George
Santayana, the eminent Harvard philosopher and scholar of the late
19th
and early 20th
century, is widely known for his quote, “Those who do
not learn history are doomed to repeat it.”
The
aforementioned assessment is timely for Democrats and Blacks as they
approach the 2022 midterms and attempt to hold on to their House and
Senate majorities. Both groups would do well to reflect on their
political successes from the 1980s, 1990s, and early 2000s and
identify the positives and negatives of turning out their diverse
political base.
Beginning
with Chicago’s Black Congressional representative, the late
Harold Washington, narrow victories over the heralded Chicago
Democratic machine in the 1983 Democratic mayoral primary and general
elections, we can see the utility of ethnic minority and liberal
coalitions. Latinx and Black citizens coalesced with White liberals
to make history.
It
was not by accident that this groundbreaking achievement occurred in
the Windy City. Harold Cruse, author of The Crisis of the Negro
Intellectual (1967), later concluded that of the major destinations
of African American during the great migration from the South in the
early twentieth century, Chicago was the political capital, Detroit
was the labor capital, and Harlem (New York) was the cultural capital
of Black America.
Mayor
Washington would use his first term to continue organizing across
racial and ethnic lines, and he cruised into a second term in 1987 on
automatic pilot in an overwhelmingly Democratic city whose Democratic
majority ignored him, largely on racial grounds, when he ran in the
1979 mayoral Democratic primary, only receiving 11,000 votes.
Unfortunately,
in 1987, shortly after his reelection to a second term, Washington
succumbed to a heart attack. Black male Councilman, Eugene Sawyer,
viewed by many as a puppet of the Chicago political machine,
succeeded him and served for two years, 1987-1989, and lost in a
special election. Sawyer’s appointment as interim mayor for
two years irretrievably fractured the Black political community for a
generation, and it did not heal until 2019 when Lori Lightfoot became
the third African American and the first Black female elected Mayor.
Next
up in seminal political races was the election of Carol Moseley
Braun. After serving in the Illinois House of Representatives and as
Cook County Recorder of Deeds, she was the first Black female elected
to the U.S. Senate in 1992 after a watershed Democratic primary in
which she defeated the incumbent, Alan Dixon after he voted to
confirm Clarence Thomas for a seat on the U.S. Supreme Court. He
cast this vote despite the credible sexual harassment allegations of
Atty. Anita Hill, Thomas’s former Black staffer.
The
massive primary campaign expenditures of the third-place finisher,
billionaire Albert Hofeld, who spent millions from his personal
fortune in an attempt to win the nomination, substantially aided
Braun. Ethnic minority and White women, across political lines,
spurred by what they perceived as the disrespect of Atty. Hill, came
out in droves to send her to Washington.
She
became a shining example of what women could accomplish in this
pivotal year when more women got elected to national office than at
any other period in political history. Women across the country were
energized by the Anita Hill controversy. Then, via a series of
questionable decisions, Sen. Moseley Braun would squander their
trust.
After
one term, because of several political and personal failures, she
lost support across racial and gender lines. At
the behest of her former Nigerian fiancé, Kgosie
Matthews, she developed a political alliance with the rogue
Nigerian dictator, Gen.
Sani Abacha, who was reviled by much of the world
and the U.S. government.
Matthews also served as Braun’s campaign
manager, constant companion, and was also an agent for the despotic
Nigerian government.
She
was defeated by a conservative Republican nobody, Peter Fitzgerald
after Braun was deserted by her political base. He served a single
term and retired from politics. Barack Obama won the open Senate
seat in 2004, paving the way for his presidential run. He began
building an interracial voter alliance while serving in the Illinois
State Senate, a seat he won in 1996 in his first run for office by
disqualifying all of his opponents from the ballot and running
unopposed.
When
it was time for political redistricting, Obama voluntarily redesigned
his district’s racial makeup to include more White voters which
would prove beneficial as he ran for higher office. He successfully
employed this strategy in his runs for the U.S. Senate and President.
This has been
adopted and expanded by Stacey Abrams as she organizes Georgia’s
New American Majority of racially diverse voting groups.
The
foregoing examples are important guideposts as Democrats, African
Americans, and their multi-cultural base of activists ready
themselves for a midterm battle royal. They offer useful models of
what to do and what not to do as they prepare to organize their
voters while fighting off the nearly 400 voter suppression bills in
48 states, and the emerging and biased Republican redistricting
schemes currently in development
But
most disconcerting about the Democrats is their ill-advised response
to their 2020 election autopsy. Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney (D-NY,
18th
District), chair of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee,
concluded that the Democratic losses were the result of:
He
gave short shrift to the need to fund outreach, get-out-the-vote
(GOTV) initiatives, spend major dollars on ethnic minority
consultants and media outlets in New American Majority communities,
and have diverse representatives at the table where decisions are
made. Newly elected Rep. Nikema Williams (D-GA, 5th
District), who replaced Rep. John Lewis, was the only co-chair of
color involved in the Maloney report to determine what went wrong.
If
White Democrats continue to control the decision-making and financial
allocation process, with their racial blinders and just expect voters
of color to show up at the ballot box, they will have a limited
chance of retaining their majorities in 2022. The question is: will
they make the necessary adjustments before the midterms?
|