Printer
Friendly Version
Note:
The size of the type may be changed by clicking on view at the top
of your browser and selecting "text size". The document
will print in the size you select.
It is a core belief among
Republican strategists that a prime time TV speech by Rev. Al Sharpton
at the Democratic national convention, in Boston, is worth millions
of white votes for George Bush in November. Sharpton’s goal is to
garner enough delegates to guarantee that he gets to make that speech.
Therein lies the perceived convergence of interests between Sharpton
and GOP dirty trickster Roger Stone.
If Black Democrats refrained
from taking center stage to avoid activating reflexive racism among
whites, they would languish in the shadows, forever. In this narrow,
perverse sense, there is a permanent convergence of interests between
Blacks seeking greater influence among Democrats, and Republicans
intent on strengthening the GOP’s identity as The White Man’s Party.
That’s part of the hand that American racism has dealt us. How Black
politicians play it is another matter, entirely.
The furor over the New York
Village
Voice’s revelations about the connection between Sharpton
and Roger Stone – the political hit man who directed the mob that
shut down the Miami-Dade vote recount process in 2000 – revolves
around which party got "played" in the deal. Sharpton has not challenged
the central facts cited in the Voice piece: that Stone loaned or
raised hundreds of thousands of dollars for the Sharpton campaign,
some of which was commingled with funds of Sharpton’s National Action
Network (NAN); and that Sharpton’s campaign manager, Charles Halloran,
and a number of aides are Stone operatives. The Voice’s Wayne Barrett
concluded: “The combination of the unpaid or underpaid services of
Stone, Halloran, [and Stone operatives] Baynard, Archer, et al.,
together with the NAN subsidies, paint a picture of a Sharpton operation
that is utterly dependent on his new ally Stone, whose own sponsors
are as unclear as ever.”
In last week’s Cover
Story, “The Problem With Al
Sharpton,” we noted Wayne Barrett’s
reputation as a crack investigative reporter, and added, “Sharpton
and Stone seem to have made Barrett’s job easy – indeed, Stone doesn’t
appear anxious to hide the fact that he has captured a Negro.”
Barrett and former Voice
colleague Joe Conason – who penned a companion piece in Salon.com – seemed
most upset about Sharpton’s offenses against the Democratic Party
and his purported disdain for “white liberals.” The real question,
of course, is Sharpton’s future as a Black “leader.” In our judgment, “Sharpton
comes across as a hapless stooge of the worst elements of the GOP.” And
that’s worse than stealing something.
Sharpton may have thought
he was a playa, but he should have known that the odds were hopelessly
stacked against him. He gambled his reputation that he could use
Republican money and campaign savvy to get him through the primaries
so that he could step up to the microphone in Boston as the certified
Go-To Guy in Black America. In the process, he could influence the
political tone and substance of the campaign and, possibly, help
shape the future of the nation. The ends justified the means, he
rationalized.
But in fact, Roger Stone
held all the cards – it was a win-win-win, no-lose situation. If
Sharpton makes his televised speech in Boston, Stone wins; whites
run to Bush. Should Sharpton be treated shabbily by white Democrats,
Stone wins; Black voters are angry and disgusted, and stay home in
November. If Stone can instigate some madness during the campaign,
that’s icing on the cake. And if pesky “white liberal” reporters
sniff out the arrangement, so what? – Sharpton self-destructs as
a national leader, causing dismay and recriminations in Black and
white Democratic ranks; Stone and Bush win. For a dirty trickster,
nothing could be more exquisitely elegant.
Sharpton has been spinning
as if his political life depends on it. In a highly charged Sunday
morning telephone interview with New York’s WRKS-FM radio, Sharpton
defended the loans from Stone (“When have you ever heard of a sellout
with a loan?”) and the Republican staffing of his campaign (“I was
trying to get technical information”). Peter Noel, a Black former
Village Voice writer who loudly and repeatedly denounced the paper
as viciously biased against Sharpton, nevertheless asked: “Why would
you associate yourself with people like Roger Stone, when you know
that they have hurt Black people?” Sharpton replied that he
had connected with the trickster after “Democratic strategists said
to me, You should find out how they are gonna try to eliminate you
[from the ballot] in Louisiana.”
Besides, said Sharpton,
his voice stuck at the extremes of the decibel meter throughout the
20-minute Q & A, Jesse Jackson and lots of other politicians
are involved in questionable or cross-party relationships. “I’m willing
to play the game by the same rules as everybody else does.”
On one point, Al Sharpton
is, we believe, unassailable: “I dare anyone to show that [Stone]
extracted something out of me,” he said.
Reporters Barrett and Conason
led their readers to believe that Roger Stone was behind Sharpton’s
attacks on Howard Dean. Stone is quoted as taking credit for the “research” that
caused former Vermont Governor Dean to admit that no minorities served
in his cabinet, for example – as if any Black man needs a racist
white man to think up such an issue! Sharpton had his own reasons
for going after Dean – what we described in our November
13 issue as “Jacksonophobia.” Sharpton shot straight through Dean
to strike at Jesse Jackson Jr. after the Chicago Congressman endorsed
Dean in late October – an intra-Black act of betrayal, from Sharpton’s
standpoint.
However, Sharpton never
veered from his progressive platform; that’s something Roger Stone
could not “extract” from him.
