The following essay originally appeared
in the journal of the African National Congress (ANC)
of South Africa.
There was another important July birthday that
passed in our country without public notice. But not so in Haiti,
where thousands of
people took to the streets bearing placards carrying the words – “Bonne
Féte President Titid” – Happy Birthday President Titid.
The birthday demonstrators also demanded the
return of Titid – President
Jean-Bertrand Aristide, an honored guest in our country. Titid, “little
Aristide,” is the affectionate Creole nickname given to President
Aristide by the poor of his country. He quietly celebrated his
51st birthday in our country on July 15.
Where our people did not join him in these celebrations because
they did not know it was his birthday, the people of Haiti did
not forget. But they could not join him because circumstances had
taken him and his family far away from his beloved motherland.
On July 15, CNN reported that, “Aristide supporters, singing ‘happy
birthday,’ marched with empty plates and spoons to show they were
hungry. ‘If Aristide was here, we would be celebrating with him
and eat with him at the national palace on his birthday today,’ said
Michele Sanon, a resident of the Cité Soleil slum.”
Reuters reported that on the very day that President Aristide
quietly celebrated his 51st birthday and the slum dwellers marched
in protest at his absence, gunmen killed two policemen in Haiti's
capital, Port-au-Prince, having fired on a group of police officers
standing in the street. The authorities said the attack was politically
motivated.
Port-au-Prince Police Commissioner Harry Beauport
said, "We
firmly believe the police are being targeted, because we have noted
a series of attacks against our policemen, several of them deadly.”
The news agency said, “With rebel forces still
in control of many areas of the country, tensions between police
and rebels have been
rising in recent weeks. Rebel leaders have criticized government
plans to disarm their soldiers, a move that would leave Haitian
police and United Nations peacekeepers in charge of security in
the country. The rebels, many of whom are former members of the
Haitian army disbanded by Aristide in the mid-1990s, have demanded
the creation of a new army.”
As much as they did not know of President Aristide’s
birthday, our people will be ignorant of all this and much else
that is happening
in Haiti. They will not have had access to the June 21st article
written by a Haitian, Lucson Pierre-Charles, entitled “Haiti
After the Press Went Home: Chaos Upon Chaos.”
Evidently the US and other journalists, who had come to Haiti
in the period preceding the removal of President Aristide on February
29th, went home soon after the President was taken out of his country.
Pierre-Charles writes that, “The country is
descending into chaos and to have a better understanding of what
lies ahead, one needs
to look no further than to the latest travel warning for Haiti
issued by the Bureau of Consular Affairs at the State Department.
“According to that statement, the situation
in Haiti remains unpredictable and potentially dangerous despite
the presence of foreign security
forces. This warning followed a report issued in early May by the
United Nations reaching a similar conclusion.”
He continues, “The security apparatus is on
the verge of collapsing due to the proliferation of small arms,
the mere presence of the
heavily armed rebels and Aristide loyalists, the increasing gang
activities, the rampant rise in kidnappings and the release of
3,000 prisoners by Guy Philippe and his squads following the ouster
of Mr. Aristide. Some of the rebels will be integrated into the
police force despite the fact that they killed a great number of
policemen and burned down police headquarters in the lead up to
the coup.
“In most parts of the country, they appointed themselves as mayors,
police chiefs and judges. (One report says 6,000 elected officials
have been removed and replaced by self-appointed individuals.)
Under Mr. Aristide’s leadership, the police force was often criticized
for being too heavily politicized. Under (the) technocratic administration
(installed after the removal of President Aristide), the police
force will consist of convicted human rights abusers, murderers,
rapists, thugs and death squads who have committed some of the
worst atrocities during the first coup in 1991.”
On May 4th, a 9-person Labor/Religious/Community Fact-Finding
Delegation visited Haiti. Sent by the San Francisco Labor Council,
it included US and Canadian trade unionists, religious leaders
and human rights activists. It reported that:
“The coup which deposed President Aristide
has led to a serious wave of attacks and persecutions of
supporters of President
Aristide and his Fanmi Lavalas Party. The delegation heard
testimony from an elected Member of Parliament for the Fanmi
Lavalas who is living in hiding, having been driven out of
his town under gunfire. Other political leaders and known activists
have also been forced into hiding, living underground, fearing
the death threats and violence directed at supporters of the
ousted government. Despite its obvious popularity, the Fanmi
Lavalas movement is not currently able to have political demonstrations
or otherwise take open political action due to the threat of
attack.
“The (new administration)…has not provided security for those
currently most at risk. The names of Lavalas supporters – and
even those suspected of being Lavalas supporters – are being
read off on right-wing radio stations as an implicit threat.
