|
|
The
current issue is always free to everyone
|
|
|
|
Solentiname
was like a paradise
but in Nicaragua
paradise is not yet possible.
I have given no thought
to the reconstruction of our little community
of Solentiname.
I think of the far more important task,
the task for us all:
the reconstruction of the whole country.
Ernesto
Cardenal, “The Meaning of Solentiname”
Sojourner
Truth, it was said, was “unruly and excessive.” She was not
material to be reformed! “Unruly and excessive,” radical, unpredictable,
an abundance of uncompromising strength and spirit, Truth was
a threat to the status quo, capable of transforming an oppressive
state. The more “refined” Frederick Douglass declared her “a
genuine specimen of the uncultured negro.” Truth, however, stayed
on course: free my people! In her time, she was a non-conformists
rather than a socialite of the elite Black community. Her activism
sought the concrete liberation of Black people from enslavement.
“‘Well, ‘manicipation came; we all know; can’t stop to go throo
de hull. I go fur adgitatin’… I believe dere is works belong
wid adgitatin’’” (‘Doers of the Word’: African-American Women
Speakers and Writers in the North (1830-1880)).
Ida
B. Wells, following the footsteps of Harriet Tubman, didn’t
hesitate to display her rifle in defense of herself and her
family, often threatened by white mobs who opposed her fight
against the lynching and Black men and women. At her first
public speaking engagement, she recalled standing before an
audience. “As I described the cause of the trouble at home
and my mind went back to the scenes of the struggle to the thought
of the friends who were scattered throughout the country, a
feeling of loneliness and homesickness for the days and the
friends that were gone came over me and I felt the tears coming…but
I kept on reading the story which they had come to hear” (Crusade
for Justice: The Autobiography of Ida B. Wells). Paradise
was not yet possible for Black citizens in the South or North!
Wells kept on and stayed on course.
For
Black people, traditional non-conformists and agitators, keeping
on hasn’t become easy since the days of slavery and Reconstruction.
They came in my yard, said Baby Suggs, and then the Black
folks embraced them!
Shirley
Chisholm, the first woman to place her name in the nomination
for president at the Democratic National Convention, the first
Black to be on the
ballot as a candidate for president, had the audacity to believe
she could remain a person conscious of her cultural and historical
heritage while fighting on behalf of the forgotten humanity.
But
amidst the activity of the invaders and the embracers stood
Shirley Chisholm where there was “little place in the political
scheme of things for an independent, creative personality, for
a fighter” (African American.com). “Anyone who takes
that role must pay a price.” And was betrayal by one’s own people
the price to pay for remaining a non-conformist and an agitator?
Chisholm
ran for the people, but the people, well, they began running
too. It was a massive run on someone’s course, with someone
else’s goal, and, thus, a run at full speed, backward. And years
later, these runners are still speeding, backward, downhill,
but so many that they can’t see beyond themselves, beyond the
flashing images, signifying an enormous illusion of movement.
The runners can’t remember Chisholm; they can’t remember the
heritage of non-conformity or agitation. They can’t remember
the defiance and fight of our revolutionaries because “the first
thing the enemy tries to do is isolate revolutionaries from
the masses of the people, making us horrible and hideous monsters
so that our people will hate us,” wrote Assata Shakur.
But,
she, Shakur, with that marathon of Black folks running backward
at full speed, with the FBI and local police conducting shooting
sprees in the Black communities, even with the bullets lodged
in her body and lay chained to a hospital bed, Shakur could
remember to listen for the voice that had power beyond
the doctors and police officials surrounding her.
“‘Who’s
better than you?’”
“‘Get
that head up’” (Assata: An Autobiography).
In
defiance of bullet wounds and physical imprisonment, Shakur
raised her head!
The
path to freedom, as Shakur discovered, is knowing that “the
almighty dollar is king; those who have the most money control
the country and, through campaign contributions, buy and sell
presidents, congressmen, and judges, the ones who pass the laws
and enforce the laws that benefit their benefactors.” As a result,
we are all in jail wherever we go, a fellow inmate remains Shakur.
Hasn’t
it been the occupation of Amerikkka to invest the backward running
mob with the power to suppress these voices of opposition (here
and abroad), to trample on the memory of their deeds, to stamp
upon those of us who won’t reform because we know the militarism
and corporatization of U.S. government can’t be reformed? It’s
the only power they are allowed—only this power to destroy!
In the globalization of destruction and death, our role as agitators,
fighters, and non-conformist extends beyond reconstructing our
“little” communities. As agitators, fighters, non-conformist,
we can envision freedom from destruction for people of
color, globally. But we are far from that goal.
Although
many of our people are tripping over themselves to run at the
bidding of their Master in that insidious downhill marathon,
we must remember that those who wish to remain Negroes, enslaved
to their Masters in a new forms of enslavement, represent our
casualties of war: the living dead. We, the last standing, must
go on. As surviving members of the Black Left, we must hear
the voice and raise our heads beyond those feet that would annihilate
us if we fail to remember who we are. We have a worthy and
a formidable tradition behind us, and, though few now, we must
pick up the torch and carry it forward. “Important tasks” have
begun with just a handful of people. We have an important task
too, and we are fortunate to have someone standing in the tradition
of Sojourner Truth, Ida B. Wells, Shirley Chisholm, and Assata
Shakur. We have our Cynthia McKinney.
It’s
imperative that we recognize that this historical moment could
very well be our last. Left to the forces of an imperialist
regime, it could be! If you haven’t read, please do read Larry
Pinkney’s “Cynthia McKinney: That Audacious Black Woman Standing
for the People” in the
Black Commentator, May
22, 2008. I will add this—our loyalty is to the struggle
and to stand with those leaders like McKinney who honors the
right to fight for human rights above the right of corporations
to drain humanity of life. For McKinney and us, our loyalty
is to the Movement and not an election campaign by and
for the “Joshua generation” against the so-called “Wright generation,”
so-called because it’s corporate media’s image depicting paradise
in white mainstream but “militancy” in dark corners. We are
the opposition against militarism and corporatization, standing
theoretically beside McKinney. Let’s make it a real! When you
stand up, you will do so with the understanding that our war
heroes never die for us as long as we are imbued with their
spirit of resistance.
BlackCommentator.com
Editorial Board member, Lenore Jean Daniels, PhD, has
been a writer, for over thirty years of commentary, resistance
criticism and cultural theory, and short stories with a Marxist
sensibility to the impact of cultural narrative violence and
its antithesis, resistance narratives. With entrenched dedication
to justice and equality, she has served as a coordinator of
student and community resistance projects that encourage the
Black Feminist idea of an equalitarian community and facilitator
of student-teacher communities behind the walls of academia
for the last twenty years. Dr. Daniels holds a PhD in Modern
American Literatures, with a specialty in Cultural Theory (race,
gender, class narratives) from Loyola
University, Chicago. Click here
to contact Dr. Daniels.
|
|
|
|
|
Your
comments are always welcome.
If you send us an e-Mail message we may publish all
or part of it, unless you tell us it is not for publication.
You may also request that we withhold your name.
Thank
you very much for your readership.
|
|
|
|
|