more than
one family works together, they told me in the Lusanyando community
outside of Lichinga, they increase the area of cultivation and also
the yield. This greater yield allows for greater diversity of crops.
This greater diversity, they said, allows other crops to compensate
if one crop fails. The diversity of crops, of foods, improves the
diet and people’s health. And, yes, the diversity of crops, the
diversity of diet, is traditional agriculture in their area.
And what else
does this increased production allow for? First of all, it allows
the members to feed their families. In Meponda, Omar Bonomar put
it this way, “Why we realized we wanted to join is before my wife
was a member of the association we had problems buying small things
like salt, fish, oil, a lot of things. But when my wife joined the
association these problems were overcome -- we were able to buy
salt, oil, fish, different products to prepare meals. ... we were
suffering and now we are not. The association is making money. We
decided to join the association.”
Beyond this,
in every community I visited, the surplus food was either sold in
the community, sold to market traders, or taken directly to a local
market. Usually, the extra harvest was sold by the association as
a group. Depending on the size of the association and the day at
the market, the money from the sale was distributed to individual
families and also used to collectively invest in the association
and the community as a whole in a variety of ways. These ways included
buying new seeds, buying new tools, renting a tractor, hiring technicians,
accessing healthcare, helping to build mosques, and developing sanitation.
In the individual
families, I was told several times, funds were used to purchase
exercise books, pencils, and clothes to assist their children at
school. They are also used to build new brick houses. For example,
when we visited the Ncachelenga Women’s Association in Namacula,
near Lichinga, I learned that their 13-member association had been
able to build three brick houses, and a new chicken house, to replace
traditional cane houses.
More on collective
marketing was explained to me in Marracuene by Arnoldo Uache, the
UNAC secretary of rural development for Marracuene. He spoke as
we walked from field to field (with interpreter Justino Baloi) talking
to different association members.
In Marracuene,
there are 23 registered associations, though there are more like
40 associations if you include the not-yet registered ones, with
about 4,500 to 6,000 peasants and farmers involved. The associations
are clustered into four nuclei of associations which together form
UCAM, the Union of Agricultural Cooperatives of Marracuene. The
nuclei represent the communities of Marracuene, Moamba, Boane, and
Manhica communities. Marracuene is in the valley of the Nkomati
River.
Anyway, when,
for example, an association’s bananas are ripe, the members get
together to discuss what to do with them. First, they ask if anyone
needs to buy any. Those are sold to the members at a very low price.
Then, the others are sold to market traders (by the association)
and that money goes to the association for distribution, as described
before. A similar special arrangement for members takes place at
the headquarters of UCAM where sapling fruit trees are planted and
nurtured. Members pay a token price for new plants.
It is in this
context of self-reliance and a supportive economy that some associations
receive donations, such as water pumps from an organization in Spain
to UCAM in Marracuene, or a small milling machine to the Casa Agraria
Association in Meponda. They assist but do not, as Diamantino Nhampossa
said, “alter the direction and sovereignty of the peasants.”
Horizontal
networks
And the flow
of that direction is quite diverse -- within the associations, within
the communities, between associations and communities. In Lusanyando,
I learned that in 1992 their association began with two members,
now there are 13 associations each with fifteen to 25 members. In
Namacula, there are 62 associations, each with 13 to 20 members.
In Marraucene with its 40 cooperatives, Tomas Honwana of UCAM said,
“ ... at the association level, each day we have someone joining
the association.”
Along with all
this growth of associations within the communities, the associations
also network. The network which unites to form the Marracuene union
of associations UCAM is one example. Within Niassa two examples
are UCA (Union of Associations and Cooperatives of Lichinga) and
UCASNE (Union of Cooperatives and Associations of Southern Niassa).
When I first arrived in Lichinga we went to meet some of the leaders
of UCA in their office. The white board on the wall was a mass of
interconnecting associations and groups of associations. Yet, as
I went from association to association, each one was the center
of their own activity, of who was responsible for what they were
doing. It was very much a horizontal network.
In
fact, as I learned from Diamantino Nhampossa, this autonomy is very
important for recent historical reasons. He told me that (of course)
the 1975 independence from the Portuguese was of great importance
for Mozambique. With independence, the Mozambique people could now
think and act for themselves and determine their own future. He
said that the period after independence was also very important
in both uniting the country and reforming land ownership, so that
everyone now has access to land. The importance of this access to
land was emphasized repeatedly to me by association members. But,
he also said, one aspect of this same period was a centralized administration
of society which tarnished some people’s attitudes towards cooperatives
-- that and an emphasis on mono-crop, industrial agriculture. This
is in contrast to today, he said, when people see associations as
a way to resolve problems. (The earlier large-scale cooperatives
also suffered greatly as a result of the long and painful war with
RENAMO, an armed force originally sponsored by the-then Rhodesia
and apartheid-era South Africa). The number one strategic mission
of UNAC is to “promote and amplify the autonomous organization of
peasants towards a dynamic strengthening of communities.”