Neither the coup regime nor its international backers have
taken action to contain what many Haitians refer to as an anti-Lavalas
'witch hunt' that continues to this day.”
A US human rights activist and College Professor who has been
visiting Haiti since 1977, Tom
Reeves, wrote on May 5, “The very same para-military and
former Army officers who terrorized Haiti during the previous
(1991) coup are doing so today. Their victims are mostly the
poor and their popular organizations who supported (and still
support) President Aristide and Fanmi Lavalas. We interviewed
many of these victims who said they recognized their tormentors
(and in one case rapists) as the same men who had victimized
them a decade ago. Among those terrorizing Haiti today are many
common criminals who were let out of the National penitentiary
by the ‘rebels,’ as well as major convicted human rights abusers
and mass murderers like Jodel Chamblain and Jean ‘Tatoune.’”
The “previous coup” to which Reeves refers
took place in 1991, when the Haiti military seized power and
forced the elected President
Aristide into exile. The then US government, opposed to unconstitutional
changes of government, assisted him to return to power in 1994.
On resuming his term as President, he dissolved the Army, leaving
the civilian police to be responsible for national security.
Oscar Arias, the former President of Costa
Rica, was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1987. Disturbed
by the reappearance
of the soldiers who had carried out the 1991 coup d’etat, and
the demands that the Haitian army, dissolved in 1995, should
be reconstituted, he spoke out on March 15.
He observed that one Guy Philippe had been
quoted by The Washington Post saying, "I am the chief, the military chief. The country
is in my hands." Arias wrote:
“Nothing could more clearly prove why Haiti
does not need an army than the boasting of rebel leader Guy
Philippe the
other day in Port-au-Prince. The Haitian army was abolished
nine years ago during a period of democratic transition, precisely
to prevent the country from falling back into the hands of
military men.
“Like so many countries in the Third World,
Haiti has suffered not only from a lack of national security
in the sense of borders
and territorial integrity but also from an ongoing crisis of
human security, the right of each person to live in peace and
with the guarantee of basic rights such as food, health care,
education and citizenship.
“The army, long an instrument of suppressive
authoritarian regimes, has historically deprived Haitians
of these fundamental
rights.
“The abolition of the army makes as much
sense today as it did in 1995. The Haitian people still need
their government
to spend its precious few resources on fighting poverty, not
buying arms. They need a professional, depoliticized police
force to maintain order, not an army that attacks its own people
with impunity. They need a say in their country's destiny,
not subjugation to the rule of men with guns.
“Were the international
community now to stand by as the rebels reinstated the army,
it would surely destroy
the seeds of peace and self-rule that have been planted with
great sacrifice by the Haitian people.”
Guy Philippe was a death squad leader under
the Duvaliers and a member of the FRAPH we mention below. He
was taken into the
police when the army was dissolved in 1995. Human Rights Watch
says that police under his command summarily executed people
they arrested. Discovered to be planning a coup d’etat in 2000,
he fled to the neighboring Dominican Republic.
Here he linked up with other killers of the
Duvalier period, including Louis Jodel Chamblain, Jean Pierre
Baptiste, who calls
himself General Tatoune, and the leader of the 1991 coup d’etat,
Emmanuel ‘Toto’ Constant.
Of Chamblain and Baptiste, the February 29
edition of the “San
Francisco Chronicle” (SFC) said Chamblain is “a former army officer
who later headed the Front for the Advancement of the Haitian
People or FRAPH, a paramilitary organization responsible for
thousands of murders of Aristide followers in the early 1990s.
“Baptiste and Chamblain were convicted in
absentia for massacring 25 Aristide supporters in a seaside
slum known as Raboteau in
the northern city of Gonaives in 1994.”
As he and his fellow “rebels” marched on Port-au-Prince in February,
Chamblain, as quoted by the SFC, said: “The army was demobilized.
Now the army has been remobilized and is a constitutional army.
Aristide has two choices: prison or execution by firing squad.”
Concerned at what might happen when they
succeeded to overthrow the democratic government of Haiti,
Deputy Director of the Americas
Division of Human Rights Watch, Joanne Mariner, said: “These
men, notorious for killings and other abuses during the military
government, must not be allowed to take violent reprisals against
government loyalists.”
The SFC also reported that while Guy Philippe
served in the leadership of the Haiti police, he and his colleagues
from the
former Duvalier army “began collecting bribes for the drugs that
easily pass through this nation of 8 million people. Internal
reports from foreign observers found that the ‘Latinos’ routinely
gave gifts to politicians and once squeezed the government into
exiling its former inspector general after the seizure of more
than three-quarters of a ton of cocaine implicated the men.”
