As thousands celebrated
the 40th anniversary of the Voting Rights Act on August 6th,
the black and white images
of peaceful Blacks being tear-gassed and clubbed on “Bloody Sunday” while
marching for the right to vote were, for many, faded memories of
a so-called bygone era. That is, until a month later, when the television
again focused the nation’s attention on another tragedy: Hurricane Katrina.
What we saw televised in New Orleans wasn’t just the function of
a broken levee. It was the intersection of race and class, laid
bare for the world to see how such factors literally amounted to
life or death.
The striking nexus between Bloody Sunday and
Hurricane Katrina is not simply that both were televised, but
rather what that coverage
revealed. Katrina’s vulnerable, the poor and politically disfranchised
who for generations had been pushed to the margins of society,
were without the economic or other means to get out of harm’s way.
Today, a growing national trend of exploiting
the fear of minimally existent voter fraud threatens to hinder
access to the ballot box
by requiring voters to present a photo ID that our nation’s most
vulnerable – the poor, elderly and many racial minorities – are
likely not to have the means to acquire.
The National Commission on Federal Election
reform, co-chaired by former President Jimmy Carter and James
Baker, recently recommended
federal legislation requiring all voters to present a “Real ID” card
in order to vote. To obtain this type of photo identification, documentary
proof would be required of an individual’s full legal name
and date of birth, Social Security number, primary address and
citizenship.
Unfortunately, the Commission’s “Real ID” recommendation is more
draconian than any ID requirement adopted in any state to date,
including Georgia’s recently enacted and widely criticized law,
which President Carter, ironically, has condemned as “discriminatory.”
Georgia’s voter identification bill is one of the strictest measures
in the nation. Voters are required to present one of six government-issued
photo identifications at the polls, reducing from 17 the number
of previously allowed forms of identification, including bank statements
and utility bills, which contain no photo. Georgia’s discriminatory
photo ID law has been blocked in federal court.
Proponents of photo ID requirements
argue that such measures are necessary to prevent fraud and to
enhance confidence in election results. But the type of voter
fraud addressed by photo ID requirements is extraordinarily small,
and supporters of the photo ID measures have yet to make a convincing
case that existing methods of discouraging and addressing fraud
are insufficient.
While the anti-fraud benefits of photo
ID measures are suspect, there is strong evidence that such requirements
will reduce political participation by otherwise eligible rural,
elderly, disabled, poor and racial minority voters, who are less
likely to have photo identification or the means to acquire one.
Like the warnings about
the capacity of New Orleans’ levees to withstand the force of
a major hurricane, a photo ID requirement will predictably increase
the ranks of
the disfranchised.
Many who were left behind
in New Orleans did not have access to a car, and thus are least
likely to possess
a driver’s license. The hundreds of thousands of people displaced
by Katrina may find it impossible to recover the identity papers
they left behind or to obtain new records from government offices
and hospitals that were destroyed. These citizens, and many like
them across the country, will be politically disfranchised by the
Commission’s ID proposal, if enacted, and by photo ID requirements
like Georgia’s.
Four decades after Voting Rights Act’s passage, the Hurricane
Katrina experience reminds us that the VRA is still necessary to
protect our nation’s most vulnerable from present attempts to dilute
their voting strength.
Ryan Paul Haygood is assistant counsel at
the NAACP Legal Defense & Educational
Fund, Inc. (www.naacpldf.org). |