Exchanging
ideas
In conversation
with association members, it was repeatedly made clear that flowing
through these network channels organized by UNAC, UCA, UCANSE, and
UCAM, were ideas, training, and support. For example, the Ncachelenga
Women’s Association described how after their association grew from
two women to a group and they saw how things were improving, they
decided they wanted to go further. “We needed to identify who could
help us, and we identified UCA. We drew up a list of our members
and went to UCA and said, ‘This is our group. What we are doing
is we have a field and we are cultivating it. We are a group a women
and we would like to have the support of UCA.’ UCA responded positively
giving hoes and seeds. Also UCA gave to the group manure and other
fertilizers. Then UCA thought that this would not be enough and
they suggested to the group that we raise chickens and also use
that manure in the field.”
On this point,
specifically, Diamantino Nhampossa says that UNAC is developing
more agroecology-based training. As an example of these methods
already in use, several people described organic fertilizers. In
Lichego, Francisco Quenesse described what they were doing when
we visited. They were planting potatoes under furrows holding rotting
vegetation timed to release nutrients as the potatoes grow to the
surface.
Lastly, within
the communities themselves, the associations described their growing
role. In Meponda, Filomena Aualo, president of the April 7 Women’s
Association, spoke of receiving training on HIV issues and helping
to spread within the community information combatting HIV. In Lusanyando,
we were told, “... associations help the community to access water
to drink. The association was the one who worked hard to have water
here. ... the associations helped the community to solve land conflicts.”
Which brings
me back to what Julieta Musse earlier told us, “... that when you
are in an association you can have a different experience.” Similarly,
in Marracuene, standing on deep riverbed-black soil, among fields
of bright green vegetables, in particular cabbage which seemed to
be bursting, I met Vasco Macuacua, president of the Bolazo B Association,
who said, “ ... they tend to come because they have seen that there
is a lot of improvement when they join the association. The people
who belong to the association have changed their lives. ... as a
group they exchange ideas, and those ideas they can expand to their
communities.”
And in those
communities the diversity of ideas is not just seen in the crops,
the foods, it is also in the diversity of the associations themselves.
Some associations come together as small or large groups of families.
Some people unite around the need to farm near a river, others to
share access to a water channel. In some the land is divided up
and worked by families, while other land is worked collectively.
In one the collective land was used to learn about new methods of
planting. Some have no collective land.
One form of
association that I learned of almost immediately was women’s associations.
When I asked the women of the Ncachelenga Association, “Why?” they
said that, basically, it was an affirmation of equality by organization.
This way they could ensure that they received their equal share
of the money made at the market from selling the harvest. In Meponda,
Filomena Aualo said that sometimes men don’t see the advantage of
working in an association, so the women form them themselves. But
she said, graciously, “Sometimes, the women go there and work and
when they get revenue they buy trousers for the husband who was
forbidding his wife to go to work in the association.” In Meponda,
there is even the occasional man who joins a women’s association.
In Lusanyando, one man said, “A woman is also a human and they have
a right to have their own group to do what they need. In this kind
of association the women are the ones who decide what to produce
and the women decide what to do with their revenues without the
influence of men.”
A creative
response
But all of this
is not to say that there are no problems. In fact, it is because
of problems, particularly of access to adequate food, that most
of the associations form. And even with associations there are problems.
I was told of having to work with poor soil, of soil ruined by earlier
use of chemicals. I was told of not having enough resources to accomplish
the projects they have in mind. Or of tools that are difficult to
use. People have to ride 60 kilometers on dirt roads to get to a
market in the back of a pickup truck really not designed for public
transportation. There are problems of access to water, education,
and healthcare.
Diamantino Nhampossa
explained that in 1987 International Monetary Fund loan conditions
were imposed on Mozambique and since then industry has been privatized
(mostly sold to Portuguese and multinational companies), ruining
in particular agricultural processing industries such as cotton,
textiles, and tea. Profits that are made, for example by Coca Cola
and aluminum companies, leave the country. Dependence on outside
countries has increased. The much-discussed massive introduction
of industrial agriculture threatens to nullify the food security
available as a result of the independence-era land reforms.
The associations
are a creative response to a difficult situation, and a creative
response that relies on developing a supportive or solidarity economy
rather than one which relies on exploiting other people. The Mozambique
movement to create peasant and farmer associations is food sovereignty
in action.
I asked Pessego
several questions about food sovereignty and associations. He said,
“ The situation for peasants in Niassa is improving because it is
not like before, years ago, because now the peasants understand
the issues of associations. But, on the other hand, it is necessary
to develop efforts to reach all communities. ... With self initiative,
people come together and try to find training. To proceed they need
self-analysis to understand the area where they are living, what
are the main problems that they would like to overcome. ... Before,
people didn’t understand this saying, food sovereignty. But now
people are trying to do diversification of crops to respond to food
sovereignty. ... They know how to manage and they know the objective
of being a member of an association. They know the objective of
an association.”
BlackCommentator.com
Guest Commentator Nic Paget-Clarke is Publisher and Co-editor of
In
Motion Magazine where this article originally appeared December
16, 2008. In Motion Magazine ® is a multicultural, online U.S. publication
about democracy. Click here
to contact Mr. Paget-Clarke. |