It is no wonder that Tom Reeves even in 2003,
after Philippe and others had started their violent campaign
against the Aristide
government, could quote a young man of Cap-Haitien as saying, "It's
the army I really despise. At least now I can sit here with my
friends and complain. Under the military, I would be shot. When
I saw Himmler leading the demonstration by the Convergence last
November, I was really scared."
Reeves wrote that, “The aptly named Himmler
is Himmler Rebu, a former army officer who has been involved
in several coup attempts.”
Those, like Rebu, who prepared the putsch that led to the removal
of the government of Haiti in 2004, carried out a violent provocation
at a university on December 5, 2003, which they proceeded to
blame on Lavalas.
The US journalist and documentary filmmaker, Kevin
Pina, Associate Editor of “The Black Commentator” wrote:
“In the wake of the fabricated events of
December 5, the Haitian government and Lavalas endured weeks
of clandestine attacks,
while the opposition demonstrated under heavy police protection.
“Then, on December 26, the great silent beast of Haiti’s
poor, portrayed as violent and anti-democratic by the Haitian
press
and their friends in the international corporate media, awakened.
Tens of thousands of Lavalas supporters hit the streets with
a singular purpose and objective: that Haiti's constitution
be respected and President Aristide be allowed to fulfill his
five-year term in office.
“The real battle had just begun, as Haiti’s long-oppressed
millions prepared to celebrate the 200th anniversary of the
world’s only successful slave revolution and the first black
republic.”
Michele Sanon, who demonstrated in Port-au-Prince
on July 15 to celebrate her President’s birthday and demand his return,
carrying an empty plate and a spoon, is part of “the great silent
beast of Haiti’s poor” of which Pina wrote. She, like many among
Haiti’s urban and rural poor, see President Aristide as their
very own Titid.
One other of her Lavalas leaders is Annette
Auguste, who was arrested on May 10, on the pretext that she
was involved in the
December 5 events. She sent out a message on May 23 from Pétionville
Penitentiary, where she was detained.
For us, her words recall a time, which is not so long ago, when
we too had to fight for our liberation. She wrote:
“While I have been forced to sit in this
jail cell I have also seen the cynicism of some within our
party, brought about
by this campaign of repression, intimidation and assassination.
I understand their fear, as I am myself a victim of this campaign
whose purpose is to destroy our hope and aspirations for building
a Haiti where the poor are not simple tools upon which to build
dreams of personal empire and wealth.
“I send you all my love and gratitude for
remaining strong in separating the lies from the truth in
Haiti's current situation.
I send you all my blessings as a free Haitian woman fighting
for the rights of the impoverished majority in my homeland.
“They may imprison my body
but they will never imprison the truth I know in my soul. I
will continue to fight
for justice and truth in Haiti until I draw my last breath.”
Annette Auguste’s moving message draws attention
to the real nature of the struggle in Haiti, which the working
people of
that country, the slum dwellers who demand the return of President
Aristide, understand very well.
From his election in 1990, President Aristide and other patriots
have been engaged in a complex and difficult struggle to establish
the stable democratic system that has eluded the First Black
Republic since its birth 200 years ago. They have also sought
to ensure that this new democracy should address the interests
of the majority of the people, the black urban and rural poor.
An adherent of Liberation Theology, together
with such outstanding progressive thinkers within the Roman
Catholic Church as Helder
Camara, Gustavo Gutiérrez, Oscar Romero, Ernesto Cardenal and
Erwin Kräutler, President Aristide would have been inspired by
such Biblical teachings as:
“He hath shewed strength with his arm; he hath
scattered the proud in the imagination of their hearts. He hath
put down the mighty from their seats, and exalted them of low
degree. He hath filled the hungry with good things; and the rich
he hath sent empty away.” (Luke 1: 51-53.)
Opposed to the related political and social outcomes President
Aristide sought are sections of the population of Haiti, which
have historically been the beneficiaries of successive systems
of dictatorship that have guaranteed the privileges of the few
and the impoverishment of the many, keeping the mighty in their
seats and subjugating those of low degree. The privileged few
have consistently depended on state repression to protect this
social order, as Oscar Arias said.
The Duvalier regimes of “Papa Doc and Baby Doc” developed this
repression into open state terrorism against the masses of the
people, relying on the police, the Army that was disbanded in
1995 and the “tonton macoutes.” Agents and practitioners of the
Duvalier state terrorism led the counter-revolution of 2004,
which resulted in the overthrow of the Aristide government.
