In a strange
piece of irony, 2 days after an announcement that the sentencing
for Jose Padilla
was postponed due to a death in Judge Marcia Cooke’s family,
the Central Intelligence Agency revealed that it destroyed
videotapes of two terror suspects being “interrogated.” This
may come as a surprise to some, but it’s not the first time
the CIA has come clean on something years after the fact. From
the outset, it would seem that if all of us were just as honest
toward those close to us as the CIA is toward the taxpaying
citizens, the world might be a better place, right? Wrong.
According to the Associated
Press’ Pamela Hess, we aren’t really even supposed to
know this. CIA Director Michael Hayden only released this
as a handwritten memo to CIA employees and it was leaked
to the AP soon afterward. The agency claims to have filmed
the “questioning” of only 2 terror suspects in ’02, watch-dogged
itself in ’03, and destroyed the tapes in ’05 out of fear
of disclosing the identities of agency interrogators to the
public. “The tapes posed a serious security risk. Were they
ever to leak, they would permit identification of your CIA
colleagues who have served in the program, exposing them
and their families to retaliation from al-Qaeda and its sympathizers.”
My question
is, was the Agency/Detainee footage destroyed just to protect
the identity of the interrogators?
Did the CIA really only electronically record the questioning
of just it’s first 2 detainees? Were they really the first
2 suspects detained? The suspects, Abu-Zubaydah and Ramzi Binalshibh
were said to have experienced what amounts to outright torture
and questioning that reportedly led to the capture of accused
9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in ’03. The harsh questioning
included a "simulated drowning" technique called
waterboarding.
Concern over just this type
of torture was on the minds of the attorneys for convicted
terror conspirator, Jose Padilla. Over 3 years ago, his case
was argued 2 days before the New Yorker exposed the
Abu-Graib abuse scandal and here we are 2 days after the 12/4
postponement of Padilla’s sentencing hearing (originally scheduled
for the 5th) with news of the CIA destroying some detainee
videotaped "questioning." Padilla’s attorneys say
he was “so badly mistreated by his own government during 3
and a half years in military custody that he deserves far less
than the life prison sentence sought by federal prosecutors,” according
to a 12/4 report by AP’s Curt Anderson. Understand that Padilla
underwent this ordeal without having been charged with any
crime and Cooke harshly criticized his prosecutors for being “light
on facts.” The hearing will begin on 1/7.
The biggest
question of course is why is the CIA being so open now regarding
its destruction
of the videotapes? Hide the evidence, what else? Yes they had
something to hide, but in light of such torture, how reliable
is this information as to the role of individuals in the CIA
and others involved in the fight against so-called "world
terrorism?"
Chris Stevenson is a columnist
for the Buffalo Criterion.Click
here to contact Mr. Stevenson.