We think we were quite circumspect
and fair in our treatment of Sharpton. We praised him and Dennis
Kucinich as the “Two Civilized
Men Among the Barbarians” of
the campaign, back in October, and last week credited Sharpton with
administering “nine months of behavior modification therapy” on the
white contenders. We believe that Al Sharpton did help shape
history during the past year. “It is a great irony that the electoral
process that Sharpton did so much to enrich, in which his formidable
presence deterred white Democrats from reverting to racist type,
has resulted in more palatable choices for Black voters, but negligible
delegate clout for himself,” we wrote.
Unfortunately, when one
happens upon a man lying in the street in his own blood and vomit,
another passerby might suspect that you were the cause of the poor
fellow’s problem. Thus, Anthony Kennerson writes, from Lafayette,
Louisiana:
Well, ,
you sure know how to knock them down when they need it, do 'ya?
When I
first saw the Village Voice piece on Rev. Al's alliance with that
nasty Willie-Horton-ad-making,
right-wing racist hack Roger Stone, I nearly lost my lunch. But
hearing that Sharpton is making alliances with some of the most meanest,
most disgustingly racist, rightest Repubs known to mankind – all
out of simple pique at "white liberals" for not jumping
into his campaign – just makes this radical Leftist Black man
want to throw my computer monitor across the room.
Here's
a brief memo to you, Reverend Sharpton: (and excuse my French...OOPS, Freedom):
What is
the freakin' matter with you? For someone who claims to represent
the most progressive,
most humanistic, most humane section of the Black electorate;
for someone who steadily, or so I assumed, bashes the DLC quite
rightfully as the "Republican" wing of the party – for you to then,
just out of personal pique for being overshadowed
for Howard Dean, ally yourself with people who represent
the very ideology
and attitude you claim to oppose, that is not only mass
unconsciousness and gross betrayal of your supporters and
your progressive base;
that's just plain ignorant and stupid. I guess that since you
can't mine Michael Jackson, Russell Simmons, and those other hip-hop
kingpins for their cash any more to maintain your failing campaign
(and BTW, how in the hell can you not know the rules for filing for
the Louisiana primary; are you that stupid or ignorant not to know
the difference between a two party check and a cashier's check – or were
you too busy plotting with your new racist buddies your "independent
campaign?"), the next step is to become a front
for the GOP hitmen?
For someone
who supposedly wants to see Dubya out of office, you have a mightily
strange way
of showing it! But, I guess I should have known
better, since you came out for censorship of rap and
rock lyrics, and pandered
to the worst of the Un-Religious Right in your nearly
Clintonic views of poor women's personal lives.
Oh, well (sigh) I guess
I'll hold my nose real tight and vote for Kerry now – but as far
as I am concerned, Al Sharpton is just another Greedygut.
Thanks
for giving me the vine and the truth, ,
and keep keeping it real and progressive.
Rev. Jeanette Pollard was
taken aback by the Sharpton revelations.
Thank
you Black Commentator, for your enlightening piece on the Rev.
Al Sharpton. Just yesterday
someone asked me who I was voting for. In
all honesty, none of the white candidates appealed
to me. I was considering writing
in Sharpton's name on my ballot.
Your story
has shed some revealing and disappointing light on Rev. Sharpton.
Friends who used
to attend the National Action Network's meetings
were unable to find out why meetings were no longer held. Your
article revealed why those meetings are no longer held.
Looking
back on Rev. Sharpton's remarks during last Friday's presidential
forum with Tom Joyner,
he made a statement that received loud applause
from the audience. He
said he'd got here (America) as a result
of a bad trade policy. It would appear that
Sharpton has put African Americans in the middle
of his own bad trade policy by selling out to right wing Republicans.
I'm a
preacher, and I'm disgusted with preachers' lack of truly standing
up for the people
and not just for ourselves!!
Michael O. Sibley has the
decidedly secular job of Director of Publications, Office of Marketing & Communications
at Tuskegee University, in Alabama.
The cover
story, "The
Problem with Al Sharpton" is the best written piece about the
African-American perspective on this year's election that I've read.
Well structured, relatively objective. I give the writers two thumbs
up!
Alternet was among
the many sites that picked up our piece on Sharpton. That’s how Thomas D’Amico
found us.
The article
was superb. It was also my impression that the man was a powerful
force in getting
the Democrats to do right. Since Dr.
King I have become smarter about life and even at 84 my anticipation
still is that Black Americans
will rescue the U.S. of A. Well, we lost
Sharpton to the money and his narcissism, I am sorry to say. But
somehow I still have the hope
that Dr. King’s dream will come through for all of our citizens.
I won’t see that day but maybe my great grandchildren will.
Bruce Banter prizes efficiency
in speech:
Yeah man.
The Black Commentator don’t play!
Rev. Sharpton’s “missteps” will
certainly affect his future, but they do not erase his past. Sarah
Santora writes:
Rev. Al
Sharpton has my eternal thanks and appreciation for bringing national
attention to
police shootings and brutality against
Black Americans, especially young Black men and teens. If my teenage
son is not shot in the back
by a fat cop who doesn't feel like
chasing him, it's Al Sharpton I have to thank. He focused national
attention on the issue, causing
police to behave themselves if only
to keep him from coming to town. For that he has earned my deep gratitude
and whatever else happens,
I will never stop thanking him for what he has done for me and
mine.
