As I sit at my Laptop PC the day after
the November 4th Election to pen reflections on Senator
Barack Obama's historic election victory, several fundamental thoughts
about the deeper meaning and significance of the results of the
Election come to mind. First, that with Barack Obama's personal
election victory he enters the premier position in a two-centuries
old governance institution called the “American presidency”. In
reflecting on Barack Obama's election as president of the United
States, we should bear-in-mind that , vis-a-vis the experience of
Black folks, the American presidency has been, shall we say, “a
devious-and-mercurial institution”. I say “devious-and-mercurial”
for very good reasons—namely, it has participated in numerous
governmental processes thoroughly oppressive and restrictive toward
Black people's status in American life and civilization.
REMEMBER
THE REACTIONARY SIDE OF THE AMERICAN PRESIDENCY
For long periods in the life-cycle of our American
democracy, the “American presidency” collaborated in facilitating
a variety of forms of oppressing, restricting, and denying fair
and equal opportunity for advancement in American life and civilization
for citizens of African descent.
From the start of the first United States Congress
in 1790 to the defeat in 1865 of secessionist slave-holding Southern
states in the bloody Civil War—in which nearly a million Black men
fought for the Union Army—the American presidency aided-and-abetted
the American slavery system-- “slavocracy” as historians dubbed
it.
Fortunately for a brief historical period, there
was an important progressive use of the American presidency as a
governance institution assisting fair and equal opportunity for
Black people during the great Era of Reconstruction (1865-1877).
But the assassination of Abraham Lincoln and the rise of reactionary
successor presidents resulted in squashing Reconstruction.
Thus nefarious act of squashing Reconstruction was
achieved via an intertwining of anti-Black political maneuvers in
the corridors of the American presidency, on the one hand, and through
all manner of political skullduggery, political authoritarianism,
bureaucratic violence, and vigilante violence and terrorism—via
the Klu Klux Klan and typical Southern White citizens—on the other
hand.
And, mind you, this blatantly authoritarian foul-play
by the American presidency and the United States Congress was perpetrated
under the proforma symbolism-and-language of “American democracy”.
Perpetrated in speeches in Congress, in the drafting of legislation,
in all manner of ceremonial speeches and texts, and in history and
social studies textbooks for American schools, and for colleges
too. In actual reality of course, some one-third of the then
48 states were operationally and systemically authoritarian (non-democratic
that is) in relation to African-American citizens who comprised
one-fifth and more of the population in many of those states.
So in that post-Reconstruction period from 1877 onward,
our country witnessed a revival and refurbishment of the use of
the American presidency to oppress, restrict, and deny equality
of status for African-Americans. For example, neither at the governance
level of the American presidency nor the United States Congress
was it possible to pass federal legislation or executive-order policy
to protect the life of African-American citizens from lynching,
the cruelest mode of terrorist brutality against Black people. Even
during the New Deal under President Franklin Roosevelt—in many respects
a president warranting the appellation “great president”—federal
legislation or policy outlawing lynching was not achieved.
OBAMA'S
VICTORY SPARKED BOTH PAIN-AND-JOY
In understanding the awful features that defined
the long epoch in American history of the downside of the American
presidency's relationship to Black folks, we are also able to understand
a widespread aspect of Barack Obama's victory in the November 4th
Election. That widespread aspect which I have in mind relates to
the complex feelings experienced by perhaps millions of African-Americans
following Obama's victory—namely, that two-prong feeling of both
pain-and-joy.
What is this pain-and-joy feeling experienced by
millions of Black folks vis-à-vis Obama's victory, and experienced
too by some White folks who have and-or-are multiculturalizing and
cosmopolitanizing their American identity? That pain-and-joy feeling
was about precisely what I discussed above. About the long season-in-hell
of the American presidency's governance indifference toward the
status of Black people in our American democracy. About the
long epoch of the American presidency's participation in multi-generational
oppression and restriction of fair and equal status and treatment
for African-American citizens.
