Recall with Malcolm a people who toiled generation
after generation on this land for the organized thievery of
landlords, merchants, and politicians, “in cahoots with the
landlords and the merchants.” Many of us transformed ourselves
into the people of Moses, collectively, subversively, transgressing
against the might of Pharaoh. Hear Robeson sing it! Still
for others, the role of warrior was more defiant, more audacious
if not perilous. Descendents of creative (critical) thinkers
and warriors of strategies and tactics in the struggle for
human rights in the U.S., we have witnessed what John Henrik
Clarke calls the “greatest single crime ever committed against
a people in world history” ignored. Now we face the “most
tragic act of protracted genocide.”
History calls upon us to question our condition
in its totality to work in the process of radically transforming
this society (Paulo Freire, Pedagogy
of Freedom: Ethics, Democracy, and Civic Courage (Critical
Perspectives Series)). As we act toward the realization
that work is required of us to fight against corporate imperialism,
we act knowing that our work has always been the most subversive
work ever done in U.S. As subversive workers, we’ve defied
the laws and many federal, state, and privatized “task forces.”
We’ve made homes of shacks. We’ve nourished our children,
our community, from the Earth. We’ve endured torture and
brutality. We’ve risked our lives and gave up lives.
As bell hooks writes, we are a people who sustained
the trauma of losing our leaders (Salvation:
Black People and Love).
And we had little time to heal from these wounds when, sometime
in 1980, in Philadelphia, Mississippi, the American public
allowed itself to be absorbed by pods! Worse, the Black privileged
class abandoned the ship just when the boat needed rocking!
They opted to die as a people! They swiftly “assimilation
into the values of the dominant white mainstream,” writes
hooks. Black elite’s abandonment represented “an unprecedented
context for collusion in their own oppression and exploitation.”
Most important, this defection permitted the takeover of “poor
black communities by a drug economy.” The war on drugs has
been the domestic version of “shock and awe” for Black Americans.
The media went to work pitting privileged Blacks against the
masses while people, following in the footsteps of Sojourner
Truth, spoke out against the injustice, were singled out as
she was for being, Peterson writes, a “crazy, ignorant, repelling”
Black person. In the white backlash, Black consciousness-please-go-away
era, our work now is more difficult and no less subversive
than at any time in our past.
The
Founding Fathers' notion of “freedom” and “democracy,” already
questionable as these terms excluded the enslaved Blacks,
the poor, the lower-working class, and women, receives a face-lift
every Republicrat administration in order to justify everything
from pre-emptive wars to domestic spying (extended to all
Americans now) for corporate interests. Carla L. Peterson
reminds us that it was Sojourner Truth’s work not only to
give “testimony on the state of the nation” but also to question
and to “reconceptualize” notions of freedom, democracy, and,
in particular the notion of the “brave.” She was particular
keen on reaching audiences of the “brave.” And, of course,
there’s good reason to reach the audience of the brave then
and now. The brave aren’t fearful of the conclusions they
reach as a result of questioning the Black condition in America.
Truth wasn’t looking for appeasers; she was seeking creative
thinkers and warriors - doers of the word. And the word in
this crucial moment is - Movement!
We didn’t wait for saviors, appointments, metals,
or titles. We sang in “personal protest” with Billie Holiday
(Blues
Legacies and Black Feminism: Gertrude "Ma" Rainey, Bessie
Smith, and Billie Holiday)
against the concrete racial injustice evident in hanging Black
bodies. Billie wasn’t a defector or an appeaser. On the contrary,
she was a creative (critical) thinker. I think of Ella Baker,
described as “being tough and confrontational if she had to
be” (Ella
Baker and the Black Freedom Movement: A Radical Democratic
Vision (Gender and American Culture)). “Baker’s
struggle against racism was as much about standing up for
herself as it was about lending her strength to struggles
initiated on behalf of others.” I can’t see an appeaser in
Baker, the warrior. We need to pick up the mantle from these
America’s brave freedom fighters and resume the peoples’ protest
movement, apart from the Republicrats and their corporate
imperialist partners.
We are creative (critical) thinkers, warriors,
militants, about the work of saving ourselves (and through
us, the country) before we have reached a point of no return.
With all that we, as Black Americans, have endured; our best
work is yet to come. We, who are creative (critical) thinkers
and warriors - revolutionaries, are in need of our
Clearing, our space of protest organizing in living rooms,
community centers, prisons, schools, and churches. Our voices
should speak of “resistance, indignation, the just anger of
those who are deceived and betrayed.” Our voices should speak,
too, “of their right to rebel against the ethical transgressions
of which they are the long-suffering victims.” This is our
Freire speaking!
“Whoever
is engaged in ‘right thinking’ knows only too well that words
not given body (made flesh) have little or no value,” warns
Freire. If our work is one of personal protest with the struggle
of the oppressed against corporate imperialist values, then
we will know it’s “right thinking” and aligned with the agenda
of the Clearing (the genesis of our past movements). It was
forward and progressive, and we know this because, to use
Peterson’s words, our work has always been “structured not
according to a capitalist economy of exchange.” Nor did our
work leave unquestioned the “hierarchies of class, race, and
gender.”
Like Malcolm, assassinated 43 years ago, we
are the Left in rage with the status quo. If this
is subversive, so be it! The work of a brave movement
to transform the imperialist world order requires that we
denounce the “process of dehumanization,” as Freire tells
us, and announce “the dream of a new society.”
In the finally analysis, it’s ridiculous to
speak of a dream without recognizing the conditions of the
masses of people. A dream consists of what? The dream is always
the dream of the people for an end to injustice and inequality
- or what else is it? More to the point, whose dream is it?
Who will benefit from all this dreaming outside the
peoples’ movement?
I think it’s more of that pod business.
Watch you don’t sleep and awake to a nightmare!