Here’s how we addressed
Sharpton’s place in history in last week’s piece:
We must
ask why Al Sharpton emerged as a contender for national Black leadership
via the presidential
primaries. The answer is simple,
and should be deeply troubling: He was the only one to step forward.
Such was also the case in the
decades of Sharpton’s rise to prominence in New York. When police
brutalized African Americans, Al Sharpton was there. When demonstrations
needed to be mounted, Sharpton was on point. When Black anger rose,
Sharpton rose to the occasion – year, after year, after year.
Whites
of all political persuasions denounced Sharpton as an opportunist
and publicity seeker – as
if they were telling Black folks something we didn’t
know. But we desperately needed
publicity, and an opportunity
to be heard. Rev.
Al seized the spotlight and shook
things up, which was a lot better
than nothing.
Somebody Black
had to do it.
So, who’s stepping forward,
now?
C. D. Goodison begins her
letter, “If I sound as cynical as Sharpton it comes with the territory.” She’s
a New Yorker.
I can't
speak to the merits or demerits of Sharpton's run for the presidency,
his candidacy remains
a minor event but it
is interesting that Sharpton's white New York City "liberal" critics
such as Joe Conason and Wayne Barrett are so concerned with where
he gets his money. Forgive my cynicism
but I don't care if he
gets paid by Halliburton. The Democratic Party of New York has
long held its black supporters in utter contempt
and without their hypocrisy
and racism Sharpton would not exist as a force.
Regardless
of what I may think of his attributes as a civil rights leader, Sharpton
has done
one good thing for black
New York: shown them that there is an alternative to supporting people
who don't think much of you or your vote while
arrogantly expecting it
anyway. Sorry but I didn't cry when black voters took Sharpton's
suggestion and sat on their hands and refused
a fourth term to Prison
Governor Cuomo or the mayoralty to the obnoxious, condescending Mark
Green. After all, white "liberal" Democrats
had no trouble abandoning a black mayor for the atrocious Giuliani
and not all of us find the better of two evils argument compelling.
When Hillary 'Ghandi owns a gas station downtown' Clinton comes around
again for my vote I still won't care too much whether Sharpton plays
with Democrats or Republicans.
The ‘Theoretician’
Dr. Andree-Nicola McLaughlin
is a Professor Interdisciplinary Studies and Professor of
Languages, Literature & Philosophy at predominantly Black Medgar
Evers College, in Brooklyn. She’s got a theory.
I read
your article, "The
Problem with Al Sharpton," and I believe the article should
have been entitled "The
Problem with The
Black Commentator
()".
It's obvious that:
1) erroneously
blames Sharpton for
the lack of Black unity reflected in African Americans
voting for some of
the white Democratic candidates in greater numbers than for Sharpton. There
is no mention of the impact of "Post-Traumatic
Slave Syndrome" in
Black voters seeking
the approval of "massa" instead
of their own kind,
or of the opportunism
of certain high profile
Black Democrats who,
following Democratic
Party orders, undertook
a preemptive strike
to throw any Black
Democratic presidential
candidate overboard
unnecessarily early
on in the campaign;
2) believes
everything white folks
write about Sharpton, from the arch-conservative New York Times to
the so-called progressive
Wayne Barrett of the
Village Voice;
3) doesn't
factor in the human nuances
of "personal friendship" or
the fact of human nature that
human beings, even conservative whites, are attracted to charismatic
individuals of influence such as Sharpton;
4) has
a short memory of the battles
Sharpton has led, the lashes he has taken over the years. The real
sellouts are Black Democratic leaders
and voters who could not support
Sharpton in a credible way for more than several months despite his
sacrifices for the national Black community;
In short, needs
to engage in investigative
reporting and a more advanced political analysis instead of rehashing
the garbage of the corporate
mainstream
media.
Despite her credentials,
Dr. McLaughlin presents only sweeping statements designed to insult.
We have already covered what we believe and don’t believe, what Sharpton
denies and does not deny, and Sharpton’s contributions to Black struggle
over the years. It occurs to us that McLaughlin’s "Post-Traumatic
Slave Syndrome" theory might be applicable to Sharpton, himself,
or to professors who ignore facts when any Black luminary
gets in trouble – but that’s not part of our humble discipline. As
for her challenge that do
an investigative piece on Sharpton – she
does the Reverend no service. Long before this primary season, we
already knew enough about Sharpton’s modus operandi to add
substantially to the negative body of reporting, had we chosen such
a course – as do literally scores of Black reporters and activists.
McLaughlin (and Sharpton) should be glad that we find more productive
things to do.
Sherletta McCaskill, of
Irvington, New Jersey, wonders what drove Sharpton to a “strategy
of madness.”
Words
may not be able to describe the depths of my despair regarding the bombshell
reporting of Sharpton's dubious political and financial associations
by the Village Voice and Black Commentator. By far it is
the most disturbing and devastating blow to black empowerment
in general and the representation of those aspirations in the
person of Al Sharpton in particular in
recent memory
with the exception
of the mute Colin
Powell and Condoleezza
Rice.
As the
daughter of a Baptist minister, I am struck by the Rev. Sharpton's
lack of faith in a God of Justice and the grassroots who have meant
his survival for
these many years.
