Trenton’s Educators’ and Citizens’ Stand Against Layoffs and the Cartel: A Fight for Workers

Last Monday, the Trenton Board of Education issued 236 layoff notices to professional and paraprofessional educators. It appears that school board president, Jason Redd, and Mayor Eric Jackson are exacting retribution from the unions and the community for their aggressive opposition to the search for a new superintendent that Redd and the mayor were forced to cancel. Yet not one district principal or supervisor was furloughed.

As a result, more than 400 citizens turned out to the April 25th Board meeting to express their passionate disapproval of these dismissals and repeatedly requested that the entire Board resign. The crowd was so large that additional space had to be arranged for the overflow.

During the meeting, Board vice president, Gerald Truehart, made some nonsensical comments saying “… the district budget was like a pie, and you had to get 100 slices out.” Go figure. It was also instructive that Board member, Dr. Jane Rosenbaum, whose husband sits on the grievance committee of Rider University’s faculty union, the Association of American University Professors (AAUP), of which she is also a member, has been in lockstep with the Board’s assault on district unions (the Trenton Education Association and the Trenton Paraprofessionals).

As speaker after speaker condemned the decision on terminations, Board president, Jason Redd, in response to speakers’ statements that the Board did not care about Trenton’s school children, condescendingly said, “You are as ignorant as your comments.” It was made clear that the Board had no intent of reversing its ruling. However, it did state that it would issue a new Request for Proposal (RFP) for a search firm to recruit candidates for the superintendent’s position. Ironically, the Board also announced that it would attend the rally at the Capitol on May 15th, organized by Trenton’s education unions, to demand that the Christie administration increase its funding of the Trenton school district.

The chair of the Trenton NAACP education committee said the NAACP would sue the Board over the layoffs and called for a forensic audit of all Board expenditures. Billy Hayes, a local community activist, indicated he felt that the Board and Trenton school administrators had likely been involved in criminal activity with respect to their use and manipulation of district funds and that a series of state monitors have been involved in this process.

When State Sen. Shirley Turner went to the podium, she asked the Board whether it had been directed by the state monitor to privatize school services and was rebuffed by every member. The fact that the Board refused to respond to a Trenton-area legislator, who is vice chair of the Senate education committee and one of the legislature’s most senior members, is interesting indeed. Is the Board so beholden to the Christie administration and the private-sector, via its president, Jason Redd, that it feels comfortable giving the back of its hand to a high-ranking African American legislator?

The advocates for special needs students were specifically vocal in protesting the job cuts. Nicole Kiefer, who heads Trenton’s Special Education Advocacy Group (SEAG), was straightforward in stating that she would no longer be cooperating in helping the district avoid and/or resolve special education parent complaints against the administration for violation of federal and state special education mandates. SEAG, an after-school program for special needs students, offers free services at no charge to the district or to parents.

Previously provided free space in a Trenton school building to carry out its programming, SEAG had saved the district millions of dollars by making its services available to the special education population which is 19% of Trenton’s total students. SEAG was bounced from its space at the same time the Board was preparing notices for the “execution” of 92 special education paraprofessionals. Moreover, this action is occurring at the same time that the special needs population is projected to increase for the 2016-2017 school year.

A careful analysis of recent Board actions leads one to the following conclusions: