This article originally appeared
in ILCA
Online, a publication of the International Labor Communications
Association. If
George W. Bush finishes a second term and avoids adjusting the
federal minimum wage, we will have completed an 11-year record
stretch without any adjustment. The previous record of nine
years was brought to us by Ronald Reagan. The current federal
minimum wage of $5.15 per hour is over 40 percent below the 1968
level adjusted for inflation. A fulltime worker taking no vacation
or holidays and earning the federal minimum wage earns 55 percent
of the federal poverty line for a family of four and a much smaller
percentage of what it takes to actually pay the rent and basic
living expenses in most parts of the country. Such a worker
qualifies for much of what remains of public support and assistance,
placing the burden on taxpayers to pick up where employers fail
to pay a living wage.
The states aren't taking
this attack on their citizens' living standards lying down. The living wage
movement is moving to the state level. After winning living
wage laws in 123 cities and counties (laws that mandate higher
minimums for certain categories of workers) and city-wide minimum
wage hikes covering all workers in four cities (D.C., Santa Fe,
San Francisco, and Madison), the campaign for decent wage standards
has shifted the battleground to the state level.
Thirty-one of the 50 states,
plus the District of Columbia, have either set a minimum wage
higher than
the federal level of $5.15 per hour, or have had bills introduced
in their legislatures this year that would do so.
Fourteen of these, plus
D.C., have already created minimum wage levels higher than the
federal, or – in
the case of Florida – have put the law on the books though it
has yet to take effect. Three of these 14 (WA, OR, FL) have
indexed their minimum wage levels to automatically increase each
year with the cost of living, thus eliminating the need for an
annual campaign to prevent the minimum wage from losing value. Five
of the fourteen (MA, CA, CT, HI, VT) also have bills in their
legislatures that would further increase their minimum wages.
Of the 17 states that do
not yet have higher minimum wages but have had bills introduced
this year,
two (WY, ND) have already seen those bills defeated. Bills in
some other states have a good chance of succeeding. Three that
are almost certain to fail (AZ, OH, MI) are in states where activist
campaigns led by the community group ACORN along with labor and
other allies, are fully committed to gathering the signatures
needed to force the issue onto a ballot initiative in 2006. The
voters in Nevada, like those in Florida, passed a minimum wage
increase by ballot initiative last November which included indexing
to the cost of living, but initiatives in Nevada must be passed
twice. The second vote, which is expected to succeed, will come
in 2006.
The movement for a fair
wage has moved to the state level in part because no one expects
action out
of Washington as long as Republicans control the Congress and
the White House. Another factor is the success of living wage
efforts at the local level. There aren't very many big cities
left to win a living wage ordinance in. Only four passed them
in 2004, bringing the total to 123. But at least as big a factor
as these is the approach that the opposition has taken. As a
result chiefly of lobbying and campaign contributions from hotels
and restaurants, and the "think tanks" they fund, eight
states have banned city-level minimum wage laws. It's nine if
we include Missouri, which is in dispute. The other eight are
Arizona, Louisiana, Colorado, and Texas, plus two that also ban
local living wage laws (UT, SC) and two that at least have state-level
laws, making the ban on local laws less damaging, (OR, FL).
Before focusing so heavily
on the state level, the living wage movement took the step three
years ago
of campaigning for city-wide minimums. After a campaign led
by ACORN and SEIU Local 100 passed an initiative to create a
minimum wage for New Orleans, the Louisiana Supreme Court threw
it out. So the living wage coalition there began working on
state legislation. But other cities picked up where New Orleans
had shown the way. An ACORN-led campaign in San Francisco has
just created a minimum wage there, and activists are now pushing
for the same in Berkeley, Oakland, and Emeryville. Coalitions
in Madison, Wis., and Santa Fe, N.M., have also won city-wide
minimums. The opposition in New Mexico is attempting to eliminate
the Santa Fe ordinance at the state level by banning all local
minimum wage laws. Labor and community groups, including ACORN,
are fighting that effort at the state level while simultaneously
campaigning for a citywide minimum in Albuquerque.
The new focus on the state
level includes an effort to make state minimum wages as lasting
as most living
wage ordinances, by indexing them to the cost of living. Indexing
is a goal of state campaigns in New Jersey, Massachusetts, and
Maryland, among other states, according to Jen Kern, Director
of ACORN's Living
Wage Resource Center.
The state-level fight also
allows the expansion of decent wage levels to more "red states." Nevada
voters last November chose both the most anti-labor president
ever to occupy the White House and an increase in the state minimum
wage.
There are signs that leaders
in the Democratic Party are noticing. Senator Edward Kennedy, who has
introduced a bill that would raise the federal minimum to $7.25
by 2007, will speak at ACORN's upcoming annual legislative conference
about the need to win higher minimum wages at the state level. And
former Senator John Edwards recently met with ACORN and committed
to working to support these state campaigns. If these efforts
result in a distinct message for the Democratic Party as the
party that can see beyond the selfish interests of robber barons,
the living wage movement might just jump to the national level. And
so might the Democratic Party.
David Swanson was communications coordinator
for ACORN from 2000 to 2003 and is now media coordinator for
the International Labor Communications Association. |