His indiscretion is reminiscent of the story of Moses' impatience
with God as he led the children of Israel in the
wilderness when
he struck the rock to produce water for the people instead of touching
the rock with his
staff as God
instructed. Due
to his disobedience
Moses was not
allowed to see
the promised
land. Tragically,
Rev. Sharpton
has mortgaged
his future and
the future of
black and progressive
issues for some
$270,000 odd
pieces
of silver (the
amount on the
promissory note
signed over to
Roger Stone)
and the $348,450
plus in expenses
for his presidential
campaign.
Given
Sharpton's history
and humanity
perfection is not a requirement for legitimacy.
However, one
wonders how he can ever extricate himself and his National Action
Network from his deal with Republican devils. Moreover, Rev.
Sharpton's
demise is precipitated by an almost forty year gap in continuity
and the co-option of so called black leadership which
has not mobilized people
and institutions
in a coherent
fashion to
combat the
scourge of
racist political
and economic
exclusion that
persist in
spite of acts
by congress
and the courts
to ameliorate
the legacy
of slavery.
While true
that the concerns
of the black
body politic
reflect those
of other Americans
concerned about
jobs, health
care and education,
the case for
Black America
is always urgent
given our doubled
rates of unemployment
compared to
the national
average and
dearth in every
other measure
of societal
progress. Blacks
this primary
season have
thus far split
their vote
among the other
candidates,
hoping to support
a candidate
who will beat
George Bush.
The role that
Sharpton would
play in keeping
the Democratic
Party
accountable – already
undermined
by black party
operatives – will
for the foreseeable future be moot.
Perhaps,
Sharpton's sense of outrage at the betrayal of the Jackson family and other
establishment black politicos drove him into a strategy of madness
casting his entire promise upon the waters of collusion with
the enemy. Sharpton has not only destroyed himself but there is now
a gaping communal wound with no apparent balm bearer to redeem the
fold. As an organizer and activist I have long advocated a community
model of leadership where none are as important as the whole. Hopefully
it is not too late to council the Reverend to abandon this doomed
strategy and "get religion" for real as suggested by Wayne
Barrett in the last last line of his Voice Article.
As always
your contribution to the struggle of progress is indispensable. I
am privileged to share
this moment
in history with such an erudite and committed vision
of humanity
justice and community. Can't and won't live without my Black Commentary
and Ms. Margaret Kimberly. Right On!
Freedom Rider
Ms. McCaskill provides a
fine segue
to Margaret Kimberley’s
February
5 column,
“No
More Souls
to the Polls.” The Freedom Rider wrote:
The political
appeal of the black church is obvious…. But the history of the black church
should not be an excuse for laziness and lack of imagination in making
political appeals to the black community. While the presidential
candidates campaigned in Iowa and New Hampshire they held pancake
breakfasts, firehouse chili feeds, school auditorium rallies and
luncheons in living rooms. The candidates ought to know that black
voters also have living rooms and their neighborhood schools would
be excellent sites for political events. Our activities do not begin
and end at the church door and those who do not attend church are
equally entitled to know what politicians are proposing for their
communities and for the nation.
John
Whitaker Betances introduced himself to Ms. Kimberley as “a fellow
New York ‘product.’” He continued:
I wish to declare
both
my pleasure, and my agreement, with the tone and specific points
contained in this fine article.
While
the dramatics you cataloged, on the part of Democratic Party representatives,
may have
some
small attraction to those among us who do not pay even scant attention
to local/national politics, they are an insult to the intelligence
of the rest – who are capable of clear thought!
Our people
have, for too many years, been subject to the trickery and deceit
of political "leaders," whose
self-interests always came before our interests. (Far too
often, this included many of our own brethren who, in effect, "sold
us out" for their personal "enrichment." And
large among this group have been some "Christian" ministers/pastors,
who have cooperated in the type of manipulation you
described in your writing.)
As a whole,
Black America is as much in jeopardy today, as it was prior to
the success of our
civil rights efforts. Yet, we have fewer real leaders,
have far less family and community cohesion, and have lost much
of our ability to teach our young the skills they will need to
survive
in this society...as well as among the peoples of the world.
We are
ill-prepared, as a people, for this "Brave New World."
One of
our few chances to stem this tide of being swept to our destruction
clearly involves
all of us becoming more aware of, critically-thinking about, and
participating in local and national voting efforts.
Otherwise,
we "African-Americans" are
doomed!
Corporate Power
Media
On the subject of “doom” – once
the corporate media decided to question Howard Dean’s “electability,” his
presidential candidacy was finished. Through hyper-consolidation,
corporate media now possess the power of near-instantaneous prophesy
fulfillment, as was demonstrated when they halved Dean’s polled
support in the space of two weeks in the latter part of January. John
Kerry, who was polling in single digits in November, suddenly became
the
frontrunner, having done nothing on his own to get there. But
then, Newsweek polls in mid-December had shown Dean to be just
as electable
as Kerry and Wesley Clark. What happened?
The Corporate Power Media
(CPM) machine happened. We wrote about it’s “Awesome
Destructive Power” in our January 29 Cover Story:
It is
no longer possible to view commercial news media as mere servants
of the ruling rich – they
are full members of the presiding corporate pantheon. General media
consolidation has created an integrated mass communications system
that is both objectively and self-consciously at one with the Citibanks
and ExxonMobils of the world. Media companies act in effective unison
on matters of importance to the larger corporate class. For all politically
useful purposes, the monopolization of US media is now complete,
in that the corporate owners and managers of the dominant organs
are interchangeable and indistinguishable, sharing a common mission
and worldview….