Accordingly, many millions of Americans witnessed
evidence of that two-prong feeling of both pain-and-joy when those
television camera's at that million-plus gathering for Barack Obama's
victory address on Election Night at Chicago Grant Park zeroed-in
on the faces of two prominent African-American leadership personalities—Oprah
Winfrey and Rev. Jesse Jackson.
Those faces were strained with that strange combination
of pain-and-joy. The pain was a pain of gnawing memory
and recall. Recalling the vile and cruel denials of democratic
and human decency to the forefathers and foremothers of Winfrey
and Jackson. And thus by extension, recalling the cruel denials
of democratic decency to the forefathers and foremothers of millions
of other African-Americans.
But the faces of Winfrey and Jackson simultaneously
exhibited joy too. But not just any old everyday joy, like the
joy from pop entertainment or whatever. This joy was soulful,
if you will. It was joy-within-the-soul. That joy which, as
in prayer, heals but heals invisibly, not visible on the outside
for immediate recognition. Those awesome television shots of the
faces Oprah Winfrey and Jesse Jackson on the night of president-elect
Barack Obama's brilliant Election Night address at Chicago's Grant
Park, were priceless evidence of the pain-and-joy among millions
of Black folks-some Whites too-vis-a-vis Obama's victory.
Another variant of the pain-and-joy memory process
was communicated to us by a photograph in today's New York Times
(November 5, 2008). It shows a young adult African-American
mother who is next to a pew in a Harlem church, her face wrenched-in-tears-and-pain.
Beside her is her maybe eight-year-old daughter soothing her mother's
face, offering solace and comfort. And no doubt we can reasonably
extend our imaginations and assume that many at that Harlem church
to witness Election Night also had faces exhibiting pain-and-joy
reactions to Obama's victory.
Still another newspaper photograph that I encountered
was also evidence of this pain-and-joy memory process. Also appearing
in today's New York Times (November 5,2008), the photograph
showed two generations of African-American women, two elderly and
one a young adult. As reported in the New York Times, one of the
elderly women was “Rutha Mae Harris...a Freedom Singer in the '60s....”
Her face strained with pain-and-joy— as was the face
of the other elderly lady (the young adult woman's face was not
fully visible)—Rutha Mae Harris told the reporter:
“He's [Obama] of a different time and place, but
he knows whose shoulders he's standing on.” Put another way, Rutha
Mae Harris is telling us—correctly--that president-elect Barack
Obama, the first ever African-American elected president, is one
with that great civil rights activism progressive African-American
leadership ethos-and-tradition.
WHAT
CAN/SHOULD WE ENVISION FOR THE OBAMA PRESIDENCY?
Those among us African-Americans whom I view in ideological
terms as “radical leftists” probably entertain not particularly
positive thoughts regarding this query. Which is to say that they
don't entertain expectations of solidly liberal or progressive public
policy practices from the Obama presidency vis-a-vis the myriad
social and economic problems facing many African-Americans—problems
relating to jobs, health care, housing, and education. We readers
of Black Commentator.com are familiar with articles
appearing in this journal by analysts who favor negative discourse
on what the Obama presidency's public policy practices might be.
By contrast, as an ideologically “pragmatic leftist”
I prefer to produce, in the first instance anyway, a hopeful discourse—or
we might say supportive discourse—regarding the Obama presidency's
forthcoming public policy practices. Why do I say this?
I
favor a hopeful rather than negative discourse regarding forthcoming
Obama public policy practices for a variety of reasons. First,
my understanding of president-elect Barack Obama's political/ideological
makeup (based on his two books–which he wrote himself unlike books
by other presidents—and on his many campaign speeches) is that he
is a genuine “liberal reformer” in regard to American domestic affairs.
Furthermore, Obama's particular variant of the “liberal reformer”
orientation can be tilted toward the progressive side of the American
political spectrum if forces associated with liberal voter-blocs,
on the one hand, and on the other hand civic-activist social movement
forces, generate broad political conditions requiring progressive
public policies from an Obama administration.
