While
there are many and varied strong opinions about the state of the
news business in America, it’s easy to miss what’s happening to
the people who gather and report the news for newspapers, the historic
foundation for the nation’s mass communications.
Yes,
there are television news shows (short and commercial-filled) and
there are a few radio news operations (few, except for the diatribes
of jocks who pretend that their rants have something to do with
news). There are some fine news magazines and other periodicals,
and books, but they reach only a small percentage of the people.
Lately,
there’s the Internet, but it’s so new and so untested that most
people don’t know how to handle the information that is available.
So,
we’ll concentrate on newspapers, which present the news in a more
or less reasonable manner. At one time, newspapers reached a large
percentage of the population and, when one engaged in a discussion
or debate, both participants got their general information from
a newspaper. They had a starting point for debate.
Reporters
served a very important function in society for that reason, even
though the power of assignment by the top editor and publisher had,
and still has, great influence over what you read.
Now,
reporters are under siege, despite the very important function they
have performed in society for generations. They’ve been downsized
and short-staffed, they have been deprived of decent pay and benefits,
and their corporate owners have bought and sold their papers as
if they were crates of widgets.
They’re
workers, just like other workers in American industry. Many of
them don’t see it that way, even those who work under a union contract.
At the non-union papers—of which there are many—the reporters and
editors are just as likely to identify with the publisher as they
are with other wage workers.
The
biggest crisis of the American press in history has descended on
reporters and editors. The reshuffling of ownership and the casting
about of publishers and their corporate boards signal that newspapers
as we knew them are coming to an end and the owners are panicking
about the decline of readership and the disaster that follows:
The decline in advertising revenues.
Mergers
and consolidations of newspapers that have been under way in the
U.S. for more than 40 years are nearly complete. What we get as
news now comes from fewer outlets and the papers that come out of
the boxes on the street corners contain less news each year, as
newsprint and ink get more expensive and bean counters pressure
newsrooms to cut staff and make room for more profit.
What
we’re seeing in America is no less than the creation of a much foggier
perception of reality than we’ve ever had. There are now many thousands
more news outlets and there are fewer checks and balances on the
accuracy of what’s being disseminated.
For
example, on the Internet, the exceptions, at least in the view of
an old newspaper reporter, are those whose accuracy, dependability,
and reporting skills were honed on newspapers or magazines. They
are people whose work was “peer reviewed” on a daily basis during
a working life of 30 or 40 years. They’re people you can trust,
but there are thousands of others out in cyberspace who have yet
to prove themselves—many probably will but it will be over time.
The
Newspaper Guild, now affiliated with the Communications Workers
of America, is in the grinder, its membership slipping along with
the steady reduction or demise of daily newspapers, and the members
themselves are suffering the same indignities that other workers
suffer, as their companies are downsized or their work sent to other
countries with a lower wage.
A
recent headline in the union’s national newspaper, The Guild
Reporter, shouted, “No pause in death of a thousand cuts.”
The story is about the loss of advertising income in the newspaper
business, to the tune of $3 billion in the first six months of this
year and the predictable response of the owners—cut staff and cut
the news hole, the news space.
People
outside the newspaper business likely see the reporters in the same
light as they do the owners. That’s a mistake. They’re workers
and most of them still have something of the old ethic that says
the paper is published to fulfill the intent of the framers of the
Constitution when they wrote the First Amendment—that a free people
need a truly free press to make a democratic republic work.
After
newspapers became “properties,” decades ago, there was a short battle
of a few years’ duration, between the top reporters and editors
and publishers and their corporate bosses about the reason they
publish a newspaper: To bring the news of the day to the people
without fear or favor, or to make money? The accounting department
won that argument.
Unfortunately,
the progress (or lack thereof) of organized labor in the U.S. has
been greatly impeded by the philosophy honored by both sides, which
says that the employer, the bosses, have “management rights,” which
means that they can do what they wish with their enterprise, with
no interference from the workers or their unions.
Decades
ago, there were those—especially in newspapers—who believed that
the quality of the product should be a subject of bargaining. In
news, after all, the stories that inform the people are often signed
by the reporter, who must stand behind the information that’s printed.
There
was a clause in some union contracts, in fact, that addressed this
“quality” issue. It said, in effect, if the story as submitted
by the reporter was edited so as to change the meaning or intent
of the reporter, said reporter could withhold the by-line. That
was a “quality” issue, but negotiating for quality stopped there
and that’s where we have run into trouble.
Surely,
newspaper owners would like to cut even more reporters and editors
and have the work done in some other, cheaper, place. While it’s
not likely that the news business will see much of its work being
farmed out, it’s a possibility. For now, the corporate owners will
be satisfied with slashing news and other staff, cutting that most
costly of expenses, labor. The newspaper industry is diminished
and so is the right of the people to be informed. It’s a quality
issue.
Whether
one gets the news from the major television networks, cable television,
radio, or the Internet, most of it is based on newspaper reporting
or the type of reporting that was the signature of good and free
newspapers. Even in decline, they’re important.
And,
even in decline, they provide the basis for a commonly-understood
body of information, so there can be intelligent debate in the public
square. Something else might eventually take the place of newspapers,
but Americans still will require a common understanding of their
daily lives. Otherwise, our “information age” will continue to
take us toward a true Tower of Babel, in which no one will understand
anyone else.
That’s
why it’s important to support the workers in the newspapers and,
when “quality of the product” becomes an issue at the bargaining
table, those workers will need even more support. When that time
comes, when the people support the news workers in their quest to
deliver accurate information and insights every day, there will
be hope that the country’s direction will be turned and we’ll move
toward being the free country that was envisioned so long ago.
BlackCommentator.com
Columnist John Funiciello is a labor organizer and former union
organizer. His union work started when he became a local president
of The Newspaper Guild in the early 1970s. He was a reporter
for 14 years for newspapers in New York State. In addition
to labor work, he is organizing family farmers as they struggle
to stay on the land under enormous pressure from factory food producers
and land developers. Click here
to contact Mr. Funiciello. |