The corporate
media has the power of self-fulfilling prophesy, and they know it.
Negative
impressions rained down on Dean like a monsoon, and didn’t let up
even after the damage was done. Dean was tagged by the media as a
loser to Bush well before he let out “The Scream” – an innocuous,
non-event, on the night of his Iowa defeat.
William F. Brabenec is a
very smart guy from Attica, Michigan. He asks and answers the question: “Who
controls the agenda?”
Over many decades I chaired a number of committees, each with
various goals and philosophies. Early on I found that if I
also assumed the
duties of physically
compiling the committee agenda, I could control the meeting with
little
challenge or deviation. If the topic wasn't on the agenda, it
didn't get discussed.
Period. That was the trick I used to steer the committees in the
direction
I wanted them to go, regardless of
sponsors' intentions or those of other members on the committee.
After witnessing the mainstream press ridicule and ignore Dean,
Kucinich, Sharpton, Lieberman and Braun in Iowa and New Hampshire
and their previous
belittling treatment, I realized that my prior experience on committees
had a direct correlation to what is going on in Corporate America
today.
The
power elite control the American public's agenda through
their
subsidiary, the Corporate Media – which consists of most of our major
newspapers, magazines, cable and network TV and radio stations. Over
90% of the media in this country
is controlled by just a half dozen individuals behind the conglomerates – who
control America’s agenda. And if the topic isn't on the agenda,
it doesn't get discussed in their media.
What
we hear or read is chosen for us along with its spin.
When one considers that the decisions we make are based
exclusively on the knowledge we have
of a subject, then it's
no wonder we act and vote the way they want us to.
The topics on our daily agenda – and their political spin – are
chosen by Corporate America, not us.
More
and more liberal observers are recognizing that “the mainstream media
in the current era is the enemy, and must be treated that way.” While
we stand and aim our progressive arrows at the Corporate Huns out
in the field,
their first line assassins in the media who are directly in front
of us are cutting open our bellies.
Damien Hyde sent us a kind
note from Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Just writing
to thank you for your excellent article. I am sending this article
to many
of my friends and relatives. Thank you for exposing what many of
us always suspect but are unable to take the time to put together
on paper the way you have done.
Kansas City’s Roger Goldblatt
has for some time understood that the corporate media is the enemy.
However, he writes, the beast is hard to get hold to.
Incredible
article on how the corporate media "punked" Howard Dean and marginalized
the peace demonstrators. I tried to organize a local consumer
boycott organization to boycott the corporate media, besides other
inappropriate corporate outlets – natural gas distribution companies,
etc. We worked for nine months, but could not pull it off. That
is the direct
action I think
is needed, which
the article alludes
to at its end.
I marched and continue
to march against the war; the international peace movement was
marginalized by the press. I've worked for Dean for a year and for no apparent
reason, his "numbers" started slipping.
Polls
of course cannot be trusted but it was apparent the corporate media
chose to punk
Dean.
In years
(we’re not yet
two) Peter Taylor is a longtime reader.
For
the past year or so, I have found your e-zine to be a weekly breath
of fresh air, i.e. life-giving.
As
you yourselves have noted: Black people are in a position of leading
us all:
“…there
is no substitute for confronting the corporate media head-on, through
direct mass action and other, creative tactics. The rich men’s
voices
must
be
de-legitimized
in
the
eyes
of
the
people,
who
already
suspect
that
they
are
being
systematically
lied
to
and
manipulated.
African
Americans
have
an
advantage
in
this
regard,
since
we
are
used to being lied to and about.”
Many
thanks and blessings to you for exercising this leadership position.
Unseen hands
Businessmen engage in “conspiracies” all
the time: that’s what boardrooms are for. As fully integrated members
of the corporate community, Big Media favor politicians and parties
that promise to create “favorable” business environments. Consequently,
corporate executives are overwhelmingly Republican – although
business also funds conservative Democrats to further narrow the
scope of
discussion.
Jack Welch is a genuine
corporate barbarian, a downsizing and merger maniac. Although retired
as General Electric chief – and as the ultimate power at GE-owned
NBC – Welch remains a ruling class member in good standing. Folks
tell him stuff, and he shares his insight with favored media.
Chris Dodson picked up on
the general line of discussion.
On
December 3, '03 Chris Matthews [MSNBC] badgered Howard Dean until
he answered
that he would indeed attempt to break up the media oligarchy if
elected. Even
though Matthews had all the candidates on his weekly election
special, Dean was the only one who received this "special" treatment.
Then today
(2/7) on CNN's money matters with Jack Cafferty, guest Jack Welch
(hissss) blurted
out that Dean had been "slotted" as "unelectable" before Iowa. Hmmm, how would
the former CEO of GE know this? It doesn't take a brain
surgeon...
This is
going to be a tough fight. We need to work together to build strategies.
MJ Parrish called our attention
to an online story that casts a shadow on computer voting in the
New Hampshire primary.
