House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi’s (D-CA) move to
oust Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA) from the powerful Ways and Means
committee may well “blow up in their face,” said CBC Chairman Mel
Watt (D-NC). The CBC has twice rallied around Jefferson, who is
under FBI corruption investigation involving alleged receipt of
bribes. Watt says Pelosi is “making up rules and applying them to
one person” – a Black Man.
Watt certainly has a point in terms of congressional
precedent. However, Watt’s newfound willingness to stand for principle,
and to rally the Caucus as a body in support of a besieged
member is out of character, and is itself, unprecedented, in his
contradictory and lackluster tenure as “leader” of the 42 Black
members of the House. Solidarity was nowhere in evidence when Watt
did Pelosi’s bidding, in the attempted
humiliation and isolation of fellow CBC member Rep. Cynthia
McKinney (D-GA) this past April.
Pelosi persuaded Watt to demand McKinney apologize
for the incident
involving the Capitol Hill police. Watt took servitude to
House Leadership a step further, insisting that Caucus members refrain
from standing with McKinney in solidarity as she delivered the forced
apology on the House floor.
In this instance, Watt was an agent of CBC solidarity
with Pelosi, rather than their own sister member.
Watt warned of a potential Black voter black lash.
“You’ve got a whole base of people out there who believe that the
Democratic Party takes them for granted already.” Yet, it is Watt
who has conditioned Nancy Pelosi to expect obedience from her poodle.
For the North Carolina Democrat to rear up on his hind legs, pretending
to be a pit bull must come as shock to Democratic Leadership and
Caucus members alike. He has done Pelosi’s bidding while failing
to rally the CBC to develop their own agenda. During Watt’s
tenure, the Caucus has fallen into total political disarray, unable
to unite around progressive legislation as its founders
intended. It is this political disarray that has allowed a faction
of the Caucus to hold corporate interests above those of their constituents,
most conspicuously including William Jefferson.
These are strange times, when the CBC finds its rare
moment of near-unanimity in defense of a member whose multiple financial
dealings earned him the nickname “Dollar Bill.” We wished that such
bold leadership had been exerted on Rep. McKinney’s behalf, and
when large numbers of CBC members voted
with Republicans on the Bankruptcy Bill, CAFTA, Estate Tax Repeal,
and now the COPE (against Internet Neutrality) bill.
If the CBC wishes to continue to promote themselves
as the “Conscience of the Congress,” then they should try
to salvage what credibility they have left by paying attention to
their own consciences and not engaging in the very double-standards
among themselves that they willingly denounce when other people
do it to them.
Leutisha Stills can be reached at [email protected].
The CBC Monitor's website is cbcmonitor.voxunion.com. |