|
|
|
The first Black female
U.S. Secretary of State will inevitably preside over a general
and dramatic
decline in American influence in the world, a process that accelerates
with each passing week. So bizarre is American behavior – so
disconnected from objective facts and from international conversation
and evolving human standards of conduct – that Condoleezza Rice
cannot escape becoming a caricature of diplomacy.
The Bush Pirates rolled
their dice in Iraq in the Spring of 2003 – and came up snake
eyes. Even elements of the U.S. corporate media see the handwriting
on the historical
wall: utter defeat for the neo-con project in Iraq, and descent
into terminal isolation for the superpower. The war is all but
lost, according to a study released by Knight Ridder Newspapers
on January
23:
”The
United States is steadily losing ground to the Iraqi insurgency,
according to every key
military yardstick. …
”The analysis suggests that unless something dramatic changes – such
as a newfound will by Iraqis to reject the insurgency or a
large escalation of U.S. troop strength – the United States
won't win the war.”
The Americans never wanted to hold elections
in Iraq, but ran out of political wiggle room when Shi’ite
Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani last year threatened to bring
a million of the faithful
into the streets of Baghdad and Basra. However, as the excellent
Pepe Escobar, of AsiaTimes,
reported on January 27, this weekend’s “elections” are possibly
the most farcical held in human history. Bush “has introduced
to the world the concept of election at gunpoint”:
”Of 1 million eligible expatriate voters, only
10% will actually vote. There are no Sunni Arab candidates (in
part because the US military killed – or jailed – many Sunni
party and tribal leaders). For any Iraqi in Jordan, Syria, Iran,
Saudi Arabia or Turkey, it will be impossible to cross the border
and vote: borders will be closed for three days. Inside Iraq
there will be curfews - and even traffic will be blocked. Half
of all candidates have already withdrawn. And there will be no
international monitors. As the names of the roughly 7,700 candidates
on 80 party coalition lists are still unknown on the eve of polling
day, no wonder the word on Baghdad's streets is that ‘the Americans
gave us the first secret elections in history.’"
Elect, then eject U.S.
The Americans dare not deny the Shi’ites
their victory. But, as Escobar reported in
December, and has been consistently misrepresented by U.S. corporate
media, the Ayatollah is no friend of the occupation:
”The United Iraqi Alliance – the Shi'ite, Grand
Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani-supervised electoral list (228 candidates) – has
a detailed, 23-point platform. According to its main negotiator,
Hussein Shahristani, the platform insists on the ‘sovereignty,
unity and Islamic identity’ of Iraq, and most crucially includes
a plan with a precise date for the end of the military occupation.”
Thus, the Americans have been painted into
a corner. Bush insists that U.S. forces will remain in Iraq “as long as it takes,” but
has been forced to invest every ounce of political capital on
elections that, in Escobar’s words, may result in the verdict: “First
we vote, then we kick you out.”
Meanwhile, the world watches as armed-to-the-teeth
U.S. troops stand on street corners, handing out election literature
in someone
else’s country, after having flattened Fallujah, a city roughly
the size of Newark, New Jersey. Imagine if machinegun-toting
Germans had performed similar electoral duties in occupied France,
in 1942. Would any civilized observer have considered such a
process legitimate? Yet Bush bets that his atrocity will be seen
as a light unto the nations – an amazing measure of the chasm
that separates the Pirates from civilization.
Aijaz Ahmad, in a piece for the political journal Frontline,
published by The Hindu of India, describes an American mindset that
is, in a word, savage:
”The mentality that the Americans brought into
their attack on the people of Falluja was well indicated by the
marine commanders who said on record that Falluja was a ‘house
of Satan’ and those other commanders who told their soldiers
to ‘shoot everything that moves and everything that does not
move’; to fire ‘two bullets in every body’; and to spray every
home with machine-gun and tank fire before entering them.”
Yet, for all the blood shed by both Iraqis and Americans, the
U.S. has suffered a huge net loss in world public opinion, and
in the resources that it has sought to steal. The Americans are
now more ill-positioned than two years ago, said Mr. Ahmad:
”By contrast, none of the
gains the U.S. had sought in Iraq and in the region as a whole
has been realized,
almost two years after Baghdad fell, seemingly so easily: not
the capturing of the Iraqi oil, not the ability to use Iraq as
the main military base in the region so as to begin an orderly
withdrawal from Saudi Arabia, not the dream of using Iraq as
a base for launching attacks against Syria, Iran, Lebanon or
whatever. A demonstration of the invincibility of American power
has come together with the overwhelming evidence of the limits
of American power of the ground. We can now witness an imperial
overreach even before they have reached very far.”
The Black Commentator said much the same
thing on March 20, 2003, as Shock and Awe broke over Iraq. “War is the great and terrible engine of history,” we wrote. “Bush
and his Pirates hope to employ that engine to harness Time and
cheat the laws of political economy, to leapfrog over the contradictions
of their parasitical existence into a new epoch of their own
imagining. Instead, they have lunged into the abyss, from which
no one will extricate them, for they will be hated much more
than feared.