I knew
electronic disenfranchisement was a real danger, particularly since
eight million people will be voting on electronic "black box" voting
machines this year. But I had no idea how easily so many votes
could be shifted from one
candidate to another without raising a hue and cry – until the NH primary.
At 8 p.m., CNN's Wolf Blitzer said exit polls indicated the race between
Kerry
and Dean was too close to call. Yet as the vote tallies rolled
in, that
too-close-to-call phenomenon wasn't evident. At the end of the
night, the poll
results were very, very different from what exit polls would have indicated.
In precincts where paper ballots were used, Kerry beat Dean by 1.5%. Yet
the two types of electronic voting machines showed very different results,
giving Kerry a runaway victory.
Ms. Parrish urges readers
to click here: “Kerry
Beat Dean in New Hampshire by Only 1.5% When Computers
Were Not Doing the Counting,” then scroll down to
the report.
Memories of Haiti
The endgame of the U.S.
campaign for “regime change” in
Haiti may
be in
motion. (See
“Haiti
Opposition Attempts “Naked Power Grab,” in this issue.) is
fortunate to have a readership with the depth and breadth of
experience and
memory to place apocalyptic events in context.
Jack Kent is a writer and
doctor who has been to Grenada and Nicaragua during their revolutions,
Cuba, Mozambique shortly after the defeat of Portuguese colonialism,
Vietnam in the early Eighties, and many points in the Middle East.
Mr. Kent recalls arriving in Haiti on May 20, 1967.
On that
day there was a failed exile attempt to overthrow the Papa Doc
Duvalier regime.
Arriving at the airport I had this deja vu feeling. Greeting
us as we disembarked was a young man with a cane in a white sporting
outfit. There
had
been
a
similar
character
in
the
movie,
The Comedian, which I had seen recently in California.
There were only a few
tourists who got off the plane and I didn't come across any others
that day. An official assigned me to a hotel. Most striking
on the ride into town was the sight of women walking long distances, ferrying
water & other goods on top of their heads.
Upon arriving
at the hotel, an
old, rambling, colonial style building – again, deja vu. Almost
instinctively I looked to my right. Was the pool there?
In The Comedian, there
was
a
pool
in
which
some
poor
butchered
soul had been dumped. I was relieved. There was a pool but no
body.
The hotel owner brought
me up to snuff. Indeed, this was the hotel. It had been recreated
in (forget the country) as the Duvalier government wouldn't permit
it to be filmed in Haiti. Richard
Burton
had
portrayed
the
owner,
while the airport greeter played himself.
That was some experience.
A haunting close-up of mass starvation. It was tough to take – me,
the only fat man among a million clinging desperately to
life. There
was a quiet. Had to do, I believe, with preserving energy.
I guessed it was no calories in, then no calories out or some
such biological conservation. Unfortunately, it hadn't
helped much, I could see, as there were easily identifiable
signs of starvation – pot-bellied
children, for example.
There was more. I wrote
about it and sent the article to the journal of the student medical
association. At the time I was a staff physician in a VA hospital.
The article was to be published but there was a change of guard
at the journal. The anti-war editors were replaced by "old guard” sorts
and out went the radicals.
There
are other memories of Haiti, too, but the present situation doesn't
surprise me. Withholding
those hundreds of millions of dollars because of so-called fraudulent
elections – what a joke considering how many legitimately elected
governments the US has overthrown in the last few decades alone.
The article Jack Kent wrote
nearly 40 years ago was titled, “A day in Haiti among a million dead.”
Hip-Hop values
A striking number of visitors
that rummage through ’s
archives emerge with comments on Dr. Martin Kilson’s
Think Piece
from July
17, 2003:
“The Pretense of Hip
Hop Leadership.” The renowned Harvard professor castigates the
recent crop of Black “intellectuals” that exhibit “mindless hip-hop style irreverence
toward African-American civil rights leadership.” Dr. Kilson
is especially incensed by California professor
of cinema/TV Todd
Boyd’s “grotesque slanders” against historical
Black leadership.
He dismisses
as valueless the courage, blood, sweat and tears expended by Blacks
in the long
and tortuous struggle to smash the cruel edifice of legal White
supremacy. This intellectually thuggish outlook embraced by Boyd
and his hip-hop
followers – an outlook that honors nothing genuinely human – is packaged
in slick commercialistic lingo that adds to its profanity. Boyd appears
to be building a career on insults to past generations of heroic
American-American leaders and citizens who, in Martin Luther King’s
words, “fought the good fight.” Boyd’s words drip with contempt for
Black people’s civil rights tradition….
The fact
of the matter is, there’s nothing whatever that’s seriously radical or progressive
about hip-hop ideas and values. It is sad that there are
university academics among us like Michael Dyson and Todd Boyd (respectively
at the University of Pennsylvania and University of California) who
fail to recognize the political emptiness of most hip-hop expression.
Hip-hop entertainers and its entertainment modalities do not represent
a “new worldview” for African Americans. Quite the contrary, the “hip-hop
worldview” is nothing other than an updated face on the old-hat,
crude, anti-humanistic values of hedonism and materialism
Jose S. Gutierrez Jr. is
a Hip-Hop radio
personality, part of the AHB Network, International.
