In a historic move, the
95th annual convention of the National Association for the Advancement
of Colored People (NAACP) on July 15 for the first time took
a strong stand in defense of celebrated Pennsylvania death-row
journalist Mumia Abu-Jamal. The hard work and hardball tactics
of activists committed to Mumia's freedom turned up the heat
on the leadership of the venerable organization, who have been
blocking resolutions of support for Mumia for years. Once the resolution was forced to the
floor of the convention, the tide turned. Meeting in his hometown
of Philadelphia and with only one dissenting vote visible, the
body passed an emergency resolution which called for overturning
Mumia's conviction and death sentence. This will hopefully spur
a new round of activity by local chapters on Mumia's behalf.
This was doubly important because the
convention had a much higher profile than NAACP gatherings usually
do. President Bush became the first president in well over half
a century to skip NAACP conventions through a full term of office,
a not very coded message to his racist backers that that he's
still their best choice. Democratic candidate John Kerry did
speak and NAACP leaders wanted a nice neat convention for his
platform.
Mumia Abu-Jamal was
convicted in 1982 of the killing of a Philadelphia cop in a proceeding
which could
be characterized as no trial at all. Mumia's defenders
claim that he is an innocent man who became the political target
of a racist criminal justice system. During the “trial” the
judge was overheard vowing that he was planning to help the prosecution “fry
the n---.”
The NAACP resolution, entitled “Reaffirming Opposition to the Death Penalty,” also
called for a moratorium on executions while restating the NAACP's long-time
opposition to capital punishment. It further asked for new studies on
the relation to the death penalty of race, sex and age discrimination, adequacy
of counsel, and access to modern technologies such as DNA analysis.
In passing the resolution, the convention asked all the NAACP's local units “to
support the international call for Mumia Abu-Jamal to be released from death
row” and to support the “movement for a new and fair trial.”
The NAACP's vote comes at a critical time for Mumia's defenders. Late in June
the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia lifted the stay on the federal
appeals of Mumia's case and ordered arguments as to why a death sentence should
not be re-imposed on him.
Hearing of the vote, Mumia's lead attorney, Robert R. Bryan, said: “I
think to have the support of the oldest and largest civil rights organization
in the U.S. is of enormous importance to this case. Along with my client,
I am very grateful to the NAACP for taking this stand.”
Passage of the resolution was no small feat for Mumia's supporters. It
also demonstrated the power of a small group when confronting a bureaucracy
which is out of touch with its rank and file and community.
The successful resolution came as a result of two years of efforts by the
Ossining, N.Y., chapter. But the story really goes back a decade
when Pam Africa and International Concerned Friends and Family of Mumia
Abu-Jamal (ICFFMAJ)
first tried to get a resolution passed. At that time the NAACP did adopt
a very mild document, but put up bureaucratic roadblocks to anything stronger. Later,
in 2000, the Philadelphia chapter of the NAACP co-sponsored an amicus brief
in support of Mumia's federal court appeal. It was about this
time that the efforts began for a new resolution. At first these attempts were
unconnected, with the people involved not even knowing about
each other. One effort began at the large US Postal Service
facility, the Morgan mail sorting center in New York, where a
small group of rank and file workers formed Morgan for Mumia
and began publicizing the case. Out of this work came a
resolution demanding a new trial for Mumia, which passed the
American Postal Workers Union (APWU) convention in 2000.
This was in a period when scores of union groups passed resolutions
supporting Mumia, including the giant Service Employees International
Union, and during
which the West Coast dockworkers gave life to their resolution by shutting
down all Pacific ports for a day. Amid all this activity for Mumia, this
writer, a member of Morgan for Mumia, noticed that that the NAACP seemed to
be conspicuously silent.
The Ossining chapter, however, was not. Unknown to this writer, it had
been campaigning for the release of Mumia and all other political prisoners
for years. With Sundiata Sadiq as president, for example, it had organized
in 1995 a meeting with the late Safiya Bukhari, beloved sister and co-coordinator
of the New York Free Mumia Abu-Jamal Coalition (NYFMAJC). The next year
it held a march featuring local lawyer Steven Hawkins as a speaker. Hawkins
was one of the first attorneys to join Mumia's legal appeals team.
After making several false starts on a resolution, this writer was introduced
to Sadiq by Pam Africa in early 2003. As a result the Ossining chapter
submitted to the national convention in Miami Beach a strong resolution pointing
to Mumia's innocence and demanding his release.