Second, keep in mind that the victory of Barack Obama
in the November 4th Election was not just another “victorious
presidential election”. By which I mean, that victory yesterday
was the victory of a very particular African-American politician.
Which is to say, an African-American politician whose leadership
career has been shaped by the civil rights activism progressive
African-American leadership legacy—the legacy of the NAACP, the
NAACP Legal Defense Fund, the National Urban, the National Council
of Negro Women, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, the
Children's Defense Fund, the Rainbow Coalition, so forth and so
on.
Two intellectually acute reporters for the New York
Times—Jackie Calmes and Megan Thee—captured this understanding of
the Obama victory yesterday. They did so by astutely characterizing
the several layers of what I would call “solid-liberal voter blocs”
that generated the nearly 63 million popular votes for Barack Obama
(62,983,132 to be precise)--some 52% of the total vote, compared
with 55.7 million votes for John McCain (46% of total vote). As
Calmes and Thee inform us in the New York Times (November 5,
2008):
“Promising change to a country now in recession,
Mr. Obama built a coalition that included majorities of women,
independent voters, political moderates, Hispanics, African-Americans,
people of most income groups and education levels and voters under
age 45.... Mr. Obama, who would be the first African-American
president of a nation that originally protected black slavery
in its Constitution and counted each black citizen as three-fifths
of a person, did better among white voters over all than a string
of Democratic nominees [before him], including John Kerry and
Al Gore. Mr. Obama outperformed Democratic nominees of the past
eight presidential elections among women, blacks, young voters,
moderates and independents. His support among Hispanics is about
the same as it was for Mr. Gore in 2000, erasing the significant
gains that Mr. Bush made in 2004.
Let me put what Calmes and Thee are telling us in
the quantitative terms based on Exit Poll data. First, some 66%
of 18-24 Age Voters favored Obama; 66% of 25-29 Age Voters favored
Obama; and 54% of 30-39 Age Voters backed Obama. Second, 55% of
women favored Obama. Third, 60% of voters earning under $50,000
annually favored Obama. Fourth, 66% of Hispanic voters favored Obama.
And above all perhaps, 95% of African-American voters favored
Obama.
NOTE
ON CENTRALITY OF BLACK VOTER BLOC IN OBAMA'S VICTORY
It is important to note in a special way the overall
95% African-American voter’s support for Obama in the November
4th Election. It happened that in major states dubbed
“battleground states” by election experts, although victory in
states like Pennsylvania (21 Electoral Votes), Ohio 20 Electoral
Votes), Virginia (13 Electoral Votes), and North Carolina (15 Electoral
Votes) depended importantly on Obama gaining something between
30% and 40% of White voters, winning these states' Electoral Vote
depended perhaps even more crucially on Obama gaining two key facets
of the Black voter bloc.
First, the Obama campaign had to achieve what I
called in earlier articles for Black Commentator “a maximal Black
voter-bloc mobilization”, which fortunately it did in the “battleground
states”. Secondly, the Obama candidacy had to win 90%-plus of
African-American voters in “battleground states”, which Obama also
achieved.
On the other hand, John McCain gained a majority
of White voters both overall in the November 4th Election
(55% in fact, to 43% White voters favoring Obama) as well as in
the key “battleground states”. Thus it was above all the maximally
mobilized Black voter bloc and that voter bloc's 90%-plus support
of Obama that produced, say, the 50% Obama victory in Indiana (49%
McCain). It was similarly the maximally mobilized Black voter bloc
and its 90%-plus support for Obama that produced the Obama 51% victory
in Ohio (47% McCain). A similar Black voter-bloc pattern produced
Obama's 55% victory in Pennsylvania (44% McCain), and finally this
Black voter-bloc pattern resulted in Obama's 52% victory in Virginia
(47% McCain).
Thus, the Obama presidential campaign has bequeathed
an important legacy to early 21st century national Democratic
Party. Namely, it has bequeathed an electoral methodology and mechanism
that can effectively challenge and reverse what had been, since
Reagan's election in 1980, a near Republican Party monopoly in winning
presidential elections. For many African-Americans, they might well
view this as being, in certain crucial respects, an African-American
political achievement.