Gutierrez also holds a masters degree in education. He thought long
and hard on Kilson’s commentary, and composed this response:
Dr. Martin
Kilson’s words
and verbal challenges posed towards Hip-Hop culture are welcome to
debate. However, I find Dr. Kilson’s words lacking insight into
the meaningful origins and roots of the Hip-Hop culture. His credibility
and understanding of the development of Hip-Hop is certainly open
to question – given his statements. I say this out of general respect
for Dr. Kilson. However Dr. Kilson and others who speak of and claim
to celebrate Hip-Hop culture must be aware of the origins of Hip-Hop;
a culture that was born of peace created in the midst of war – orchestrated
by
the
honorable
founders:
Afrika
Bambaata,
Kool
Herc,
Flash
and
many other poor Blacks and Puerto Ricans from The Bronx, New
York.
I am aware
that most people wrote off Hip-Hop when my sister, cousin and I
were breakin’ as elementary
school children in the early ‘80s or when my mother was pop-locking
in Watts in the ‘70s. Most people figured Hip-Hop was a fad, a ghetto
fire soon to fizzle and many people recently jumped on the bandwagon
when Hip-Hop became “mainstream.” Most people ignored the joy and
love experienced by those who live as Hip-Hop breathes inside and
through them. I am aware. If nothing else, Dr. Kilson in his statement
demonstrates our failure as a people to document, provide mentorship
and take ownership of our beautiful creations (jazz, the blues, bluegrass,
the golf tee, etc.). We devalue ourselves to the point where we
devalue our creations as well, only for external forces and modern-day
Mobutus to allow mercenary forces to tell us what we are worth and
juice us to the pulp. Where are the elders in this process? The
leaders
to
guide
Hip-Hop
culture,
rather
than
shun
it,
debase
it
or ignore it?
Dr. Kilson
rightfully and honorably acknowledges our ancestors and foundation
layers and
the organizations that they represented and that represented them. But
I must also acknowledge something that I see. I see a failure of
some, not all, of our elders of color holding on to the leadership
of our communities to their last dying breath. I see fake “role
models” in church, school and business who are not uplifting our
greatest offering: young people. Our young people will either be
future leaders, future followers or future puppets and criticizing
one of the only things (Hip-Hop) that empowers them and provides
them identity is a crushing blow, rather than an engaging slap on
the butt. I see people trying to please external populations rather
than our own. Recently I met with a brother, the founder of Tacoma,
Washington’s Eastside Bloods – notorious in the late ‘80s through
the mid-‘90’s for murder and violence. This brother has been incarcerated
for violating the law, but when he was released he began The Big
Homie Program, which provides mentorship for young kids in Tacoma – who
face many challenges growing up. This brother, Stone, attempted
to reach out to the elder leadership in the Black community and in
the church and he was initially turned away by his own and accepted
and supported by a White pastor down the block. Not that the White
pastor is not a good man, but if we don’t help our own – we leave
them to others to do what they will and this has an effect on how
we look at, treat, trust and interact with each other. This is not
unlike how young Hip-Hop artists have wound up signing contracts
submitted by businessman who are ignorant of the culture and the
people who are of it.
I respect
the efforts made by Dr. Kilson and his colleagues serving for decades
and I stand
by the fact that there is much room for positive improvement in
the messaging and modeling for our young people, but we must communicate
with young people rather than dismiss them. We cannot relinquish
influence – these are the youth with much to learn and right now
they are learning from people who are more interested in how much
money can be made than how much quality of life can be achieved. There
is a fine difference between getting paid and getting paid hand over
fist. Many of the Hip-Hop artists who I have conversed with and
managed have been caught up in record deals that only a fool would
sign, because at the time they were hungry, too enthusiastic, ignorant
and were not nurtured. At
the
same
time
that
they
must
be
willing
to
be
nurtured,
there
must
be
people
enthusiastic
about
nurturing
them.
Therefore,
I recommend a refocus. Rather than making statements like “There’s nothing whatever
that’s seriously radical or progressive about Hip-Hop ideas and values”,
which is an empty self-satisfying and depressing statement to make – why
not change the game or at least try? Dr.
Kilson
with
all
of
his
educational,
organizational
and
life
experience
on
hand
could
explore
a
little
and
reach
out
to
those
people/artists
who will respond
and who do live
off
of
their
radical
and
progressive
ideas
and
values
which
extend
far
beyond
Hip-Hop. Dead Prez is just one
of these “radical” organizations/groups with political, racial and
economic insights and literature. DPZ (as they call themselves)
speak and rap about empowering people of color, socialism, uplifting
Black women (most importantly) and they highlight current issues
like police brutality – always while acknowledging the ancestors. They
are very pro-black, but most of the fans at their shows I have attended
are White?! There is something to be said when Black folk aren’t
attending Black celebration events. Dead Prez speak at colleges
and in our communities, conversing with the people not about them
or around them. Davey
D,
Paris,
KRS-ONE,
KAM,
Lighter
Shade
of
Brown
and
many
others
also
represent
a
community
awareness/activism
approach
from within the Hip-Hop community.
I know
that elders are tired and have served respectfully, but wisdom
and training are needed
by the next generation of leaders, and not in-bred leadership
either. The
fact of the matter is that Dr. Kilson’s statement that began, “There’s
nothing…” is
quite
premature.
Young
people
can
benefit
from
and
be
energized
by
is
his
(positive)
guidance
and
wisdom,
rather
than
motionless
commentary.