The central purpose of the counter-revolution is to halt and
reverse the long-delayed democratic revolution in Haiti, guarantee
the positions of the privileged few, and ensure the continued
oppression, disempowerment and impoverishment of the millions
of poor Haitians. In many respects, the 2004 counter-revolution
in Haiti was not dissimilar to the counter-revolution in Chile
in 1973, which resulted in the overthrow of the Allende government,
the death of the President, and the installation of the Pinochet
military dictatorship.
In his July article, “Haiti’s Cracked Screen: Lavalas Under
Siege While the Poor Get Poorer,” Kevin Pina described Haiti
today in the following terms:
“Former Haitian military leaders prance
hand in hand with Haiti's traditional economic elite, intellectuals
and artists.
The poor black majority, who cannot read or write and continue
to support the constitutional government of President Aristide,
has been deliberately made indescribably poorer in an effort
to force them to turn against their own interests.
“Going to bed hungry is not uncommon in Haiti. The greatest
violence here is the violence of hunger and poverty. It permeates
and consumes everything in its path. Haiti's phantom ‘middle
class’ – the relative few who have something such as an education
to cling to – can be easily manipulated against a government
that has declared itself to be working on behalf of those who
have nothing save for the conviction that tomorrow may yield
a better future for their children. This is especially true
when the media inside and outside of Haiti do everything possible
to make it so.”
On February 29th, the day President Aristide was flown out of
his country, the UN Security Council adopted a Resolution on
Haiti. Among other things, it decided to establish an intervention
force and directed this UN contingent to:
What was and is strange and disturbing about this Resolution
is that it is totally silent on the central issue of the unconstitutional
and anti-democratic removal of the elected Government of Haiti.
It says nothing about the notorious figures who achieved this
objective, arms in hand, killing many people.
Seemingly to avoid the obligation to disarm
and punish those who took up arms against a democratic government,
it even directed
that the UN forces should discharge these obligations “as circumstances
permit.”
However, it is perfectly obvious that a safe
and secure environment in Haiti, respect for human rights,
and a return to constitutional
legality cannot be achieved without defeating the criminal forces
of counter-revolution that necessitated the deployment of UN
troops and other international interventions. The declared purposes
of the UN cannot be realized while those schooled in the brutal
practices of the Duvalier’s occupy the center-stage in Haiti.
The UN will not achieve its goals if it does not guarantee the
safety and security and the democratic rights of the leaders
and members of Fanmi Lavalas, other democrats and the poor of
Haiti who demand democracy and development.
Time will tell whether the UN is ready and
willing to live up to its obligations to the poor of Haiti,
as well as respect the
binding principles contained in its Charter and the Declaration
of Human Rights. Time will tell whether what Oscar Arias warned
against will be avoided – the destruction of “the seeds of peace
and self-rule that have been planted with great sacrifice by
the Haitian people.” What has been allowed to happen in Haiti
After the Press Went Home raises serious concerns in this regard.
As the African slaves of Haiti fought for their liberation more
than two centuries ago, among other things the counter-revolution
opposed to the French Revolution tried hard to restore the slavery
in Haiti that Jacobin France had abolished, propelled by the
heroic struggle of the risen slaves.
At that time, the outstanding leader of the
revolutionary African slaves, Toussaint L’Ouverture, wrote
to the French Directory and, speaking of the counter-revolution,
said:
“Do they think that men who have been able
to enjoy the blessing of liberty will calmly see it snatched
away? They supported their chains only so long as they did not
know any condition of life more happy than that of slavery. But
today when they have left it, if they had a thousand lives they
would sacrifice them all rather than be forced into slavery again… We
have known how to face dangers to obtain our liberty, but we
shall know how to brave death to maintain it.”
Annette Auguste has sent the same message
to the counter-revolution of 2004. In her heart burns the same
unquenchable desire to build “a
Haiti where the poor are not simple tools upon which to build
dreams of personal empire and wealth,” which inspired her forebears
to defeat the mighty European powers and establish the First
Black Republic.
The risen slaves achieved their liberation
even though their brilliant and renowned leader, Toussaint
L’Ouverture, was imprisoned
far away in a French jail. The poor of the slums of Bel Air,
Cité Soleil and elsewhere in Haiti will achieve their liberation
even though their brave and beloved leader, Jean-Bertrand Aristide,
is an honored guest far away in South Africa.
Knowledge of that past, and this future,
was the best birthday present that Titid received, to celebrate
his 51st birthday.
Bonne Fête President Titid.
|