CONCLUDING NOTE
No one, of course, possesses a sooth-sayers ball
of truth for projecting whether our upcoming Obama presidency—the
first ever American presidency headed up by an African-American
politician—will generate public policies that address the needs
and mobility opportunities of not just the socially weak sectors
of African-Americans, but also the socially weak sectors of White
Americans, Latino-Americans, Asian-Americans, and others among our
citizens. I make no pretense at all along these lines.
There are, however, “good reasons” for expecting
an Obama presidency, at some point in its first term, to generate
a range of genuine liberal-reform public policies regarding America's
domestic socio-economic affairs. Those “good reasons”, as noted
above, relate partly to my understanding of the generic political-ideological
makeup of president-elect Barack Obama. Those “good reasons” relate
partly to Obama's linkage with the progressive African-American
leadership legacy. And those “good reasons” relate, perhaps above
all, to the future capacity of genuinely liberal voter-blocs among
American citizens, on the one hand, and on the other hand civic-activist
social movement forces.
Among the latter, I have in mind civic-activist social
movement forces among trade unions, women groups, church-based civic
activists, activist college students, activist academics, civic
activist professionals among lawyers, doctors, health professionals
generally, civic-activist business persons, so forth and so on.
Furthermore, I have in mind a special belief (feeling, hunch,
predilection) that African-American based-and-or- influenced trade
unions, women groups, church-based civic activists, activist college
students, activist academics, civic-activist business persons, and
civic activist professionals among lawyers, doctors, health professionals,
are going to play a key role in pressuring the Obama presidency
toward liberal-reform public policies.
Let me conclude these hopeful ideas regarding possible
liberal-reform public policy outcomes in the Obama presidency by
quoting a passage from Obama's address at Chicago's Grant Park on
Election Night.
“The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be
steep. We may not get there in one year or even one term, but
America—I have never been more hopeful than I am tonight that
we will get there.
I promise you—we as a people will get there. ...This
victory alone is not the change we see—it is only the chance for
us to make that change. And that cannot happen if we go back to
the way things were. It cannot happen without you. So let us
summon a new spirit of patriotism; of service and responsibility
where each of us resolves to pitch in and work harder and look
after not only ourselves, but each other. Let us remember that
if this financial crisis taught us anything, it's that we cannot
have a thriving Wall Street while Main Street suffers—in this
country, we rise or fall as one nation; as one people.
Click
here
to post a comment about the election
and read what others are saying
on the BC Readers' Corner Blog
BlackCommentator.com Editorial Board member Martin Kilson, PhD hails from an African Methodist
background and clergy: From a great-great grandfather who founded
an African Methodist Episcopal church in Maryland in the 1840s;
from a great-grandfather AME clergyman; from a Civil War veteran
great-grandfather who founded an African Union Methodist Protestant
church in Pennsylvania in 1885; and from an African Methodist clergyman
father who pastored in an Eastern Pennsylvania mill town - Ambler,
PA. He attended Lincoln
University (PA), 1949-1953, and Harvard
graduate school. Appointed in 1962 as the first African-American
to teach in Harvard
College, in 1969 he was the first African-American
tenured at Harvard. He retired in 2003 as a Frank G. Thomson Professor
of Government, Emeritus. His publications include: Political Change in a West African State: A Study of the Modernization
Process in Sierra Leone (Harvard University Press, 1966); Key Issues in the Afro-American Experience (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1970); New States in the Modern World (Center for International Affairs)
(Harvard University Press, 1975); The African Diaspora: Interpretive Essays (Harvard University Press, 1976); The Making
of Black Intellectuals: Studies on the African American Intelligentsia
(Forthcoming. University of Missouri Press); and The
Transformation of the African American Intelligentsia, 1900-2008
(Forthcoming). Click here
to contact Dr. Kilson. |