However, the resolution
never made it to the floor. The national office blocked it on the grounds
that Ossining was behind in its dues. The chapter then
tried to get it considered as an emergency resolution, a move
which required the signatures of national leaders Kwesi Mfume
and Julian Bond. But they wouldn't sign, with Bond bizarrely
telling Sadiq that a resolution was unnecessary because Mumia's
case was already in the federal courts.
This year Ossining
tried again. Sadiq
made sure that the dues were paid, but this time the national
office blocked the resolution again, this time with the excuse
that Ossining hadn't filed a financial report. At the urging
of a sympathetic national Resolutions Committee member, Sadiq
fired off a protest to Mfume requesting that the resolution be
considered as an emergency, especially considering that the convention
was being held in Philadelphia, the scene of Mumia's frame-up. He
got no response.
At this point ICFFMAJ rescheduled its usual July 4 protest to
the 11th, a Sunday when several thousand convention delegates
would begin gathering. It
also called for the demonstration to be an education and lobbying effort to
get the Ossining resolution considered as an emergency. To this end the
NYFMAJC drafted a leaflet for the delegates entitled, “NAACP: Which Side Are
You On?” with the Ossining resolution printed on the back.
The 50 or so street
lobbyists who gathered at the Pennsylvania Convention Center
found a friendly audience. Delegates
took leaflets and read them. One, Mel Mason, president
of the Monterey Peninsula chapter in California, let it be known
that he was prepared to challenge the national leadership from
the floor. Later, Mfume himself came down to meet with
Pam and Sadiq, promising to attend a workshop the next day on
the criminal justice system. He made no promises about
a resolution, however.
He also didn't show up at the workshop. Instead about 20 plainclothes
cops appeared to bar Pam and Sadiq from the event. After a loud protest
from NAACP members, they were called off, and Pam and Sadiq went in to hear
local attorney Michael Coard give the group a short presentation on Mumia's
case.
This was certainly the low point. But things began to move afterward,
as more delegates learned about the Ossining resolution and the embarrassing
scene with the cops. At the same time Pam realized that the Ossining
proposal had no chance of being endorsed by the leadership, so she requested
a meeting to work out something acceptable.
That meeting happened
on Wednesday. Representing
the NAACP leadership was Hillary Shelton, the group's D.C. lobbyist,
who agreed to present an emergency draft to Mfume and Bond for
their signatures. But first it had to go to the typist. Pam
called a press conference for the next day in the street to make
sure the agreement was carried out.
However, it wasn't. What came back from the typist on Thursday morning
had the important parts removed: there were no calls for overturning
Mumia's conviction and death penalty. Pam and a small number of people
from ICFFMAJ immediately – and very visibly – began making placards inside
the Convention Center right as John Kerry began to address the convention.
Before long Shelton emerged to see what was going on. He admonished the
group about making the signs, but admitted that the typist's copy wasn't the
agreement from the day before. He and this writer then went upstairs
at the Convention Center and drafted the final wording. Sadiq and Pam
approved it, Mfume and Bond signed, and the resolution went to the convention
floor.
Pam Africa thinks that nothing would have passed without Ossining first
having submitted its strong resolution. She is undoubtedly right. The
leadership clearly didn't want to say anything about the case, probably – and
understandably – fearing a funding backlash from some of the organization's
corporate contributors. But the leaders feared an embarrassing incident
in front of the rank and file delegates and the national press during Kerry's
speech even more. So in the end the leadership did the right thing and
supported their imprisoned brother Mumia.
In the face of a reluctant leadership, however, it will be up to the local
chapters to put life into the statement. The resolution gives the chapters
the official go-ahead to do things which the Ossining chapter has been doing
on its own for a long time. The situation is similar to the one in the
APWU, where the national leadership has ignored that union's resolution. However,
in locals like New York, rank and file members like Morgan for Mumia have used
it to get an official union banner made, circulate educational leaflets on
the case, and to bring other local union members to rallies and demonstrations. Bill
Bachmann is a long-time member of the New York Free Mumia
Abu-Jamal
Coalition and of the American
Postal Workers Union. As a member of the rank and file
group Morgan for Mumia, he authored the resolution supporting
Mumia which was passed by the APWU's national convention in
2000. He wrote this article for Justice
Speaks, the newspaper of Black Workers For Justice.
Information on Mumia's case can
be obtained on-line at www.mumia.org or www.freemumia.com. |