“In attempting to break humanity's will to resist,
the Bush pirates have reached
too far.”
Handmaiden to evil
George Bush and his handmaiden, Condoleezza
Rice, speak a strange language that is understood only by the
denizens of the American
bubble. It is a language of aggression, pure and simple – an
American Manifest Destiny that threatens the sovereignty of every
other nation on the planet, but pretends to be a liberating force.
Bush also delivered an implicit threat to those Americans who
resist involvement in his savage crusade: “We are led, by events
and common sense, to one conclusion: The survival of liberty
in our land increasingly depends on the success of liberty in
other lands,” said Bush in his inaugural
address. “The best hope for peace in our world is the expansion
of freedom in all the world.” It is difficult to avoid the conclusion
that the Bush men (and woman) are prepared to declare domestic
opponents of his imperial policies to be threats to internal
American liberties.
In her confirmation hearings, Condoleezza Rice showed herself
to be as bellicose as her master. In addition to Syria and Iran,
writes Patrick Sale, of the Lebanon-based Daily
Star, Rice placed Muslims in general in the cross-hairs. “America
and the free world," she declared, "are once again
engaged in a long-term struggle against an ideology of hatred
and tyranny and terror and hopelessness. And we must confront
these challenges ..."
Confrontation, everywhere,
including in the south of our own hemisphere. Rice made a special
effort
to signal aggressive
U.S. intentions against Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez for
his “close association” with Fidel Castro. Democratic Connecticut
Senator Christopher Dodd reminded Rice that Luiz
Inacio Lula de Silva, President of the southern colossus, Brazil,
is also on good terms with Castro. He might have also told
her that Brazil and other Latin American nations are working
furiously to sever their dependency on strangulating U.S. terms
of trade, most notably by concluding massive new deals with
China; that Venezuela, Brazil, Cuba and Uruguay may soon launch
a cooperative news
service, so that CNN and other American agencies will no
longer pollute their national dialogues; that Brazil, South
Africa and India are busily establishing strategic alliances
designed to circumvent the North – especially the United States;
that India, China and Russia are struggling to create new
poles of power in the world, circles of influence in which
the U.S. would be absent.
A bad poker hand
The U.S. invasion and ongoing torture of Iraq put the planet
on notice that Washington is a danger to global stability. Not
just progressives, but the conservative elites of Europe and
Asia, were shocked and awed in ways that the insular Americans
did not contemplate. The Financial
Times, a spokes-publication for Britain’s elite, warns: “Central
banks are shifting reserves away from the US and towards the
eurozone in a move that looks set to deepen the Bush administration's
difficulties in financing its ballooning current account deficit.” These
financial managers are careful to move away from the dollar incrementally,
so as not to plunge the global system into panic – but the direction
is inexorably away from the U.S. currency. As a nation, we are
being set up for a deep fall, but the fault lies with the Bush
men (and woman), who are playing a kind of poker with the rest
of the planet – one in which the only cards in their hands are
military.
The military fiasco in Iraq has shown that
these are weak cards, yet the only response from the Bush Pirates
is to threaten further
aggression in Iran, Syria, Venezuela, and Cuba. Ironically, the
corporate class that Bush serves is the least “patriotic” of
all, ready and eager to abandon the homeland to its economic
fate in favor of greener pastures in Asia. Bernie Sanders, the
socialist congressman from Vermont, exposed these rich traitors
for what they are, in a recent issue of In
These Times:
“Amazingly,
while the U.S. middle class declines, corporate America is
helping make
China the economic superpower of the 21st century. Not only
is China rapidly becoming the manufacturing center of the
world, it is quickly becoming the information technology
hub as well. Andy Grove, the founder of Intel, predicted
last year that the United States will lose the bulk of its
information technology jobs to China and India over the next
decade. These are some of the best-paying jobs available.
“And John Chambers, the CEO of Cisco, is typical
of many corporate leaders when he said: ‘China will become the
IT center of the world, and we can have a healthy discussion
about whether that’s in 2020 or 2040. What we’re trying to do
is outline an entire strategy of becoming a Chinese company.’”
The Bush men (and woman) loot the American
treasury and threaten world order in the service of corporations
that have already
abandoned their U.S. nationality, and now seek to destroy the
sovereignty of all other nations. They have initiated a war against…everyone.
Civility cannot long exist where savages
rule. In questioning the perennial prevaricator Condoleezza
Rice, Minnesota Senator
Mark Dayton found it impossible to keep up the pretensions of
the upper chamber. "I don't like impugning anyone's integrity,
but I really don't like being lied to," Dayton
said. "Repeatedly, flagrantly, intentionally."
The entire planet is rejecting blatant American
lies and aggression, and actively conspiring to undermine United
States military,
economic and political domination. This aggression now has a
new face – that of a Black woman. We are saddened at the historical
irony, but so be it. Evil comes in all colors.
|
|
|
|
|