All respects
to Dr. Martin Kilson.
Slow death of Hip-Hop
Lamont Slater is a freelance
writer, born in the Boogie-Down-Bronx, now living in Dallas, Texas.
Here’s his commentary:
It started
off as a usual drive home: I threw the laptop in the backseat, checked
the gas gauge,
and popped in one of my favorite cassettes. In my car, I keep an
array of old school Hip Hop that includes the likes of BDP, Public
Enemy, Rakim, Big Daddy Kane, and Bizmarkie. One may feel that at
34, I should have matured to Jazz status by now. However, as I drive
home I reminisce of a time that Hip-Hop encompassed a culture, which
included break dancing, Graffiti, MC battles, and colorful fashion
statements.
In my
translation of the word Hip-Hop, I simplify the term as such: Hip,
borrowed from the
Seventies slang term meaning “cool,” and Hop representing dance,
such as a sock hop. When you put these two words together you get
the term Hip-Hop, meaning cool music to dance to. Back then, music
wasn’t
necessarily
rated
G
as
evidenced
by
Boogie
Down
Productions
inaugural
album
entitled
Criminal
Minded,
but
even
by
using
that
example
KRS
1
acknowledged
his
violence
on
his
follow
up
hit
single
My
Philosophy,
and
raised
the
bar
by
using
his
status
in
the
industry
to
educate
the
public
about
life
in
the
street,
the
government,
and
issues
regarding
blacks
in
America.
Other
artists
during
this
era
continued
this
movement
on
wax,
which
was
created
by
the
grit
of
the street proletariat.
When I
arrived home, I spent precious family time with my wife and children,
and then wound
the night down by reading the Dallas Morning News. While perusing
the entertainment section of the paper, I was appalled that the
nominees for best Rap Album included Petey Pablo and Mystical.
It was at that
point that I realized that Hip-Hop had turned into Hip-Pop. Gone
are the real MC’s that had different personalities and attributes
that set them apart from each other. For example, Das Efx, Digible
Planets, Rakim, Cool G Rap and Polo and Public Enemy were able
to co-exist in an atmosphere that embraced them for their individuality.
Today,
most rap songs include explicit sexual innuendo, fairy tales of
being rich and famous,
gangster brutality, and violence towards our women. We find ourselves
typecast all over again, as if today’s artists are nothing but modern
day Hattie McDanielses. Part
of
me
believes
that
this
negative
self-imposed
image
can
be
attributed
to
the
lack
of
a
positive
male
influence
in
the
lives
of
Black
males
in
general.
It
is
my
belief
that
some
of
these
rap
artists
are
emulating
a
caricature
of
what
being
a
strong
black
man
really
means.
The
foul-mouth,
sex-crazed,
muscle-bound
caricature
is
a
gross
misrepresentation.
However,
the
stereotype
can
be
considered
an
ugly
side
effect
of
the
plethora
of
social
ills
that plague the Black community.
The way
the industry works is similar to a slave auction block, where the
master secures the
services of a muscle-laden, young buck so he can be assured that
he would have a good crop, and create wealth for himself and his
family. Today is no different. The industry is infatuated with
marketing
hardcore types such as 50 cent, Trick Daddy, DMX, JA Rule, and
the
late Tupac Shakur. This is the image that the CEOs of major record
companies want you to see. As long as this type of new wave blaxploitation
is profitable, it won’t go away, but will continue to eat at the
fabric that holds the Hip-Hop community together. Rap will suffer
the same fate as the infamous “Freaknik,” which started off as a
get together between schools that encompass the Atlanta University
Center. Playing
football
in
the
park,
barbecue,
and
Frisbee
were
quickly
replaced
by
sex,
violent
acts,
and
t-shirt
sales.
Greed
and
blatant
disregard
for
the
common
good
inevitably
led
to
the
demise
of that event.
Until Blacks in America
express their dismay by sending a strong message to the media distributors,
record labels, and producers that we are tired of being depicted
as minstrels, it will continue to be business as usual.
I don’t fault the artist
for making an honest dollar, however, every time I hear children
repeat profanity laced verses, I think of the adults that allow their
children to be exposed to music that is inappropriate for their age.
Hip-Hop, as we know it will die a slow and painful death unless record
companies start signing artists that are the mouthpieces of the community.
This doesn’t necessarily mean it will take 50 Chuck D’s
to
save
Hip-Hop;
it
means
that
we
need
to
hear
what
is
important
to
us,
not
what
serves
the almighty record companies.
For now,
I will always cherish the memories of my cousin Terrince and I exiting
my grandmothers
Bronx apartment toting a large boom box in hand, and walking down
a urine drenched stairwell to get to the park bench, where we communicated
with each other by nodding our heads to the beat as we prepared
ourselves for a game of one on one stickball.
With a
very few exceptions, today’s Hip-Hop reminds me only of that stairwell, and not Hip-Hop’s
glory days.
Lamont Slater can be contacted
at [email protected].
High praise
Richard Haynes made our
day – no, he brightened the whole week.
Really
enjoy reading your
articles. This forum replaces Emerge magazine
that was discontinued. I've been looking to find a replacement,
either print or electronic – glad I found you.
www.blackcommentator.com
Your
comments are welcome.
Visit
the Contact Us page for E-mail
or Feedback.
Back
|