Illegal immigration reform
is a salient issue in America today, particularly among the
Republicans who consider
this issue “a border crisis.” Congress’ effort
to legislate a solution, that was met with a last minute Republican
filibuster, stalled a viable solution to addressing the 12 million
resident aliens in the country with a measured naturalization
process for those who qualify. It was said that it was too much
like amnesty. But now the Republicans have pulled out their latest
secret weapon, former homeless advocate now Black Republican,
Ted Hayes. Hayes, who came to the nation’s attention as
a homeless advocate in the 1990s, has abandoned the homeless
movement that has taken on a disproportionately African American
hue (at a time when Los Angeles is the homeless capital of the
nation) for a new “Black movement.” Illegal immigration.
Hayes, the only homeless advocate I ever knew to have Laker floor
seats, and the only one to take homeless people on a field hockey
trip to Europe, never engaged in anything “Black” when
he was a homeless advocate. But now he wants to be the African
American voice standing arm and arm with the Minutemen movement,
border patrol civilians who take it as their civil right to defend
their property. Here’s a man who claims to have no property,
representing (or used to represent) property-less people, suddenly
looking to protect the rights of property owners and national
citizenship. What’s wrong with this picture?
Or maybe the more relevant question is,
what’s behind
it? Ted Hayes, coincidentally, has become a Republican and has
interjected himself in a fight that has a racial element - white
conservative “minuteman”, protecting America from
illegal invasion that assaults their “American values.” Although
Mexican immigrants represent less than forty percent of all the
illegal immigrants who enter the nation each year, they’re
the only ones being called out. And the Southern border is the
only one being “walled off,” while the Northern border
remains open to the same terrorist threats. There’s something
openly racist about this. So what better way to hide the hypocrisy
of this contradiction than to interject a counter-racial component,
that Blacks are being hurt by illegal immigration. The same argument,
and the same strategy was used a dozen years ago, when Affirmative
Action came under attack. Being attacked by whites made it a
race issue that would be perceived as “racial,” so
Republican conservatives came up with a Black face to sell a
bad bill of goods - that affirmative action was bad for everybody,
including Blacks.
Ward Connerly became the face of the anti-affirmative
action movement and the “colorblind” politic has lead to
the deconstruction of affirmative action. Ted Hayes and his “Choose
Black” politic is becoming, to the anti-immigration movement,
what Ward Connerly’s “Civil Rights” initiative
was to the Anti-Affirmative Action movement. Connerly is paid
by conservative think tanks and Republican policy forums, over
a million dollars a year to overturn affirmative action, state
by state. How much is a homeless man being paid to go around
the nation to round (or rouse) up Blacks against immigration
reform? Ted Hayes is on record stating that “illegal immigration
is the biggest threat to Blacks since slavery.” But we
know the biggest threat to Blacks has been this colorblindness;
Republican conservatives use these new Black Republicans to espouse
policies that undermine the progress of the historical race disparities
African Americans have spent 140 years trying to correct. And
with GOP support, suddenly Ted Hayes is “Black” again.
For the last year, as immigrants have pressed
the citizenship question and others have tried to press African
Americans into
a position on this, I’ve insisted that this is not our
issue. There is nothing to be lost, or gained, in African Americans
coming out for, or against, immigration reform. There are more
issues that impact African Americans nationally that we could
be vocal about. Immigration reform is not one of them. It’s
an issue for conservatives concerned about illegal immigration’s
impact on national security. For social and fiscal moderates,
it’s the economy and immigrations impact on the suppression
of wages. Both are legitimate issues. However, for poor people
- the issue has been around the competition for jobs and the
illusion that immigrants are taking jobs from good hardworking
Americans. I say this position is illusionary because immigrants
aren't taking jobs from Blacks or anybody else. They make jobs
where there are no jobs, and only take jobs for wages that nobody
will work for, including Blacks. Moreover, Blacks and Latinos
are both impacted by wage suppression that using illegal labor
brings about. Attacking each other benefits neither, and most
Black and Latino groups recognize this. So far, every time Hayes
has shown up somewhere with his “Choose Black” rhetoric,
he is met with a greater number of unified Black and Latino groups,
working together to improve economic injustice in poor communities.
If choosing “Black America” is the call, why would
one choose to concentrate on illegal immigration over the economic
exploitation that promotes the wage suppression and wealth disparities
exploiting both races? If Hayes wants to advocate for justice,
why does he side with the injustice that continues to blame the
poor for the nation’s problems, when the top one percent
of the population holds 40% of the wealth? Maybe it’s because
the pay is better to advocate against the poor and oppressed
than it is to advocate with them. Hayes would have much more
credibility advocating for the homeless.
But he’s given up the homeless gig for one that pays better,
attacking immigrants and trying to interject Blacks in the conflict,
to deflect attention anyway from those who have issue with Mexican
immigrants - but none of the other immigrants coming into the
country. Hayes’ anti-immigration advocacy is a ploy that
most Blacks aren’t buying into. However, like Ward Connerly
before him, Hayes has been bought and sold to the anti-immigration
forces as “the Blackface” in the movement. It’s
worked before…
BC Columnist
Dr. Anthony Asadullah Samad is a national columnist, managing
director of the Urban
Issues Forum and author of the upcoming book, Saving
The Race: Empowerment Through Wisdom. His Website is AnthonySamad.com. Click
here to contact Dr. Samad. |